Look who's back again?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CZPKlQEfvg1:11
And here come these, you know, very
1:13
arrogant, confident, unabashed guys who
1:15
are saying, yeah, all the religions are
1:17
bad and evil and wrong and here's why.
1:19
And so they had their moment in the sun.
I was warning against them even then! Here had emerged the perfect opportunity to focus on the evil of the Old Testament, the logical conclusion of which would be the revival of Gnostic Christianity, and out of nowhere a movement led by three Jews (Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens) (plus one Gentile useful idiot (Dennett)) suddenly showed up to instead attack religion as a whole, thereby redirecting the energy of disillusioned Judeo-Christians into atheism instead? How much of an airhead do you have to be to not figure out what was going on? (Answer: at least as much as False Leftist Kulinski, apparently.)
1:21
But what happened with the new atheist
1:23
is kind of sad and pathetic because
1:25
instead of like staying true to those
1:27
like enlightenment values and liberal
1:30
values
Screw your enlightenment values and liberal values a.k.a. modernist anthropocentrism! Where does the anthropocentrism come from in the first place? The Old Testament FFS!
ended
1:35
up going right-wing and their hate boner
1:39
for Muslims became like genuine bigotry
1:43
against Muslims. Um, you know, you also
1:46
had they got obsessed with these like
1:49
purple-haired social justice warriors on
1:51
college campuses and they acted like
1:53
they were the main enemies of
1:54
civilization. So, out of the new atheist
1:56
thing did come this like antisocial
1:58
justice warrior craze, right? And so
2:00
many of them went right.
Do you know why? Because social justice is indeed the main enemy of Western civilization. You can have social justice or you can Western civilization. You cannot have both (False Leftist Kulinski believes you can because he thinks social justice comes from enlightenment values, when in reality it comes from Jesus and Mohammed, the original SJWs against Judaism).
He's just a
2:28
neocon.
He is, but you have the wrong definition of neocon.
They're
2:42
the bad guys. They have bad values. They
2:43
come from a bad culture with a bad
2:44
religion. We're trying to spread our
2:46
good values. And so like the wars are
2:47
justified.
This is not necessarily neocon. It is only neocon if "bad" means non-Western and "good" means Western. If it is the reverse, it is anti-neocon. But False Leftist Kulinski does not understand this as usual.
If Dick Cheney had
2:32
his way, he would turn the Middle East
2:34
into like Wyoming.
If I had my way I would turn Israel into Palestine. But False Leftist Kulinski cannot tell the difference between me and Cheney.
It's so easy to be like,
3:38
"Oh, yeah, that last war which was an
3:39
obvious disaster. I'm against that. But
3:41
this new one, this is going to be
3:42
great."
War against Israel would be great.
Sam Harris
10:40
correctly believes that Donald Trump is
10:43
like a psychopathic fascist. How can you
10:46
in one breath say, "This guy's a
10:48
psychopathic fascist, but also he should
10:50
launch an illegal and offensive war
10:52
against this country that didn't attack
10:54
us and overthrow their government and
10:56
fix their political system."
I believe Putin is a psychopath. I am thankful every day that he invaded Ukraine. But False Leftist Kulinski cannot tell the difference between me and Harris.
I believe Trump is a psychopath. I want him to get the US into a war against Denmark over Greenland (preferably ending with Denmark getting nuked). This would also prevent the war against Iran. False Leftist Kulinski does not understand this either.
Home
Search
Login
Register
