Our enemy Ann Coulter thinks she can challenge us with questions:
https://vdare.com/articles/ann-coulter-it-s-hate-white-history-month1. Why did slavery end so much sooner in white Christian countries?
2. Are countries run by Muslims, Buddhists or voodoo doctors more or less likely to recognize human rights than Christian nations?
3. Why would your teachers refuse to tell you about slavery among the “Indigenous” peoples?
4. A Smithsonian magazine article about the Trail of Tears is titled, “How Native American Slaveholders Complicate the Trail of Tears Narrative.” What’s the “narrative”?
5. In your other readings, have you found that the sins of whites and Christians are comically exaggerated, while those of nonwhites and non-Christians are buried in a lead casket and dropped in the middle of the sea?
Challenge accepted.
1. Because whereas the rest of the world enslaved without regard to ethnic background, "whites" enslaved "non-whites" but not "whites". Thus, in absence of an ingroup-outgroup double-standard, slaves elsewhere had less motivation to rebel than did slaves in "white"-ruled countries.
2. Less likely, because "human rights" are a Western concept consequential to the uniquely Western belief that non-humans have no souls. In contrast, Mohammed taught that non-humans can be better Muslims than humans, Siddhartha taught that all sentient beings can achieve Buddhahood, and animists at least believe non-humans have souls. However, Jesus also preached against anthropocentrism, therefore there is nothing Christian about "human rights". It is in fact Judaism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnthropocentrismIn the 1985 CBC series "A Planet For the Taking", Dr. David Suzuki explored the Old Testament roots of anthropocentrism and how it shaped human views of non-human animals. Some Christian proponents of anthropocentrism base their belief on the Bible, such as the verse 1:26 in the Book of Genesis:
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
3. I am not refusing to do this (see 1.).
4. The narrative is that the Trail of Tears was wrong. That there existed Native American slave holders among those put on the Trail of Tears does not contradict the narrative, because "white" slave holders were not put on the Trail of Tears.
5. It is impossible to exaggerate the evil of "whites" even if we wanted to:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-sustainable-evil/https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/