OLD CONTENT
I have seen False Leftists insult rightists such as Ben Shapiro (Jew) by calling him “short” and “pre pubescent”. As True Leftists, this is unacceptable given our aesthetic standards that value neoteny. IMO this is a slavish attitude that seeks to uphold Western aesthetics, similar to how a bullied boy gets “revenge” by bullying others.
This was particularly appalling to me as I have dealt with this type of behavior; my parents would take out their frustration on me, and kids in school would exclude me because the same was done to them. What’s worse is soon I found myself nearly acting the same way towards my younger siblings!
Back then, I didn’t want to sound too “whiny”, but now I realize that the tactics false leftists use are remarkably similar, and how this attitude is fundamentally Judaic. This illustrates the False Left’s deference to authority. Their superficial opposition to authority only extends insofar as it serves their self interest, after which point they will lash out as those perceived to be “lesser” than them. Thoughts?
---
"IMO this is a slavish attitude that seeks to uphold Western aesthetics"
You are correct. Not that Shapiro is even that neotenous in reality (which just makes the False Left insult all the more absurd)! Most obviously, look at his huge facial hair area (entire lower cheek and jawline) and forearm hair:
A neotenous man should not have to shave his cheeks/jawline. (Eventually I want men to be selectively bred until they have no facial hair at all.)
But this is not even the main point. The main point is about why rightists and False Leftists each consider the other immature. I believe it is schematically equivalent to how men and women typically each consider the opposite gender less mature than their own gender (according to their own gender's conception of maturity). Basically rightists stereotype False Leftists similarly to how men stereotype women (ie. as girls), whereas False Leftists stereotype rightists similarly to how women stereotype men (ie. as boys).
"similar to how a bullied boy gets “revenge” by bullying others"
It is not revenge (which must be directed at the initiator of violence); what you are describing is
tradition in the truest sense of the phenomenon: each generation being taught to accept being bullied now in exchange for a chance to be the bully in the future.
Revenge is in fact the best antidote to tradition: instead of the present generation taking out the frustration accumulated from being bullied by the previous generation by bullying the next generation in turn (thereby passing on the frustration to them, and ensuring the cycle continues), simply take out the frustration by retaliating against the previous generation (thereby breaking the cycle)!
---
For reference:
www.bbc.com/future/article/20160418-the-real-reason-men-grow-beardsour research on beards and voices shows that beards probably evolved at least partly to help men boost their standing among other men.
Compared to males and females of many other primates, men and women on average look very different from each other – partly thanks to men’s facial hair. And when we see differences between males and females, the explanation often boils down to evolution through sexual selection – the process that favours traits that boost mating opportunities.
...
a number of studies have suggested that both men and women perceive men with beards as older, stronger and more aggressive than others. And dominant men can get more mating opportunities by intimidating rivals to stand aside.
...
Beards aren’t the only feature that can convey dominance – voices do too. People tend to vote for leaders with lower-pitched voices, and during competitive tasks men lower the pitch of their voice if they think they are more dominant than their opponent. Like facial hair, voice pitch also easily distinguishes men and women.
In other words, the less a culture values dominance, the weaker would be the selective pressure for large facial hair area (as well as low voice pitch) among men. Thus the racial ideal corresponding to the kind of culture we want would include minimal facial hair area and minimal vocal sexual dimorphism. Both of these are associated with high neoteny, since prepubescent boys and girls both have no facial hair and insignificant difference in vocal pitch.
---
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051201022811.htmHanson and Gluckman, who respectively head the Centre for the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) at the University of Southampton, and the Liggins Institute at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, researched the age of puberty stretching back beyond the Stone Age.
They found that Paleolithic girls arrived at menarche - the first occurrence of menstruation - between seven and 13 years. This is a similar age to modern girls, which suggests that this is the evolutionarily determined age of puberty in girls.
'This would have matched the degree of psychosocial maturation necessary to function as an adult in Paleolithic society based on small groups of hunter-gatherers,' they write.
Now you understand why non-Aryans have so called "coming of age" rituals, where they learn to "act their age" and chastise others for not doing the same (effectively revitalizing the Paleolithic era where immature individuals would be considered unworthy and would be excommunicated from the tribe), be it Bar mitzvahs in the case of Jews, or other rituals such as hazing in the case of Gentiles.
---
"So, one can have non-neoteny appearance like the supreme leaders, yet can be Aryans from their actions, right?"
An individual can be noble in actions*. This does not imply that the same individual can reliably produce biological descendants who will also be noble in action. Aryan (as used to describe blood) refers to the latter phenomenon, or what we call heritable nobility.
(* This can also be simulated to a high degree of credibility by any sufficiently cunning individual who wants to pretend to be noble.)
---
“ * This can also be simulated to a high degree of credibility by any sufficiently cunning individual who wants to pretend to be noble.)”
This must be why many Hollywood movies feature Jews playing the role of noble characters, precisely because they are good at feigning their personality on screen.
---
I told you so:
scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=pjn.2017.351.358
Statistical analysis revealed that age at menarche was negatively correlated with endomorphy and mesomorphy components (r = -0.22 and r = -0.123, respectively), but positively correlated with ectomorphy component (r = 0.207). Conclusion: The findings indicated that age at menarche increases with increasing ectomorphy, but decreases with endomorphy and mesomorphy components. Thus, girls with high endomorphy and mesomorphy attained menarche earlier than did girls with high ectomorphy.
---
"Could the philosophies of pre-modern peoples outside the West reflect a childlike stage of cognitive development?"
Yes!
"Why did Europeans reach Piaget's final stage of “formal operational reasoning” long before the Rest?"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans#Between_races,_ethnicities_and_among_primates
Montagu said that the "Mongoloid skull generally, whether Chinese or Japanese, has been rather more neotenized than the Caucasoid or European...,"[52] and Montagu added that "Chinese peoples" are "perhaps" the best representatives of neoteny out of the Mongoloids.[53] ... Montagu also observed that "the skeleton of the classic Mongoloid type is very delicately made, even down to the character of the sutures of the skull which, like those of the infant skull, are relatively smooth and untortuous.
...
Montagu said that Negroids have the following neotenous traits relative to Caucasoids: flattish nose, flat roof of the nose, small ears, narrower joints, frontal skull eminences, later closure of the premaxillary sutures, less hairy, longer eyelashes and cruciform pattern of the lower second and third molars.[3]
Home
Search
Login
Register