Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: February 17, 2026, 04:42:00 pm »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usm-bXQa7k0
I disagree with presenting folkism as the correct option on the grounds that Arctic Alliance is less reliable than folkism. We should argue that folkism is the correct option even if the opposite were true, on purely moral considerations. Even if "whites" were sincerely willing to accept you, why would you want to be accepted by them?
I propose a simplifying thought experiment. If you are currently not yet born, and have to be born as a human but can choose to be born to either "white" parents or "non-white" parents, with the condition that after birth you will not remember being offered this choice, which would you choose? This removes the issue of non-guaranteed acceptance. Nevertheless, can you in good conscience allow the "white" side to have one more member, and the "non-white" side one fewer member, given awareness of world history?
Woke comments:
I disagree with presenting folkism as the correct option on the grounds that Arctic Alliance is less reliable than folkism. We should argue that folkism is the correct option even if the opposite were true, on purely moral considerations. Even if "whites" were sincerely willing to accept you, why would you want to be accepted by them?
I propose a simplifying thought experiment. If you are currently not yet born, and have to be born as a human but can choose to be born to either "white" parents or "non-white" parents, with the condition that after birth you will not remember being offered this choice, which would you choose? This removes the issue of non-guaranteed acceptance. Nevertheless, can you in good conscience allow the "white" side to have one more member, and the "non-white" side one fewer member, given awareness of world history?
Woke comments:
Quote
The world is healing in Truth and revealing the wicked
Quote
How they side with white people, THEIR oppressors, and after white people colonised and destroyed their countries, is beyond me

