Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: rp
« on: October 11, 2025, 11:44:54 pm »

https://x.com/viprabuddhi/status/1975983297126625474?t=lvoxygW3tteV-vrtgKYutA&s=19
Quote
Wignats aren't the sharpest tool in the shed.

The main reason H1B exists is to save costs. Those that reside in US consume, which results in money percolating into US economy.

$30B remittance is peanuts compared.

All that consumption will happen in India itself now.

You will see more job losses in consumption based sectors like automobile, restaurant, retail, etc if high earners move out.

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: July 19, 2025, 06:03:01 pm »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLOASYapus0

From the comments:

Quote
Imagine a world with no putrid Stevie Miller!

Exterminating Miller alone changes almost nothing; another with the same talking points will rise to take his place. What we need to imagine is a world without all of those who side with Miller, and we need to be willing to do whatever it takes to make it reality.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: July 12, 2025, 06:12:04 pm »

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 04, 2025, 05:52:33 pm »

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 18, 2025, 05:22:16 pm »

Posted by: WorseThanWeThought
« on: April 17, 2025, 11:57:51 pm »

U.S. intelligence contradicts Trump’s justification for mass deportations
Quote
[...]
The National Intelligence Council, drawing on the acumen of the United States’ 18 intelligence agencies, determined in a secret assessment early this month that the Venezuelan government is not directing an invasion of the United States by the prison gang Tren de Aragua, a judgment that contradicts President Donald Trump’s public statements, according to people familiar with the matter.

The determination is the U.S. government’s most comprehensive assessment to date undercutting Trump’s rationale for deporting suspected gang members without due process under the Alien Enemies Act, the 1798 law last used during World War II that laid the foundation for the incarceration of more than 110,000 Japanese Americans.

Trump invoked the act in mid-March, proclaiming without evidence that Tren de Aragua is perpetrating an “invasion” of the United States “at the direction” of the regime of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Under the Alien Enemies Act, the government sent planeloads of alleged gang members to El Salvador’s notorious megaprison despite a judge’s order to turn the planes around and afford the detainees an opportunity to challenge their removal through standard legal processes.

The intelligence product found that although there are some low-level contacts between the Maduro government and Tren de Aragua, or TdA, the gang does not operate at the direction of Venezuela’s leader. The product builds on U.S. intelligence findings in February, first reported by the New York Times, that the gang is not controlled by Venezuela.
[...]
The finding was nearly unanimous among the U.S. intelligence agencies with the exception of the FBI, which assessed a moderate level of cooperation between the gang and the Venezuelan government, two people familiar with the matter said.
[...]
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/u-s-intelligence-contradicts-trump-s-justification-for-mass-deportations/ar-AA1D8C88?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=f11bad89e50842c79614d647c53e2eeb&ei=12
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: March 23, 2025, 04:11:48 am »

Posted by: rp
« on: February 15, 2025, 01:11:26 am »

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 12, 2024, 10:02:24 pm »

Automation is either less/as efficient than manual labour or more efficient. If the former, then it has not yet made manual labour obsolete. If the latter, then an automated service can satisfactorily serve more customers than its manual counterpart can, thus the correct direction of migration for optimizing customer service is into the country with more automation.
Posted by: rp
« on: November 12, 2024, 08:10:02 pm »

Is this true?:
https://x.com/vdare/status/1223618834227253248?t=qbZm-s4xEgvz5Fi05YDlKA&s=19
Quote
The future will become more technological and automated, so it’s crazy for America to continue admitting millions of low-skilled immigrants .

Washington should wake up and realize that:

"Automation makes immigration obsolete."

vdare.com/posts/automati…
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 22, 2024, 05:30:09 pm »

Our enemies complain that the government pays people for being charitable:

https://www.amren.com/news/2024/10/germany-syrian-migrant-earns-shocking-e13000-a-month-for-housing-5-underage-migrants-in-his-apartment/

Quote
Although the single man is officially a hairdresser, a career which usually generates little income, he recently learned he could become a host father and earn substantial amounts of money by housing unaccompanied minors.
...
This is far from the only case involving migrants earning extraordinary amounts of money from German taxpayers.

They portray this as wealth being redistributed to immigrants. But this ignores that any taxpayer (including natives) can similarly get paid by the state if they were similarly willing to host unaccompanied minors. Thus there is no unfairness here: if all taxpayers were hosting unaccompanied minors, the fraction of tax money set aside for payments to hosts would be evenly redistributed. This is no different than the state paying people for recycling: if everyone recycled, the money would be evenly redistributed; it is only because some people don't recycle that more money ends up going to those who do. If you choose to be lazy, you cannot complain when those who choose to not be lazy get more subsidies than you do.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 02, 2024, 06:05:40 pm »

https://www.infowars.com/posts/eva-vlaardingerbroek-warns-whites-to-take-stand-against-globalist-great-replacement-agenda/

Quote
Dutch political commentator and lawyer Eva Vlaardingerbroek warned that Europeans must take a stand against the huge demographic shift brought by mass migration orchestrated by their leaders or risk becoming a minority in their home countries.

When asked by Remix News at CPAC Hungary 2024 this week how conservatives should deal with accusations of racism while also not wanting to be demographically replaced in their home countries, Vlaardingerbroek responded, “You can’t.”

“That’s the thing, you can’t. So you have to pick a side. Of course, you’re going to be attacked if you say, “Hey, this continent, Europe, has been predominantly White for the entirety of its history, and now suddenly within one generation, a few bureaucrats have decided against the will of the people that we should suddenly be a minority,” she said.

“‘Why do we agree with that, or why do we allow that to happen?’ If you say that, you are going to be attacked.”

The "bureaucrats" you refer to are not importing "non-whites" against the will of those individuals. In other words, those "non-whites" themselves first decide to migrate, and the "bureaucrats" you refer to are merely not initiating violence against them. They are also not initiating violence against you, as you are also free to stay or emigrate as you choose. You, on the other hand, want the "bureaucrats" to  initiate violence against "non-whites" for the sake of keeping "whites" a majority. So yes, of course you deserve retaliatory violence.

Quote
“But the only other option then you have is saying nothing and have it happen, so the choice is yours, and I’ve made my choice,” she continued. “I think there are many ways in which you can defend yourself, of course, against this ridiculous attack, so I’m sure that they’re going say about me that I’m a terrible racist again. No, that’s not true. I don’t think that any race is superior to another. I just think that mine is also not inferior to that of others.”

Well, you seem to think that "whites" deserve to be treated as if they were superior to "non-whites" (see below).

Quote
“So, I don’t have to be pointed at as the root of all evil, as the Neo-Marxist critical race theory does,” she said. “I don’t have to become a minority in my own country, as Joe Biden said would be ‘a good thing,’ would be ‘our strength.’ No, why actually? Who was the racist here? Explain to me why we don’t have the right to exist, why we’re not allowed to be a majority in the continent, in the countries that we have been a majority in since forever? Explain it to me. Turn the question around.”

Did "whites" allow indigenous ethnicities to remain a majority in continents (e.g. North & South Americas, Australasia) where they had been the majority? So why should "whites" be entitled to what they saw no problem denying others?

How many "whites" live outside "Europe"? Why should not at least the same number of "non-whites" live in "Europe"?

As for who was the racist here, well, was it "whites" or "non-whites" who started categorizing people as "white"/"non-white" in the first place?

Enemy background:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Vlaardingerbroek

Quote
Eva Lotte Louise Joan Vlaardingerbroek (born 3 September 1996) is a Dutch far-right activist,[1] known for propagating conspiracy theories[2][3][4] and expressing anti-feminist sentiments in the past.
...
She has made numerous appearances with American conservative pundit Tucker Carlson on his current affairs program Tucker Carlson Tonight on Fox News and with Mark Steyn on his eponymous British talk show on the GB News. During Carlson's show, she falsely claimed that the Dutch farming crisis is not a result of the nitrogen crisis,[7] instead promoting the Great Replacement Theory, a recurrent theme in her speeches and discussions.
...
Vlaardingerbroek joined the far-right political party Forum for Democracy (FvD) in 2016.
...
In November 2023, Vlaardingerbroek stated that she would vote for the Party for Freedom (PVV) in the 2023 Dutch general election.[15]
...
journalists branded Vlaardingerbroek the "shield maiden of the far right" and an "Aryan princess"

Oh please, as if her views are not subhuman enough, look at her face shape:



(When are False Leftists going to learn?)

Quote
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Vlaardingerbroek spoke out as a firm critic of lockdowns
...
Also in 2021, Vlaardingerbroek worked for some time in Sweden as presenter of her own pan-European talk show "Let's Talk About It" on the YouTube channel of Swedish media outlet Riks,[22] which is affiliated with the far-right party Sverigedemokraterna.[23]
...
Until late 2020, Vlaardingerbroek was in a relationship with French author Julien Rochedy, who between 2012 and 2014 had been president of Génération Nation, the youth wing of the French right-wing populist party Front National.[34][35] During the conflict within the FvD in November 2020, which had seen Vlaardingerbroek publicly turn against party leader Thierry Baudet, Baudet revealed that Vlaardingerbroek and he had had a love affair in 2017,[36] to which Vlaardingerbroek responded that it had been nothing more than a brief fling.[37]

On 29 March 2022, Will Witt, former commentator for the American conservative advocacy group PragerU, announced that he and Vlaardingerbroek had become engaged.[38] The couple had been introduced by PragerU co-founder Dennis Prager about a year prior.[39]

Posted by: rp
« on: April 16, 2024, 07:20:37 pm »

I did not see that. I will henceforth try to not promote him unless he has some good takes that have not been stated here already.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: April 16, 2024, 04:18:45 pm »

OK, but why promote him superfluously? We already have this exact same argument covered here:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/debunking-rightist-anti-immigration-arguments/msg9867/?topicseen#msg9867

Quote
rightists claiming that if we are opposed to a wall to keep out immigrants from the country, we should "similarly" be opposed to walls to keep out immigrants from our own homes also. This is, of course, nonsense. Being opposed to a wall to keep out immigrants from the country merely means we want immigrants treated with the same standards that we treat natives in terms of freedom of movement. And, in general, we do not let natives into our own homes either.
Posted by: rp
« on: April 16, 2024, 10:37:45 am »

I agree with our enemy Hanania here again:
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1740962401917534703?t=EYzAThS7FG6Mip4ocoBflw&s=19
Quote
Can someone explain to me this rightoid argument “why don’t you let immigrants live in your house?”

Nobody ever asks them if they love their fellow Americans so much why don’t they live with them. I don’t know how this became a requirement for allowing immigrations.
Quote
I’m sure Richard would have no problem letting 10 or 15 Somali refugees live in his house with him and his family. If he could pick to have Jewish refugees or Guatemalans living in his city which would he choose?