Home
Search
Login
RegisterPosted by: rp
« on: October 03, 2025, 06:06:57 am »Posted by: rp
« on: February 25, 2025, 01:59:52 am »www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTpUJgsRU-E
You know Kelly was bad when people were calling him the "adult in the room".
You know Kelly was bad when people were calling him the "adult in the room".
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: February 22, 2025, 07:35:32 pm »Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: February 09, 2025, 05:29:39 pm »British value according to Zoomer
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: January 14, 2025, 08:05:44 pm »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLvXGKQ3X3U
I actually do not mind the term "savage" too much to refer to "non-whites" so long as it is understood to refer strictly to having fewer machines. I distinguish this from "barbarian" which refers to moral primitivism. This is why I have never used the term "savage" to refer to "whites" but have used "barbarian" countless times.
I actually do not mind the term "savage" too much to refer to "non-whites" so long as it is understood to refer strictly to having fewer machines. I distinguish this from "barbarian" which refers to moral primitivism. This is why I have never used the term "savage" to refer to "whites" but have used "barbarian" countless times.
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: January 02, 2025, 10:15:00 pm »Quote
One of the greatest epochs in world history was the European discovery and colonization of America, New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and Africa and large areas of Asia.
Nonwhites envy the beautiful empires White men created.
Whereas other races remained in a state of despotic lethargy in the same place, Whites built nations across all the continents of the world, and mapped the whole world, Africa, South and North America, Caribbean, Asia, India and China, including Antarctica, Greenland and the Arctic.
Nonwhites had no geographic sense of the location of their own lands. Whites mapped their nations, and wrote their histories with proper scholarly methodologies, and civilized them.
Do not apologize for the greatness of your ancestors.
Source :
https://x.com/dr_duchesne/status/1872361592492306646
I don't think we can educate people to be good. Ricardo Duchesne is already mature and educated but still not yet realize the brutal violence resulted from Western progress
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: January 02, 2025, 09:53:22 pm »Quote
The most deadly soldiers throughout human history, the best conquerors, were White men.
Beginning with the Greek hoplite infantrymen fighting in rank, followed by the Macedonian phalanxes and the Roman legions, White men conquered the entire Mediterranean world, and then sustained their superiority in warfare for 2,500 years.
Among the major innovations during the Middle Ages and Early Modern times are included the arched saddle, spurs, and stirrup, as well as knights on horseback with quilted armor, chain mail, and plate armor; the longbow along with disciplined archery; carvel-built ships, which allowed for the placement of guns lower in the ship to avoid instability ----------followed by the "gunpowder revolution" from which point the innovations were continuous and too numerous to mention in one post.
Between 1800 and 1914 Europeans extended their control from 35% of the world's land surface to almost 85%.
European nationals did not fear any nonwhite nation. They were only apprehensive about each other.
As Europeans went about conquering the world outside the Mediterranean, from the 1500s onwards, the nation states of Europe spent most of their time and resources fighting against each other.
Between 1500 and 1700 Europeans were engage in wars with each other three years out of every four.
The Napoleonic wars (1803–1815) were massive in their geographic scope and destructiveness. No matter. The power of Europeans over the rest of the world peaked in 1914.
Then WWI and WWII came. The best fighting men of Europe died in these wars. Europeans decided to become peaceful, consensual, tolerant, feminist --- and to open their border to immigration to compensate morally for their empires, and overcome their guilt over imperialism.
So, now, the nonEuropeans who could never conquer the Europeans, despite having far larger populations, are conquering Whites through demographic colonization.
See the map below identifying the lands under White colonial power. What our current leaders are doing goes against the natural order of things, and against how history was meant to unfold. Don't let it happen!
Source :
https://x.com/dr_duchesne/status/1874971264248316151
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: December 15, 2024, 12:53:10 am »Rightist exposing their hipocrisy
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 31, 2024, 06:13:02 pm »https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/oct/29/former-british-colonies-owe-debt-of-gratitude-robert-jenrick-reparations
But the reason such commentary is still possible is because False Leftists still refuse to tackle head-on the challenge I presented here:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/western-democracy/msg3362/#msg3362
Previous Jenrick coverage:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/ethnonepotism/msg28107/#msg28107
Jenrick also looks like what we would expect:
Quote
Britain’s former colonies should be thankful for the legacy of empire, not demanding reparations, according to the Conservative leadership candidate Robert Jenrick.
In comments that were described by a Labour MP as “deeply offensive”, the former minister said countries that were part of the empire “owe us a debt of gratitude for the inheritance we left them” in the form of legal and democratic institutions.
...
He said: “The territories colonised by our empire were not advanced democracies. Many had been cruel, slave-trading powers. Some had never been independent. The British empire broke the long chain of violent tyranny as we came to introduce – gradually and imperfectly – Christian values.”
Quote
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the chair of the all-party parliamentary group for Afrikan reparations, which has organised Britain’s second national conference on reparations, taking place on Sunday, described Jenrick’s comments as “deeply offensive and an obnoxious distortion of history”.
She said: “Enslavement and colonialism were not ‘gifts’ but imposed systems that brutally exploited people, extracted wealth, and dismantled societies, all for the benefit of Britain. To suggest that former colonies should be ‘grateful’ for such unimaginable harm disregards the legacy of these injustices and the long-term impact they still have on many nations today.
“Following Brexit we need to establish ourselves as a nation that everyone can do business with. We cannot afford such vile, baseless commentary. Whilst it might send perfectly pitched dog whistles for a Tory leadership contest, these insulting sentiments are catastrophic for international relations.”
But the reason such commentary is still possible is because False Leftists still refuse to tackle head-on the challenge I presented here:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/western-democracy/msg3362/#msg3362
Quote
So here it what is comes down to:
A) "Western civilization is not superior to all other civilizations."
B) "Democracy is superior to autocracy."
Challenge for False Leftists: PICK ONE. Because if you believe B), you logically cannot believe A).
Previous Jenrick coverage:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/ethnonepotism/msg28107/#msg28107
Jenrick also looks like what we would expect:
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: October 11, 2024, 11:23:40 pm »Quote
"I have come to the realisation and conviction that the struggle in South Africa is not between White, Black and Brown, but between Christian civilized standards and the powers of chaos."
– P.W. Botha as Prime Minister of South Africa, Warrenton, 24 July 1982, as cited in PW Botha in his own words, Pieter-Dirk Uys, 1987, p. 23
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: October 10, 2024, 07:03:56 pm »Quote
I am a believer in the fact that it is for the good of the world that the English-speaking race in all its branches should hold as much of the world's surface as possible. The spread of the little kingdom of Wessex into more than a country, more than an empire, into a race which has conquered half the earth and holds a quarter of it is perhaps the greatest fact in all of history.
Letter to F.C. Selous, Teddy Roosevelt, 1900
Quote
It is our duty to seize every opportunity of acquiring more territory and we should keep this one idea steadily before our eyes that more territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race more of the best the most human, most honorable race the world possesses. [...] I contend that we are the finest race in the world and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race.
Confession of Faith, Cecil Rhodes, 1877
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: September 30, 2024, 01:14:35 am »Quote
"To describe America as a 'nation of immigrants' is to stretch a partial truth into a misleading falsehood, and to ignore the central fact of America's beginning as a society of settlers."
...
"Multiculturalism is in its essence anti-European civilization." - Samuel P. Huntington, American Political Scientist
Source :
Samuel P. Huntington, Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity (2004), Page 46 and 171
https://archive.org/details/whoarewechalleng0000samu/page/46/mode/2up?q=partial+truth+into+a+misleading+falsehood
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: September 20, 2024, 05:31:03 pm »Our enemies try to critique a woke academic:
https://www.amren.com/features/2024/09/the-truth-about-empire/
This is essentially accurate.
The expedition's own reports are now a reliable source? Should we also consider Israeli reports about Hamas activities a similarly reliable source?
I certainly do not. Reports written by the colonizers about the colonized are not evidence of anything except the desire of the colonizers to whitewash their colonization.
I say Lester hits the nail on the head. If those currently profiting from carbon-footprint-heavy industries tell us global warming is not caused by their industries, should we not be suspicious of their claims?
Fortunately, our enemies' mask falls off in the next paragraph:
Western colonialists back then probably thought the same as our present-day enemies.
Who was colonizing whom? Duh!
Exactly.
This is correct.
In other words, our enemies admit they start with the conclusion they want to avoid and then work backwards to reach the historical narrative they need in order to avoid it, which is the opposite of serious scholarship.
My approach is finally being adopted!
Similarly, no serious anti-Zionist blames only Likud.
Our enemies let their mask drop again in the final paragaph:
No, which is why the second will have to be killed by bloodline elimination of all who carry it.
https://www.amren.com/features/2024/09/the-truth-about-empire/
Quote
Prof. Lester is the editor of The Truth About Empire, and is a determined critic of Britain’s imperial past. His books have been mostly academic, with the exception of his polemic, Deny and Disavow: Distancing the Imperial Past in the Culture Wars, in which he wrote that the empire was: “a vehicle for establishing, maintaining, and justifying White Supremacy on a global scale, and for persuading Britons that ours is a White island that keeps colonised subjects of colour in their place overseas.” (p. 14)
This is essentially accurate.
Quote
Typical is the tellingly brief summary of the 1897 British invasion of Benin, written by Prof. Lester. He disparagingly refers to accounts of slavery and human sacrifice in the African kingdom of Benin as the “pretexts” for the British invasion. Nowhere does Truth quote gruesome contemporary accounts of human sacrifice, nor the expedition’s own reports of mass sacrifice and mutilation by Benin’s rulers.
The expedition's own reports are now a reliable source? Should we also consider Israeli reports about Hamas activities a similarly reliable source?
Quote
Omissions like this suggest that the authors don’t trust us to interpret the evidence ourselves
I certainly do not. Reports written by the colonizers about the colonized are not evidence of anything except the desire of the colonizers to whitewash their colonization.
Quote
Prof. Lester hardly inspires confidence when he explains that Truth’s “denial of imperial racism and violence [is] . . . a disinformation campaign sharing both tactics and motivations with those around Covid, Brexit and climate change.”
I say Lester hits the nail on the head. If those currently profiting from carbon-footprint-heavy industries tell us global warming is not caused by their industries, should we not be suspicious of their claims?
Fortunately, our enemies' mask falls off in the next paragraph:
Quote
What, too, should we make of Truth’s assertion that these few people were the “traditional owners of the land,” which, at 26,000 square kilometers, is roughly half the size of England. The idea of “ownership” is laughable.
Western colonialists back then probably thought the same as our present-day enemies.
Quote
Dr. Liam Liburd’s A Short History of a Controversial Comparison, however, is a defense of black author Kehindre Andrews’ claim that “The British Empire was far worse than the Nazis.”
Quote
Prof. Biggar defends the empire.
...
As Prof. Biggar wrote in Colonialism, “Whereas the balm of indulgence is given the [native], the acid of cynicism is poured relentlessly over the British,” (p. 299). That is true of all modern historiography about European interaction with other cultures.
Who was colonizing whom? Duh!
Quote
Truth’s concluding essay, No End to a Reckoning, reprimands Prof. Biggar for having put too much faith in the accounts of the “elite white men” who governed the empire.
Exactly.
Quote
Prof. Lester, for one, believes that Britain’s imperial past justifies demographic transformation. In Deny and Disavow, he wrote, “We need to start seeing slavery and the successive forms of colonialism . . . as something that Britons did to other Britons . . . if we are to move towards racial reconciliation in this country.” This includes acknowledging that, “Black people became British as a result of Empire — that ‘they are here because we were there.’” (p. 89)
This is correct.
Quote
This is civilizational suicide.
In other words, our enemies admit they start with the conclusion they want to avoid and then work backwards to reach the historical narrative they need in order to avoid it, which is the opposite of serious scholarship.
Quote
Deny and Disavow also writes of Western whites’ “deeply irrational fear of racial extinction” (p. 29) — but notably doesn’t claim it isn’t happening.
My approach is finally being adopted!
Quote
On the same page, he all but celebrates the coming reduction of American whites to a minority.
Quote
When another anti-colonialist commenter tried to foist the sins of the empire onto a “tiny number of people” running “a gigantic cartel,” Prof. Lester tried to spread the blame: “the investments ran deeper. That land was taken above all by a diaspora from the British Isles of well over 20 million people . . . all came as occupiers rather than supplicants.”
Similarly, no serious anti-Zionist blames only Likud.
Our enemies let their mask drop again in the final paragaph:
Quote
“The sun never sets on the British Empire” was once a common, proud observation. It wasn’t a moral one. Neither was the command of “Rule, Britannia!’’ to “rule the waves!” There are two kinds of pride evoked by the British Empire: one moral, the other triumphant. Even if the authors of The Truth About Empire make many surrender the first, I wonder if they could ever completely kill the second.
No, which is why the second will have to be killed by bloodline elimination of all who carry it.
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: September 15, 2024, 12:11:26 am »Continuing
Source :
H105, American History I John C. Calhoun, speech on Mexico (January 4, 1848).
https://kdhist.sitehost.iu.edu/H105-documents-web/week13/CalhounreMexico1848.html
Source :
To John Adams from Thomas Jefferson, 11 June 1812
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-5806
Quote
Ours is the Government of the white man. The great misfortune of what was formerly Spanish America, is to be traced to the fatal error of placing the colored race on an equality with the white. - John C. Calhoun, 7th United States Vice President (1825 - 1832)
Source :
H105, American History I John C. Calhoun, speech on Mexico (January 4, 1848).
https://kdhist.sitehost.iu.edu/H105-documents-web/week13/CalhounreMexico1848.html
Quote
...the backward will yield, & be thrown further back. these will relapse into barbarism & misery, lose numbers by war & want, and we shall be obliged to drive them, with the beasts of the forest into the Stony mountains - Thomas Jefferson, 3th United States President (1801 - 1809)
Source :
To John Adams from Thomas Jefferson, 11 June 1812
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-5806