Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: SodaPop
« on: December 23, 2025, 06:42:18 pm »

Odd and plausible I suppose:

Who is behind The Bondi Beach Tragedy and Why It Happened | Prof Jiang Xueqin
Quote
The Bondi Beach tragedy shocked Australia and quickly became a global spectacle.
But beyond the headlines, viral clips, and instant blame narratives, deeper structural questions remain unanswered.

In this long-form audio monologue, Professor Jiang Xueqin examines the Bondi Beach event through the lenses of game theory, media dynamics, state behavior, and historical precedent. Rather than focusing on individual guilt or surface-level outrage, this analysis asks a more difficult question:

Why did this event unfold the way it did — and who benefits from how it is being framed?

This episode explores:

Why modern mass-casualty events increasingly resemble spectacle rather than chaos

How information release, media timing, and official narratives shape public perception

The role of geopolitics, ideology, and state incentives in moments of crisis

Why some tragedies are amplified while others disappear

How fear, identity, and moral panic are leveraged in the twenty-first century

This is not a breaking-news report and not a claim of criminal attribution.
It is a structural analysis of power, incentives, and narrative control — consistent with Professor Jiang’s long-standing approach to predictive history.

Listeners are encouraged to think critically, question first impressions, and resist the pressure to accept instant explanations in emotionally charged moments.

This content is an educational reconstruction of Prof. Jiang’s lectures arguments for archival study and geopolitical interpretation.

Disclosure:
Synthetic voice used for academic transformation and explanatory preservation in full compliance with YouTube’s synthetic media policies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ke0nsy70khE
Posted by: BlackCat
« on: November 12, 2025, 12:38:16 pm »

The title of this video made me chuckle, not that I agree with it, but it reminded me of all the MAGA QANON ghouls that were running around spewing the "Pizzagate" nonsense prior to the election, and afterwards. I always knew instinctively that most of the real child grapists are in the rightist camp the entire time. Much of the rightist camp seems to be filled with angry closeted homosexuals who could never admit to themselves that they deny their own sexuality simply because Jews told them to in a book they wrote for themselves...

On Cam: Colombian President Petro Calls US Leaders ‘Clan of Paedophiles’ Amid Tensions With Trump
Quote
Colombian President Gustavo Petro escalated tensions with Washington on Sunday, warning that Latin America “will rise by the millions” if the United States expands military action in the Caribbean. His fiery remarks came after President Donald Trump cut all US aid to Colombia and branded Petro a “drug leader” and a “lunatic,” accusing Bogotá of failing to curb narcotics production.
Petro denounced the Trump administration as hypocritical and authoritarian, alleging it uses racism and xenophobia to distract from internal scandals. He also condemned growing US military activity in the Caribbean, operations that Washington says target “narco-boats,” but which Petro and Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro describe as imperialist aggression.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2AGkaj54fE

Rightists are getting more demented as each day passes:

Perverts Alex Jones & Russell Brand Get Naked & Touch Each Other | The Kyle Kulinski Show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpVnZYlfolI

Some, having been able to at least maintain a grain of nobility are waking up to rightist gender nonsense thankfully:

‘IT’S OVER’: Sneako Leaves The Manosphere, Calls It A ‘CESSPOOL’ | The Kyle Kulinski Show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9KqTfgHvU4

To the rest of the non-western world, I recommend you never take westerners seriously when they tell you "IT'S OVER"...
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: September 30, 2025, 07:49:04 pm »

This tweeter is also our enemy:

https://x.com/ChromeBarracuda

Quote
Pan-European Neo-Cabalist Deep-Green Neo-Colonialist Spencerian Fuentesian Futurist

You should always mention this when reposting enemy content.
Posted by: rp
« on: September 30, 2025, 06:29:40 pm »

https://x.com/ChromeBarracuda/status/1972788428954910997?t=AZJ1acRQZ_VKpDRa4s940A&s=19
Quote
Candace Owens, Max Blumenthal, and Tucker Carlson lied about Charlie Kirk becoming anti-Israel.

What do they all have in common?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: September 13, 2025, 05:18:07 pm »

The best thing to do right now is to wait to see if Robinson mysteriously dies before trial. If he does, it would fit the usual modus operandi. If he does not, on the other hand, we can listen to what Robinson himself has to say about what he was doing and why. I caution against jumping to conclusions at this early stage, especially since False Leftists seem to be as hellbent on dissociating* the left from the shooting as rightists are eager to pin it on the left, both sides exaggerating whatever appears to reinforce their interpretation and ignoring whatever does not fit it.)

(* Until the left inclines towards taking credit for such actions, there is no hope for leftist victory.)

Finally, I would like to note:

https://nypost.com/2025/09/12/media/over-10k-posts-tie-charlie-kirks-murder-to-israel-as-conspiracy-theories-explode-online-adl-report/

Quote
Jackson Hinkle, a 25-year-old known for amplifying pro-Putin propaganda, wrote in an incendiary post on Wednesday that Kirk “used to be an Israel loyalist … He feared ‘Israel would kill him’ … He started *mildly* criticizing Israel.”
Posted by: Onoda Hiroo
« on: September 13, 2025, 01:33:30 pm »

I was as also critical of Kirk for his subservience to Israel, however during the final weeks to the end of his life he criticised the Jews and linked Epstein to Israeli government blackmailing operation.

Despite Kirk's criticism being mostly wrongheaded, failing to see "cultural Marxism" as a mere tool of provocation to Zionism, perhaps he was the sort of person to wake up to the bigger picture of the Zionist dialectic.

Kirk was also regularly providing a speaking platform to anti-Zionists, to whom he would lose in ethical debate, despite video titles such as "Charlie Kirk destroys leftist veteran on 9/11".

As for ZOG planting a German Mauser bolt-action in the woods and transgender-ideology-engraved ammunition, even a child can point out that they went too far. The Mauser is 1.25 metres long and doesn't disassemble without removing foot long screws, and even then it would not fit in the 2 foot carry case seen in the roof dismount footage.

They're saying the shooter, Tyler Robinson, is Antifa. Needless to say, I don't buy it. Even the decoy "Zinn" was a Jew.

Meanwhile Netanyahu is doing a media tour rambling about how Israel had nothing to do with it.
Posted by: rp
« on: December 12, 2024, 02:32:53 am »

I noticed that most of the False Left anti Israel crowd doesn't bring up the 9/11 false flag or the "Holocaust". Probably because they separate Jewish identity from Israel.

But equally annoying is the fact that most of the people who do bring it up are rightists (which doesn't even make sense: many of them gradually began accepting that Muslims are the bad guys anyway).
Posted by: rp
« on: December 07, 2024, 11:10:54 am »

Quote from: 90sRetroFan on December 06, 2024, 02:44:22 am
Jones is less annoying than Kulinski in this one video if taken in isolation. Kulinski's materialist smugness here is an excellent example of why I despise False Leftists, whereas Jones' only objectionable rhetoric here is his MAP-phobia.

What leftism needs is not Kulinski, but a leftist version of Jones. Those whom we need to stop are not corporations (and definitely not MAPs), but Western machinists.

JAM comes to mind.
Posted by: rp
« on: December 06, 2024, 05:52:04 am »

"Jones is less annoying than Kulinski in this one video if taken in isolation. Kulinski's materialist smugness here is an excellent example of why I despise False Leftists, whereas Jones' only objectionable rhetoric here is his MAP-phobia."
I agree. But what's funny is that Jones now sounds like one of those Megachurch preachers he used to rail against in the 00s.

"What leftism needs is not Kulinski, but a leftist version of Jones. Those whom we need to stop are not corporations (and definitely not MAPs), but Western machinists."
I agree. It is also worth pointing out that Jones himself is not anti machinist (as I have elsewhere).
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 06, 2024, 02:44:22 am »

Jones is less annoying than Kulinski in this one video if taken in isolation. Kulinski's materialist smugness here is an excellent example of why I despise False Leftists, whereas Jones' only objectionable rhetoric here is his MAP-phobia.

What leftism needs is not Kulinski, but a leftist version of Jones. Those whom we need to stop are not corporations (and definitely not MAPs), but Western machinists.
Posted by: rp
« on: December 06, 2024, 02:08:27 am »

www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4OT0wOHWDg

Although Jones's call to destroy the world to prevent post humanism could be interpreted as anti Yahwist.
Posted by: SimplestExplanation
« on: November 10, 2023, 08:01:11 pm »

"Capitalism is generally considered to date back to the Renaissance:"

Some people often say ancient Rome and Greece were "fully functioning capitalist societies", I realize after you brought it up why it is better to attach capitalism to the Renaissance though.

Capitalism in Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece: Risk and Unethical Business
https://digitalworks.union.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1697&context=theses

Hilarious to note that the author of the above is named Sam Goldman. Perhaps this is another example of backlash herding?


Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 10, 2023, 07:53:48 pm »

"capitalism predates western civilization"

Capitalism is generally considered to date back to the Renaissance:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism#History

Quote
Capitalism, in its modern form, can be traced to the emergence of agrarian capitalism and mercantilism in the early Renaissance, in city-states like Florence.[32]
...
The economic foundations of the feudal agricultural system began to shift substantially in 16th-century England as the manorial system had broken down and land began to become concentrated in the hands of fewer landlords with increasingly large estates. Instead of a serf-based system of labor, workers were increasingly employed as part of a broader and expanding money-based economy. The system put pressure on both landlords and tenants to increase the productivity of agriculture to make profit; the weakened coercive power of the aristocracy to extract peasant surpluses encouraged them to try better methods, and the tenants also had incentive to improve their methods in order to flourish in a competitive labor market. Terms of rent for land were becoming subject to economic market forces rather than to the previous stagnant system of custom and feudal obligation.[35][36]
...
The economic doctrine prevailing from the 16th to the 18th centuries is commonly called mercantilism.[37][38] This period, the Age of Discovery, was associated with the geographic exploration of foreign lands by merchant traders, especially from England and the Low Countries. Mercantilism was a system of trade for profit, although commodities were still largely produced by non-capitalist methods.[39] Most scholars consider the era of merchant capitalism and mercantilism as the origin of modern capitalism,[38][40] although Karl Polanyi argued that the hallmark of capitalism is the establishment of generalized markets for what he called the "fictitious commodities", i.e. land, labor and money. Accordingly, he argued that "not until 1834 was a competitive labor market established in England, hence industrial capitalism as a social system cannot be said to have existed before that date".[41]

England began a large-scale and integrative approach to mercantilism during the Elizabethan Era (1558–1603).

I do agree, though, that what caused this is not capitalism, but (the even more uniquely Western) organic chemistry:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbicide#History

Quote
The first modern herbicide, 2,4-D, was first discovered and synthesized by W. G. Templeman at Imperial Chemical Industries.
...
Independently, a team under Juda Hirsch Quastel, working at the Rothamsted Experimental Station made the same discovery.



See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/academic-decolonization/msg16015/#msg16015

But because Western science is literally worshipped by progressives/False Leftists, they prefer to attack capitalism instead.

By the way:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juda_Hirsch_Quastel

Quote
Categories: ... British Jews Jewish scientists
Posted by: SimplestExplanation
« on: November 10, 2023, 07:39:00 pm »

Why Liberals Can't Counter Conspiracy Theories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVy_a9u8CeQ

Quote
The reality unfortunately is alot less awesome though. The truth is that a chemical company was just left unchecked, thus was able to very freely spread a questionable herbicide far and wide, predictably resulting in ecological side effects. The frog hormone imbalance thing actually does not seem like that big of a deal at all when compared to alot of the other actually nasty stuff this herbicide is alleged to do. To put this all in simple terms, this is caused by, well, capitalism... — BadEmpanada

To put it in simple terms from a True Left perspective, this is not caused by "capitalism", it is caused by Western Civilization, because capitalism predates western civilization and the poisoning of this planet and life on a mass scale does not predate western civilization. Therefore, western civilization is the root cause of this problem, not the economic system it happens to employ. (This is not an endorsement of capitalism).

See also: https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/china-the-ocean-is-not-japan's-trash-can/  (Seriousness about environmentalism).

Posted by: .
« on: September 26, 2023, 08:31:29 pm »

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/26/robert-kennedy-jr-september-11-podcast-peter-bergen

Robert F Kennedy Jr expresses skepticism at official 9/11 account

Quote

The Democratic presidential hopeful appeared to cast doubt on a key finding of the investigation into the September 11 attacks

In a podcast interview, the US presidential hopeful Robert F Kennedy Jr raised a conspiracy theory about 9/11 and also refused to say that al-Qaida was responsible for the attacks on New York and Washington DC.

“I don’t always accept official explanations,” he said.

Kennedy, 69 and an attorney, is the son of the former US attorney general and New York senator Robert F Kennedy and nephew of President John F Kennedy.

Challenging Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination next year, Kennedy lags in polling but has nonetheless achieved an unusual level of coverage for an outsider running against an incumbent, in part due to his family history and prominence as an anti-vaccine campaigner.

Kennedy’s podcast interview was with Peter Bergen, host of In the Room and author of books including The Rise and Fall of Osama bin Laden and Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for Bin Laden from 9/11 to Abbottabad.

Bergen first asked if Kennedy “bought” the official explanation of 9/11, as established by the bipartisan 9/11 commission

Kennedy said: “I don’t know what happened on 9/11. I mean, I understand what the official explanation [for 9/11] is, I understand that there is dissent. I have not looked into it. I haven’t examined it. I’m not a good person to talk to about it.”

Bergen said: “So there’s doubt in your mind that al-Qaida was responsible?”

Kennedy raised a well-known 9/11 conspiracy theory, that 7 World Trade Center, a building close to the twin towers, did not fall because of the attack nearby.

He said: “Well, I know … there’s strange things that happened, that don’t seem … One of the buildings [in New York] came down that wasn’t hit by a plane, so, you know, was it building seven or building 10?”

 "I do think that it ought to be permissible in this country to question official narratives.”

Bergen said. “And if your position is that the 9/11 commission’s explanation of September 11 … is somehow up for question, this kind of extreme skepticism is going to make being president, well, kinda tough.”