Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 28, 2025, 03:31:44 am »

Continuing from:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg14610/#msg14610

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg25735/#msg25735

How inferior is Western eroticism? Answer:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aDD70n886s

To generalize, focusing on sexually dimorphic areas is inferior, whereas focusing on areas that are sexually non-dimorphic is superior. (This is another reason why **** is inferior to gravure.)
Posted by: rp
« on: January 28, 2025, 11:12:48 pm »

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824001053#:~:text=On%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20facial,Marcinkowska%20et%20al.%2C%202019%3B
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 31, 2024, 12:29:40 am »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrglGbINv5A

Anyone who likes to sniff panties should be prohibited from reproducing. (Also, the narrator should be prohibited from reproducing.)
Posted by: rp
« on: November 07, 2024, 11:55:33 pm »

"OK, but why with her and not with some other girl? (I assume she wasn't the only girl in the class?)"
We were placed together for some activity. There was also a redhead with her, but due to Eurocentric conditioning from Barbie dolls and television shows, you could say I had a Eurocentric bias.


"So you would have had a similar blood rush if a non-blond girl was interacting with you? Or not?"
Yes. I had a similar rush with a brown-skinned Hispanic girl, and also the redhead.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 07, 2024, 01:41:58 am »

"it just felt like that the conditioning was such that the "right" thing to do was pair up with her, more of a vacancy-filling mindset than anything. Compulsory schooling cultivates masculinity from an early age"

OK, but why with her and not with some other girl? (I assume she wasn't the only girl in the class?)

"it was mostly one of a girl interacting with me (blood rush). I wasn't attracted to the blond hair in and of itself"

So you would have had a similar blood rush if a non-blond girl was interacting with you? Or not?

"I knew something was "reptillian"  (for the lack of a better word) about being attracted to a blonde-haired girl."

What about celebrities? Is there a similar feeling towards your favourite blond celebrity that is absent towards to your favourite non-blong celebrity? (This is actually probably a better test, as other factors of appearance can be maxed out.)
Posted by: rp
« on: November 06, 2024, 12:30:12 am »

Now that I think about it, it wasn't even "attraction" per se, it just felt like that the conditioning was such that the "right" thing to do was pair up with her, more of a vacancy-filling mindset than anything. Compulsory schooling cultivates masculinity from an early age by forcing **** like gender-segregated bathrooms, color coding (blue is for boys pink is for girls). So boys are shown as different from girls, and any interaction is a potential sexual relationship. There is also the fact that many "children's toys" advertisements are male coded (esp Mattel advertisements for mechanical toys which have the archetypal deep-voiced man as a narrator), and most TV shows feature heterosexual relationships

As for primitive emotion being switched on, it was mostly one of a girl interacting with me (blood rush). I wasn't attracted to the blond hair in and of itself, but I knew something was "reptillian"  (for the lack of a better word) about being attracted to a blonde-haired girl.

"I do not find this too convincing, given that only recently you told us about being attracted to someone else with a terrible face shape."

 I didn't really notice the face shape, I just liked that a girl was giving me attention, and I assumed she was "kind" because she was doing so. After interacting with her again after a few years later in middle school I learned her personality was very different from mine (as were most girls') so all attraction went out the window. But now looking back at her face shape, I would say there was a correlation.

As for the other girl, I really wanted to be non prejudicial and give her the benefit of the doubt. It was definitely her other features (low sexual dimorphism, ectomorph, gracility), that attracted me the most. And definitely her having an upbringing with Aryanist values made me want to believe that she truly was noble.

"Unless you mean this one is even worse than that one."
I would say so. The second one at least had some potential in her body physiognomy, which caused me to jump the gun and assume it correlated with her personality. I similarly assumed the same of some other gracile ectomorphs when in school, but upon learning that they eat meat, my attraction went out the window.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 05, 2024, 11:33:07 pm »

"I could tell that it was due to some primitive emotions in my brain being switched on (the classmate also happened to be blond)"

Can you elaborate? In what way are the emotions primitive? And are you saying they would not have been switched on if the classmate were not blond?

"Looking back at her face shape I couldn't imagine how this was ever the case"

I do not find this too convincing, given that only recently you told us about being attracted to someone else with a terrible face shape. Unless you mean this one is even worse than that one.
Posted by: rp
« on: November 05, 2024, 08:54:03 pm »

I remember my first Oedipus complex experience at 6, when I would pretend play to be pregnant in the womb with a female second cousin of mine. In this way I became attracted to older cousins. I didn't know conception was the result of consensual sex at the time.

In contrast, my first psychosexual experience of mine was with a classmate. I remember being a little attracted to her, but I could tell that it was due to some primitive emotions in my brain being switched on (the classmate also happened to be blond). Looking back at her face shape I couldn't imagine how this was ever the case, but under some circumstances (e.g. compulsory schooling) it is possible.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 17, 2024, 10:53:01 pm »

https://us.yahoo.com/news/more-republican-democratic-men-think-172403292.html

Quote
Republican men are significantly more likely than Democratic men to rate themselves as “highly masculine,” according to a Pew Research Center survey.

The survey — conducted in early September and published Thursday — shows 42 percent of men rate themselves as “highly masculine,” including 53 percent of Republican or Republican-leaning men and 29 percent of Democratic or Democratic-leaning men.
...
Views of masculinity continued to split when examining the ideological divides within the parties.

Among Republican or Republican-leaning men, 60 percent of those who identify as “conservative” call themselves “highly masculine,” whereas 38 percent of Republican or Republican-leaning men who call themselves “liberal” or “moderate” say the same.

Among Democratic and Democratic-leaning men, 20 percent of those who call themselves “liberal” say they are “highly masculine,” and 37 percent of those who call themselves conservative say the same.

I have always said that False Leftists who try to attack rightist men as unmasculine are getting it all wrong.

Also:

Quote
The rate at which men describe themselves as “highly masculine” is 25 percent for men ages 18 to 29; 36 percent for men ages 30 to 49; 53 percent for those ages 50 to 64; and 54 percent for those 65 years old and older.

So False Leftists who try to attack rightism as "childish" are even more wrong. As I keep saying, Western civilization is the most adultlike civilization in history. This is why it is the worst. It is also the most masculine civilization in history, because men are more adultlike (lower in neoteny) than women on average, therefore in order to be the most adultlike, it must be the most masculine by necessity.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: September 21, 2024, 08:11:23 pm »

For TV/movie purposes, I personally prefer MILF characters to be played by non-reproducers in real life, as this way I don't have to worry about them treating their real-life offspring worse than their on-screen offspring.

Posted by: rp
« on: September 21, 2024, 04:55:08 pm »

"whereas MILFs are already declining in fertility."
Ectomorphic MILFs are love ngl.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: July 24, 2024, 12:43:55 am »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frNpmwEUREk
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 27, 2024, 06:17:28 pm »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJC63zLpq9I

Males who are turned off by post-menopausal females are Yahweh-worshippers. Contrast with:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/misinformation-about-racial-origins/msg22150/#msg22150

Quote
I personally give a bonus to women who reach menopause without reproducing, as I can henceforth look at them with certainty that they will never be reproducing.

(Neither King nor Stewart get this bonus, of course. In fact, I myself ridiculed Stewart back here:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/face-shapes-and-preferences/msg19715/?topicseen#msg19715

But I was doing so from the left.)
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 08, 2024, 04:27:51 am »

Turan-worship again:



What happened to the multi-millennial ancient Sinosphere perspective of viewing Mongols as subhuman barbarians? Do these tweeters watch no wuxia at all?
Posted by: rp
« on: March 20, 2024, 10:30:24 pm »

Now that I think of it, my mother was always the ideal standard of a woman that I looked for in a partner (prior to knowing that she is not perfect). It also helps that she has a somewhat Aryan phenotype (I'd say above average tbh). This is also why the human beauty page immediately resonated with me immediately: I was simply seeing the phenotype of my mother.