Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: PotatoChip
« on: December 14, 2025, 10:25:20 pm »

Lest we forget this assessment in which (starting @45:28) Taiwan bares the full brunt of a nuclear escalation between the US and China. I suspect Japan's nukes, if it has them by then, would also be used on Taiwan?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsrCWehWSuU
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 14, 2025, 09:07:04 pm »

On elementary inspection, Japan getting nukes would appear to help us, as it increases the global ratio of nukes in "non-white" hands relative to nukes in "white" hands, which reduces our disadvantage in a hypothetical Turner-Diaries-style confrontation.

But the above paragraph assumes Japan would actually use its nukes the way we want it to, which is currently unrealistic. Under current circumstances, it is far more likely that Japan would point them at China, and China seeing a nuclear-armed Japan would similarly point its own nukes towards Japan. Thus the real effect is to increase the global ratio of nukes pointed towards "non-whites" (which is Trump's and Putin's actual intention) relative to nukes pointed towards "whites", which increases our disadvantage.

The best way to undermine the Trump-Putin plan would be for China to become the strongest public voice supporting a nuclear-armed Japan (including offering whatever practical assistance might be needed towards this end), which would reassure Japan that China has no intention of nuking itself, which would reciprocally also enable China to feel safer knowing that Japan now has no way to credibly accuse China of hostility towards itself. This is folkism.

Of course, the above paragraph will obviously never happen under Xi (though I would love to be proven wrong). So, my conclusion remains unchanged: no improvement can be expected until Xi is replaced by a folkist.
Posted by: PotatoChip
« on: December 14, 2025, 07:48:03 pm »

Posted by: SodaPop
« on: November 09, 2025, 01:51:04 pm »

Will Trump Spark a New Nuclear Arms Race?
Quote
Trump's recent suggestion that the US will soon re-engage in nuclear weapons testing has up-ended decades of policy and sparked anxiety that we could be entering a new nuclear age, with other major powers stepping up efforts to modernise their capability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcyGbqR9GgQ

Noteworthy:

DOWNWIND - Official Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcyGbqR9GgQ

Posted by: SodaPop
« on: November 07, 2025, 05:17:47 pm »

Are we entering a new era of nuclear weapons testing? | GZERO Europe
Quote
Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt asks whether the world is sliding back into the dangerous era of open nuclear weapons testing, and it all started with a misunderstanding by US President Donald Trump misunderstanding.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/are-we-entering-a-new-era-of-nuclear-weapons-testing-gzero-europe/vi-AA1Q1yi1?ocid=msedgntp&pc=ASTS&cvid=690e7bbfd9af4adaa53b76500ba55ed4&ei=112
Posted by: WMD
« on: March 19, 2025, 09:19:51 pm »

Germany's doubts about US are causing it to rethink having nuclear weapons | DW News
Quote
Germany's incoming chancellor Friedrich Merz says he no longer believes US security commitments to Europe can be taken for granted. And that's led to doubts about the future of the US nuclear umbrella for Germany. That in turn has reignited a debate in Germany and beyond about rethinking Europe’s nuclear set-up.

Chapters:
0:00 Germany considering options after US doubts
3:11 Frankziska Stärk, Nuclear Deterrence Researcher
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Tw1GPjHvF8
Posted by: WMD
« on: March 17, 2025, 10:14:36 pm »

Poland Wants to Go Nuclear. And More.
Quote
From Poland’s nuclear ambitions to China’s military provocations and Syria’s insurgency nightmare, the world is on edge. Here’s your in-depth briefing on this week’s most critical global events.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20ze-VQyHoA

Europe's Nuclear Future
Quote
Recent events have invigorated a discussion of the disposition of nuclear weapons in Europe. In a speech on March 5, French President Emmanuel Macron declared that "Europe's future does not have to be decided in Washington or Moscow," and called for discussions on the expansion of the French nuclear umbrella to European allies. Frontline countries such as Poland have embraced opening this dialogue. Meanwhile, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has declared that Poland "must reach for the most modern possibilities, also related to nuclear weapons and modern unconventional weapons."

What might a French nuclear umbrella or Polish nuclear capability look like? What are the implications for broader NATO defense efforts? Please join the CSIS Defense and Security Department for a conversation on the future of European rearmament, nuclear deterrence, and transatlantic relations, featuring Dr. Heather Williams, director of the CSIS Project on Nuclear Issues, Dr. Tom Karako, director of the CSIS Missile Defense Project, and Kari A. Bingen, director of the CSIS Aerospace Security Project.

This event is made possible by general support to CSIS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWyjbFr9Vas
Posted by: rp
« on: March 11, 2025, 05:02:46 pm »

Day by day my youthful optimism is fading. I feel like I am being forced to accept the initiated violence occuring all around me, which is why I contemplated annihilation as the only option. It is becoming hard to function normally..
Posted by: rp
« on: March 11, 2025, 04:48:40 pm »

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: March 11, 2025, 03:51:52 pm »

There will be survivors, and those whose bloodlines propagate most successfully in the anarchic aftermath will be those with the strongest survivalist traits. Basically it would be a pro-Darwinian reset. Our entire approach, in contrast, is about state control over reproduction and eliminating the most dangerous bloodlines first.
Posted by: rp
« on: March 11, 2025, 02:19:29 am »

Why are we opposed to nuclear annihilation? Wouldn't this theoretically achieve our end goal of zero population?
Posted by: rp
« on: April 26, 2024, 12:57:38 am »

https://twitter.com/sushantsareen/status/1782279258552893578?t=ySkSQ_SYke5CnqcIzrVBEA&s=19
Quote
Seriously?? The way I see it, if you got the guns, you will get the grains; if you got grains but no guns, you will lose the grains. This is not an either/or issue. The future belongs to nations which have both guns and grains.
Quote
#MondayMotivation
“The future belongs to nations with grains and not guns.” - M. S. Swaminathan

Posted by: rp
« on: April 09, 2024, 06:10:02 pm »

I agree with the tweeter. India cannot denuclearize without a guarantee of the US also denuclearizing.