Author Topic: Non-Aryan maturity  (Read 1246 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8752
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2022, 05:27:15 pm »
I agree academically with our enemy Taylor:

https://www.amren.com/news/2022/10/anthony-trollopes-white-genius/

Quote
It occurred to me, as I read the last few pages of Barchester Towers, that a taste for Anthony Trollope is something else that sends an almost unerring racial signal. You could add “reads Trollope” to the profile of people you would like to meet through a dating service, and you wouldn’t have to specify race. If Detroit still has public libraries, I bet the Trollope volumes never leave the shelves.
...
people who are forced to read him before they are old enough to understand him hate him just as they hate Shakespeare or Dickens, but for those who discover him when they are ready, he is pure joy.

In other words, only the sufficiently adulterated can like Trollope.

Quote
Some people like this kind of writing and some don’t. Some people like opera and some don’t. But I think it is hard to like Anthony Trollope and not be white.

This is hardly unique to Trollope, of course. All the great authors of Western literature — and some critics do not even rank Trollope among the really great — have the same subtle understanding of human nature and make the same demands on readers. They appeal to a sensibility that is not only thoroughly adult, but adult in a way that is thoroughly European.

In other words, Taylor's claim is that low neoteny is a defining characteristic of "whiteness". I agree with this claim. I have explained before that the way in which True Left wokeness despise "whiteness" should be emotionally similar to the way in which Original Nobility despises adulthood. This is in contrast to the False Left approach of attempting to portray "non-whites" as more mature than "whites".

The enemy article also includes a picture of Trollope:



See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/msg6238/?topicseen#msg6238

Quote
I believe that Western civilization considers itself superior to non-Western civilizations in the same sense that adults consider themselves superior to children. And just as children have been mostly conditioned to agree that adults really are superior by accepting the adult standards of superiority, non-Western civilizations have similarly been mostly conditioned to agree that Western civilization is superior by accepting Western standards of superiority. Only we can see that the truth is the complete opposite.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2022, 06:25:11 pm by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8752
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2023, 08:57:42 pm »
Another prodigy:

https://www.lindaikejisblog.com/2023/2/9-year-old-nigerian-boy-david-balogun-becomes-one-of-the-youngest-ever-high-school-graduates.html

Quote
He said he especially enjoys math and science, especially nuclear chemistry, and he hopes to one day go into astronomy, engineering or software development.

When he's not studying, David said he also enjoys building robots

Face:


blu alder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2023, 01:18:43 pm »
I recently found this GIF of skulls. However, I could only find the GIF showing the differences in the two races shown. Though I have seen gracile face shapes in people of all races, it is rare, and I would say even rarer in East Asians. I've always wondered why I couldn't see many East Asians as other people do in terms of how neotenous they are, and this GIF helped me see why. It seems like a lot of people do not consider gracility and neoteny in the same boat, as many faces considered, "neotenous" are quite round and wide looking...Unless I am seeing wrong.

GIF:

https://imgur.com/BMrYSWZ

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8752
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2023, 06:14:04 pm »
The GIF you posted is Eurocentrist propaganda. It is easy to find counterexamples:

https://img1.doubanio.com/view/photo/l/public/p2335599129.webp

https://up.gc-img.net/post_img_web/2021/12/d73b143732c14c2042f5c785bc41652d_22282.jpeg

(See also: https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/media-decolonization/msg8720/#msg8720 )

Gracility and neoteny are not the same thing, as there exist people who are already robust as children (e.g. https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg17900/#msg17900 ). When we associate gracility with neoteny, we are talking about those who were not robust as children who also manage to avoid gaining robustness during puberty being more neotenous than (and hence superior to) those who were not robust as children but who gain robustness during puberty.

The general rule is: the lighter the effects of puberty on a person, the more neotenous the person is.

This is most clearly seen in body hair (which increases most during puberty):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_hair#Across_populations

Quote
Stewart W. Hindley and Albert Damon of the Department of Anthropology at Stanford University studied, in 1973, the frequency of hair on the middle finger joint (mid-phalangeal hair) of Solomon Islanders, as a part of a series of anthropometric studies of these populations. They summarize other studies on prevalence of this trait as reporting, in general, that Caucasoids are more likely to have hair on the middle finger joint than Negroids and Mongoloids, and collect the following frequencies from previously published literature: Andamanese 0%, Eskimo 1%, African American 16% or 28%, Ethiopians 25.6%, Mexicans of the Yucatan 20.9%, Penobscot and Shinnecock 22.7%, Gurkha 33.6%, Japanese 44.6%, various Hindus 40–50%, Egyptians 52.3%, Near Eastern peoples 62–71%, various Europeans 60–80%. However, they never completed an Androgenic hair map.[18]

According to anthropologist and professor Ashley Montagu in 1989, Asian people and black people such as the San people are less hairy than white people. Montagu said that the hairless feature is a neotenous trait.[19]

« Last Edit: April 06, 2023, 07:17:44 pm by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
« Reply #19 on: April 13, 2023, 07:53:06 pm »
Who is Jack Teixeira, the man arrested over Pentagon files leak?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/13/who-is-jack-teixeira-the-man-arrested-over-pentagon-files-leak
Quote
In photographs, Jack Teixeira, the 21-year-old air national guardsman who has been identified as the prime suspect in the leak of classified intelligence documents, is slim in his dark blue air force uniform. He is youthful looking, barely older than the teenage friends seen in the online group in which the classified documents were leaked.

On Thursday evening, the FBI arrested Teixeira and were searching his home. Video footage from a local TV station showed him being led away in handcuffs.

Teixeira was identified by the New York Times as the leading figure in an online gaming chat group, Thug Shaker Central, on the social network Discord. The details that have emerged about Teixeira have put him in the frame as a person of interest in the leak investigation.

Deployed in the 102nd intelligence wing of the Massachusetts air national guard, Teixeira was also a key member of a group of about 30 people who shared an interest in guns, video games and racist memes.

Face:

Youthful looking (neoteny) =/= Aryan looking (gracility).
« Last Edit: April 13, 2023, 08:47:30 pm by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8752
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
« Reply #20 on: April 13, 2023, 08:24:29 pm »
"Youthful looking (neoteny) =/= Aryan looking (gracility)."

I think there is some confusion here. Recall:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg18568/#msg18568

Quote
Gracility and neoteny are not the same thing, as there exist people who are already robust as children (e.g. https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg17900/#msg17900 ). When we associate gracility with neoteny, we are talking about those who were not robust as children who also manage to avoid gaining robustness during puberty being more neotenous than (and hence superior to) those who were not robust as children but who gain robustness during puberty.

All gracile adults used to be gracile children. In other words, all gracile adults are neotenous.

On the other hand, some robust adults used to be gracile children, while other robust adults used to be robust children (albeit less robust than the adults they eventually became). Neither are neotenous.

Teixeira reminds me of Shapiro who was previously discussed here:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg461/#msg461

Note Teixeira's deep eye sockets. That is not neotenous.

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
« Reply #21 on: April 13, 2023, 08:45:22 pm »
"I think there is some confusion here."
I was referencing the comment from the article: "He is youthful looking, barely older than the teenage friends". Would you agree that Texiera looks young, in this picture for example (note the lack of facial hair):


"Neither are neotenous"
So a robust child who remains robust as an adult is not neotenous? I thought neoteny merely meant retaining the appearance one had as a child, but I suppose it actually means retaining a youthful (childlike) appearance, in which case those who were robust as children are automatically disqualified as they were already adulterated?

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8752
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Aryan maturity
« Reply #22 on: April 13, 2023, 09:28:34 pm »
"Would you agree that Texiera looks young, in this picture for example (note the lack of facial hair):"

This is the reduced/paedomorphic type that we keep talking about.

"So a robust child who remains robust as an adult is not neotenous?"

They are not, because maturation only ever increases robustness.

"those who were robust as children are automatically disqualified as they were already adulterated?"

Yes!