Author Topic: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism  (Read 1109 times)

guest30

  • Guest
Let's see the written Hitler's thoughts on Book "Political Testament of Adolf Hitler Hitler-Bormann Documents as taken down by Martin Bormann". Recorded on 4th February 1945. 2 months 23 days, or 85 days before his honorable suicide on 30th April 1945.








Transcript :

"The laws of nature follow a logic which does not
necessarily always conform to our own ideas of logic. We
ourselves were disposed to compromise.
We were ready to
throw our forces into the scales for the preservation of the
British Empire; and all that, mark you, at a time when, to
tell the truth, I feel much more sympathetically inclined to
the lowliest Hindu than to any of these arrogant islanders.

Later on, the Germans will be pleased that they did not
make any contribution to the survival of an out-dated state
of affairs for which the world of the future would have
found it hard to forgive them. We can with safety make one
prophecy: whatever the outcome of this war, the British
Empire is at an end. It has been mortally wounded. The
future of the British people is to die of hunger and
tuberculosis in their cursed island."
- Adolf Hitler's recorded conversation on 4th February 1945

The conclusion is, Hitler's speeches which tend to support Britain and her colonial empire were just pragmatic political program and not the real goal of Hitler's regime and National Socialism ideology.


guest30

  • Guest
Hitler against Western Civilization
« Reply #31 on: July 18, 2022, 12:28:11 am »
Let's see the content from the pages which photographed below



Photographed on 2th July 2022, 11 : 37 Jakarta Time



Photographed on 2th July 2022, 11 : 37 Jakarta Time

Important Transcript :

“The World War had as one of its consequences that, wherever capitalism reigns, America has supremacy. And since America suffers from industrial overproduction, it will exploit this supremacy to dispose of its overproduction. That concerns everyone—Germany as well as France, England as well as South America, China, and Japan. Only where capitalism has been broken, abolished, replaced by something new does America’s power stop.

Herein lies our greatest mission and at the same time our best chance! Here is the bedrock where we may cast anchor. From there an anti-industrial world can be erected.” - Adolf Hitler

Source : Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant halaman 160, 161

To make this happen, we must defeat Liberalism and Communism, and Western Civilization, which it's people forcing everyone to be an industrialist machinist

Compare what Hitler envisage to what Karl Marx envisage

"Without slavery, North America, the most progressive of countries, would be transformed into a patriarchal country. Wipe out North America from the map of the world and you will have anarchy— the complete decay of modern commerce and civilization. Abolish slavery and you will have wiped America off the map of nations." - Karl Heinrich Marx



Defeat Cultural Marxism




Zea_mays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2022, 07:42:13 am »
Quote
How were the communists able to promote an anti-ethnocentric worldview in predominantly white countries at the same exact time as the National Socialists then?

I won't disagree that certain historic NS writings on "race" were too bogged down by ethnocentrism at times, but Soviet policy was explicitly ethnocentric as well. Perhaps much more so than Germany, arguably:
Quote
Through Joseph Stalin's theory on nationality, borders were drawn to create national homelands for various recognized ethnic groups.[4] Early republics like the Kazakh ASSR and the Turkestan ASSR in Central Asia were dissolved and split up to create new union republics.[5] With delimitation came the policy of indigenization which encouraged the de-Russification of the country and promotion of minority languages and culture.[6] This policy also affected ethnic Russians and was particularly enforced in ASSRs where indigenous people were already a minority in their own homeland, like the Buryat ASSR.[7] Language and culture flourished and ultimately institutionalized ethnicity in the state apparatus of the country.[8]
[...]
By the 1930s the mood shifted as the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin stopped enforcing indigenization and began purging non-Russians from government and intelligentsia. Thus, a period of Russification set in.[6] Russian became mandatory in all areas of non-Russian ethnicity and the Cyrillic script became compulsory for all languages of the Soviet Union.[11] The constitution stated that the ASSRs had power to enforce their own policies within their territory,[12] but in practice the ASSRs and their titular nationalities were some of the most affected by Stalin's purges and were strictly controlled by Moscow.[13] From 1937, the "bourgeois nationalists" became the "enemy of the Russian people" and indigenization was abolished.[11]
[...]
When the Soviets gained the upper hand and began recapturing territory in 1943, many minorities of the country began to be seen as German collaborators by Stalin and were accused of treason, particularly in southern Russia.[15] Between 1943 and 1945 ethnic Balkars,[16] Chechens,[17] Crimean Tatars,[18] Ingush,[17] and Kalmyks[19] were deported en masse from the region to remote parts of the country. Immediately after the deportations the Soviet government passed decrees that liquidated the Kalmyk ASSR on 27 December 1943,[19] the Crimean ASSR on 23 February 1944,[20] the Checheno-Ingush ASSR on 7 March 1944,[17]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republics_of_Russia#History

Quote
Besides national republics, oblasts, and okrugs, several hundred national districts (with populations between 10,000 and 50,000) and several thousand national townships (population 500 to 5,000) were established. In some cases this policy required voluntary or forced resettlement in both directions to create a compact population.
[...]
In the 1920s and the 1930s, the policy of national delimitation, which assigned national territories to ethnic groups and nationalities, was followed by nation-building, attempting to create a full range of national institutions within each national territory. Each officially recognized ethnic minority, however small, was granted its own national territory where it enjoyed a certain degree of autonomy, in addition to national elites.[5] A written national language was developed (if it had been lacking), national language planning was implemented, native teachers were trained, and national schools were established.
[...]
Following the introduction of the Soviet passport system in 1932, each adult citizen's ethnicity (Russian: национальность) was necessarily recorded in their passport. Where parents' nationalities differed, a citizen was able to choose which nationality to register in their passport.[37] This practice did not exist in the Russian empire and has been abolished in the Russian Federation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_delimitation_in_the_Soviet_Union

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/64/Republics_of_Russia.png
Quote
Map showing the ethnic republics of the Russian Federation (2008) that succeeded the national territories of Russian SFSR (pre-1990)

Map showing all the former ethnic republics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Liquidated_national_territorial_administrative_units_of_the_Russia.jpg

Quote
How Stalin Created Some of the Post-Soviet World's Worst Ethnic Conflicts
[...]
Terry Martin, director of the Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University and coauthor of "A State Of Nations: Empire And Nation-Building In The Age Of Lenin And Stalin," agrees, but adds that the Soviets created problems from the beginning by trying to draw borders too precisely along ethnic lines in places where ethnic identities were still evolving.

"If they did anything that created ethnic conflict, they created ethnic conflict by trying to draw the borders too precisely," he says. "That is, they created a lot of ethnic mobilization around borders in the 1920s as people lobbied to get one border and lobbied various people to identify with their nationality and not with another in areas where nationality was very fluid, like Central Asia. Most of the modern nationalities that we have [today] hadn't even been formed yet."
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/03/how-stalin-created-some-of-the-post-soviet-worlds-worst-ethnic-conflicts/273649/

Stalin even created the first Israel:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast

Instead of Hitler trying to create provinces for each of the 5 or so "sub-races" that existed in Germany, Hitler's goal was to unify them into something new.


Quote
He was already struggling in a war where everyone was attacking him on all sides, so he really had nothing to lose by openly promoting something more similar to what we promote now.

Hitler was not a biologist, so I do not blame him for not having a sufficient understanding to precisely express the ideology which he intuitively felt.

Here is Walter Gross attempting to clarify the official stance of the party regarding racial matters in 1939, from Der deutsche Rassengedanke und die Welt. This was just as the party was trying to distance itself from Nordicism.
Quote
Germany goes here in 1933 and introduces a completely new concept into law and international law, namely a classification of people according to their descent from a racial point of view. In practice, we were treading Judaism, and quite exclusively Judaism, because we did not have a foreign race problem of a different kind in Germany to a significant extent at that time, nor did we have any contact with foreign breeds outside our borders, which would be significantly impaired by the German racial laws. First of all, it is a conflict between us and Judaism. But for reasons that matter here, we deliberately did not speak of Jews but of non-Aryans in the first legal measures (such as the law on the restoration of the professional civil service) and thus put the whole problem on a much broader basis than, for example, the conflict between Jews and Germans.
[...]
But a very serious situation arises from the fact that now other peoples and states feel directly attacked and defamed in their honor and dignity as a nation, namely as a non-Aryan nation, by the German racial rule and the segregation from the racial alien. I do not want to count all the peoples and countries with whom there have been serious debates for this reason. It is appropriate to point out that, for example, the whole world of the Far East was for a long time under the impression that the German in his new National Socialist conception described it as non-Aryan, and that he considered the non-Aryans as an inferior rabble. So: The German distinguishes us as inferior, secondary people and himself as the actual bearer of culture. Suffice it to say that such a conception could understandably cause infinite excitement and hatred against this new Nazi Germany among proud, self-confident, reverent national peoples, such as Japan. We have had the same phenomenon in India, for example, and we have experienced it in many Near Eastern peoples.

All this manifested itself in two ways. Once in a mood-based bias against the Third Reich, against Germanness in general.
[...]
sooner or later this government was forced by its own people to ask Berlin now, so to speak, what is actually going on about it: Whether their people are actually regarded and treated as second-class people and semi-savages because of their race and discord? This has indeed led to diplomatic steps in Berlin at a time when any tension of any kind on this globe, if it was not absolutely inevitable, has been annoying, unpleasant and actually unbearable.
[...]
What could we do about this tendency to see in the German racial idea a fundamental defamation of people of other races? We could do nothing but repeatedly present the German racial idea in its actual form with calm and superiority and make it clear to people that the essence of racial knowledge is not the evaluation or even the devaluation of other groups of people in this world, but nothing more than the cool, yes I would like to say scientific, statement, that there are different groups of people in this world and that there is primarily no talk of an evaluation at all, that the statement: You are of a different race towards us--first contains no more and no less value judgment than the objective observation of a person who walks through the forest and says: "It is not only trees in the forest, but this and this is an oak tree." -- This is not an insult or a value judgment.
[...]
We are sometimes there--that I must also pronounce--disturbed by clumsiness over even stupidity in our own country, when somewhere a wild fool produced his ideas of race, or that if we had just made it painstakingly clear to some people that we respect and honor them and that we completely concede to them his peculiarity on the basis of his bloody and racial internal legality, with one fool in his leaflet or book wrote that this people was racially inferior, that they were under cow and donkey, that their qualities were wickedness and uncleanliness, and what do I know. With such stupid derailments, not only foreign-race peoples in distant parts of the world, but even neighboring peoples in Europe, often even historically, fatefully determined friends of National Socialist Germany, have sometimes been irritated and alienated to the blood. I say openly that the two great peoples and powers who first began with us the political-organizational struggle against all the forces of decay and decline in the world, namely Italy and Japan, have shown an infinitely strong reserve against the German racial idea for years, out of misunderstanding, but unfortunately also partly as a result of the nonsense of individual irresponsible people in our own people, because they believed that the content of this German racial idea was an immediate degradation and defamation of their own national and cultural values.
[...]
If today we can speak with the Japanese in this field in a completely clear and unbiased way: you are like this and we are different, we are deeply different in nature, -- then this will never give us a single hint of cause for friction and explosions, we will precisely out of respect for otherness from the outset remove the possibility from the outset, which can give a dilution, mixing and blurring of these natural boundaries between us, and in the end there remains the deep respect for the culture of a very nation that has become a strong, proud and great nation out of completely different bloody foundations and completely different historical conditions and is thus somewhere closely related to ourselves, which, of course, we possess and must preserve other styles and other forms from our inner racial law and racial content.

Exactly the same thing, as you know, has occupied us for a long time in the position on fascism and Italy. All the greater is our concern that the Italian people have now lost all sensitivity to the racial idea of Germany not only in this area, but are even the first other people to have established their own racial idea, which is directly related to ours, and has thus moved into the common front in the struggle for the racial idea.

I would say Gross's apparent ethnocentrism may be arising from a failure to fully pry apart nationality, ethnicity, and "race". Particularly in the last 2 paragraphs. In reality, racially, the Japanese are deeply similar to Germans (which is why they were Aryans allied with Germany). In terms of ethnicity, obviously they are different, but this is irrelevant for political matters. In terms of nationality, culture, and the corresponding "national idea" which Japan must base their nationalism on--their history and culture are very different from Germany's, so they must have a distinct "national idea". This interpretation is more obvious in the final paragraph about Italians. Italians are, ethnically, not too distantly-related from Germans, yet they have an entirely different "racial idea" than Germany.

If Gross was around today, perhaps he would have worded things more precisely. But the core of what he is saying is that (1) different "peoples" exist, (2) different "peoples" are not inferior to Germans simply for being different (i.e. anti-ethnocentrism), and (3) non-Aryans are inferior (i.e. Jews, specifically, and exclusively in the case of Germany. Not "Rhineland bastards", but exclusively Jews). Logically, Aryans and non-Aryans must be qualitatively similar to each other within each category, regardless of differences in ethnicity or nationality.


In A. James Gregor's article on NS and race, he explains similarly:
Quote
In effect this last phase of National Socialist race theory was a complete rejection of Guenther's Nordicism.
[...]
We are told that "the races distinguish themselves not through their characteristics; for the same characteristics can be found in different races…For example a Mediterranean can be as courageous as a Nordic, an Alpine as musical as a Dinaric, an East Balt as cunning as a Nordic. On the other hand not all Mediterraneans are courageous, nor all Nordics. But when a Mediterranean is courageous he is courageous in a 'Mediterranean fashion' as a Nordic would be courageous in a 'Nordic fashion'."[102]

Here is an entirely different racism, an entirely different Nordicism than that of Guenther and his followers. Here there was no question of general inferiority - it was a question of maintaining an ideal as an archetype for an entire civilization. Germany had a Nordic archetype; its art form was Nordic; its literature and philosophy, its music and institutions were inspired by Nordic ideals. Each German was bequeathed this patrimony from the original racial elements, now inextricably mixed into the German Nation, among which the Nordic predominated. It was not a question of intrinsic worth, national and racial superiority and inferiority tearing asunder the peoples of Europe. There is no transcendental standard by which to evaluate racial differences.[103] A people characteristically Mongolian treasures a Mongolian heritage and ideal, a Mediterranean people a Mediterranean one.[104]

But to Hitler, "Nordics", "Alpines", etc. are not truly races. Aryan is a race. The so-called racial classifications made by academics are just ancient ethnic groups or nationalities whose mixture gave rise to the modern nationalities. The grand task is understanding the traits which have been inherited by a modern nationality and promoting the noble ones. Germany, Italy, and Japan were formed from different historic mixtures, and it was not possible to judge whether one of those mixtures was better than the other, since they all had positive and negative traits.

Today, we know now the racial process which likely gave rise to noble traits in the first place (selection for a farming lifestyle) and on this basis we can see the underlying noble characteristics in Germany, Italy, and Japan are not so different after all.



Quote
Although I'm sure plenty of white nationalists would argue that Hitler was simply slandering Eastern Europeans for propagandistic purposes, since they were warring against him

The term Underman was originally used to describe the quality of individuals/nations which had succumbed to Communism (National Socialists did not coin the term). However, National Socialists consistently used this definition. In the image below, note that this type of anti-Communist/anti-Underman propaganda was translated into multiple Slavic languages (for nations allied with Germany). The fact that Communism's hold was strongest on Slavic nations may have been a coincidence, or, as we would assert, due to Turanism...


christianbethel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Miami, FL, USA
    • View Profile
Re: Media decolonization
« Reply #33 on: July 21, 2022, 04:56:20 pm »
Just did some digging and apparently the NSDAP considered jazz 'degenerate' because it had 'Negro' and 'Jewish' origins. While this is true, I assume this isn't the actual reason why jazz was considered degenerate, as the laws enforcing jazz were not widely enforced, and as you probably already know, Goebbels had his own propaganda band known as 'Charlie and His Orchestra.' What did Hitler and Goebbels really think about jazz? Did they consider it 'degenerate' and 'jungle music'?
When in doubt, use the 16 Words: 'We must Engineer the Destruction of Western Civilization and Tribalism, and Unite All Races Through Nobility.'

Aryan ≠ 'White'.

History is Written by the Victors.

He Who Controls the Past Controls the Future; He Who Controls the Present Controls the Past.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7398
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #34 on: July 21, 2022, 09:50:01 pm »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_music

Quote
Degenerate music (German: Entartete Musik, German pronunciation: [ɛntˈaʁtɛtə muˈziːk]) was a label applied in the 1930s by the government of Nazi Germany to certain forms of music that it considered harmful or decadent. The Nazi government's concerns about degenerate music were a part of its larger and better-known campaign against degenerate art (German: Entartete Kunst). In both cases, the government attempted to isolate, discredit, discourage, or ban the works.
...
Jewish composers such as Felix Mendelssohn and Gustav Mahler were disparaged and condemned by the Nazis.[1] In Leipzig, a bronze statue of Mendelssohn was removed. The regime commissioned music to replace his incidental music to A Midsummer Night's Dream.[2]
...
From the Nazi seizure of power onward, these composers found it increasingly difficult, and often impossible, to get work or have their music performed. Many went into exile (e.g., Arnold Schoenberg, Kurt Weill, Paul Hindemith, Berthold Goldschmidt); or retreated into "internal exile" (e.g., Karl Amadeus Hartmann, Boris Blacher); or ended up in the concentration camps (e.g., Viktor Ullmann, or Erwin Schulhoff).

Let's listen to these composers!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEkcP8lZvZA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8LZ43LA2nY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXhAtBT57zA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4Q-4JcqEa8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkFbrUEhSCc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKQLoIlUnu8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0agKt_ZKBg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0mvuHJIZGg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkKwuCnr4JY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2ZZ4SkzCBw

Most music considered degenerate by National Socialism was WESTERN CLASSICAL MUSIC! But somehow this is overlooked.....
« Last Edit: July 21, 2022, 09:57:39 pm by 90sRetroFan »

christianbethel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Miami, FL, USA
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #35 on: July 22, 2022, 08:31:02 am »
I'll take that as a 'Hitler and Goebbels actually enjoyed jazz music and 'historians' like Lusane and Kater are lying when they say they hated jazz music and wanted it banned.'
When in doubt, use the 16 Words: 'We must Engineer the Destruction of Western Civilization and Tribalism, and Unite All Races Through Nobility.'

Aryan ≠ 'White'.

History is Written by the Victors.

He Who Controls the Past Controls the Future; He Who Controls the Present Controls the Past.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7398
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #36 on: July 22, 2022, 08:09:24 pm »
The only NSDAP members who definitely disliked jazz:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negermusik

Quote
On 4 May 1930, Wilhelm Frick, the Reich's newly appointed Minister of the Interior and Education for Thuringia made a decree called "Against the Negro Culture – For Our German Heritage".[8][9]

Frick again! We have covered him before:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/summer-cleaning/comment-page-1/#comment-176176

Quote
“A supplementary decree issued on 26 November 1935 extended the law to “Gypsies, Negroes, and their bastards.
Also non Aryans could not be considered for the Ahnenpass.
Africans were not considered part of the Aryan race, Africans could not join.the Sturmabteilung”

The decree was established by Wilhelm Frick, a minister under Hitler’s rule, and was quickly sacked from power and influence by Hitler after he established that decree.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Frick

Quote
His power was greatly reduced in June 1936 when Hitler named Himmler the Chief of German Police, which effectively united the police with the SS. On paper, Frick was Himmler's immediate superior. In fact, the police were now independent of Frick's control, since the SS was responsible only to Hitler.[13][14]

Who else? Back to first link:

Quote
Eugen Hadamovsky, who purportedly stated:

    Mit dem heutigen Tag spreche ich ein endgültiges Verbot des Negerjazz für den gesamten Deutschen Rundfunk aus. (As of today, I decree a definitive ban on the negro jazz for the entire German Radio.).[8][12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Hadamovsky

Quote
Goebbels was not entirely pleased with him, as is evident by many references in Goebbels' diaries.

And again, as with general hostility towards "blacks", hostility towards jazz actually predated the National Socialist era, therefore it would be more accurate to consider Frick and Hadamovsky as carrying over these attitudes from the Weimar era:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_jazz

Quote
After the Great War in Germany, Negrophobia coalesced with the preexisting anti-Semitism and flourished, especially since Jews were often depicted as having a racial affinity with blacks, possessing similar objectionable qualities. Jews were prevalent figures in new art forms such as jazz, cabaret, and film. Often, a great number of jazz band leaders were Jews, many from Eastern Europe, including Bela, Weber, Efim Schachmeister, Paul Godwin, and Ben Berlin.[6]
...
the deeply engrained and institutionalized racism of German society was not tolerant of blacks. For instance, many nationalistic student fraternities rejected student members who were of color or married to women of color. Furthermore, in 1932, all the conservative musicians and critics were denigrating jazz as a product of "Negro" culture, which provided the government the fodder to forbid the hiring of black musicians. Thus, for many African-American artists, popularity was a mere facade of a grim reality of being seen as a "racial alien". One critic even went as far as to call jazz a mere "negro noise", having only one purpose: "to introduce obscenities into society."[6]

Paul Schewers, a music critic, brought forth crude images of lewdly dancing black boys and girls in the service of procreation, implying that the lower forces were always surging through blacks, overtaking the rational light of morality and reason the way the white man grasped it. Undoubtedly, sensuality has an affinity with dance, and it was pervasive in jazz and in the lyrics, but this became a means of judging it as void of morality, and even aesthetics, reduced to being inferior to "high German culture".[6]
...
This burgeoning hatred of jazz and its subculture infected the entire Nazi party structure that Adolf Hitler and his followers were trying so desperately to erect.[6]

As for Hitler himself:

Quote
Even though he never publicly spoke out against jazz specifically in the Weimar Republic, one can infer that Hitler's sentiments toward jazz must have had strong ties to his perception of racial hierarchy, with jazz, not surprisingly, being at the very bottom.[6]

No, one cannot infer this! If anything, that Hitler never explicitly criticized jazz despite how politically easy it would have been for him to do so gives us a reason to infer in the opposite direction. There is also no information that I have come across that positively suggests Hitler enjoyed jazz personally. However, it is not necessary to personally be a fan of something in order to not be hostile towards that thing.

Another possibility is that Hitler disliked jazz for different reasons than the rightists did, but avoided talking about it in order to not cause confusion. It is actually possible to criticize jazz from the left, by arguing that it is an improvement over Western classical music but still shares some of its values, such as gratuitous complexity/decorativeness/showboating, and therefore needs further purification. From this perspective, the musical developments of the Counterculture era can be viewed positively as the removal of more Western aesthetical assumptions from composition. (I myself fall into this camp.)

christianbethel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Miami, FL, USA
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #37 on: July 23, 2022, 11:45:31 am »
I have also read that Goebbels made several attempts to create a German version of jazz and swing due to popular demand for music that was more 'swinging'. His results were varied, but Charlie and His Orchestra lasted for the entire duration of the war.
When in doubt, use the 16 Words: 'We must Engineer the Destruction of Western Civilization and Tribalism, and Unite All Races Through Nobility.'

Aryan ≠ 'White'.

History is Written by the Victors.

He Who Controls the Past Controls the Future; He Who Controls the Present Controls the Past.

guest30

  • Guest
Re: Diplomatic decolonization
« Reply #38 on: August 01, 2022, 07:31:21 pm »
Hitler's Diplomatic Decolonization :





Photographed on Tuesday, 2 August 2022, 07 : 20 Jakarta Time

“Let us not lose sight of an alliance with the Arab League. We Germans have gotten into the habit of looking for friends only in Europe — if possible, among people of the same race. Perhaps that’s a mistake. Perhaps it’s much easier to find friends among other races. If the Arabs know that we—that is, a new Germany—can offer them understanding, support, and firm backing in their own struggles for freedom, and that we consider them competent to enter into alliances—welcome them, in fact—such a realization might have significant repercussions on our position in Europe as well. Furthermore, an alliance of interests between Germany and the Arabic-Semitic race might also have far-reaching significance for our relations with the millions of the African, Indian, and yellow peoples" - Adolf Hitler

Source : Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant page 271 (PDF format's page) paragraph 4 and page 272 (PDF format's page) paragraph 1

guest30

  • Guest
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #39 on: August 14, 2022, 11:24:00 pm »
The differences between how Hitler's soldiers and the Western Allied soldiers treated the "colored" people was on how they treat them during the war.

The Hitler's soldiers placed the "colored" people's volunteers on the battles which less brutal. Like how the "Free Arabian Legion"'s soldiers placed on a battle against the Greece partisans on the territory of Greece. The "SS Handschar" Muslim legion wo are placed on a battle against the Communist partisans on the territory of Balkans. The "white" soldiers from Germany and her other "white" volunteers were kept placed in primary and large battle, like on Battle of Moscow, Battle of Kursk, Battle of Normandy, Battle of Italy, and other famous war theatres

The Western powers, like French for example, placed the "colored" troops on the frontline of battle and got segregrated from the "white" French counterparts. And they got task to large battle against the difficult enemy positions. So, the French "white" troops will saved from large cassualties. During their succeed on defeating the German troops and pushed them back. They all got removed from the frontline and changed with the "white" French troops who almost did not do anything to succeed the war. That phenomena was happened during "Liberation of France" during 1944

guest30

  • Guest
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #40 on: August 22, 2022, 07:36:08 pm »
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7MUPcq2rXxIK/

Western European Colonialism is Bad for the World

guest30

  • Guest
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #41 on: August 23, 2022, 05:30:23 am »
Quote
"In 1932, Hitler took the time to sit down with a Georgian-born African-American scholar, Dr. Milton S.J. Wright, 255 who was studying in Heidelberg at the time.256 Ottley reports that Hitler asked what he wanted to do with his degree once he returned to America."

Source: Kuzniar-Clark - Black Nazis II Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler's Armed Forces page 139



Photo source : https://amandamaewrites.wordpress.com/2018/08/27/phd-student-meets-hitler/

antihellenistic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
    • View Profile
Re: Alt-Right internet pipeline
« Reply #42 on: October 27, 2022, 02:18:19 am »
The European rightist always support Hitler to justify their political view. But Hitler did mass killing to the "whites" during World War 2 until his defeat, he wasn't reproduce to made more "whites" and killed himself as a "white" person. Had the European rightist do what Hitler did based on what I write today, we will gain total victory. The rightist always complain about "White Genocide" but support Hitler who did total genocide to the "whites". What an irony, they are hypocrite

Soulbadger

  • Guest
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #43 on: October 28, 2022, 12:53:03 pm »
One thing is for certain, "black" people would benefit more and "whites"\Jews—and rightists in general— would benefit less, if Kanye West just stopped talking altogether:

Kanye's Disturbing History of Praising Hitler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Seg3UQdYxWU



I've heard some "blacks" say things along the lines of: "we black people know not to take Kanye West seriously....". Well, perhaps you should, because every time rightists like Kanye West and Candace Owens open their mouths "whites"\Jews benefit at the detriment of "blacks"!

SirGalahad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
    • View Profile
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
« Reply #44 on: October 28, 2022, 06:29:33 pm »
Kanye is also one of those "'Black' people are the REAL Israelites" types. So this whole debacle being widely advertised is also bad for us since it keeps anti-Zionist debate within the framework of "Non-Jews just secretly wish that they were us"