Author Topic: Aryan fingers  (Read 278 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11046
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Aryan fingers
« on: August 04, 2020, 12:10:32 am »
OLD CONTENT

royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2011.2351

Quote
Facial shapes associated with high digit ratios (figure 2, left panels) are characterized by a relatively large forehead, long and slim eyebrows, comparably large eyes with a round shape of the visible iris, and a relatively long distance of the eyes to the alae origins. The deformation grid in the nose area indicates a vertical stretching of the nose as well as a relatively short distance to the mouth. The cheeks are narrower, the jaw outline is less broad and the chin more pointed than predicted for faces corresponding with boys with lower digit ratios (figure 2 right panels). These faces, in contrast, have a relatively smaller and shorter forehead. The eyebrows are thicker and further apart from the smaller eyes. The distance between the eyes is comparably large. The flaring parts of the nostrils are relatively wide and short. The grids point to a prominent lower jaw that is laterally and ventrally extended compared with boys with higher digit ratios.

I predicted almost all of this!

Quote
Taken together, the variation in male digit ratio might thus reflect a preparation for different life-history strategies depending on social status and environmental context (e.g. chronic stress). Specifically, we hypothesize dominant and/or stressed mothers to have children with higher prenatal testosterone exposure. Such children might behave more competitively from childhood onwards.

Uncertainty about the future is one of the main sources of stress. In prehistoric times, living in a fixed location already known to be able to support long-term habitation, especially with permanent infrastructure, food stockpiles and other reassuring features of a subsistence farming village, entails much less uncertainty compared to nomadic life. It all fits.

---

“Uncertainty about the future is one of the main sources of stress. In prehistoric times, living in a fixed location already known to be able to support long-term habitation, especially with permanent infrastructure, food stockpiles and other reassuring features of a subsistence farming village, entails much less uncertainty compared to nomadic life. It all fits.”

Yes. But such children (such as myself) will have trouble adjusting to the stressful world come their teenage years.

---

Guess what? More masculine men have stronger gender-based double-standards!

www.psypost.org/2016/05/study-prenatal-testosterone-exposure-mens-agreeableness-toward-women-42504

Quote
A good indicator of the approximate level of fetal testosterone exposure can be found by comparing the length of the index and ring fingers (known as the 2D:4D ratio). A low 2D:4D ratio (index finger shorter than ring finger) indicates high exposure to testosterone in utero, while a high 2D:4D ratio (ring finger longer than index finger) indicates low exposure.
...
Men were more agreeable in their interactions with women than in their interactions with men. However, the size of this gender gap in agreeable behavior was larger among men with low 2D:4D ratios than among those with high 2D:4D ratios. Both groups of men were equally agreeable in their interactions with men, but those with low 2D:4D ratios were significantly more agreeable in their interactions with women.

Meanwhile, men with high 2D:4D ratios were equally quarrelsome with men and women, but those with low 2D:4D ratios quarreled less with women than they did with men. Women’s interactions did not differ as a function of 2D:4D ratio, or on the basis of the gender of their interaction partners.

“Our results suggest that greater exposure of the fetal male brain to androgens may produce changes that enhance how agreeable adult men are to women, but not to men,” Moskowitz and his colleague wrote.

The authors conclude that men who experienced higher levels of testosterone exposure before birth (as indicated by low 2D:4D ratio) tend to favor women to a greater extent in their adult social interactions than men exposed to lower testosterone levels. They suggest that prenatal testosterone exposure affects fetal brain development in ways that affect motivation to make social connections with women in adulthood.

I have always despised people (men and women) who behave differently in front of different genders.

This is why I have always despised the uniquely Western "Ladies First" manners (men expected to open doors/pull chairs/etc. for women but not the other way round) which is based on this exact mode of patronizing behaviour, and which is not found in any other historical civilization.

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ladies%20first

Quote
ladies first
Gentlemen's favorite sentence.
Men with good manners, will always let the woman go first (example through the door etc.)

but it's not the true meaning.

In reality, it means "Lady, go first so can I stare at your butt!"

---

“Ladies First”
Yes, which is why many MGTOW types condemn it as “gynocentrism”. However, their solution is to replace it with more masculinity, when it is masculinity that causes “gynocentrism” in the first life.

---

"MGTOW types condemn it as “gynocentrism”."

They are idiots. Treating healthy people as if they are disabled is not complimentary, but insulting. Every time a man opens a door for a woman in any situation where he would not do the same for another man, he is intentionally reminding her that women are on average physically weaker than men. This is the point behind Western manners: to issue regular veiled threats to women's safety ("We can physically overpower you any time we want, so you'd better not act up!") so as to keep them subdued. This is androcentrism (or what I prefer to call patriarchy), not gynocentrism. We see the same thing going on with women's wristwatches being thinner than men's wristwatches (instead of non-gendered wristwatches catering to each individual wearer's size), the same with rings, and so on.





Everything in Western civilization is designed to pound into women's minds every single day that they are physically weaker than men on average. This is why I laugh when anyone tries to claim that Western civilization is less patriarchical than other civilizations.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter