True Left

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909

The data for sexual behavior more clearly supported our hypothesis that bullying behavior predicts an increase in sexual opportunities even when accounting for age, sex, and self-reports of attractiveness, likeability, and peer victimization. These results are generally congruent with the hypothesis that bullying perpetration is, at least in part, an evolutionary adaptive behavior.

Remember, Yahweh deliberately designed it this way.

A behavioral genetics study calculated that 61% of the variability in bullying perpetration was due to genetic rather than environmental factors
...
We have predicted that bullying is associated with at least three benefits, reputation, resources, and reproduction, all of which are likely to be associated with passing on one’s genes to future generations
...
To begin with, bullies are perceived as being more popular than adolescents who do not bully others
...
Bullies can also gain access to greater economic (e.g., Flanagan, 2007) or physical resources
...
Finally, as we have suggested, bullies may also benefit from having more mating success (Volk et al., 2012, 2014). Given that the selective regime used by evolution is whether a gene increases or decreases in frequency, reproduction is a key evolutionary variable
...
this same study found a positive link between social status seeking and sexual (but not dating) behavior (Kelly et al., 2012). As previously mentioned, status and sex are two goals that are also believed to be outcomes associated with bullying behavior (Volk et al., 2014). This suggests that perhaps there may be common goals that link some adolescents’ desire to bully others (i.e., gain status) and their desire to have sex.

State control over reproduction prohibiting reproduction by both bullies and (more importantly) those attracted to bullies could solve the entire problem in a few generations.

From an evolutionary perspective, there are many potential reasons why bullies should enjoy increased reproductive benefits. Bullies generally elevated social and physical attributes may offer a signal of good genes

This is what a eugenicist (which we are not) sounds like. If evolutionarily adaptive = "good", we do not want such "good". We want noble genes.

In addition, the confluence of increased bullying (Volk et al., 2006) and dating (Zimmer-Gembeck, 2002) during adolescence may help explain why antibullying interventions often fail to work

Duh!

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/superiority-cannot-be-taught/

Continuing:

In one of only a few studies to directly measure bullying and dating, Connolly, Pepler, Craig, and Taradash (2000) found that bullying (in both sexes) was associated with an earlier entrance into puberty and dating at a younger age, more activity with members of the opposite sex, greater dating opportunities, and being more likely to be in a dating relationship.

Which fits our racial model of Aryans entering puberty late (as well having higher standards for dating).

Reports of sexual behavior may still be indirect as they do not directly measure number of viable offspring, but they are likely to be more strongly correlated with ultimate reproductive success than dating variables

I would not be surprised if, even controlling for the quantity of sexual activity, bullies (ie. non-Aryans) reproduce more, in other words are more biologically fertile. This would also fit our racial model.

There were several significant univariate relations between bullying and dating, suggesting that bullying is related to an increased interest in dating (Study 1), an increased likelihood of having dated, and a greater number of dating partners.

See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/non-aryan-infidelity/

It all fits together.

Our data suggest that bullying is associated with a 1.5–2x greater likelihood of having had sexual intercourse (see Table 3). Bullying was also a small but statistically significant predictor of the number of sexual partners in both linear regressions (see Table 4). These findings, in two separate samples, offer converging support for our prediction that bullying would be related to sexual opportunities, independent of age, sex, self-reported attractiveness, victimization, and likeability. They suggest that the act of bullying itself, or some intrinsic character of bullies beyond those mentioned above, predispose and/or facilitate bullies’ access to sexual opportunities.

While this is true, I would add (something that the authors have apparently neglected) that I expect bullies to be less likely than non-bullies to turn down available sexual opportunities. By exclusively discussing access to sexual opportunities, the authors seem to assume that everyone will take every sexual opportunity available! This tells us something about the racial inferiority of the authors themselves.....

Finally, remember that colonialism is just a scaled-up version of bullying. You figure out the rest:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/reproductive-decolonization/