Author Topic: Aryan bones  (Read 922 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Aryan bones
« on: August 03, 2020, 11:57:02 pm »
OLD CONTENT

www.livescience.com/49236-bone-density-human-evolution.html

Quote
"We initially suspected that a more gracile, lightly built skeleton might be a characteristic of modern humans in general, compared to Neanderthals or our ancestors," Richmond said.

Instead, the researchers discovered that the arms and legs of recent modern humans are lightly built compared not only with other living primates and with extinct human species, but also with modern humans from before the present Holocene Epoch, which began about 12,000 years ago. Rather than shifting gradually over time, bone density remained high throughout the history of human evolution, until the appearance of recent modern humans, when it decreased dramatically.
...
"Much to our surprise, throughout our deep past, we see that our human ancestors and relatives, who lived in natural settings, had very dense bone. And even early members of our species, going back 20,000 years or so, had bone that was about as dense as seen in other modern species," Richmond said in a statement. "But this density drastically drops off in more recent times, when we started to use agricultural tools to grow food and settle in one place."
...
"There are other things that could account for some of the differences between early agriculturalists and foragers — the amount of cultivated grains in the diet of the agriculturalists — in this case maize — as well as possible deficiencies in dietary calcium [that] may also contribute to lower bone mass," Ryan said in a statement. "However, I think the key appears to be higher physical activity and mobility from a very young age that makes the bones of nonhuman primates and human foragers stronger."



I am unconvinced that farming back then involved less physical activity than hunting; indeed there are signs that the opposite was the case:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-labour/

But what Ryan is not considering is that the type of physical activity involved in farming actually benefits from lighter bones, as the heavier your bones, the more body mass you have to shift around all day (in addition to the stuff you are carrying around) and hence the more energy is invested with no additional return in the amount of food grown (which is limited by farmland/sunlight/water/etc.). This is in contrast to hunting, when a more skeletally robust hunter (while also spending more energy to move) might be able to use heavier bows etc. which would make it easier to take down larger prey, thus more than compensating for the extra energy spent moving.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2020, 11:37:20 pm by 90sRetroFan »

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2020, 11:35:08 pm »
This is important:

https://vdare.com/posts/blonde-vs-brunette

Quote
This 1939 book “You and Heredity” by science cartoonist Amram Scheinfeld, the son of a rabbi, is a good example of how popular eugenics was among Jews before WWII, a fact that has been completely retconned down the memoryhole since the days of Stephen Jay Gould.
...
The most striking revelation is that, contrary to the current impression, Jews largely approved of eugenics until the end of the 1960s. (The most effective opponents tended to be Catholics, such as G.K Chesterton, author of 1922’s Eugenics and Other Evils.) Glad quotes endless Jewish spokesmen from the first seven decades of the 20th century to the effect that Jews had been practicing eugenic marriages for 3,000 years. The medical profession, which was largely secular and progressive, was enthusiastic about eugenics, and there was little evidence that the sizable number of Jewish doctors objected.

Duh!

http://aryanism.net/blog/other/racial-jewishness-archive-from-true-left-forum/

But the most important point is, what traits do Jews want to breed for? The answer:



So, once again, not only is it confirmed that Jews practiced eugenics, but it is confirmed that we do not. Controlled breeding for gracility is not "eugenics", but Aryanization. The fact that Jews have been practicing eugenics for 3000 years is the reason why Jews are so ugly.

(Plus the Jew couldn't even get our face shape correct in the drawing.....)
« Last Edit: October 06, 2020, 03:05:46 am by 90sRetroFan »
Funny Funny x 1 View List

guest27

  • Guest
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2020, 10:15:36 am »
So there is hope one day we'll have hollow bones and be able to fly
The most Aryan mode of locomotion ;)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2020, 12:24:47 am »
"The most Aryan mode of locomotion"

While flying would enable us to avoid stepping on crops, planting the crops in rows and walking between the rows works just as well. Additionally, walking allows us to feel what the soil is like, and react accordingly.

In fact, flying offers the biggest advantage to predators.

« Last Edit: December 19, 2020, 12:27:07 am by 90sRetroFan »

guest27

  • Guest
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2020, 03:37:59 am »
"The most Aryan mode of locomotion"

While flying would enable us to avoid stepping on crops, planting the crops in rows and walking between the rows works just as well. Additionally, walking allows us to feel what the soil is like, and react accordingly.

In fact, flying offers the biggest advantage to predators.

Flying (as soaring/sky-sailing (edit: ok yes the word I was looking for was gliding)) largely relies directly on solar energy (wind) whereas walking demands complex energy conversion. It allows us to bypass needless terrain-obstacles, and best avoid injuring living organisms. There's no reason we can't still touch the ground.

Indeed flying gives predators an advantage, shouldn't we even the odds? Agriculture also gives predatory humans an advantage; you don't see any supervillainous hunter-gatherer nations.


90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2020, 01:52:31 pm »
I have no problem with using flying in war against our enemies. But flying was irrelevant to the Neolithic Revolution. Therefore it is incorrect to refer to it as Aryan in an evolutionary sense (what this subforum is about).

Regarding energy, you are referring to gliding, but that is only possible after considerable horizontal speed has been built up, and then there is the issue of changing direction (as would be frequently necessary for farm labour). These are what flapping wings are for, which require similar energy conversion to walking, but in much greater quantity, as energy must be wasted to lift and support body weight. You would have to flap your wings a lot to do the same amount of farm labour in midair (and even more if you are carrying stuff around all day).
« Last Edit: December 19, 2020, 11:05:12 pm by 90sRetroFan »

guest27

  • Guest
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2021, 03:42:02 pm »
Quote
These are what flapping wings are for, which require similar energy conversion to walking, but in much greater quantity, as energy must be wasted to lift and support body weight. You would have to flap your wings a lot to do the same amount of farm labour in midair (and even more if you are carrying stuff around all day).

True! Thanks for giving this some thought. I suppose we shan't be bees or faeries but a spot of gliding here and there can't hurt. Imagine: Light bones and gracile muscles, you spread your wings to take advantage of a gust of wind, carrying you effortlessly to the middle of your field, where you land gently on the soil to tend a wee plant. I shall call this the Mary Poppins model. It's possible the energy required to maintain extra appendages outweighs the energy saved by occasional gliding, however.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2021, 01:36:48 am »
Our enemies are now recycling our old content:

https://incels.co/threads/hunter-gatherers.284516/

Quote

but using it to promote their preferred traits:

Quote
we don't even need muscles and skin to see he was chad and had hunter eyes

brutal af, agricultural revolution was a mistake

They have a new slur for us too:

Quote
How can farmoid subhumans cope?

Of course they are wrong about who is subhuman. The word "human" comes from "humus" (ie. soil). Therefore by definition it is non-farmoids/non-Aryans who are subhuman.

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2021, 08:39:00 am »
"hunter eyes" have always been an incel favorite, along with high fwhr (face width/height ratios. Until I discovered Aryanism, I assumed these were traits that were viewed as "superior" by all people, when in fact they are only "superior" according to Western standards of beauty that percolate through Western institutions.

Also, lol at "farmoids".
« Last Edit: March 19, 2021, 10:24:23 pm by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2021, 11:27:39 pm »
"I assumed these were traits that were viewed as "superior" by all people"

Did you yourself too view such traits as superior, or did you assume you were alone in not finding such traits superior?

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2021, 11:54:04 pm »
"Did you yourself too view such traits as superior, or did you assume you were alone in not finding such traits superior?"

I was a relativist, so I thought the concept of viewing traits as superior itself was bad because of the negative personality attributes associated with those traits, such as aggression and high sexual promiscuity, and I thought the concept of superiority itself was intertwined with those traits.

I honestly did feel alone and cornered though because I was trying to retain my original nobility by flashing back to my childhood when I definitely did not find such traits superior, so I started questioning why such traits are considered superior by the majority of people, and wanted to challenge their idea of superiority but was intellectually restricted by my relativism. It wasn't until I discovered Aryanism, whereupon I encountered aesthetic anti-traditional absolutism through the "human beauty" page, that I realized such traits are only not superior but are in fact inferior. As a bonus, it was like the page was essentially just verbally articulating what I was feeling but was previously unable to express verbally, so I wouldn't say the website even "persuaded" me.

Does that make sense?

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2021, 04:36:39 am »
I told you so:

« Last Edit: May 14, 2021, 04:53:09 am by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2021, 03:12:22 am »
I learned something new today:

https://medlineplus.gov/ency/imagepages/17182.htm

Quote
Body frame size is determined by a person's wrist circumference in relation to his height. For example, a man whose height is over 5' 5" and wrist is 6" would fall into the small-boned category.

I also found something that again reflects the absurdity of Western obsession with sexual dimorphism:



Why would you have gender-specific sets of sizes (which, to make things worse, use the same names for different measurements!) when you could simply have a single set of non-gender-specific sizes? (They also need to add a size A (Aryan) for <15cm wrists (e.g. mine).)

https://www.youbeauty.com/fitness/ask-a-scientist-being-big-boned/

Quote
(A quick cheat: If you wrap the thumb and middle finger of one hand around the opposite wrist, do they overlap, just touch or not touch at all?)

I had enough space left over to insert at least nine pens. My thumb and middle finger can touch around my ankle FFS. When are we going to stop letting subhumans set the standards?
« Last Edit: May 15, 2021, 03:25:31 am by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7344
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2022, 02:33:27 am »
Like Like x 2 View List

guest55

  • Guest
Re: Aryan bones
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2022, 09:47:38 pm »
Fascinating stuff dude!!! Definitely grabbing this book! Found this one interesting too: