Home
Search
Login
RegisterPosted by: rp
« on: December 26, 2024, 03:16:49 am »Romanian Communist dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu:
Posted by: rp
« on: November 09, 2024, 08:14:41 am »Ron Paul:
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 09, 2023, 10:20:27 pm »https://twitter.com/LindyTasteful/status/1722638774155252162 (video at link)
Posted by: rp
« on: April 29, 2023, 04:25:01 am »Liev Schrieber (Jew) vampire "Sabretooth" from Wolverine:
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: April 27, 2023, 09:11:20 pm »"So what we have is Aryans being cuckolded by Tuanian "Chads"... Perhaps some Aryans today sense this and end up turning to inceldom because of this?"
I disagree with your description. Incels constantly wish they looked like Chads and are frustrated that they do not, whereas I have never for an instant wished to look like anyone robust. When a robust man expresses preference for gracile women, the first thought in my mind is: "Please look in the mirror and figure out you do not deserve anyone so much more highly evolved than yourself, you subhuman!" This is the opposite of incel-style thinking.
If anything, incels should be compared to the steppe losers:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg19047/#msg19047
who wished they were the steppe winners but were not.
I disagree with your description. Incels constantly wish they looked like Chads and are frustrated that they do not, whereas I have never for an instant wished to look like anyone robust. When a robust man expresses preference for gracile women, the first thought in my mind is: "Please look in the mirror and figure out you do not deserve anyone so much more highly evolved than yourself, you subhuman!" This is the opposite of incel-style thinking.
If anything, incels should be compared to the steppe losers:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-aryanism/msg19047/#msg19047
Quote
Some men probably did inherit it, but then consequently tended to reproduce less than the other men who did not inherit it.
who wished they were the steppe winners but were not.
Posted by: rp
« on: April 27, 2023, 08:08:48 pm »Ana de Armas, Cuban-Spanish actress:
Posted by: rp
« on: April 27, 2023, 08:03:18 pm »"This is how we eventually reach the pentagon shape."
I see. So what we end up getting is a gracialized Turanian face?
"I of course am totally disgusted by this, since I think gracile women should only be paired with similarly gracile men"
So what we have is Aryans being cuckolded by Tuanian "Chads"... Perhaps some Aryans today sense this and end up turning to inceldom because of this?
I see. So what we end up getting is a gracialized Turanian face?
"I of course am totally disgusted by this, since I think gracile women should only be paired with similarly gracile men"
So what we have is Aryans being cuckolded by Tuanian "Chads"... Perhaps some Aryans today sense this and end up turning to inceldom because of this?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: April 27, 2023, 07:37:55 pm »"Since the female offspring also have the potential of patrilineally inheriting their skeletal type, wouldn't there have been a sizeable proportion of robust women as well?"
This is how we eventually reach the pentagon shape.
"And wouldn't these women have reproduced as much as the gracile women"
Perhaps not, if the Turanian men involved preferred high sexual dimorphism and (being robust themselves) perceived less robust women as more feminine and thus preferable. (I of course am totally disgusted by this, since I think gracile women should only be paired with similarly gracile men.)
This is how we eventually reach the pentagon shape.
"And wouldn't these women have reproduced as much as the gracile women"
Perhaps not, if the Turanian men involved preferred high sexual dimorphism and (being robust themselves) perceived less robust women as more feminine and thus preferable. (I of course am totally disgusted by this, since I think gracile women should only be paired with similarly gracile men.)
Posted by: rp
« on: April 27, 2023, 07:09:29 pm »"Some men probably did inherit it, but then consequently tended to reproduce less than the other men who did not inherit it. In order for a trait to become established, not only does it have to be inherited, but it has to be inherited by those who then reproduced more than (or at least not less than) average."
But by the same token, how did gracility for women become established? Since the female offspring also have the potential of patrilineally inheriting their skeletal type, wouldn't there have been a sizeable proportion of robust women as well? And wouldn't these women have reproduced as much as the gracile women, since gracility does not afford any ergonomic advantages after the women have been transported back to the steppe?
But by the same token, how did gracility for women become established? Since the female offspring also have the potential of patrilineally inheriting their skeletal type, wouldn't there have been a sizeable proportion of robust women as well? And wouldn't these women have reproduced as much as the gracile women, since gracility does not afford any ergonomic advantages after the women have been transported back to the steppe?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: April 27, 2023, 06:40:48 pm »"But why is it that only the women inherit this skeletal structure matrilineally, and not men?"
Some men probably did inherit it, but then consequently tended to reproduce less than the other men who did not inherit it. In order for a trait to become established, not only does it have to be inherited, but it has to be inherited by those who then reproduced more than (or at least not less than) average.
"Also, since the victims also did not commit suicide, would these victims be Gentile-Aryan hybrid types, since they were non-Aryan enough to find their rapists attractive, but nevertheless had Aryan skeletal structure?"
Find their rapists attractive is not the only explanation for not committing suicide. In some cases it could have been merely choosing to stay alive even if they did not like the lifestyle. Some perhaps hoped to be ransomed/swapped back home one day. Some could even have been spies.
Some men probably did inherit it, but then consequently tended to reproduce less than the other men who did not inherit it. In order for a trait to become established, not only does it have to be inherited, but it has to be inherited by those who then reproduced more than (or at least not less than) average.
"Also, since the victims also did not commit suicide, would these victims be Gentile-Aryan hybrid types, since they were non-Aryan enough to find their rapists attractive, but nevertheless had Aryan skeletal structure?"
Find their rapists attractive is not the only explanation for not committing suicide. In some cases it could have been merely choosing to stay alive even if they did not like the lifestyle. Some perhaps hoped to be ransomed/swapped back home one day. Some could even have been spies.
Posted by: rp
« on: April 27, 2023, 06:10:40 pm »"Many Turanian women have compounded matrilineal ancestry from victims of kidnapping by Turanian raiders over millennia."
But why is it that only the women inherit this skeletal structure matrilineally, and not men? Also, since the victims also did not commit suicide, would these victims be Gentile-Aryan hybrid types, since they were non-Aryan enough to find their rapists attractive, but nevertheless had Aryan skeletal structure?
But why is it that only the women inherit this skeletal structure matrilineally, and not men? Also, since the victims also did not commit suicide, would these victims be Gentile-Aryan hybrid types, since they were non-Aryan enough to find their rapists attractive, but nevertheless had Aryan skeletal structure?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: April 27, 2023, 05:46:25 pm »"Turanian women seem to be less robust than Giant women. Why?"
Many Turanian women have compounded matrilineal ancestry from victims of kidnapping by Turanian raiders over millennia. Overly robust women would have tended to be more ergonomically inconvenient to transport by horse all the way back to the steppe. They would probably instead have been **** and then left behind.
This is also why Turanian sexual dimorphism is so high: the men keep becoming more masculine (the best raiders in each generation reproduce with the largest number of kidnapping victims) while the women keep becoming more feminine (accumulating ancestry generation after generation from kidnapping victims who did not commit suicide).
Many Turanian women have compounded matrilineal ancestry from victims of kidnapping by Turanian raiders over millennia. Overly robust women would have tended to be more ergonomically inconvenient to transport by horse all the way back to the steppe. They would probably instead have been **** and then left behind.
This is also why Turanian sexual dimorphism is so high: the men keep becoming more masculine (the best raiders in each generation reproduce with the largest number of kidnapping victims) while the women keep becoming more feminine (accumulating ancestry generation after generation from kidnapping victims who did not commit suicide).
Posted by: rp
« on: April 27, 2023, 05:16:46 pm »I guess it depends on the angle. Although I certainly agree now that her face is rather short and that she has sharp cheekbones, she does have a somewhat oval face as well as a high forehead in the image I posted. I at least find her better than the visibly robust Giant types (come to think of it, Turanian women seem to be less robust than Giant women. Why?). Perhaps it is due to Aryans' evolutionary history of allying with Turanians that causes me to feel this way?
Coming back to the point, I certainly agree now that Dunn's face does not measure up to our standards. However, I disagree that she is much worse than Holt. But if you must choose between the two, you can boot Dunn until we find a better face, at which point we can boot Holt.
Coming back to the point, I certainly agree now that Dunn's face does not measure up to our standards. However, I disagree that she is much worse than Holt. But if you must choose between the two, you can boot Dunn until we find a better face, at which point we can boot Holt.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: April 26, 2023, 11:54:22 pm »Dunn's face shape doesn't really fit our standards:
Many shots make her face look outright short:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOWthiHcVZk
I would go as far as to say she better belongs in:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-turanism/
Many shots make her face look outright short:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOWthiHcVZk
I would go as far as to say she better belongs in:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/facial-turanism/
Posted by: rp
« on: April 01, 2023, 07:05:38 pm »Jourdan Dunn, British supermodel:
This is the first supermodel I have seen who actually has an attractive face.
This is the first supermodel I have seen who actually has an attractive face.