Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: Today at 09:24:46 am »

Quote from: christianbethel on January 10, 2026, 04:44:21 pm
New blog post: https://unitythroughnobility.blogspot.com/2026/01/double-standards-in-wwii-historiography.html

In historical fact, it was indeed Hitler who sought to initiate war and to carry out aggressive expansion across Europe. The YouTube channel TIKHistory has refuted the historical narrative claiming that Hitler did not want to start a war and instead sought peace with the Western Allied countries, as presented by the Zoomer Historian channel. Regarding the record of atrocities committed by various states during the Second World War, Hitler’s regime indeed also carried out such atrocities, just like other regimes such as Great Britain and the Soviet Union. Great Britain caused the Bengal famine, the Soviet Union caused the Katyn massacre and the Holodomor, while Hitler caused the deaths of 20 million Russian civilians as well as large-scale attacks and bombings that resulted in thousands of deaths among the peoples of Britain, France, and other European countries.
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: January 10, 2026, 04:44:21 pm »

New blog post: https://unitythroughnobility.blogspot.com/2026/01/double-standards-in-wwii-historiography.html
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: December 10, 2025, 08:31:40 pm »

The title of this thread says 'Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII', but I will be posting articles that cover events outside of the conflict to illustrate the Western double standard when it comes to historiography. That being said, is there a thread where I can post about, say, the numerous colonial genocides?

Edit: Nevermind, I found it!
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: November 29, 2025, 01:41:21 pm »

American historians readily accuse National Socialist Germany for 'brainwashing' their citizens with propaganda, yet they ignore the fact they had this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Office_of_War_Information

Quote
The United States Office of War Information (OWI) was a United States government agency created during World War II. The OWI operated from June 1942 until September 1945. Through radio broadcasts, newspapers, posters, photographs, films and other forms of media, the OWI was the connection between the battlefront and civilian communities. The office also established several overseas branches, which launched a large-scale information and propaganda campaign abroad. From 1942 to 1945, the OWI reviewed film scripts, flagging material which portrayed the United States in a negative light, including anti-war sentiment.

You will remember America entered ground combat against Germany in 1942 with Operation Torch:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Torch

Quote
Operation Torch (8–16 November 1942) was an Allied invasion of French North Africa during World War II. Torch was a compromise operation that met the British objective of securing victory in North Africa while allowing American armed forces the opportunity to begin their fight against Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy on a limited scale.

About the OWI:

Quote
At the onset of World War II, the American public was in the dark regarding wartime information. One American observer noted: "It all seemed to boil down to three bitter complaints...first, that there was too much information; second, that there wasn't enough of it; and third, that in any event it was confusing and inconsistent". Further, the American public confessed a lack of understanding as to why the world was at war, and held great resentment against other Allied Nations. President Roosevelt established the OWI to both meet the demands for news and less confusion, as well as resolve American apathy towards the war.

The OWI's creation was not without controversy. The American public, and the United States Congress in particular, were wary of propaganda for several reasons. First, the press feared a centralized agency as the sole distributor of wartime information. Second, Congress feared an American propaganda machine that could resemble Joseph Goebbels' operation in Nazi Germany (facepalm). Third, previous attempts at propaganda under the Committee on Public Information/Creel Committee during WWI were viewed as a failure. And fourth, the American public favored an isolationist or non-interventionist policy and were therefore hesitant to support a pro-war propaganda campaign targeting Americans.

But in the wake of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the need for coordinated and properly disseminated wartime information from the military/administration to the public outweighed the fears associated with American propaganda. President Roosevelt entrusted the OWI to journalist and CBS newsman Elmer Davis, with the mission to take "an active part in winning the war and in laying the foundations for a better postwar world".

About Davis:

Quote
In 1928 he [Davis] published the novel Giant Killer, a retelling of the Biblical story of David.
...
As Director of the Office of War Information, Davis recommended to Roosevelt that Japanese-Americans be permitted to enlist for service in the Army and Navy and urged him to oppose bills in Congress that would deprive Nisei of citizenship and intern them during the war. He argued that Japanese propaganda proclaiming it a racial war could be combated by deeds that counteracted this. Davis has been termed one of the "unsung forefathers" of the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, an all-Nisei combat unit in the war.
...
Davis was also instrumental in loosening censorship rules that forbade the publication of images of dead GIs on the battlefield. Until late 1943, the U.S. Office of Censorship permitted the media to publish only images of blanket-covered bodies and flag-draped coffins of dead U.S. soldiers, partly for fear that Americans would be demoralized if they had any graphic understanding of the human price being paid in the war. The government also restricted what reporters could write, and coverage was generally upbeat and bloodless.

Wow, they even had a literal Office of Censorship (more on that later):

Quote
The Office of Censorship was an emergency wartime agency set up by the United States federal government on December 19, 1941, to aid in the censorship of all communications coming into and going out of the United States, including its territories and the Philippines. The efforts of the Office of Censorship to balance the protection of sensitive war related information with the constitutional freedoms of the press is considered largely successful.

Moving on:

Quote
In conjunction with the War Relocation Authority, the OWI produced a series of documentary films related to the internment of Japanese Americans. Japanese Relocation and several other films were designed by Milton S. Eisenhower to educate the general public on the internment, to counter the tide of anti-Japanese sentiment in the country, and to encourage Japanese-American internees to resettle outside camp or to enter military service. The OWI also worked with camp newspapers to disseminate information to internees.

What a slap in the internees' faces. They probably sanitized the footage to make it look like the inmates were living well.

Davis has some words about his methods for propaganda:

Quote
The OWI Bureau of Motion Pictures (BMP) headed by Lowell Mellet worked with the Hollywood movie studios to produce films that advanced American war aims. According to Elmer Davis, "The easiest way to inject a propaganda idea into most people's minds is to let it go through the medium of an entertainment picture when they do not realize that they are being propagandized." Successful films depicted the Allied armed forces as valiant "Freedom fighters", and advocated for civilian participation, such as conserving fuel or donating food to troops.

The Americans even had their own Gleiwitz Incident:

Quote
One of the most astounding of all OWI operations occurred in Luxembourg. Known as Operation Annie, the United States 12th Army Group ran a secret radio station from 2:00–6:30 am every morning from a house in Luxembourg pretending to be loyal Rhinelanders under Nazi occupation. They spoke of Nazi commanders hiding their desperate position from the German public, which caused dissent among Nazi supporters. Further, they led Nazi forces into an Allied trap, and then staged an Allied attack on the Annie Radio office to maintain their cover.

Of course, the OWI was not without controversy:

Quote
From 1942 to 1945, the OWI's Bureau of Motion Pictures reviewed 1,652 film scripts and revised or discarded any that portrayed the United States in a negative light, including material that made Americans seem "oblivious to the war or anti-war."
...
Some of the writers, producers, and actors of OWI programs admired the Soviet Union and were either loosely affiliated with or were members of the Communist Party USA.

All in all, it is reminiscent of the great lengthss taken by Herr Minister Goebbels to disseminate propaganda, though this propaganda (like all Western propaganda) is false.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 20, 2025, 05:17:21 pm »

For reference:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_welfare_in_Nazi_Germany

Quote
There was widespread support for animal welfare in Nazi Germany[1] (German: Tierschutz im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland) among the country's leadership. Adolf Hitler and his top officials took a variety of measures to ensure animals were protected.[2]
...
In his private diaries, Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels described Hitler as a vegetarian who was contemptuous of Judaism and Christianity for the ethical distinction they drew between the value of humans and the value of animals;[6][5] Goebbels also mentions that Hitler planned to discourage slaughterhouses in the German Reich following the conclusion of World War II.[6]
...
The current animal welfare laws in Germany were initially introduced by the Nazis.[10]
...
According to Boria Sax, the Nazis rejected anthropocentric reasons for animal protection—animals were to be protected for their own sake.[12]
...
the animal was to be "protected for itself" ("um seiner selbst willen geschützt"), and made "an object of protection going far beyond the hitherto existing law" ("Objekt eines weit über die bisherigen Bestimmungen hinausgehenden Schutzes").[18]
...
between 1927 and 1937, these policies resulted in a decline in consumption of 17 percent for meat, 21 percent for milk, and 46 percent for eggs.[22]

HAIL HITLER!

Which is not to deny that plenty of NSDAP members were in reality behaviourally nearer to 764 and other neo-Nazi groups (which is actually just normal Western civilization) than to Hitlerism:

Quote
German experimenters placed rats in cells into which cigarette smoke was introduced. The rats gasped, fell on each other, and finally suffocated to death.[29] Other experiments were conducted in which it was shown that the tar emitted in cigarette smoke caused cancer in mice at a high rate.[30] Researchers also exposed mice to asbestos to prove that it can cause lung cancer.[31] In 1939, the SS doctor, Sigmund Rascher, performed a series of experiments on animals with the direct cooperation of Himmler.
...
At the University of Freiburg, an experiment was conducted on cats with brain electrode implants.[33] In 1942 the German Nobel laureate bacteriologist Gerhard Domagk conducted infection experiments on animals when he examined the effect of sulfa on gangrene necrosis in animals.[34] The German dermatologist Hans Theodor Schreus also conducted similar infection experiments in animals. In 1941, he infected exposed muscles of mice, then crushed their muscles to encourage the development of infection.[35]

From 1933, the Nazi doctor Carl Clauberg conducted experiments on animals in research on reproduction. In his research he demonstrated how the fertility of animals can be neutralized and then restored.[36] The Nazi neurologist, Georg Schaltenbrand studied multiple sclerosis between 1935-1942. As part of his research, he injected into the spines of great apes fluid from the spines of humans with sclerosis. The monkeys fell ill, but Schaltenbrand was not sure it was multiple sclerosis. In an attempt to find out, he injected the liquid from the monkeys into the spines of 14 mentally and physically disabled people.[37] The German authorities ordered the German chemist, Gerhard Schrader to perform experiments on animals in the field of nerve gas research, and in these experiments, all the animals died. The German army ordered more extensive experiments in nerve gas research on baboons and other types of monkeys. These animals vomited, excreted feces uncontrollably, lost control of their body movements, and convulsed until they died.
...
On June 12, 1944, the head of the Military Academy of Medicine in Berlin, the virologist, Eugen Haagen sent a letter to Brigadier General Walter Schreiber in which he complained that his laboratory mice were running out and asked for a new supply: "May I ask you to endeavor to secure for me several thousand mice of both sexes, preferably only young animals."[41] At the Luftwaffe's animal farm 200,000 rabbits were grown for experimental purposes.[42]
...
Hunting was a common hobby among the leaders of the Nazi regime, Gauleiters, members of the Nazi extermination squads, and extermination camp staff.[43] A non-exhaustive list of hunters among notable Nazis includes:

Among Hitler's cabinet ministers: Hermann Göring,[44] Heinrich Himmler,[45][46][47] Joachim von Ribbentrop,[45] Wilhelm Keitel,[48] Hans Frank[49][50]
Among Gauleiters and other senior Nazi politicians: Arthur Greiser,[51] Erich Koch,[46][47] Karl Kaufmann,[43][47] Max Amann[52]
Among SS and Waffen-SS generals: Reinhard Heydrich,[53][54] Oswald Pohl,[55][47] Odilo Globocnik,[47] Gottlob Berger,[56][47] Sepp Dietrich,[57] Werner Lorenz,[58] Karl Wolff,[45][47] Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski,[47] Otto Rasch[59]
Among top army commanders: Erwin Rommel,[60] Heinz Guderian,[61][62] Eduard Dietl,[63] Adolf Galland[64]
Among the Nazi staff in Auschwitz: Rudolf Höss,[65] Richard Baer,[66][67] Eduard Wirths,[68] Horst Schumann,[69] Victor Capesius.[70]
...
Hitler himself said in a conversation on September 7, 1942 that hunting for German officers is like jewelry for women.[80] At a meeting held by Martin Bormann, Hitler's secretary, with the Nazi governors in early 1942, the Gauleiters were so eager to tell their hunting stories that Bormann was unable to conduct a discussion of the serious issues at hand.[43] On July 21, 1941, the SS officer and member of the Einsatzkommando, Felix Landau, noted in his diary: "The men got a day off, and some of them went hunting."[81]

Other than Hitler himself, it was really only the original Eckart disciples (Hess, Rosenberg, etc.) who understood that National Socialism was supposed to be a form of applied Gnosticism.
Posted by: PotatoChip
« on: November 19, 2025, 10:51:12 pm »

(There's probably a better place for this post).

Quote
764 is a decentralized, internationally operating online sextortion network. It emerged in 2021 from the CVLT network.

Although 764 has been described as a "Satanic neo-Nazi cult" by multiple sources,[3][4] investigations suggest that its members' misanthropic worldview and sadistic tendencies are more significant drivers, with group dynamics playing a key role in further radicalization. Members of 764 frequently adopt the corresponding symbolism but are primarily described as being motivated by sadism.[5][6]

764 is classified as a terror network by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), and is considered a terrorist "tier one" investigative matter by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) similarly classifies 764 as an "ideological violent extremist network"...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/764_(organization)

"Child abuse and animal cruelty". These people of no idea of what Hitler would actually do to them. That's Neo-Nazis for you...

Victims of extremist 764 network warn parents about predators targeting kids online
Quote
Parents speak out about how their 13-year-old son was allegedly coerced into taking his own life by the sinister online network, which has spread around the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQFudD1ar14

Who created Neo-Nazis ultimately, was it the same westerners who refused to listen to General George S. Patton that denazification of postwar Germany was actually a terrible idea? Now look at what you people have created FFS!
Posted by: PotatoChip
« on: October 25, 2025, 12:25:37 am »

Social fascism
Quote
Social fascism was a theory developed by the Communist International (Comintern) in the late 1920s which saw social democracy as a moderate variant of fascism, particularly on the basis of their shared interest in class collaboration. The theory was abandoned by the Comintern in 1933 after the victory of the Nazis in Germany and subsequent suppression of communists.

The Comintern argued that capitalism had entered a Third Period in which proletarian revolution was imminent, but could be prevented by social democrats and other "fascist" forces.

Overview

Poster of the Portuguese MRPP of a rally on 12 October 1975 at Campo Pequeno, in Lisbon, commemorating a killed party member, whose slogan reads: "Neither Fascism, nor Social fascism. Popular Government" At the 6th World Congress of the Comintern in 1928, the end of capitalist stability and the beginning of the "Third Period" was proclaimed. The end of capitalism, accompanied with a working class revolution, was expected and social democracy was identified as the main enemy of the Communists. The Comintern's theory had roots in Grigory Zinoviev's argument that international social democracy is a wing of fascism. That view was accepted by Joseph Stalin, who described fascism and social democracy as "twin brothers", arguing that fascism depends on the active support of social democracy and that social democracy depends on the active support of fascism. After it was declared at the Sixth Congress, the theory of social fascism became accepted by many in the world communist movement...".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_fascism#Overview

Quote
According to the idea of the NSDAP [Nazi party], we are the German left. Nothing is more hateful to us than the right-wing national ownership block. - Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff (The Attack), (6 December 1931), quoted in Wolfgang Venohr’s book: Documents of German existence: 500 years of German national history 1445-1945, Athenäum Verlag, 1980, p. 291, In German: „Der Idee der NSDAP entsprechend sind wir die deutsche Linke. Nichts ist uns verhaßter als der rechtsstehende nationale Besitzbürgerblock

Quote
We are socialists because we see the social question as a matter of necessity and justice for the very existence of a state for our people, not a question of cheap pity or insulting sentimentality. The worker has a claim to a living standard that corresponds to what he produces. We have no intention of begging for that right… Since the political powers of the day are neither willing nor able to create such a situation, socialism must be fought for. It is a fighting slogan both inwardly and outwardly. It is aimed domestically at the bourgeois parties and Marxism at the same time, because both are sworn enemies of the coming workers’ state. It is directed abroad at all powers that threaten our national existence and thereby the possibility of the coming socialist national state. - Joseph Goebbels, “Those Damn Nazis: Why Are We Socialists?” written by Joseph Goebbels and Mjölnir, Die verfluchten Hakenkreuzler. Etwas zum Nachdenken, Nazi propaganda pamphlet (Munich: Verlag Frz. Eher, 1932)

See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/re-national-socialists-were-socialists-3223/

There's a "MAGA-Communism" thread around here as well somewhere, but I couldn't find it. It exists and belongs in this thread...


Posted by: New Mythos
« on: October 24, 2025, 10:17:24 pm »


Sci-Fi, Satire, and the Post-WWII Mythos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H52OedcjRFA

Quote
These regimes are imagined as bleak, universally oppressive murder machines, and for some people they were. But they also had wide public support. The Nazis National Socialists actually did deliver on many of their promises with jobs and economic growth, even if a lot of it was built on shady financial shenanigans, MEFO bills and whatnot.

Quote
...while there are a lot of factors involved with Italy's sharp reduction in the number of its citizens immigrating after the fascists came to power, it's notable that some Italians that had immigrated to America went back during Mussolini's rule.

Quote
I'm not saying that fascism was great, only that it wasn't **** Mordor. People raised their kids, walked their dog, went out to dinner, hung out, and laughed with their friends. These were overwhelmingly normal people, for the most part, living what we would recognize as mostly normal lives. But that was not the cultural archetype that was needed during and even after the war. They had to be monsters, goblins, and malicious sorcery updated to the modern age. And so it morphs into the jack booted Mirmadons of popular fiction. Villains who will blow up entire planets on a whim. The Galactic Empire being the most famous iteration of the space Nazi trope, the one that'sbeen the template for a half century now.

Quote
The Man in the High Castle is notable here. After the series wrapped, all the swastikas were not simply thrown out or sent to the prop house, but carefully cut up and burned, almost like magical runes that needed to be ritually destroyed, lest the power of the twisty spider get out and corrupt the world. As though just by existing they hurt people, exuding danger by the sigil alone.

Posted by: Not Racist
« on: October 17, 2025, 08:16:43 am »


Every Major Nazi Myth Explained By a German by Brofessor Stein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3ZFY_pfpu0
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: June 30, 2025, 07:12:53 am »

Quote
Nazis did not conceal their racism. Though extreme, it built on top of mundane sentiments of tha time. The Weimar Constitution itself defined the German nation as a union of "tribes," and "German blood" defined citizenship (Brubaker 1992). Racial theory was influential contemporary biomedical science in many countries, and common-sensical racial assumptions were everywhere made. Germans and other nations were de- fined by blood, hereditarily, and to this was yoked a sense of national superiority common among Great Powers. Germans were regarded as racially superior to nations around them, especially to the supposedly less civilized nations to the east and to "Semites." Anti-Slav jokes, songs, and graffiti were common through east of the country, even un the SPD.

Source :

1. Fascists by Mann, Michael Page 183 and 184

https://archive.org/details/fascists0000mann/page/182/mode/2up?q=A+strong+state+will+see+that+production+is+carried+on+in+the+national+interests
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 26, 2025, 10:12:36 pm »

"racism"

Racism is ethnotribalism, which indeed National Socialism opposes. But what you posted has nothing to do with ethnotribalism. You yourself in your previous post did not use the term "racism", but instead "racialism":

Quote
Hermann Goering, Commander-in-Chief of the Hitler Regime's Air Force, Explains that the National Socialist Movement was not Officially adopting Racialist Worldview

which could refer to racial idealism, which National Socialism absolutely emphasizes, although I agree that Goering does not (and hence have never taken him seriously).

Goering's intellectual dishonesty/incompetence (not sure which) is further demonstrated here:

Quote
a faction of Nazis who were fanatic racial exponents became politically powerful. Men like Rosenberg, Streicher, Himmler, and Goebbels.

Do I really need to explain that these four individuals did not belong in the same faction? Thus for Goering to claim that they do only discredits Goering himself as a reliable source on National Socialism.

More about Goering:

Quote
He instituted reforms to the forestry laws and acted to protect endangered species. Around this time, he became interested in Schorfheide Forest, where he set aside 100,000 acres (400 km2) as a state park, which is still extant. There he built an elaborate hunting lodge

Quote
Italian Foreign Minister Galeazzo Ciano once noted Göring wearing a fur coat

 ::)

Besides, if you believe that traitors are reliable sources, then you would also have to consider the possibility that Himmler (another traitor) is also qualified to define National Socialism. But Himmler was racist (ie. ethnotribalist). So using traitors as sources does not at all strengthen our case that National Socialism is anti-racist.

(I understand that you yourself, in addition to being anti-racist (which I am glad to see), have never been enthusiastic about racial idealism (which worries me).)
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: May 26, 2025, 09:04:03 pm »

Quote from: 90sRetroFan on May 26, 2025, 05:39:35 pm
"Hermann Goering, Commander-in-Chief of the Hitler Regime's Air Force, Explains that the National Socialist Movement was not Officially adopting Racialist Worldview"

Goering was a traitor:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_G%C3%B6ring

Quote
Informed on 22 April 1945 that Hitler intended to commit suicide, Göring sent a telegram to Hitler requesting his permission to assume leadership of the Reich. Considering his request an act of treason, Hitler removed Göring from all his positions, expelled him from the party and ordered his arrest.

He is not qualified to say what National Socialism is or is not.

What I want to convey is that I want to show from the historical record data that, even, traitors from within the party explained that the National Socialist view did not emphasize racism.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 26, 2025, 05:39:35 pm »

"Hermann Goering, Commander-in-Chief of the Hitler Regime's Air Force, Explains that the National Socialist Movement was not Officially adopting Racialist Worldview"

Goering was a traitor:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_G%C3%B6ring

Quote
Informed on 22 April 1945 that Hitler intended to commit suicide, Göring sent a telegram to Hitler requesting his permission to assume leadership of the Reich. Considering his request an act of treason, Hitler removed Göring from all his positions, expelled him from the party and ordered his arrest.

He is not qualified to say what National Socialism is or is not.
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: May 26, 2025, 10:43:03 am »

Hermann Goering, Commander-in-Chief of the Hitler Regime's Air Force, Explains that the National Socialist Movement was not Officially adopting Racialist Worldview

Quote
"If one went along with National Socialism one didn't have to agree with the twenty-five points of their platform. Some of us were more interested in one point, others in another. Some National Socialists were members for political, others for social, still others for racial reasons."

Did he consider the race politics of the Nazis an intrinsic matter, or merely incidental? "Not basic at all. Completely irrelevant and incidental. It only became basic or important because a faction of Nazis who were fanatic racial exponents became politically powerful. Men like Rosenberg, Streicher, Himmler, and Goebbels. National Socialism could also have taken a much different course."

Would he have approved of another course? "Certainly. Many of us in the party were opposed to the sharp racial laws and politics but we were too busy. Political and economic strength are more important than all this racial propaganda. Furthermore, I was never so close to the party. I was more in the state section. Personally I would never have allowed the party to have so much influence on the state. There were two groups. One espoused the theory that the party should rule the state. The second felt that the state should govern the party. I was for the second idea."

-  Hermann Goering on the Nuremberg Interviews, May 21, 1946

Sumber :

The Nuremberg Interviews by Leon Goldensohn Page 105 & 106

Goering did not even refer to Hitler as a racial fanatic in the course of the interview

Recall :

Quote
The society which was created after the NSDAP achieved power was in many ways a compromise. Hitler himself admitted (to Leon Degrelle among others) that it would be the next generation - the Hitler Youth generation - which would create a genuine National-Socialist society. Organizations such as the SS and the Hitler Youth were steps toward the creation of such a National Socialist society, and it was these organizations which implemented the ideal of personal honour, and respect for others, of whatever race and culture. As Hitler and his true followers, such as Rudolf Hess, matured in understanding, so too did National-Socialism. National-Socialism was not born, fully developed and fully-understood, in the early years of the NSDAP - it developed slowly, over several decades. Thus, as Hitler admitted, Mein Kampf was never intended to be some kind of bible of National-Socialism: it was the product of its time and while most of the underlying principles of National-Socialism were laid down in that book, some principles were not. What was written was subject to change, to revision, as National-Socialism itself developed. - David Myatt, March 2011

Source :

David Myatt: A National Socialist Ideologist by Rachael Stirling page 14

https://archive.org/details/dm-ns-ideologist/page/n13/mode/2up

Quote
68 years ago (1930s)

'The third point is that a person must be racially flawless. Let him be Germanic, or Roman, or Chinese, or a Jew, or an Indian, or a Negro, and so on. I respect all equally. We can work with and count on all of them. Each has his established traits. Depending on what one is looking for, this one or that one is to be preferred for the job in question. It is no different with people than with horses or dogs. Once one has established the proper race for a particular task, one can rest assured that the task will be resolved.'

...

“But if what you say is true, you should not have written Mein Kampf beforehand,” I objected.

“Quite right. And I frequently regret that I did. But at the time, when I was in Landsberg after November 9, 1923, I thought everything was over. I was in captivity, I was deprived of my freedom, the party was expropriated, dissolved—everything seemed at an end, even worse than Germany after the Great War. I wrote Mein Kampf as a kind of report to the German Volk, chiefly in memory of the martyrs of November 9. I wrote it out of the narrowness of my cell.

“When I was released, I had Mein Kampf printed. Perhaps, I hoped, it would serve to rally my old friends. And that really happened! That is how it came about.

“But gradually, I saw that many things were, after all, different from the way I had seen them through prison bars and from the way I had figured them out. And soon I set out to draft changes, improvements. But they only turned out to be changes for the worse. I thought about withdrawing the book. But it was too late. It made its way through Germany, it was even spread abroad, and what was right and positive about it did not miss its mark. So I kept hands off. I made no more changes. The book even gave me the financial basis for reconstructing the party. If I were to write it today, a lot would be different. But today, I would not write it at all

Source :

Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant page 143 and 273

Quote
"Racial war need not break out if people are selected not according to their appearance but according to their achievements. Looks and ability are often quite far apart. You can make the selection according to the appearance, and you can make it - as the party has done - according to the test of life." - Adolf Hitler, 27th January 1942

Reference :

1. Monologe im Führerhauptquartier 1941–1944 by Heinrich Heim Page 201

2. Adolf Hitler, 27 January 1942, quoted from Zitelmann, "Hitler's National Socialism," Page 456.

3. Exposing National Socialism's Contradictions to refute it - TIKhistory, 10th December 2024 (Minute 12:35 until 12:55)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYLvrwj-HFI

Quote
In May 1944, to officers in a remarkable speech at the Platterhof, Hitler said: "We have this people of ours that is not to be identified with a race, and this is now clear to millions. ... But when I began (speaking) about twenty-five years ago this was not so. I was told by [counterrevolutionary-bürgerlich) circles: Yes, Volk and Race are one and the same! No! Volk and race are not the same. Race is a component of blood, a hematologic [blutmässig) kernel, but the Volk is very often composed not of one race but of two, three, four or five different racial kernels. ... Each of these racial kernels possesses particular talents."*

Source :

1. The Hitler of history by John Lukacs page 123

https://archive.org/details/hitlerofhistory00luka/page/122/mode/2up?q=platterhof

2. Kuzniar-Clark - Black Nazis II Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler's Armed Forces page 226 and 229

3. Institut für Zeitgeschichte, MA 316, Ansprache des Fuhrers vor Generalen und Offizieren am 26.5.1944 im Platterhof, 26-28, 50.

Posted by: christianbethel
« on: May 26, 2025, 09:20:41 am »

Quote
White Nationalists and Neo-Nazis have always portrayed a historical narrative in which Hitler was a peacekeeper. This makes no sense, given that Hitler was a socialist and thought to reject pacifism, and reject Western colonialism.
Yeah, that's true. Still, authors like Stolfi, Tedor, Taylor, and Schultze-Rhonhof can't be ignored or discredited because they use primary German-language sources in their books discussing the origins of WWII. Conversely, this 'historian' you've been quoting does not.