Posted by: antizion
« on: December 31, 2025, 04:55:05 pm »It's ok for pedos to be "white"



The Trump administration has reportedly proposed the creation of a new "Office of Remigration" as part of a sweeping State Department reorganization, according to a 136-page document.https://trueleft.createaforum.com/index.php?action=post;topic=366.840;last_msg=30300
Critics argue that the term "remigration" is rooted in far-right ideology and has been used to promote and justify ethnic cleansing policies in Europe, with marches held in numerous capitals across the continent. In the UK the Homeland Party has adopted remigration as one of its core policies.
The proposed office would fall under the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) and would, according to the document reviewed by Wired, serve as a policy hub for tracking repatriation and coordinating removals across U.S. agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security.
"It will provide a policy platform for interagency coordination... on removals/repatriations, and for intra-agency policy work to advance the President's immigration agenda," the document reportedly states.
The document, first published by Reuters, outlines the office's purported role to facilitate "the voluntary return of migrants to their country of origin or legal status."
While the term "remigration" has rarely been used in U.S. policymaking, it has gained traction among European far-right movements and is associated with mass deportations and efforts to reduce non-white populations, as Wired explains. The policy concept was popularized by Austrian activist Martin Sellner, who was previously part of a neo-Nazi group and currently promotes a multi-phase plan to repatriate undocumented immigrants, legal residents, and even naturalized citizens considered "non-assimilated."
Asked whether Trump's policies align with remigration, Sellner told Wired:
"Yes, [Trump] ticks many of the boxes. There are differences between Europe and the USA, but the common line is the same: preserving the cultural continuity by stopping replacement migration. Reversing the flows with border security, mass repatriations, and incentives to leave"
President Trump referenced "remigration" in a September 2024 post on X (formerly Twitter), vowing to "return Kamala's illegal migrants to their home countries (also known as remigration)":
A State Department official told Axios that the move reflects a reversal of the Bureau's historical mission:
"It had the migration function — it's in the name — we're just reversing the flow of migrants who shouldn't be here"
Critics warn the policy marks a dangerous normalization of extremist ideology. As Wendy Via of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism told Wired:
"It's outrageous. There is no hiding from the fact that the ultimate goal of 'remigration' is purely about ethnic cleansing. It is a terrible day for our country when 'remigration' proponents are crediting the US and Trump's administration for normalizing the term"
Amid Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Washington offered to host foreign nationals deported from the United States in Ukraine, The Washington Post reports.https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-wants-to-send-deported-migrants-to-ukraine-wp/ar-AA1EjGv8?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=3425f8af8c0c49949bce7bbd76f40c4b&ei=14
In early 2025, the administration of US President Donald Trump called on the Ukrainian government to accept an unspecified number of third-country nationals deported from the United States.
According to the documents obtained by the agency, the proposal was submitted in late January by a high-ranking American diplomat. The proposal was about accommodating foreign nationals on the territory of Ukraine, despite Russia's full-scale invasion and the lack of functioning airports due to constant rocket attacks.
According to the documents, a representative of the Ukrainian side informed the US Embassy that the government would respond after formulating its position. The documents do not specify what exactly the reaction of official Kyiv is. Similar proposals were also sent to other countries.
According to the agency, Ukraine has not accepted any foreigners deported from the United States, and there is no reason to believe that Kyiv considered this initiative seriously. Two Ukrainian officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that the issue was not discussed at the government level. One of them said he was not aware of any US political demands on the issue.
The State Department emphasized that ongoing engagement with foreign governments is key to countering illegal migration and securing America's borders. At the same time, the department forwarded inquiries about the content of the offer to Ukraine to the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which did not comment.
Subtle blackmail by Washington
Documents reviewed by WP indicate the Trump administration's intention to expand deportation policy on a large scale, involving new mechanisms. The materials, dated January-May, state that the administration has been trying to increase the number of countries willing to accept deported third parties, in particular by providing incentives or promises of improved relations with the United States.
For example, many Latin American countries, including El Salvador, Mexico, Costa Rica, and Panama, have agreed to accept non-citizens. In El Salvador, for example, with the government's consent, President Nayeba Buchele received an invitation to the White House, and his administration allocated millions of dollars to house deportees in prisons.
In some cases, such as Panama, the US administration, according to sources, threatened economic restrictions, including tariffs or even a review of the status of the Panama Canal.
Yael Schacher, director of the Americas and Europe at Refugees International, noted that the Trump administration was likely to focus on governments seeking Washington's favor or in difficulty. In her opinion, the scale of American efforts in this area is unprecedented. According to her, it is not only the number of agreements that is striking, but also their irregular nature, the logic of reciprocity, and financing.
Even before the 2024 elections, Trump had repeatedly expressed his readiness to use Ukraine's dependence on American military aid to put pressure on Kyiv. After he took office in January 2025, the rhetoric intensified.
Tensions, according to sources, peaked in February during Trump's conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office. A partial easing of tensions became possible after Kyiv agreed to some of the US demands, including access to Ukraine's critical mineral resources.
Transit points
Some negotiations concerned the use of third countries as transit points. Thus, in conversations with Uzbekistan in early March, the possibility of using the country as a logistics base for the deportation of Russian and Belarusian citizens in the absence of air traffic due to the war in Ukraine was considered.
A document prepared by the US government states that the Uzbek representative did not deny this possibility. Instead, the American side offered many incentives, including a phone call or a personal meeting between the leaders of the countries to reach an agreement.
Deportation of migrants from United States
After taking office in January this year, US President Donald Trump and his administration began mass deportations of migrants from the country.
To legitimize this action, the White House is trying to use the Alien Tort Statute of 1798.
In early April, the US authorities introduced daily fines for those migrants who did not leave the country after a court order.
In addition, the Trump administration has launched a self-deportation program. According to the program, those migrants who voluntarily leave the United States will receive a free ticket and monetary compensation.
Donald Trump's administration is working to ramp up its pointless cruelty toward immigrants, and has apparently been plotting to have the military send Asian immigrants to Libya imminently, according to immigration lawyers.https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/lawyers-say-trump-is-trying-to-send-asian-immigrants-to-libya/ar-AA1Empj9?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=7ce60f9e56f14d5c93149e250cc94e47&ei=13
The plan to deport immigrants to Libya, a war-torn country known for widespread mistreatment of migrants, would represent not just a likely human rights violation but another brazen act of defiance toward the federal judiciary.
Last month, a federal judge in Massachusetts issued an injunction barring the Trump administration from deporting any noncitizen to a third country - a country that is not their country of origin - without due process, and without giving them a meaningful opportunity to demonstrate they fear being persecuted, tortured, or killed if they are sent there.
Judge Brian Murphy, who issued that injunction, quickly issued an order on Wednesday clarifying that "the allegedly imminent removals, as reported by news agencies and as plaintiffs seek to corroborate with class-member accounts and public information, would clearly violate this court's order."
The New York Times reported Tuesday that the Trump administration was planning to use a military plane to fly immigrants to Libya as early as Wednesday. When Trump was asked Wednesday whether he was planning to send immigrants to Libya, he replied, "I don't know, you'll have to ask Homeland Security, please."
Lawyers with the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and Human Rights First submitted an emergency motion before Murphy on Wednesday.
The lawyers warned that "Laotian, Vietnamese, and Philippine" immigrants, who are being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Texas, were "being prepared for removal to Libya, a county notorious for its human rights violations, especially with respect to migrant residents." They said the immigrants had not received required notice or a chance to apply for protection under the Convention Against Torture.
"Libya has a long record of extreme human rights violations," the lawyers wrote. "Any class member who is removed to Libya faces a strong likelihood of imprisonment followed by torture and even disappearance or death."
Included as an exhibit was an email from an immigration lawyer at the Orange County Public Defender in California. It said: "What we're hearing from relatives is that, yesterday, ICE officers at the South Texas Detention Facility gathered 1 Vietnamese detainee, along with 5 others (including 1 from Laos) into a room and told them that they needed to sign a document agreeing to be deported to Libya. When they all refused, they were each put in a separate room and cuffed in (basically, solitary) in order to get them to sign it."
Another exhibit included emailed declarations from lawyers at the Asylum Defense Project. One lawyer wrote that a Laotian man at the South Texas ICE Processing Center "may be sent to Libya or Saudi Arabia imminently." She went to meet with immigrants there, "but they have already been moved out," her colleague wrote.
The Trump administration has already deported hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to a notorious mega-prison in El Salvador without due process, despite a federal judge's order not to, claiming that no one can force the administration to bring them back. Trump and his officials have prominently refused to bring back Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man whom it illegally deported to the Central American nation - even after the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision ordering it to "facilitate" his return.
El Salvador's prison system is known for torture and abuses, and its judicial system is effectively a "black hole," as Rolling Stone has reported. But shipping immigrants to Libya would be a new low.
The State Department's 2023 annual report on human rights practices in Libya found, among other things, "credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; enforced disappearance; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment perpetrated by the government and armed groups on all sides; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; political prisoners or detainees; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; punishment of family members for alleged offenses by a relative; serious abuses in a conflict, including reportedly widespread civilian deaths or harm."
The report painted an even more dire picture for migrants and refugees.
"Migrants, refugees, and other foreign nationals were especially vulnerable to kidnapping," the report said, adding that "such individuals remained vulnerable to seizure by armed groups engaged in human trafficking or migrant smuggling."
Elsewhere, the report said: "An unknown number of individuals, including refugees, asylum seekers, and other migrants, were held in facilities under the control of armed groups" including in "extralegal facilities run by smugglers and other nonstate actors."
It continued: "The criminal and nonstate armed groups controlling extralegal facilities routinely tortured and abused detainees, subjecting them to arbitrary killings, **** and sexual violence, beatings, electric shocks, burns, forced labor, and deprivation of food and water, according to dozens of testimonies shared with international aid agencies and human rights groups. In many instances, the purpose of this abuse was reportedly to extort payments from detainees' families."
The New York Times reported Wednesday afternoon that Libya's two rival governments both denied having agreed to any deal to accept deportations from the U.S.

The National Security Agency was reportedly aware of vulnerabilities in the messaging app Signal weeks before 18 top Trump administration national security and defense officials used the app in a group chat to plan the recent bombing of Yemen. Those vulnerabilities, an NSA memo warned, were being exploited by Russian hackers. Details have also emerged that at least two top administration officials who were in the chat were overseas, including one in Moscow — where he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin.Entire article: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/putin-is-giddy-nsa-knew-signal-was-vulnerable-to-russian-hackers-before-security-breach/ar-AA1BEheF?ocid=BingNewsSerp