Author Topic: Facial Turanism  (Read 2374 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Facial Turanism
« on: January 30, 2021, 12:38:31 am »
This page was linked from the old blog many years ago; I finally found it again, and it deserves reposting as it is helpful to know what our enemies see when they look at themselves (and at us!):

http://www.satanicreds.org/satanicreds/diab-sov.html

Quote
http://www.satanicreds.org/satanicreds/faces-xtoid.jpg

http://www.satanicreds.org/satanicreds/faces-tur.jpg

PLEASE refer to the PAGE OF FACES and notice Stalin, Yezhov and Dzerzhinsky and others of note who are obviously Slav-Turanians of some kind. Here is where one can even hear Satanists say "they look EVIL." Compare it to the other page of the goodie goodie Jesus-like faces, the "good" person image. You'll have to have a LOOK at it to appreciate it. We used to have random faces up there, but then it was decided to put more well-known faces up there to demonstrate a point.
...
Even Phil said: Lenin and Dzerzhinsky look like demons, they have the demon look. Yezhov also, and I definitely look like Yezhov as B's crazy "morph of our faces" proves - the points to make the morph lined up except I was smiling, Yezhov was not. Phil thinks that Lysenko looks like he has a bit of the demon look and looks like a gangster, definitely a gangster, he'll break your knees for a fee. Casey insists that Lysenko has demon eyes but that Yezhov and Dzerzhinsky definitely qualify for demonhood. This definitely feeds into people's impressions, unconsciously. I KNOW that this definitely feeds into the utter skepticism I encounter when I try to talk of the good deeds these people did or how nice they were. When Stalin was young, he was VERY good looking in a very macho way - TOUGH looking. However, Phil sees that when the whole of us with these looks SMILE, we have the ultimate "happy faces." Not the round yellow-circle happy face, but that the whole cheekbone area, the eyebrows and eyes all slant upward, the cheeks bulge forward and the lips make a bow-shaped smile like the corners of the lips go up in the smile: HAPPY FACE. Our faces tend to be triangular from the eyes down to the point of the chin due to this bone structure. He doesn't know if most Europeans see this as happy face, they might instead be seeing a "diabolical" grin.

I, of course, think we are the ultimately pretty people! The prettiest!
...
What does a demon look like? Everyone seems to KNOW what everyone else means by this, but does anyone wonder about it? Well, we who HAVE these looks are KEENLY aware of it
...
Keep in mind, I'm the one that came up with a mockery of the "angelic looking ones" with their long dour faces, thin lips, startled looking round eyes and no cheekbones. The austere, ascetic looking Jesus-faces. UGLY, sterile or ascetic looking, wimpy looking though they can look like what I stereotype as sadists, stern, pent-up, malicious and loveless. HA!

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Dazhbog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2021, 08:30:20 pm »
The 'mask of Hermes'-face, as that 'Turanian Look'-graphic puts it, might just as well be called the 'Red Army monument'-face:

Spoiler (hover to show)

Lenin statues are notoriously demonic looking as well:

Spoiler (hover to show)

Want more nightmare fuel? I also came across an extremely ugly monument from Poland the other day:

Spoiler (hover to show)
« Last Edit: February 01, 2021, 08:36:15 pm by Dazhbog »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Western civilization = sustainable evil
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2021, 12:57:56 am »
Kasparian's Turanian phenotype fits her personality perfectly as someone of Armenian ancestry. Yet, on HBD forums, you will see people describe Armenian phenotypes such as hers as "Aryan" (along with Scythians, etc.).

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2021, 01:26:52 am »
Again, please post pictures when discussing face shapes. Again, I will do it for you this time:



I wouldn't say she is archetypically Turanian, which requires a pentagon shape (see above), whereas she inclines towards oblong.



rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2021, 01:33:01 am »
Her heavy features are definitely Turanian though, are they not?

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2021, 02:55:38 am »
Ancestrally this may be the case, but I don't want newcomers to get the impression that this is what we are primarily thinking of when we use the term in an archetypical sense. It is not necessary to force everyone to belong to one category or another. Most people are spiritually raceless*; similarly, we should also expect plenty of physiques to be racially undefinable.

(* This is certainly true of Kasparian, who merely adheres to whatever is considered the fashionable progressive position at the current time.)

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2021, 03:11:20 am »
Ok. But in the other thread (Turkey), I was trying to use her as an example to highlight the Turanian ancestry of Armenians, because I have seen HBDers refer to Armenian and Kurdish features (similar to hers) as "Aryan".

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2021, 04:27:43 am »
Wouldn't a clearer approach be to find ethnically Armenian examples of both actual Turanian and actual Aryan faces, and put them side by side for contrast?

Going by the definitions in the first post of this topic, a Turanian-looking Armenian (what we call Sethite type) would be like:



whereas an Aryan-looking Armenian (what we call Samarra type) would be like:



(Kasparian looks nothing like either!)
« Last Edit: April 29, 2021, 05:25:49 am by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #8 on: May 12, 2021, 10:39:07 pm »
Turanian phenotypes make good villains in movies. This clip from the movie "baby driver" popped up in my YouTube feed:


Eiza Gonsalez plays the female bank robber. Here is what she looks like:


Note the pentagonal proportions, and the devious, hyperfeminine "cat-like" look, which perfectly fits the personality archetype of her character (i.e. a "sexy" female criminal).

By no coincidence, her real life personality also archetypally fits her phenotype as well:
Eiza Gonzalez apologises for wearing blackface on telenovela: ‘I was pressured against my will’
https://metro.co.uk/2020/06/25/eiza-gonzalez-apologises-wearing-blackface-telenovela-was-pressured-will-12899926/?ito=cbshare

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2021, 12:20:35 am »
"Turanian phenotypes make good villains in movies."

For sure!





"hyperfeminine "cat-like" look"


rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2021, 12:30:33 am »
It is unfortunate that they had to make the Catwoman some sort of weird "antihero"* love interest of Batman in "The Dark Knight Rises". Probably why the movie ended up sucking, among many other reasons.

*WTF is an "antihero" anyway? IMO it is an attempt by Gentiles to reinvent Gentile attributes such as aggression, sociopathy, etc., and present them as "heroic". Wolf of Wall Street is a good example of this (based on the real life character of Jordan Belfort (Jew)), where the main protagonist is a villain, but they have to present him as a "hero" to give some "meaning" to the "plot".

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2021, 01:06:04 am »
"*WTF is an "antihero" anyway?"

As I understand the term, an antihero is a character who is perceived as a villain by most other characters inside the story, but who is supposed to be perceived as a hero by the audience, thereby reflecting the degeneracy of the in-story society that it is incapable of recognizing a hero.

"IMO it is an attempt by Gentiles to reinvent Gentile attributes such as aggression, sociopathy, etc., and present them as "heroic"."

But we can also use antiheroes to exhibit our worldview. For example, a character who goes around killing meat-eaters would surely be seen as a villain by the meat-eating society inside the story, but of course would be a hero in our eyes. The point of the antihero is to emphasize that morality and social approval do not always go together. This is true irrespective of the system of morality being advocated.

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #12 on: May 13, 2021, 01:13:57 am »
Ah. I see. But in the present day antiheroes are predominantly non-Aryan. This is because the society they are rebelling against is usually counterculture era things like political correctness, sensitivity, and Christian moralism (particularly disliked by Turanian WNs such as Richard Spencer (Gentile)). Nietzsche fans (incl. Spencer) especially glorify this version of the antihero archetype.

"The point of the antihero is to emphasize that morality and social approval do not always go together. This is true irrespective of the system of morality being advocated"

Agree with this part. Siddhartha, for example, could also be considered an antihero then, rebelling against the societal norms of his time.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2021, 01:22:41 am by rp »

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #13 on: May 13, 2021, 09:13:19 pm »
Speaking of 'Batman', the billionaire hero of the super rich corporate types of Gotham, wouldn't the "Joker" character be accurately perceived as the anti-hero in that story line? If so, it is fascinating so many non-billionaires identify more with the 'Batman' character in real life, isn't it? Batman is more akin to the Sheriff of Nottingham, whilst the "Joker" would be Robin Hood in the Robin Hood story. People accurately align with the "noble thief" in the Robin Hood story rather than the hero of the monarchy, Sheriff Nottingham. I wonder how much of Judeo-Western Freemasonic anti-Monarchist sentiment has played a role in twisting the anti-hero archetype in this way?

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Facial Turanism
« Reply #14 on: May 13, 2021, 11:50:11 pm »
"Siddhartha, for example, could also be considered an antihero then"

The term "antihero" was intended for application to drama rather than history (where the term "iconoclast" is used instead), since historians exist in the same universe as the historical characters whereas the audience exists outside of the drama universe. I agree that a drama portrayal of Siddhartha as an antihero would be appropriate.

"wouldn't the "Joker" character be accurately perceived as the anti-hero in that story line?"

In order for this to be the case, the audience would have to see in the Joker's actions redeeming qualities that are however invisible to most characters inside the story. How do you propose the Joker's actions look different to those inside the story than to those looking in from outside?

"people accurately align with the "noble thief" in the Robin Hood story rather than the hero of the monarchy, Sheriff Nottingham."

But Robin Hood is also widely viewed as a hero by people inside the story, so he does not fit the definition of an antihero.

(I do not like the Robin Hood story in the first place since it is premised on pro-Richard I attitudes.)