Author Topic: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism  (Read 1109 times)

NSFAN

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2022, 10:54:41 pm »
Quote
How were the communists able to promote an anti-ethnocentric worldview in predominantly white countries at the same exact time as the National Socialists then?

The fact that anyone could bring themselves to say such a thing considering proven Russian "whiteness" present day, Russia's colonial past, and the Jewishness of Marx himself, boggles the mind!



Quote
"Cuckservative" is a pejorative[1] formed as a portmanteau of "cuck", an abbreviation of the word "cuckold", and the political designation "conservative".[2] It has become a label used by white nationalists and the alt-right in the United States.[3][4][5][6] The word "cuckservative" reached a high level of mainstream political conversation around mid-July 2015, where it gained media attention just a few weeks before the start of the first Republican primary debate for the 2016 United States presidential election.[4][7]

The term, as well as the shortened form "cuck" for cuckold, originated on websites such as 4chan (specifically the /pol/ imageboard) and 8chan, the right-wing message board My Posting Career,[1][3] the blog The Right Stuff,[8] and other sites associated with the alt-right.[3][9][10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckservative

You can lead a conservative and communist to water, but you cannot stop them from shitting in it!

Quote
The slaughter of the firstborn reveals that clearly enough. Just as they have done with us, the Jews had won the great lower stratum of the population for themselves -- 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!' -- until one night they sent out the order, 'Down with the bourgeois! Kill them, the dogs!' but things didn't turn out so well as they had expected.
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Bolshevism_From_Moses_to_Lenin.pdf

Illiterates!

See also: https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/turanian-diffusion/?message=14246
« Last Edit: June 23, 2022, 11:05:27 pm by NSFAN »

christianbethel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Miami, FL, USA
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #16 on: June 24, 2022, 12:02:51 pm »
Quote
...Chamberlain nowhere gives a specific morphological identity to his "German," although he does wax enthusiastic over the tall, blond dolichocephal (long head). On the other hand he suggests, perhaps taking his cue from Gobineau, who was convinced of the heterogeneity of the Aryan type, that some of the purest "Germans" are brunets, even raven-haired. Nor does Chamberlain deny creativity nor value to other races. So there is evidence that the National Socialist theory of race at this time was more than somewhat vague and indeterminate, at least with respect to the problem of how one identified one's select race. Nowhere in the early literature of the Movement does the designation "Nordic" figure with any prominence, least of all in Hitler's public statements. Even at the close of this first period, in 1930, when Rosenberg's Mythos appeared, his use of the word "Nordic" was strictly qualified by this pronouncement: "…nothing would be more superficial than to measure a man's worth by his physical appearance (with a centimeter rule and cephalic indices). A far more accurate measure of worth is conduct."
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
By 1938 Ludwig Ferdinand Clauss mocked the entire procedure of assigning certain mental traits ("ability to make judgments," "love of truth," etc.) to specific races as distinguishing characteristics. "It is true", he said, "that Nordic men are capable of making judgments. No one denies that. No one denies, for that matter, that Nordic men occasionally eat, drink and sleep - it only seems doubtful that these characteristics would distinguish them from men of other races."
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
...Similarly, if all creativity derives from Nordic blood why have the most prominent men in European history been of manifestly mixed racial origin? "Many of the men," Fischer, Baur and Lenz contended, "who are universally regarded as the greatest in history (for instance, Socrates, Michelangelo, Luther, Goethe and Beethoven) were obviously of mixed race. Speaking generally, it is exceptional to find that distinguished men exhibit a pure racial type." And, of course, as a corollary to that even sincere friends were driven to ask of these enthusiastic adherents of Nordicism: why did the Nordic Race, where it had been preserved from the admixture of lower potential, in Scandinavia and Northern Europe in general, have to wait until it was stimulated by bastard peoples from the Mediterranean before it developed any advanced culture of its own?
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
...For in a genetically mixed population there is no simple correlation between physical appearance and potentiality so that an individual possessed of the racial livery of the Nordic must also have a Nordic soul. Characteristics are transmitted through a particular chromosomal substance, the gene. In a mixed population each individual inherits a total of anywhere from 10,000 to 45,000 genes. With a random mixture, conducted over at least the last three thousand years (i.e., the presence of mixed types in the earliest "Nordic" graves87 ) the number of gene combinations would be infinite - meaning that the correlation coefficient between physical and psychic characteristics could, mathematically, be expected to be nil. More precisely one could not say with any assurance that an individual displaying all the physical traits of the Nordic race was equally possessed with (presuming there to be any) Nordic mental characteristics. The chances that an individual in contemporary Europe should have inherited from an astronomical number of ancestors only Nordic traits are millions to one.
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
Günther was to be specifically rejected. While recognizing the fact that his books had served to stimulate inquiry into the intricate problems of race, the pernicious aspects of the "Nordic hypothesis" were decried. The enthusiasm with which Günther's ideas had been accepted, Weinert wrote, precipitated conclusions for which "there was no biological foundation… The consequence was often that an unfounded race-pride threatened to sunder the German people."
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
The first clear statement on official reorientation had come from Hitler himself only seven months after he came to power, at the 1933 Nuremberg Parteitag. Hitler said: "We do not conclude from a man's physical type his ability, but rather from his achievements his race."
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
Thieme repeats Hitler's principle and adds "the men who bear the qualities of heroism, strength of will, a readiness to sacrifice and faith have played a decisive role in deciding Germany's destiny, and they shall continue to do so even if they are not all tall, blond or blue-eyed."
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
Eichenauer goes so far as to inform his readers that the amount of Nordic blood an individual possesses means nothing (spielt keine Rolle) in the Nordic scheme of things because "it has often enough been the case that men of extremely mixed race (stark gemischter Rasse) have conceived and more powerfully grasped these notions than the predominantly Nordic."
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
In mid-1936 the Nationalsocialistische Korrespondenz stated with clarity and authority: "From his deeds one can recognize the Nordic man - not from the length of his nose and the colour of his eyes." In effect this last phase of National Socialist race theory was a complete rejection of Günther's Nordicism.
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
...We are told that "the races distinguish themselves not through their characteristics; for the same characteristics can be found in different races…For example a Mediterranean can be as courageous as a Nordic, an Alpine as musical as a Dinaric, an East Balt as cunning as a Nordic. On the other hand not all Mediterraneans are courageous, nor all Nordics. But when a Mediterranean is courageous he is courageous in a 'Mediterranean fashion' as a Nordic would be courageous in a 'Nordic fashion'."
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
Here is an entirely different racism, an entirely different Nordicism than that of Günther and his followers. Here there was no question of general inferiority - it was a question of maintaining an ideal as an archetype for an entire civilization. Germany had a Nordic archetype; its art form was Nordic; its literature and philosophy, its music and institutions were inspired by Nordic ideals. Each German was bequeathed this patrimony from the original racial elements, now inextricably mixed into the German Nation, among which the Nordic predominated. It was not a question of intrinsic worth, national and racial superiority and inferiority tearing asunder the peoples of Europe. There is no transcendental standard by which to evaluate racial differences. A people characteristically Mongolian treasures a Mongolian heritage and ideal, a Mediterranean people a Mediterranean one.
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
Dr. Walter Gross, head of the Rassenpolitische Amt of the National Socialist Party, said: "We appreciate the fact that those of another race are different from us… Whether that other race is 'better' or 'worse' is not possible for us to judge. For this would demand that we transcend our own racial limitations for the duration of the verdict and take on a superhuman, even divine, attitude from which alone an 'impersonal' verdict could be formed on the value or lack of such of the many living forms of inexhaustible Nature." Less than a year later, in 1939, he defined the official position of mature National Socialist race theory: "A serious situation arose through the fact that other people and States, because of German race laws… felt themselves attacked and defamed … For example the whole world of the Far East remained for a long time under the impression that the Germans… had designated them as non-Aryan, and as non-Aryans inferior rabble - (that the) Germans had designated (them) unworthy, second class humanity and that the Germans imagined themselves as the sole bearers of culture… What could we say to those who saw in German racism a fundamental defamation of men of other races? We could do nothing other than, with patience and conviction, repeat that German racism does not evaluate or deprecate other racial groups… It only recognizes, scientifically, that differences exist… We have often been disturbed by the indiscretion or even stupidity in our own land when, just after we had carefully made clear to some people or other that we respected and honoured… their racial qualities, some wild fool manufactured his own ideas about race and declared that these same people were racially inferior and stood somewhere below the cow or the ass, and that their characteristics were degrading or impure and lord knows what else! But such idiotic assertions were repelled and offended not only alien peoples in distant parts of the world but even our own neighbours in Europe, many times even friends of National Socialist Germany bound to us historically and in destiny."
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
...Finally, late in the war, even under the gathering shadows of defeat, the Headquarters of the Reichsfuehrer SS published the work of Dr. Ludwig Eckstein. He carefully dissected the remains of the Nordicism purchased over a decade before at so high a cost, and concluded: "While supporting our own race, and if necessary fighting against other races to protect its right to existence, we should not overlook the fact that almost all races display something in themselves that is sound and biologically resolved and therefore beautiful, natural and valuable… Each race carries first of all the measure of worth in itself. When once we understand this then we do not foster feelings of inferiority in others, a consequence that the hitherto existing race theories have too often achieved…"
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)

Quote
In Italy the same tendencies revealed themselves in the Fascist Race Manifesto of 1938, and in the work of Maggiore and Franzi. Everywhere the talk was no longer of fixed and immutable races, but of races in formation, the components for which arise out of the crucible of the past - races in formation cast over by the ideal of a living heritage - for Germany a Nordic Mythos, for Italy an animating devotion of Romanita. The talk is of races yet to be fashioned by living an ideal, united by a common destiny, nurtured in a common environment, the political expression of which is Nationhood. Here are the germs of a worldview which makes of man a creator, a builder of future races; a philosophy which unites history, politics and race, eugenics and humanism, pride in self and respect for others, a philosophy scientifically sound and emotionally satisfying.
(A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race, 1958)
« Last Edit: September 10, 2022, 12:52:05 pm by christianbethel »
When in doubt, use the 16 Words: 'We must Engineer the Destruction of Western Civilization and Tribalism, and Unite All Races Through Nobility.'

Aryan ≠ 'White'.

History is Written by the Victors.

He Who Controls the Past Controls the Future; He Who Controls the Present Controls the Past.

SirGalahad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #17 on: June 24, 2022, 10:45:36 pm »
@90sRetroFan

"Communists promoted blank slate theory as their anti-ethnocentric worldview. But National Socialism rejects blank slate theory on principle. As you say, National Socialism in order to be true to its principles would have to promote an anti-ethnocentric racial theory. This, however, is much harder than promoting blank slate theory. Therefore the fact that communists successfully promoted blank slate theory at best implies that Hitler could also have similarly successfully promoted blank slate theory, but does not imply that Hitler could have similarly successfully promoted an anti-ethnocentric racial theory."

I agree that anti-ethnocentric race theory would be more difficult to promote than blank slate theory, but the real question is whether it would have made Hitler's mission that much harder. He was already struggling in a war where everyone was attacking him on all sides, so he really had nothing to lose by openly promoting something more similar to what we promote now. And the world honestly would have been better for it, because it would have been impossible to slander National Socialism with 99% of the accusations currently levied against it. Imagine how easy our job would be if it had always been obvious from the beginning that National Socialism was anti-racist. Historical baggage is the #1 reason why our ranks aren't growing nearly as fast as we wish they would. The issue is that while you could theoretically make a case that Hitler was anti-racist and believed in a theory that was in conflict with ethnocentrism, as has been done on the main site, there just isn't enough definitive evidence to definitively prove the case. To make our case of Hitler's true beliefs and character relies on too many assumptions, which is only natural since I'm sure we can both at least agree that Hitler never stated outright what his true beliefs were, if he even had any hidden true beliefs, and if they were even comparable to our views

"this is a consistent anti-Turanist attitude (almost identical to what I promote here, by the way). To portray Hitler as an ethnocentrist, your only remaining option is to argue that Hitler was a narrow Germanic ethnocentrist who considered even speakers of other branches of PIE-derived languages too ancestrally distant from speakers of Germanic languages."

That would potentially be my assumption, if Hitler could be described as an ethnocentrist. Although I'm sure plenty of white nationalists would argue that Hitler was simply slandering Eastern Europeans for propagandistic purposes, since they were warring against him

"That he was happy about this makes it impossible for his worldview to be based in any kind of ethnocentrism (unless you want to argue that he believed that Germans and Japanese had common ancestors not shared by Russians)."

The "honorary Aryan" thing isn't too convincing for self-described leftists, because it could easily be met with the argument of "Well the people described as honorary Aryans were the ones that were valuable to his war effort in some way." And on the surface, that's a fair assessment to make if you truly believe that Hitler was racist. Also, the apartheid regime of Azania had a similar title of "honorary white" that was applied to the Japanese, Chinese, and the Koreans. So it especially wouldn't be all that convincing for "black" people and white-passing leftists in Azania, or for people who are aware of the former use of this term in apartheid Azania in general


By the way, if you're using the phrase "bait-and-switch" with it's negative association, I would never do such a thing. I respect you far too much, both as a person and as the defacto head of the ideology in its current iteration
« Last Edit: June 24, 2022, 11:03:16 pm by SirGalahad »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7398
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #18 on: June 25, 2022, 01:48:32 am »
"he really had nothing to lose by openly promoting something more similar to what we promote now."

By doing that he would have risked Himmler rallying the Nordicists and overthrowing him, and I am sure he sensed this. If he had managed to replace Himmler with Heydrich as the leader of the SS, then it might have been safe enough for him to do what you suggest. But with Heydrich assassinated in 1942, that was dead in the water. From there Hitler's only hope was to win WWII first. We all know how that turned out.

It was in the 1945 "Political Testament of Adolf Hitler" (when Hitler knew he had lost WWII, and hence truly had nothing more to lose) that he came out with the clearest anti-ethnocentric statements, such as:

"I am sure that the Japanese, the Chinese and the peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France."

and

"I feel much more sympathetically inclined to the lowliest Hindu than to any of these arrogant [British] islanders."

Why would he have bothered with such statements (shortly before suicide FFS) if he was not a committed anti-ethnocentrist at heart?

"there just isn't enough definitive evidence to definitively prove the case."

I know, and whereas False Leftists will choose to believe in racist Hitler, True Leftists will choose to believe in anti-racist Hitler. Just like how Judeo-Christians believe in Yahwist Jesus while Gnostic Christians believe in anti-Yahwist Jesus. It is always like this.

"it could easily be met with the argument of "Well the people described as honorary Aryans were the ones that were valuable to his war effort in some way.""

Then how do they explain the quotes above, made after he knew WWII was already lost?

"Also, the apartheid regime of Azania had a similar title of "honorary white" that was applied to the Japanese, Chinese, and the Koreans."

But there were no "Europeans" who were excluded from "whiteness" under Apartheid. Therefore Apartheid could still be argued as ethnocentric (Arctic Alliance style), since it is in fact the case that Japanese are ancestrally more closely related to Dutch than Xhosa are closely related to Dutch.

Hitler, in contrast, included Japanese while excluding Russians, despite it being obvious that Russians are ancestrally much closer to Germans than Japanese are close to Germans. Do you not see the structural difference?
« Last Edit: June 25, 2022, 03:51:40 am by 90sRetroFan »

christianbethel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Miami, FL, USA
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #19 on: June 26, 2022, 12:05:15 pm »
Quote
...Hitler disapproved of such [racial] comparisons. He especially opposed reference to physical contrasts of stature, coloring, or physiognomy among German ethnic groups. In 1930 he told an aid, “Discussions about the race problem will only divide the German people further, incite them against one another, atomize them, and in this way make them inconsequential with respect to foreign affairs.” He admonished senior officials of the party to avoid the subject of ethnic diversity in speeches and articles: “Everything that unifies and welds the classes together must be brought forth, what divides them, what re-animates old prejudices, must be avoided. . . .They are the surest way to destroy a community.” He remarked that people should be selected for leadership roles “not according to outward appearance, but by demonstrating inward ability." Goebbels, himself a diminutive man with a slight limp, recorded in his diary in October 1937, “Discussed race policy with Dr. Gross. I reproached him for our flawed standards for making selections. According to them, practically every officer today would be dismissed."
(Richard Tedor, Hitler's Revolution, Ch. 1, 'Racial Hygiene' section)

Quote
Hitler believed that the more capable and fit among the Germans should not set themselves above other groups to preserve or advance their particular bloodline. It was their duty to help elevate the German nation as an entity. As summarized by his chronicler Dr. Henry Picker, Hitler was “firmly resolved to transfer racially excellent military units, such as formations of the Waffen SS, to every region where the indigenous people are substandard. They will provide for the population by replenishing its bloodlines." (The Waffen SS was an elite branch of the German military requiring high physical standards for enrollment.)
(Richard Tedor, Hitler's Revolution, Ch. 1, 'Racial Hygiene' section)

Quote
Though believing in the inequality of mankind, Hitler opposed clique-forming or elitist attitudes among his countrymen’s more gifted persons or ethnic groups. He measured people not by what nature gave them, but by how they contributed their talents, be they lofty or modest, to advance the national community. This was a standard every German could aspire to, regardless of his or her station in society. Personal attitude and endeavor, not the circumstances of birth, determine the superior being. In a speech as chancellor of Germany, Hitler described the evolution of his country into a social, national, and spiritual entity: “The German people came into being no differently than almost every truly creative civilized nation we know of in the world. A numerically small, talented race, capable of organizing and creating civilization, established itself over other peoples in the course of many centuries. It in part absorbed them, in part adapted to them. All members of our people have of course contributed their special talents to this union. It was, however, created by a nation-and-state forming elite alone. This race imposed its language, naturally not without borrowing from those it subjugated. And all shared a common fate for so long, that the life of the people directing the affairs of state became inseparably bound to the life of the gradually assimilating other members. All the while, conqueror and conquered had long become a community. This is our German people of today. . . . Our only wish is that all members contribute their best to the prosperity of our national life. As long as every element gives what it has to give, this element in so doing will help benefit all our lives."
(Richard Tedor, Hitler's Revolution, Ch. 1, 'Racial Hygiene' section)

Quote
Hitler promoted whatever contributed to this goal [unification] and rejected what did not. A literate man with a profound grasp of history, he fashioned a political philosophy that interpreted Germany’s past as a continuous, progressive struggle for independence and unification. Disharmony among the Germans had cost them freedom and life. The Roman Empire had imposed an immoral foreign influence until the Cheruskan Arminius unified prominent German tribes to force the invaders out.
(Richard Tedor, Hitler's Revolution, Ch. 1, 'The Nation as One' section)

Quote
Hitler grew up in the social milieu that Nietzsche criticized for its class distinctions. World War I, during which Hitler saw combat in an infantry regiment, welded various social factions into an entity. “At the front, the feeling of being destined to belong together, the feeling of a community, was by and large reborn,” Gross wrote in Der Schulungsbrief. Hitler and his comrades felt solidarity in the trenches but found it undermined by political discord at home. “The enemy no longer faced the frontline soldier just as an honorable fighting man, but also made trouble behind the front,” a journal for the German armed forces related. During the post-war period, the country suffered economic distress, political disharmony and foreign exploitation. Hitler later declared that when the German people “form a unified bloc, they are a power. When they are divided, they are defenseless and impotent."
(Richard Tedor, Hitler's Revolution, Ch. 1, 'The Nation as One' section)

Quote
By emphasizing German unity, National Socialism followed in the footsteps of the Romans' nemesis Arminius, the Prussian reformers who rose against Napoleon, the statesman Bismarck, and the eminent Nietzsche.The matter of Germany’s moral, social, and political harmony influenced the NSDAP’s stand on virtually every major issue. [In] National Socialism, the journal Der SA. Führer (The SA Officer) wrote, recognized that “the labor question was the cardinal social problem of the 19th and 20th Centuries. ... It confronted liberalism’s materialistic, distorted idea of freedom, which leads to abuse and to the rule of a capitalist minority, with a new freedom; one based on the growth of the individual fellow citizen within the national community according to achievement. Unlike the disfranchisement of labor through liberalism, National Socialism incorporates the worker into German society, elevating him and his accomplishments onto par with the rest of the nation."
(Richard Tedor, Hitler's Revolution, Ch. 1, 'The Nation as One' section)

Quote
Judging someone’s worth according to performance, as far as Hitler was concerned, superseded questions of ethnic standing within the German community. Though many National Socialists based their world view on scientific research on race, the government under Hitler also relied on education to realize human potential. Goebbels wrote in his diary in June 1936, “the Führer sharply disapproves of the work of all the race committees." Hitler based his attitude on the potential negative impact such activities could exercise on national unity.
(Richard Tedor, Hitler's Revolution, Ch. 1, 'The Nation as One' section)

« Last Edit: September 10, 2022, 01:02:03 pm by christianbethel »
When in doubt, use the 16 Words: 'We must Engineer the Destruction of Western Civilization and Tribalism, and Unite All Races Through Nobility.'

Aryan ≠ 'White'.

History is Written by the Victors.

He Who Controls the Past Controls the Future; He Who Controls the Present Controls the Past.

guest30

  • Guest
Learn Loyality from Adolf Hitler
« Reply #20 on: June 27, 2022, 12:34:59 am »
Hitler choose suicide rather than surrender to the Western Democratic Liberalist power. If he did it. The people from incoming generation will see Hitler as liberal sympathizer

If Hitler wanted to be died because of death punishment by the Marxist troops from the Eastern Europe. The people from incoming generation will see Hitler as Communist sympathizer.

If Hitler commit suicide. Rational people will see Hitler as loyal to his ideas and worldview. Progressives and humanist people see him as "coward" and "irresponsible".

Hitler commit suicide when his troops still fought against the European liberals and communist troops until the end. Therefore Hitler's suicide can be considered as keeping loyality to his Muslim and non-European alliances outside Europe which also fought against that dangerous Western ideological movements.

The result of Hitler's suicide is the rise of anti-Western political culture in modern era, see this writings from the link/URL below :

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/05/the-developing-world-thinks-hitler-is-underrated-duterte-world-war-ii-nazi-politics/





guest30

  • Guest
Dr. Supomo. One of Nusantara's independence planners consider the Hitler's ideology are Eastern by culture, not part of Western culture and civilization. See this photos of writings of his speeches during grand meetings of independence planning on May 31st 1945.  From a book named "RISALAH SIDANG BPUPKI DAN PPKI 28 MEI - 22 AGUSTUS 1945 SEKRETARIAT NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA 1995" page 33, 34, 35













Quote
On Nusantara language, he condemn liberalism, communism, and more prefer to national socialism and integralism :

"Negara ialah suatu susunan masyarakat yang integraal, segala golongan, segala bagian, segala anggotanya berhubungan erat satu sama lain dan merupakan persatuan masyarakat yang organis. Yang terpenting dalam negara yang berdasar aliran pikiran integraal ialah penghidupan bangsa seluruhnya. Negara tidak memihak kepada sesuatu golongan yang paling kuat, atau yang paling besar, tidak menganggap kepentingan seseorang sebagai pusat, akan tetapi negara menjamin keselamatan hidup bangsa seluruhnya sebagai persatuan yang tak dapat dipisah-pisahkan. ...

...

...Dasar susunan hukum negara Eropa Barat ialah perseorangan dan liberalisme. Sifat perseoangan ini, yang mengenai segala lapangan hidup (sistem undang-undang ekonomi, kesenian dan lain-lain), memisah-misahkan manusia sebagai seseorang dari masyarakatnya, mengasingkan diri dari segala pergaulan yang lain. Seorang manusia dan negara yang dianggap sebagai seseorang pula, selalu segala-galanya itu menimbulkan imperialisme dan sistem memeras (uitbuitings systeem) membikin kacau-balaunya dunia lahir batin. ...

Tuan-tuan telah mengerti sendiri bahwa sifat demikian harus kita jauhkan dari pembangunan Negara Indonesia ...

Dasar susunan negara Sovyet Rusia pada masa sekarang, ialah diktaktur dari proletariaat. Boleh jadi dasar itu sesuai dengan keistimewaan keadaan sosial dari negeri Rusia, akan tetapi dasar pengertian negara itu bertentangan dengan sifat masyarakat Indonesia yang asli.

Lain negara, ialah negara Jerman nasional sosialis sebelumnya menyerah dalam peperangan sekarang. Negara itu berdasar atas aliran pikiran negara totaliter, das Ganze der politischen Einheit des Volkes (integrate theory). Prinsip "Pimpinan (Führung) sebagai Kernbegriff (ein totaler Führerstaat) dan sebagai prinsip yang dipakainya juga ialah persamaan darah dan persamaan daerah (Blut und Boden Theorie) antara pimpinan dan rakyat.

Tuan-tuan yang terhormat, dari aliran pikiran nasional sosialis, ialah prinsip persatuan antara pimpinan dan rakyat dan prinsip persatuan dalam negara seluruhnya cocok dengan aliran pikiran ketimuran." - Prof. Mr. Dr. Soepomo saat rapat besar sidang Badan Pelaksanaan Untuk Kemerdekaan Indonesia pada 31 Mei 1945

Quote
On English colonial language :

"The state is an integral community structure, all groups, all parts, all of its members are closely related to each other and are an organic community unity. The most important thing in a state based on the integraal school of thought is the livelihood of the nation as a whole. The state does not take sides with the strongest or the largest group, does not regard one's interests as the center, but the state guarantees the safety of the entire nation's life as an inseparable unity.

...

...The basis of the legal structure of Western European countries is individualism and liberalism. This individual nature, which affects all fields of life (economic law systems, arts, etc.), separates man as a person from his society, isolates himself from all other associations. A human being and a country are also considered as a person, everything always gives rise to imperialism and a blackmailing system (uitbuitings systeem) that causes chaos in the world and in the inner and outer world. ...

Gentlemen, you have understood for yourself that we must keep this nature away from the development of the State of Indonesia...

The basis of the structure of the Soviet-Russian state at the present time is the dictatorship of the proletariat. It may be that the basis is in accordance with the peculiarities of the social conditions of the Russian state, but the basic understanding of the state is contrary to the nature of the original Indonesian people.

Another country, the former national socialist Germany surrendered in the present war. The state is based on the totalitarian state of thought, das Ganze der politicchen Einheit des Volkes (integrate theory). The principle of "Leader (Führung) as Kernbegriff (ein totaler Führerstaat) and as a principle he also uses the equality of blood and regional equality (Blut und Boden Theorie) between the leadership and the people.

Dear Sirs, from the national socialist school of thought, the principle of unity between the leadership and the people and the principle of unity within the state are entirely compatible with the Eastern school of thought." - Prof. Mr. Dr. Soepomo during a large meeting of the Institution of Implementation  for Indonesian Independence on May 31, 1945

christianbethel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Miami, FL, USA
    • View Profile
Re: Homophobia is not American
« Reply #22 on: June 30, 2022, 12:47:16 pm »
Just came across this article containing excerpts from The Pink Swastika: https://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=PinkSwastika
I know it's Zionist bullshìt, but I found and will embolden key excerpts here:

Quote
The pink triangle, symbol of the "gay rights" movement, is familiar to many Americans. As the badge used by the Nazis to designate homosexuals in the concentration camps, the pink triangle perfectly expresses the message of "gay rights."... While some homosexuals were interned in Nazi work camps, the role of homosexuals in Nazi history cannot be accurately represented solely by a pink triangle.

Quote
Betraying his roots in the "Butch" faction of the German "gay rights" movement, [Ernst] Röhm viewed homosexuality as the basis for a new society. Louis Snyder writes that Röhm "...projected a social order in which homosexuality would be regarded as a human behavior pattern of high repute...he flaunted his homosexuality in public and insisted that his cronies do the same. What was needed, Röhm believed, was a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in his eyes, were not as adept in such behavior as practicing homosexuals" (Snyder:55) "The principle function of this army-like organization," writes historian Thomas Fuchs, "was beating up anyone who opposed the Nazis, and Hitler believed this was a job best undertaken by homosexuals" (Fuchs:48f).

Quote
"Gay Holocaust" revisionists assert that Hitler's ascension to the Chancellorship marked the beginning of a homosexual Holocaust in Germany. For example, in The Pink Triangle, Richard Plant writes, "After years of frustration...Hitler's storm troopers now had the opportunity to smash their enemies: the lame, the mute, the feebleminded, the epileptic, the homosexual, the Jew, the Gypsy, the communist. These were the scapegoats singled out for persecution. These were the 'contragenics' who were to be ruthlessly eliminated to ensure the purity of the 'Aryan race.'" (Plant:51). Rector, another revisionist, makes a similar statement: "Hitler's homophobia did not surface until 1933-1934, when gays had come to affect adversely his New Order designs-out of which grew the simple solution of murdering them en masse" (Rector:24). The fact is that homosexuals were never murdered "en masse" or "ruthlessly eliminated" by the Nazis. Yet many homosexuals were persecuted and some did die in Nazi work camps. What is the truth about Nazi persecution of homosexuals? There are several incidents in Nazi history which are most often cited as evidence of a "gay Holocaust." This list includes a series of increasingly harsh public pronouncements and policies against homosexuality by Hitler and Himmler, the sacking of the Sex Research Institute of Berlin, "the Röhm Purge" (also known as "the Night of the Long Knives"), and the internment of homosexuals in work camps. The law against homosexual conduct had existed in Germany for many years prior to the Nazi regime as Paragraph 175 of the Reich Criminal Code, to wit: "A male who indulges in criminally indecent activity with another male, or who allows himself to participate in such activity, will be punished with imprisonment" (Burleigh and Wipperman:188). When Hitler came to power he used this law as a means of tracking down and punishing those homosexuals who, in the words of one victim, "had defended the Weimar Republic, and who had tried to forestall the Nazi threat" (ibid.:183). Later he expanded the law and used it as a convenient tool to detain other enemies of the regime. In February of 1933, Hitler banned pornography, homosexual bars and bath-houses, and groups which promoted "gay rights" (Plant:50). Ostensibly, this decree was a blanket condemnation of all homosexual activity in Germany, but in practice it served as just another means to find and destroy anti-Nazi groups and individuals. "Hitler," admit Oosterhuis and Kennedy, "employed the charge of homosexuality primarily as a means to eliminate political opponents, both inside his party and out." (Oosterhuis and Kennedy: 248). The masculine homosexuals chief officials in the Nazi leadership selectively enforced this policy only against their enemies and not against all homosexuals. Even Rector lends credence to this perspective, citing the fact that the decree "was not enforced in all cases" (Rector:66). In 1935, Paragraph 175 was amended with Paragraph 175a which criminalized any type of behavior that could be construed as indicating a homosexual inclination or desire (Burleigh and Wipperman: 190). (Interestingly, the new criminal code addressing homosexuality deleted the word "unnatural" from the definition - Reisman, 1994:3.)...when [homosexuals] were threatened, many effeminate homosexuals, especially those in the arts community, were given protection by certain Nazi leaders (Oosterhuis and Kennedy:248). Plant writes: The most famous example is that of the actor Gustaf Grundgens... Despite the fact that his homosexual affairs were as notorious as those of Roehm's, Goering appointed him director of the State Theater...[And] On October 29, 1937 ...Himmler advised that actors and other artists could be arrested for offenses against paragraph 175 only with his personal consent, unless the police caught them in flagrante (Plant:116).

Quote
The event in history most frequently cited as evidence of Nazi persecution of homosexuals is known variously as the Blood Purge, the Night of the Long Knives, and the Röhm Purge. The fact that SA leaders were the primary targets in the massacre could therefore be construed as a sort of "moral cleansing" of the Nazi ranks, which, in fact, Hitler claimed it was. But Hitler lied. The Röhm Purge was driven by political, not moral concerns. Hitler feigned disgust and outrage about the homosexuality of the murdered SA leaders to justify himself to the German people; it was a tactic he had used previously to allay public suspicions about the sexual deviancy of his inner circle. The importance of this fact is asserted in many leading works by both mainstream and homosexualist historians:
'Hitler eliminated his closest friend Röhm and certain SA leaders as potential rivals. The strictly political motivation of this ruthless power play was initially too obvious to be entirely denied, but later it was conveniently obscured by charges of homosexual depravity.' (Haberle:369f).
'Ernst Röhm wasn't shot because the Nazi Party felt outraged by the abrupt discovery that he was "having" his storm troopers-that had been known for ages; but because his sway over the SA had become a menace to Hitler...'
'Hitler himself, of course, had been well aware of Röhm's sexual orientation from the earliest days of their long association....So strong was Röhm that the Wehrmacht [German Army High Command] was concerned that he might seize control of the army. In 1934, Hitler became fearful that the Wehrmacht was plotting a coup against him to prevent such a takeover. To forestall this danger, Hitler had Röhm and about one thousand other men murdered one weekend in June 1934, the famous "Night of the Long Knives" (Crompton:79f).
Igra provides us with a long and detailed account of the power struggle which led to the purge, beginning with a refutation of the idea that it represented a policy of extermination of homosexuals by Hitler: 'We shall find that, far from eliminating the sex perverts from his party, Hitler retained most of them, and that he moved against those whom he did eliminate only with the greatest reluctance and after he had been relentlessly pushed by outside forces and circumstances. On June 14 and 15 Hitler was in Venice to see Mussolini. It soon became common knowledge that the German Dictator and his entourage had made an unfavorable impression upon the Italians... Mussolini was never a stickler for puritan morality, to say the least, but there was one vice which the Italians particularly loathe; they call it il visio tedesco, the German vice. The conduct of some members in Hitler's entourage at Venice disgusted the Italians. Mussolini protested against the moral character and political unreliability of the leading personnel in the Nazi Storm Troops and warned Hitler that he would have to sacrifice his favorite colleagues if he wished to save his own personal prestige and that of his regime. Among those colleagues, Röhm, Heines and Karl Ernst were mentioned (Igra:77f). The Röhm Purge, then, was not a "moral cleansing" of the Nazi ranks, but a re-alignment of power behind the German government which was primarily forced upon Hitler by powerful political elements whose support he needed to maintain control. Igra goes on to point out that not only did the majority of the SA homosexuals survive the purge, but that the massacre was largely implemented by homosexuals. He cites Strasser's statement that "the Chief Killers of Munich [were] Wagner, Esser, Maurice, Weber and Buch." These men "were all known to be sex perverts or sexual maniacs of one type or another," concludes Igra (ibid.:80). Plant records that the larger campaign of assassinations across Germany was orchestrated by Reinhard Heydrich, also a well-known homosexual (Plant:56). Igra addresses Hitler's justification for the purge: In his defense before the Reichstag a week later Hitler talked of "traitors." That was his alibi...In his speech to the Reichstag he admitted that one of the motives for ordering the massacre was to get rid of the moral perverts in his party and that they were traitors because they practiced homosexualism. But under the dictatorship it was not possible for anyone to put Hitler at question. Nobody asked him to explain how it was that, if his purpose was to get rid of homosexuals, he really didn't rid himself of them but used them as the instruments of his own murder lust and still retained most of them as members of his personal entourage, as well as in key positions of the party organization and the government. Otto Strasser, in his book, The German St. Bartholemew's Night (which has not been published in English), mentions sixteen of these highly placed homosexualist officials who survived the massacres of June 30 and retained their posts (Igra:82).
When in doubt, use the 16 Words: 'We must Engineer the Destruction of Western Civilization and Tribalism, and Unite All Races Through Nobility.'

Aryan ≠ 'White'.

History is Written by the Victors.

He Who Controls the Past Controls the Future; He Who Controls the Present Controls the Past.

guest30

  • Guest
Adolf Hitler the Anti-White Radical
« Reply #23 on: July 01, 2022, 01:24:43 am »
See the information about recorded Hitler's speeches and conversations from his closest associate, Walther Hewel, from book "Jejak Hitler di Indonesia" by Hoorst H. Geerken :



On Nusantara language :

Quote
"16 Desember 1941 : Führer tentang Jepang : Mengherankan bahwa kita, dengan bantuan Jepang, sedang menghancurkan posisi-posisi ras kulit putih di Asia Timur sedangkan Inggris bersama kaum Bolshevist malah menyerang Eropa. Ras kulit putih maksudnya Belanda di Hindia Timur, Inggris di Burma, Malaya dan Singapura, AS di Filipina dan Perancis di Indochina.

...

Ucapan Hitler tentang Jepang dikemukakan 16 Desember, satu minggu setelah Jepang memulai gerakan ofensifnya ke Asia Tenggara. Hal tersebut berkaitan dengan pernyataan Hitler di radio yang kemudian juga disiarkan oleh radio Jepang dan pers Jepang bahwa mereka sekarang sedang menunaikan suatu perang suci melawan ras kulit putih bersama satu milyar penduduk Asia. ..."

On English Colonial Language :

Quote
"December 16, 1941: Führer on Japan: It is surprising that we, with the help of Japan, are destroying the positions of the white race in East Asia while Britain and the Bolshevists are attacking Europe. White race means the Dutch in the East Indies, the British in Burma, Malaya and Singapore, the US in the Philippines and France in Indochina.

...

Hitler's remarks about Japan were made on December 16, one week after Japan began its offensive into Southeast Asia. This is related to Hitler's statement on the radio which was later broadcast by Japanese radio and the Japanese press that they are now waging a holy war against the white race with one billion people in Asia. ..."

Source : Jejak Hitler di Indonesia, by Hoorst H. Geerken page 210

If Anti-White sentiment goes too far...



guest30

  • Guest
Hitler Regime's Assistance to the Nusantara People's Struggle of Independence, the Forgotten History

See the writings of the book below :































On Nusantara Language :

Quote
"...Di antara kaum pribumi, ada saja yang tidak melihat negatif langkah kebijakan Hitler. Mereka memandang dalam sosok Hitler figur "pembebas" yang pada akhirnya dianggap akan membuka peluang membebaskan diri mereka dari belenggu penjajah. Kelompok-kelompok nasionalis menerima ledakan jumlah anggota setelah angkatan perang Jerman menduduki tanah air tuan-tuan penjajah mereka, yang memberi harapan bahwa mereka pun akan segera mematahkan belenggu hukum kolonial.

...

Salah satu partai yang menonjol di kalangan pribumi adalah Partai Indonesia Raya (Parindra), yang didirikan oleh Sartono, Amir Sjarifuddin, dan M. Husni Thamrin pada tahun 1935. Pada 6 Januari 1941, Husni Thamrin dituduh oleh penguasa kolonial mempunyai ikatan yang terlalu dekat dengan Nazi Jerman dan Jepang. Ia dikenakan tahanan rumah, tetapi hanya lima hari kemudian, pada 11 Januari, ia meninggal dalam keadaan yang masih belum dapat dijelaskan sampai hari ini. Sayap Pemuda Parindra benar-benar merupakan foto kopi dari Pemuda Hitler Jerman, termasuk dalam seragam dan "salam Hitler" nya.

...

Semua partai nasionalis dan partai-partai yang dekat dengan Hitler punya satu tujuan yang sama, yakni Indonesia Merdeka! Mereka melihat tujuan ini kian mendekati kenyataan ketika tentara Hitler berbaris menuju Belanda. Di mata mereka, Jerman sedang bertempur, ikut membuka jalan bagi pihak mereka.

Sebagaimana sudah kita lihat, bukan hanya orang Indonesia, melainkan juga sementara orang Belanda yang mendukung Hitler dan gerakan Nazi di tanah air mereka sendiri maupun di negeri-negeri jajahannya-ratusan ribu dari mereka dengan antusias mengangkat tangan kanan dalam "salam Hitler". Ketika pewaris takhta Belanda, Putri Juliana menikah dengan Pangeran Bernhard tahun 1937, bendera swastika Jerman berkibar di samping bendera Belanda di Hindia Belanda

...

Kaum pribumi sekarang melihat kesempatan untuk mencampakkan belenggu kolonialisme dan menaruh harapan mereka kepada Hitler. Setelah mencaplok Austria dan Sudetenland, juga gerak cepatnya yang sukses gemilang ke arah front barat dan timur, Hitler sangat dikagumi kaum pribumi di Asia Tenggara dan India. Suasana batin di Hindia Belanda waktu itu adalah seperti ini : Jika Hitler masuk ke tanah Jawa, setiap orang akan menyambutnya dengan taburan bunga.

Saya sudah mewawancarai banyak saksi mata yang dapat dipercaya, yang masih selamat melewati masa Perang Dunia II dan masa pendudukan Jepang. Mereka dilatih dalam Peta (Organisasi Tentara Pembela Tanah Air) dan terjun dalam perang kemerdekaan. Orang-orang ini datang dari semua golongan masyarakat. Pada awal 1963 masih ada setengah juta mantan pejuang, anggota laskar, dan partisan di Indonesia yang berhimpun dalam berbagai asosiasi veteran. Oleh karena itu, banyak orang dapat mengatakan siapa-siapa saja yang pernah berjuang.

Saya juga pernah mendengar dari mereka bahwa Jerman, selama pendudukan Jepang, memberikan bantuan militer untuk memperlengkapi Peta, seperti topi baja, kantong air, dan peralatan masak. Jerman juga memasok perlengkapan berat seperti truk, sepeda motor DKW RT 125, BMW, dan Triumph. Bahkan, Jerman memberikan pesawat amfibi Dornier. Teman-teman saya di Indonesia juga membenarkan bahwa mereka, seperti kebanyakan pejuang perang kemerdekaan pasca-proklamasi 1945, bertempur melawan tentara Belanda dan Inggris dengan memakai topi baja dari Jerman. Mereka katakan, para opsir Jerman juga pernah melatih tentara Indonesia, sementara para pelaut Jerman turut ambil bagian dalam perjuangan kemerdekaan. Saya lantas tertarik untuk menindaklanjuti informasi "baru" ini.

Sejak tiba di Jakarta tahun 1963, saya rutin mengunjungi pasar loak di Jalan Surabaya. Anda dapat menemukan barang apa saja di sana : barang antik, radio, dan barang curian. Toko-toko yang normal hampir selalu kosong persediaan barang kurun itu, tetapi di Jalan Surabaya jangan ditanya. Hampir semua barang tersedia. Jika anda datang ke sana dengan maksud ingin berbelanja barang tertentu hendaklah "berhati-hati" dengan barang Anda. Sebab pasar gelap yang "resmi" dan pasar para pencopet.

Saya terhenyak menemukan banyak peninggalan tentara Nazi Jerman di sana: ratusan topi baja, bayonet dan pistol Mauser, peralatan masak, kantong air, sepatu bot tentara Jerman, dan lain sebagainya. Karena rasa ingin tahu, saya membeli sebuah botol minum, panci, dan topi baja. Saya hadiahkan topi baja itu kepada seorang tentara Indonesia, mantan pejuang. Ketika ia meninggal, istrinya menaruh topi baja itu di atas pusaranya.

...

Agaknya, Hewel menggunakan pengaruhnya pada Hitler untuk mendukung pergerakan kebangsaan menuju Indonesia merdeka. Bagaimanapun, bahan baku dari negeri ini sangat penting bagi Hitler. Dan sebagaimana ditunjukkan oleh tulisan-tulisan di buku catatan harian Hewel, Hindia Belanda sering menjadi bahan percakapan mereka di sore hari. Oleh karena itu Hewel menggunakan setiap asumsi bahwa Hitler akhirnya mengizinkan Hewel, yang ahli tentang kawasan ini, memberikan bantuan Jerman untuk Peta.

Hewel tidak hanya memiliki kesempatan untuk mendapat dukungan Hitler, ia juga mendapat bantuan dari pembantu-pembantu berpengaruh Hitler lainnya. Di Berlin ada triumvirat lingkaran dalam Hitler yang dekat dengan rakyat, kebudayaan, dan seluruh kepulauan Indonesia. Mereka bertiga ini mendukung terbebasnya negeri ini dari kolonial Belanda, sekalipun Jepanglah yang memainkan peran utama dalam pendirian PETA."

Sumber : "Jejak Hitler di Indonesia" by Hoorst Henry Geerken halaman 99, 100, 101, 155, 254, 255, 256


On English Colonial Language :

Quote
"...Among the natives, there are those who do not see the negatives of Hitler's policy steps. They see in Hitler a figure of a "liberator"who in the end is considered to be an opportunity to free themselves from the shackles of colonialism. Nationalist groups accept the explosion in the number of members after the German army occupied the homeland of their colonial masters, which gave hope that they too would soon break the shackles of colonial law.

...

One of the prominent parties among the natives was the Great Indonesia Party (Parindra), which was founded by Sartono, Amir Sjarifuddin, and M. Husni Thamrin in 1935. On January 6, 1941, Husni Thamrin was accused by the colonial authorities of having too close ties to Nazi Germany and Japan. He was placed under house arrest, but just five days later, on January 11, he died in circumstances that remain unexplained to this day. The Parindra Youth Wing is actually a photocopy of the German Hitler Youth, included in its uniform and "Hitler greetings".

...

All nationalist parties and parties close to Hitler have the same goal, namely an independent Indonesia! They saw this goal closer to reality as Hitler's army marched towards the Netherlands. In their eyes, Germany was at war, helping to pave the way for their side.

As we have seen, not only Indonesians, but also some Dutch people who supported Hitler and the Nazi movement in their own homeland as well as in the colonies – hundreds of thousands of them enthusiastically raised their right hands in "Hitler salutes". When the heir to the Dutch throne, Princess Juliana married Prince Bernhard in 1937, the German swastika flag flew next to the Dutch flag in the Dutch East Indies

...

The natives now saw an opportunity to throw off the shackles of colonialism and put their hope in Hitler. After annexing Austria and the Sudetenland, as well as his successful rapid movement towards the western and eastern fronts, Hitler was greatly admired by the natives in Southeast Asia and India. The inner atmosphere in the Dutch East Indies at that time was like this: If Hitler entered Java, everyone would welcome him with a sprinkling of flowers.

I have interviewed many reliable eyewitnesses who have survived World War II and the Japanese occupation. They were trained in Peta (Organization of Army Defender of the Fatherland) and took part in the war for independence. These people come from all walks of life. In early 1963 there were still half a million former fighters, laskar members, and partisans in Indonesia who belonged to various veterans' associations. Therefore, many people can say anyone who has ever struggled.

I've also heard from them that Germany, during the Japanese occupation, provided military assistance to equip the Map, such as helmets, water bags, and cooking utensils. Germany also supplies heavy equipment such as trucks, DKW RT 125, BMW and Triumph motorcycles. In fact, Germany provided the Dornier seaplane. My friends in Indonesia also confirmed that they, like most fighters in the post-proclamation war for independence in 1945, fought against the Dutch and British troops wearing German helmets. They said that German officers had also trained Indonesian soldiers, while German navy had taken part in the struggle for independence. I was then interested in following up on this "new" information.

Since arriving in Jakarta in 1963, I have regularly visited the flea market on Jalan Surabaya. You can find just about anything there: antiques, radios, and swag. Normal shops were almost always empty during that period, but don't ask questions on Jalan Surabaya. Almost all items are available. If you come there with the intention of shopping for certain items, you should be "careful" with your items. Because the black market is "official" and the market for pickpockets.

I was surprised to find many relics of Nazi Germany soldiers there: hundreds of helmets, bayonets and Mauser pistols, cooking utensils, water bags, German army boots, and so on. Out of curiosity, I bought a water bottle, a pot, and a headpiece. I gifted the helmet to an Indonesian soldier, a former fighter. When he died, his wife put the helmet on his grave.

...

Presumably, Hewel used his influence on Hitler to support the national movement towards an independent Indonesia. After all, the raw materials of this country were very important to Hitler. And as the writings in Hewel's diary show, the Dutch East Indies were often the subject of their afternoon conversation. Hewel therefore used every assumption that Hitler eventually allowed Hewel, who was an expert on the area, to provide German assistance for Peta.

Hewel not only had the opportunity to gain Hitler's support, he also had the help of other influential aides of Hitler. In Berlin there was a triumvirate of Hitler's inner circle who was close to the people, culture and the entire Indonesian archipelago. The three of them supported the independence of this country from Dutch colonialism, even though it was Japan who played a major role in the establishment of PETA."

Source : "Jejak Hitler di Indonesia" by Hoorst Henry Geerken page 99, 100, 101, 155, 254, 255, 256



guest30

  • Guest
Let's see the writings from the book named "Delivered from Evil: The Saga of World War II". New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-015812-5. page 64 which marked by red circle




Historical writings show that the government of the Nazi regime had provided firearms and ammunition to black people in Ethiopia who fought against the Italian colonial army from 1935 to 1937.

Source: The book "Delivered from Evil: The Saga of World War II". New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-015812-5. page 64

Website source: https://archive.org/details/deliveredfromevi00leck_0/page/64/mode/2up


Wikipedia source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Italo-Ethiopian_War

guest30

  • Guest
Hitler's Method on Political Work Confirmed
« Reply #26 on: July 01, 2022, 03:46:28 am »
Hitler's Method on Political Work Confirmed, in Accordance with True Left Community's Observance.

See the writings of the page below :



On Nusantara Language :

Quote
"Pada 2 Juni 1941 : Führer berkata : sebagai pribadi, saya tak pernah melanggar janji. Tapi sebagai seorang politisi, bagi Jerman, bila perlu ribuan kali.

Pada 30 April 1943, ketika Menteri Luar Negeri Ribbentrop meminta daftar semua perjanjian yang telah ia tandatangani, Hewel melaporkan bahwa Hitler tertawa mengejek karena sangat sedikit dari perjanjian-perjanjian itu yang tidak dilanggar oleh Jerman!"

On English Colonial Language :

Quote
"On June 2, 1941: The Führer said: as a person, I have never broken a promise. But as a politician, for Germany, if necessary thousands of times.

On April 30, 1943, when Foreign Minister Ribbentrop asked for a list of all the treaties he had signed, Hewel reported that Hitler laughed mockingly because very few of the treaties were not broken by Germany!"

Source: "Jejak Hitler di Indonesia" by Hoorst Henry Geerken page 209

christianbethel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Miami, FL, USA
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #27 on: July 01, 2022, 02:22:31 pm »
@kameradbaren Thank you for posting pictures of text I can't read or understand.
When in doubt, use the 16 Words: 'We must Engineer the Destruction of Western Civilization and Tribalism, and Unite All Races Through Nobility.'

Aryan ≠ 'White'.

History is Written by the Victors.

He Who Controls the Past Controls the Future; He Who Controls the Present Controls the Past.

guest30

  • Guest
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #28 on: July 01, 2022, 10:04:19 pm »
@christianbethel

Quote
@kameradbaren Thank you for posting pictures of text I can't read or understand.

No more hostility to me. Incompetent people cannot be condemned forever

guest30

  • Guest
Learning About Western Civilization
« Reply #29 on: July 04, 2022, 12:04:26 am »
What is Western Civilization.... From Hitler's perspective

Let's see the written Hitler's thoughts on Book "Political Testament of Adolf Hitler Hitler-Bormann Documents as taken down by Martin Bormann". Recorded on 7th February 1945. 2 months 23 days, or 81 days before his honorable suicide on 30th April 1945.



















Transcript :

"Spain, France and Britain have all enfeebled, devitalized
and drained themselves in these vain colonial enterprises
.
The continents to which Spain and Britain gave birth,
which they created piece by piece, have today acquired a
completely independent way of life and a completely
egoistical outlook. Even so, they are but artificial worlds,
with neither a soul, a culture or a civilization of their own;
and judged from that point of view, they are nothing more
than excrescences.


It is, of course, possible to make out a case for the success
achieved in peopling continents which before had been
empty. The United States and Australia afford good
examples. Success, certainly - but only on the material side.
They are artificial edifices, bodies without age, of which it
is impossible to say whether they are still in a state of
infancy or whether they have already been touched by
senility. In those continents which were inhabited, failure
has been even more marked. In them, the white races have
imposed their will by force, and the influence they have
had on the native inhabitants has been negligible
; the
Hindus have remained Hindus, the Chinese have remained
Chinese, and the Moslems are still Moslems. There have
been no profound transformations, and such changes as
have occurred are less marked in the religious field,
notwithstanding the tremendous efforts of the Christian
missionaries, than in any other. There have been a few odd
conversions the sincerity of which are open to considerable
doubt-except, perhaps in the case of a few simpletons and
mentally deficients. The white races did, of course, give
some things to the natives, and they were the worst gifts
that they could possibly have made, those plagues of our
own modern world-materialism, fanaticism, alcoholism and
syphilis.
For the rest, since these peoples possessed
qualities of their own which were superior to anything we
could offer them, they have remained essentially
unchanged. Where imposition by force was attempted, the
results were even more disastrous, and common sense,
realizing the futility of such measures, should preclude any
recourse to their introduction. One solitary success must be
conceded to the colonizers: everywhere they have
succeeded in arousing hatred
, a hatred that urges these
peoples, awakened from their slumbers by us, to rise and
drive us out. Indeed, it looks almost as though they had
awakened solely and simply for that purpose! Can anyone
assert that colonization has increased the number of
Christians in the world? Where are those conversions en
masse which mark the success of Islam?
Here and there one
finds isolated islets of Christians, Christians in name, that
is, rather than by conviction; and that is the sum total of the
successes of this magnificent Christian religion, the
guardian of supreme Truth!" - Adolf Hitler's recorded conversation on 7th February 1945



Western Civilization ever almost got annihilated. It's time to make it perish forever



Historical map of resistance to Western Civilization on it's peak on 1942.