Author Topic: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences  (Read 4867 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2020, 12:00:24 am »
https://www.psypost.org/2020/12/women-overestimate-mens-attraction-to-thin-female-fashion-models-study-finds-58831

Quote
The researchers found that while men and women gave similar ratings to the models, neither gender was accurate at guessing how the other would evaluate the models. Both men and women felt that the other sex would be less likely to rate the models as too thin and more likely to find the models attractive than they actually were. The researchers call this a “parallel misconception”, explaining that men overestimated the extent that women would idealize the models’ bodies, and women similarly overestimated the extent that men would admire the models’ bodies.

In other words, both men and women overestimate our influence in society.

(For the record, most fashion models are facially ugly despite having thin bodies. Here is the picture that goes with the article:



Note the robust jaw of the model nearest the camera.)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #16 on: January 04, 2021, 03:41:56 am »
Tanya Roberts just died:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanya_Roberts

Quote
Roberts was born in 1955 in the Bronx, New York City, the second child of a father of Irish descent and a Jewish mother.[2]

But wait!

Quote
Roberts was married to Barry Roberts from 1974 until his death in 2006. They had no children.[11]

Heritage matters when it is passed down, not when it is terminated. Therefore Roberts is not a Jew.

(If everyone with Jewish parents followed Roberts' example, the Jewish problem would be solved in one generational cycle.)
« Last Edit: January 04, 2021, 03:48:50 am by 90sRetroFan »

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #17 on: January 16, 2021, 08:57:24 pm »
Trump Goon: He's The MOST Masculine President EVER


Surprised again!!! Never thought I'd agree with a Trump goon on anything.

Does anyone anticipate Musk putting a massive bust of himself in the entrance of his Mars colony with a plaque on it that reads, "Welcome to Mars, and don't forget, I'm yo daddy!!!"? Musk is literally a mini-Martian-Yahweh!  ;D

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2021, 11:06:15 pm »
https://www.livescience.com/21172-men-sexist-attitudes-muscles.html

Quote
Men obsessed with building muscles are significantly more likely to objectify women, be hostile toward women, and have sexist attitudes, new research finds.

As we expected.

Quote
"We have previously found that men who hold stronger oppressive beliefs are more likely to think that thinner women are attractive," study researcher Viren Swarmi, of the University of Westminster in the United Kingdom, told LiveScience in an email.

This fails to distinguish between those (True Leftists) who also prefer men to be thin and those (rightists) who prefer men to not be thin. The problem is not (as False Leftists think) preferring women to be thin, but having gender-based double-standards.

Quote
"but we're also arguing that those oppressive beliefs directed at women also have an impact on men's own body images, specifically their drive for muscularity," Swarmi said.

In other words, this does not apply to us. We want both men and women to be thin, thus reducing sexual dimorphism, whereas rightists want muscular men and thin women, thus increasing sexual dimorphism.

Quote
Those men who showed more interest in being muscular were also more likely than others to score higher on sexist beliefs, hostility toward and objectification of women.

"We think men who hold oppressive beliefs about women and gender equality are also more likely to endorse traditional stereotypes of masculinity, which includes the muscular physique," Swarmi said.

"In addition, in societies where patriarchal structures are being challenged, some men may seek to reassert their masculinity by enhancing their physiques." For example, they might react to having a female boss by beefing up at the gym.

Again, not us. Our enemies, on the other hand, are perfect examples:

https://incels.co/threads/if-allah-appeared-before-you-and-told-you-he-would-change-your-looks-as-you-wished-what-would-you-do.274425/

Quote
This is how i imagine myself in my dreams.

https://incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimg-comment-fun.9cache.com%2Fmedia%2Fa6N2rnN%2Fa5jPb5LB_700w_0.jpg&hash=a1ffe7d8a8e32f326e8f22ac5f596640

https://incels.co/threads/how-do-you-rate-foids.269687/

Quote
There are 100/10 giga stacies that I don't even get a crush on because they're light years out of my league like top models and top actresses. Barbara Palvin for example:

https://incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hawtcelebs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2Fbarbara-palvin-for-aimer-spring-summer-2019-14.jpg&hash=8c74584fc4ebcea668d4a41ad2015ba2

And no, it's not just the low camera angle; her face really is that short:



A short face and a thin body is actually a horrible combination.
« Last Edit: February 17, 2021, 11:34:42 pm by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #19 on: February 24, 2021, 12:38:05 am »
No wonder I have always found makeup disgusting:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p6331

Quote
female faces were shown to have greater luminance contrast between the eyes, lips, and the surrounding skin than did male faces. This sex difference in facial contrast was found to influence the perception of facial gender. An androgynous face can be made to appear female by increasing the facial contrast, or to appear male by decreasing the facial contrast. Application of cosmetics was found to consistently increase facial contrast. Female faces wearing cosmetics had greater facial contrast than the same faces not wearing cosmetics. Female facial beauty is known to be closely linked to sex differences, with femininity considered attractive. These results suggest that cosmetics may function in part by exaggerating a sexually dimorphic attribute—facial contrast—to make the face appear more feminine and hence attractive.

No. Femininity in female faces is considered attractive only by inferior* people. Superior people have the exact opposite tastes (by which I mean we prefer low sexual dimorphism, not that we prefer masculinity (Westerners perpetually struggle with this conceptual distinction)). The superior may be the minority, but it is sloppy academic writing to make it sound like the superior minority does not exist.

(* The subhumans who like makeup on females almost always dislike makeup on males, a double-standard. This gender-based double-standard is what makes them inferior. While I would disagree with someone who likes makeup on both males and females, I would not consider such a person aesthetically inferior as they at least have no gender-based double-standard. (I would consider still them ecologically/economically inferior, but that is a separate discussion.))

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #20 on: April 05, 2021, 01:14:01 am »
Our enemies exhibit their gender-based double-standards:

https://www.amren.com/blog/2021/04/even-those-who-would-be-trad-wives-may-miss-their-chances/

Quote
White trad wives are the most desired creatures on the planet, but many white women still manage to blow it because they have never been told the rules that were invented by our female ancestors to protect their daughters. Even when men have fewer choices, they will still be men, even those who have the vision to create a family and build their own white clan.
...
The white woman should be reactive, which is the opposite of the sexually aggressive, dominant, promiscuous, vulgar, emotionally empty woman that modern media have taught us to be: “Just be yourself, throw yourself over him, and it will magically work out”. It won’t. Men appreciate women with standards and values they want transmitted to their children even if they themselves are not 100 percent up to these standards.

In other words, according to rightists, men can be promiscuous, but women cannot. Men should reject promiscuous women but women should accept promiscuous men.

And of course some Gentile blood memory:

Quote
I wish our men could help us become better versions of ourselves by explaining what makes us attractive. Unfortunately, reality is different. We must discover who we are, and whom we want to attract. Men must do the same. Fish do not tell fishermen how or when to cast their lines. Fishermen must figure this out for themselves.

The comments are even worse:

Quote
One of the things I like about President Trump is that he has made more like himself/ourselves. Failed marriages? So what. That's not important. The important thing to do is reproduce and reproduce White.

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2021, 10:33:14 pm »
https://lookism.net/threads/elon-musk-is-a-slayer.364418/
Quote
He said that went to college partly just to meet girls lmao, he chose Queen's University because of its high female-male ratio. Meanwhile an incel wouldn't even dream of meeting girls. What a **** jock tbh, he's had three divorces, is 6'2'', is a multi billionaire, very high IQ and has a big robust skull.



Giants are usually less intelligent than their Turanian counterparts. Musk seems to be an exception.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2021, 10:35:06 pm by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2021, 11:48:12 pm »
"Giants are usually less intelligent than their Turanian counterparts."

I wouldn't make such a claim. They may be less adept at social manipulation, but there is no reason why they would not have been selected for high technical intelligence, which is what IQ test score measures.

Quote
What a **** jock tbh, he's had three divorces

Citing number of divorces as an achievement is a good example of our enemies' value system.

Quote
big robust skull.

It's a consistent Musk family trait:


« Last Edit: April 10, 2021, 12:41:12 am by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #23 on: April 10, 2021, 12:38:53 am »
" may be less adept at social manipulation"

Perhaps this could account for Musk's unpolished social interactions.

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #24 on: April 21, 2021, 12:59:19 am »
Even in non-Western countries traits such as agressiveness and high sexual dimorphism are seen as "attractive" by many. Perhaps this is simply because non-Aryans are the majority in all countries, but I do not believe these traits would be extolled as much as they are now were it not for Western influence.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2021, 04:13:45 am »
At least in pre-colonial-era non-Western countries, those who like high sexual dimorphism (even if the majority) could be mocked as having vulgar plebian tastes. In a culturally non-democratic society, what is considered aesthetically superior is not necessarily what is popular but what is endorsed by culture leaders who were trusted to have good taste. Back then, if an aesthetical preference was popular but not shared by any of the culture leaders, one would conclude that most people have not reached the cultural level required to understand the reason behind the culture leaders' consensus rejection of it. This is how we explain why, despite (as you say) the majority in non-Western countries liking high sexual dimorphism, we do not see this preference reflected in non-Western clothing styles etc. anywhere near as much as in their Western counterparts, because clothing styles were determined not by the majority but by artisans.

What happened during colonialism was that, in the minds of the colonized majorities, the colonialists replaced the local artisans as those trusted to have good taste. Worse, even some* of the less self-confident artisans themselves started trusting the colonialists over their own senses, and hence deliberately Westernized their own tastes in order to 'keep up'! What we are here to do is to gather the incorruptible remnants who never stopped despising Western aesthetics, and restore these individuals to their deserving roles as culture leaders.

This is why it is so important for us not just to state our preference, but to explicitly claim that our preference is superior. This is why I don't just say: "Porizkova is not my type," instead I say outright: "Porizkova is UGLY, and if you disagree you have inferior blood, and if you are physically able to have sex with her, you should be prohibited from reproducing!" I am putting the vulgar plebs back in their place. And similarly here:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/
« Last Edit: April 21, 2021, 04:32:03 am by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #26 on: April 21, 2021, 07:02:43 pm »
"vulgar plebian tastes"
Vulgarity also seems to have become fashionable in non-Western countries. Western Civilization seems to be effective in societally elevating non-Aryan traits and by extension non-Aryans, effectively ensuring Aryan blood becomes rarer than it is already.

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #27 on: May 16, 2021, 12:42:27 am »
Our enemies ridicule us using the incel "Virgin vs Chad" meme:


All of their descriptors are accurate (save for the labelling of inferior traits as "superior) except for one: the complexion. Neolithic people had darker skin due to their exposure to the sun, unlike the subhuman Ice Age Giants.

FYI "Stacy" is an archetypal high sexually dimorphic female, the counterpart to a "Chad"

Anyway, it is good to see our enemies making it clear how they view themselves (and us). Now it is our turn to make it clear how we view ourselves (and them). In other words, the good guys have always been the good guys, and the bad guys have always been the bad guys.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2021, 12:47:48 am by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #28 on: May 16, 2021, 01:36:33 am »
"Neolithic people had darker skin due to their exposure to the sun, unlike the subhuman Ice Age Giants."

I think they are citing:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/07/first-modern-britons-dark-black-skin-cheddar-man-dna-analysis-reveals

Quote
Scientists believe that populations living in Europe became lighter-skinned over time because pale skin absorbs more sunlight, which is required to produce enough vitamin D. The latest findings suggest pale skin may have emerged later, possibly when the advent of farming meant people were obtaining less vitamin D though dietary sources like oily fish.

""Stacy" is an archetypal high sexually dimorphic female,"

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/gentilism/msg2646/#msg2646

In any case, their points contradict one another. If we are "harvesting grain all day", how can we also be living a "sedentary life"? So which is it?

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-labour/

Similarly, if we live next to rivers, why would we need rainwater?

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-hydraulic-empire/
« Last Edit: May 16, 2021, 01:56:14 am by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Sexual Dimorphism Preferences
« Reply #29 on: May 16, 2021, 01:44:34 am »
If they mean "sedentary" in the sense of "settling down in one place", they would be correct. But if by "sedentary" they mean "sitting around", then they would be wrong.

I would agree though that a farmer would be "weaker" in terms of brute physical strength than a hunter.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2021, 11:13:56 am by rp »