Author Topic: Facial Aryanism (Read 2728 times)

rp · « **Reply #90 on:** February 23, 2023, 02:50:31 am »

Yes!
Also, finally:

Quote from: 90sRetroFan on January 24, 2023, 02:49:06 am

Recall:

Kaur has a longer nose than Rao, therefore her chin also being longer merely maintains balance between the floors. If you want to reduce her chin, you would have to proportionately reduce her nose as well or else lose balance. But you yourself already said:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg17616/#msg17616

Quote
I notice that the skull is longer/more oval than Rao

so if you want to reduce Kaur's chin while maintaining balance, you would be making her face less oval(!). So are you claiming oval should not be our ideal face shape in the first place?

I also look forward to your response to the exercise I set up:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg17635/#msg17635

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg17638/#msg17638

Also, how do you rank Kwan and Chow compared to Rao?

Finally, with the recent additions, we are about ready to start booting! From now on, every new face introduced should be accompanied by a request to boot an existing one. If approved, I will delete the corresponding face. Eventually I foresee having to expand the total number allowed in the club as the quality rises, but we can do some booting first. Let the fun begin!

Chow has a similar fwhr to Rao, but Chow's gracility and gonial angle simply blows Rao's phenotype out of the water. Kwan has a slightly better gonial angle than Rao despite having a similarly robust jaw, but more importantly her fwhr is better than Rao's. So Kwan and Chow both beat Rao! I probably suffered from Eurocentric bias and considered Rao superior without even considering other ethnicities because she is more "Caucusoid" looking, but not anymore.

BTW, I notice many "non-Whites" also suffer from this bias wrt other "non-White" ethnicities when they say things like "all x look the same". These people are not even Gentiles from what I have observed, but have been conditioned by centuries of colonial propaganda. This could be because, as you have stated before, Aryan blood immunizes from ethnotribalism but not necessarily ethnocentrism.

Zhang Caizhi · « **Reply #91 on:** February 23, 2023, 03:53:33 am »

May you find a Thai person with an Aryan face?

rp · « **Reply #92 on:** February 26, 2023, 11:25:11 pm »

Returning to this post:

Quote from: 90sRetroFan on January 23, 2023, 02:10:09 pm

"Kaur does have a youthful looking face, her jaw is somewhat wide/robust."

WTF?! Even rp doesn't think so anymore:

Quote
I agree with you wrt the jawline

yet you now think so?

Post what you think a narrow/gracile jaw looks like.

I also think there is too much vocabulary being used interchangeably, which might account for part of the confusion. Recall:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/re-afghanistan-1612/msg16716/#msg16716

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/re-afghanistan-1612/msg16723/#msg16723

I'm not sure what rp means by "sharp" either. Is this a separate parameter or merely another word for parameters we already have other words for?

In order to clear things up, compare the music video I (re)posted here:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg17635/#msg17635

with the following music video which is another example of hero-heroine facial matching:

1) How would you describe the aesthetical differences between the faces of the two heroines (both of which easily meet our qualifying standards, for the record)?

2) Which heroine would you say matches Tam better?

To clarify, I now think that Kaur's chin appears "sharp" (i.e. more prominent) because of her gonial angle. I think a greater gonial angle would reduce the prominence of the chin.

HikariDude · « **Reply #93 on:** April 01, 2023, 07:34:00 pm »

Don't you have to boot someone? Who would you want to boot?

rp · « **Reply #94 on:** April 01, 2023, 07:48:59 pm »

Oh right, I forgot!
I propose booting:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg17448/#msg17448

rp · « **Reply #95 on:** April 17, 2023, 01:38:38 am »

Quote from: 90sRetroFan on February 23, 2023, 12:09:48 am

"would you say overbite = neotenous appearance?"

I never thought about it like that. Is it common for children who have overbite to automatically lose it as they grow up?

"reduce its visibility"

Visibility is a poor way to judge gracility, as faces with less fat will have more visible bone structure than faces with more fat. A better way to judge gracility is bone volume. If we could directly measure circumferences etc. this would be easy, but relying on photos and videos alone requires comparisons with other people in the same shot, which is what the exercise is for. I will wait for your response to the second part.

After thinking about this for a while, I have realized that overbite in some cases may actually be non-neotenous. Incels frequently talk about "good forward growth", or growth of the maxiallary/upper jaw bone. This results in a more protruding profile, which, when coupled with a heavy nosebridge/browridge, results in an adulterated "3D" appearance (see the "3D face" that Chinese Eurocentrists were talking about). I have noticed this with myself; I have an Aryan looking face when viewed from the front, but when viewed from the side, the rather heavy nose bridge/brow-ridge and protruding maxilla are anything but Aryan.

On a side note, I want to mention the remarkably mix-and-match nature of Aryan traits in my brother and myself. I am ectomorphic, gracile, leptoropsopic, don't have facial fat but have heavy features and am not so dolicocephalic, while my brother is endomorphic, is not as leptoprosopic, and has facial fat, but is extremely dolichocephalic and has lighter features.

Additionally, another non-Aryan facial trait you mentioned was deep-set eyes. I have noticed the difference between me and my brother in this regard as well, where his noticeable lack of deep eye sockets gives him a strikingly Aryan eye area, with many even remarking on the "radiant" nature of his face due to that. Although, I myself don't have very deep eye sockets, they are deeper compared to my brother's as his eyes bulge out more.

It seems Aryan traits were distributed evenly among us. How tf is this even possible?

90sRetroFan · « **Reply #96 on:** April 17, 2023, 02:49:44 am »

"It seems Aryan traits were distributed evenly among us. How tf is this even possible?"

Surely what you describe is what we would expect from random reproduction? If (contrary to what you describe) mixed blood had the ability to self-sort into pure Aryans and pure non-Aryans in the following generation, Aryanization breeding programs would be unnecessary!

guest98 · « **Reply #97 on:** April 26, 2023, 05:03:18 pm »

nbc news anchor Lester Holt:

https://www.tvinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/15-27-5078.jpg

I don't know who to remove.

edit: I'm not sure how to put the picture directly in my post, sorry.

antihellenistic · « **Reply #98 on:** April 26, 2023, 07:15:45 pm »

@m94r

He is pretty Aryan on facial shape

See my personal message to you to know how to put the picture into a post

guest98 · « **Reply #99 on:** April 27, 2023, 02:04:59 pm »

Ok, i suggest removing https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg16928/#msg16928:

90sRetroFan · « **Reply #100 on:** April 27, 2023, 04:48:25 pm »

Firstly, just posting the link to the post will do. There is no need to repost the picture.

As for the faces, I would say that when both were young, Davidson looked far better:

In particular, Holt has a wider chin:

whereas Davidson's only chin flaw is the slight cleft.

On the other hand, Davidson aged terribly:

whereas Holt aged relatively well. So it depends on whether you want to compare them at their best or compare their longer trajectory over time. (Looking at the last picture, note Davidson's relatively small facial hair area. The genetic potential was definitely there......)

Does anyone else have an opinion on this?

guest98 · « **Reply #101 on:** April 28, 2023, 02:17:09 pm »

"(Looking at the last picture, note Davidson's relatively small facial hair area. The genetic potential was definitely there......)"

The genetic potential to became aryanized/perfected? @90srf

90sRetroFan · « **Reply #102 on:** April 28, 2023, 03:05:36 pm »

In that particular trait, at least.

guest98 · « **Reply #103 on:** April 28, 2023, 03:21:05 pm »

So if someone has a large facial hair area its not possible for them to aryanize the lower half of their face? Or they can aryanize only to a certain extent, whereas someone with no facial hair could aryanize the lower half of their face to full perfection?

90sRetroFan · « **Reply #104 on:** April 28, 2023, 04:38:27 pm »

I think they are separate phenomena. It should be technically possible to breed gracile skull + large facial hair area, or robust skull + small facial hair area. But our racial ideal just happens to be gracile skull + small facial hair area, since this is the combination of maximal neoteny.

We should try to co-opt the term "neckbeard" and use it to refer to the inferior low-neoteny bloodlines that produce large facial hair areas.

True Left

News:

Author Topic: Facial Aryanism (Read 2728 times)

rp

Re: Facial Aryanism

Zhang Caizhi

Re: Facial Aryanism

rp

Re: Facial Aryanism

HikariDude

Re: Facial Aryanism

rp

Re: Facial Aryanism

rp

Re: Facial Aryanism

90sRetroFan

Re: Facial Aryanism

guest98

Re: Facial Aryanism

antihellenistic

Re: Facial Aryanism

guest98

Re: Facial Aryanism

90sRetroFan

Re: Facial Aryanism

guest98

Re: Facial Aryanism

90sRetroFan

Re: Facial Aryanism

guest98

Re: Facial Aryanism

90sRetroFan

Re: Facial Aryanism