Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 03, 2025, 07:32:33 pm »

"Racists will say the "blacks" are inferior they're more mature (like here), but then they would also say "blacks" are inferior because they're less mature."

To be fair, what our enemies mean is that "black" children reach puberty at an earlier age on average:



but "black" adults have lower sexual dimorphism than "white" adults (due to the latter having a heavier puberty) on average:



In short, our enemies think that "blacks" are inferior because "black" children aren't really children and "black" adults aren't really adults, just like they think "blacks" are inferior because "black" women aren't really women and "black" men aren't really men. We could say that Western civilization, in addition to valuing high sexual dimorphism, also values high pre/post-pubescent dimorphism. This is consistent with Westerners being not only homophobic and transphobic, but also MAP-phobic.

We also see this in how, at the same time as Western civilization is praised by our enemies for having fiction with the most adult themes:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg16234/#msg16234

it is also only Western civilization has an explicit category of fiction called "children's fiction". In every other civilization prior to the colonial era, it was considered normal for children and adults to consume the same fiction.

Even the stupidity known as:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_rating

was a Western idea:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Board_of_Film_Classification

Quote
The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC)[3] is a non-governmental organisation founded by the British film industry in 1912

Ultimately, Western civilization is the most age-segregationist civilization. (Compulsory schooling for children is the most cruel manifestation of this.)
Posted by: antizion
« on: December 03, 2025, 10:20:15 am »

Quote from: 90sRetroFan on April 23, 2024, 08:27:13 pm
Previously:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-bones/msg10572/#msg10572

Our enemies are still doing it, this time with kids:



(Is rp paying attention? This is an Oval.)

Contrast with, for example:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-ahimsa/msg7870/#msg7870

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-ahimsa/msg19139/#msg19139

Who looks more dangerous? (Hint: ask the fish!)

I always find this funny. Racists will say the "blacks" are inferior they're more mature (like here), but then they would also say "blacks" are inferior because they're less mature. They love to flip-flop the narrative as long as it fit their predetermined conclusion.

A classic case of a psuedoideology:
https://aryanism.net/philosophy/ideology-vs-pseudoideology/
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 02, 2025, 09:19:43 pm »

"We at least have this much:"

This could be more like checkers, which is known to be much older than chess:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkers#History

Quote
A board resembling a checkers board was found in Ur dating from 3000 BC.[4] In the British Museum are specimens of ancient Egyptian checkerboards, found with their pieces in burial chambers, and the game was played by the pharaoh Hatshepsut.[2][5] Plato mentioned a game, πεττεία or petteia, as being of Egyptian origin,[5] and Homer also mentions it.[5] The method of capture was placing two pieces on either side of the opponent's piece. It was said to have been played during the Trojan War.[6][7]

so, as you suggested, Turanians probably came across checkers, decided it was not complicated enough, and modified it into chess.
Posted by: rp
« on: June 02, 2025, 06:32:56 pm »

"I personally have never enjoyed chess anywhere near as much as I have enjoyed dice-based board games.  :)"
I found that when the family played dice based games, there was no competition or sense of intellectual domination among siblings. But chess very soon changed this dynamic.
Posted by: rp
« on: June 02, 2025, 06:26:22 pm »

"Both face shapes are terrible. I'm not sure what you are trying to get at."
Gukesh's face is a little narrower, eye sockets shallower...


"which is millennia after the Vedic invasion, therefore I am not sure how we can credibly claim it is Aryan. Unless you have information indicating that it already existed during Indus Valley civilization?"
We at least have this much:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/zqw9wh/this_ancient_chess_board_was_excavated_from/?rdt=38408

"Also, how according to your theory do you explain the the overtly Turanian pieces?"
Perhaps it was a later addition, and the pieces were not named as such before?

"I personally have never enjoyed chess anywhere near as much as I have enjoyed dice-based board games.  :)"
I liked the mental challenge that came with chess, but soon I found that winning it was basically psychological manipulation. But part of me wants to think it isn't necessarily this way? Anyway, in the short term I support "non Whites" reclaiming it (and restoring its non Western origins) from "Whites" (including Jews).

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 02, 2025, 05:26:03 pm »

Both face shapes are terrible. I'm not sure what you are trying to get at.

"Chess belongs to Aryans (its original creators)"

The earliest known version:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturanga

Quote
It is first known from India around the seventh century AD.[1]

which is millennia after the Vedic invasion, therefore I am not sure how we can credibly claim it is Aryan. Unless you have information indicating that it already existed during Indus Valley civilization?

Also, how according to your theory do you explain the the overtly Turanian pieces?

Quote
ratha or sakaṭa (chariot
...
aśva (horse

Thinking more about this topic, my intuition is that chess is Turanian. Chess is basically each player trying to herd the other player's pieces. If it is Aryan games we are looking for, we should look to games involving chance, which better parallel farmers' mentality to account for factors such as weather etc.. And indeed archaelogically:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice

Quote
Excavations from graves at Mohenjo-daro, an Indus Valley civilization settlement, unearthed terracotta dice dating to 2500–1900 BCE,[7] including at least one die whose opposite sides all add up to seven, as in modern dice.[8]

I personally have never enjoyed chess anywhere near as much as I have enjoyed dice-based board games.  :)
Posted by: rp
« on: June 01, 2025, 07:53:09 pm »

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hindustantimes.com/sports/others/magnus-carlsen-bangs-table-in-anger-d-gukesh-in-disbelief-after-plotting-epic-norway-chess-revenge-on-world-no-1-101748812401530-amp.html

Compare face shapes:


Vs



Chess belongs to Aryans (its original creators), not Jews or Gentiles.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 17, 2025, 07:44:47 pm »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwwXz4ygS7g

Why is it surprising? We have always known that women are on average shorter than men and live longer.

Anyway, this confirms that puberty is literal poison.

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 30, 2024, 05:05:08 pm »

Another prodigy:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/12-old-memorized-periodic-table-165754752.html

Quote
Recent high school graduate Suborno Isaac Bari, 12, plans to start studying math and physics at New York University in the fall, but he’s already got his ambitious sights set on beginning a doctoral program.
...
The gifted tween, who memorized the periodic table at 2 years old and has taught lectures at colleges in India since he was 7, graduated on Wednesday from Malverne High School in Nassau County, New York.

Face:

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 25, 2024, 05:17:20 pm »

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jocb.351

Quote
There are national differences in scientific activity that are not well accounted for by economic and intellectual factors alone. We examine the novel hypothesis that androgen levels may also play a role. Androgens are often referred to as male hormones, but are present in both men and women, and have been linked to performance in other domains, such as sports and entrepreneurship. National-level empirical data on scientific productivity, in terms of numbers of publications, and science Nobel laureates were compared to seven national-level androgen indicators; namely androgenic body hair, the length of the CAG repeat on the androgen receptor gene, prostate cancer incidence, male and female 2D:4D finger ratio, and sex frequency and number of partners. The majority of these indicators were associated in the expected direction with per capita number of scientific publications and Nobel prizes. Moreover, several indicators significantly interacted with national-level estimates of intelligence, such that androgen levels are related to measures of the scientific achievement only when the level of intelligence is relatively high. These findings may partly explain the global distribution of scientific productivity, achievements, and Nobel prizes.

Even before I was aware of its correlation with progress, I was already disgusted by body hair because of its association with biological maturation. Once again my inutition was correct! Progress is basically the civilizational version of maturation. Think about it this way: a threshold of biological maturity is required for biological reproduction, whereas a threshold of progress is required for settling outer space (ie. reproducing Western civilization elsewhere). All forms of maturation are fundamentally evil.

For reference:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen#Male_pubertal_development

Homework: if the aim is to end progress ASAP, who should be prohibited from reproducing first? Hints:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/how-to-resign-as-a-jew/msg17926/#msg17926

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg16234/#msg16234

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg24370/#msg24370
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 04, 2024, 05:40:16 pm »

I presume you are referring to:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg7737/#msg7737

Quote
The truly neotenous do not reproduce so early, as (by definition of the term) our youth is extended. Many of us never reproduce at all. Padeomorphs, on the other hand, tend to be highly fertile (and possessing high sex drive). This confirms what I explained a long time ago: paedomorphy is a mere superficial effect not caused by neoteny

This is referring to someone who facially appears immature, whereupon their having reproduced is a way to debunk the claim that they are immature in actuality.

In contrast, the face you posted looks fully mature, thus it would not be visually surprising to see a face like that with offspring. Therefore to cite such a face having offspring is not particularly useful.

"But you have previously stated that neotenous people reproduce late due to late sexual maturation."

Yes, but other people who reproduce late are non-neotenous people who would have preferred to reproduce early but who needed a long time to become economically ready or to find a reproductive partner, whereas other people who reproduce early are people (including neotenous) who were not given a choice. The point is that age of reproduction involves too many overlapping variables to be useful as a measure of maturity.
Posted by: rp
« on: June 04, 2024, 02:54:27 pm »

"20 by ancient standards was not a young age for reproducing"
But I recall another post of yours where you, referring to a paedomorphic Chinese women who had reproduced before 25, said, "Aryans do not reproduce so early".

"In any case, I remain ambivalent about using this as an indicator of maturity, as it's not like reproducing requires exceptional skill.."
But you have previously stated that neotenous people reproduce late due to late sexual maturation.

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 31, 2024, 03:49:31 pm »

At least he won't be reproducing again!  ;D Seriously, though, 20 by ancient standards was not a young age for reproducing, so I'm not sure if this is the best example. Even with present-day cases, we could go a lot younger, such as:

https://au.news.yahoo.com/australias-youngest-parents-teen-couple-with-two-kids-under-two-38824189.html

Quote
16-year-old couple Mollie Syrigos and her boyfriend Oscar Wilks, labelled Australia's youngest parents ... The couple met when they were both 12 and became pregnant with their first child Theodore just over a year later



In any case, I remain ambivalent about using this as an indicator of maturity, as it's not like reproducing requires exceptional skill.... I still think genuine prodigal talent (which is also much statistically rarer) is likely to be a better indicator.
Posted by: rp
« on: May 31, 2024, 09:15:43 am »

Example of non-Aryan reproductive maturity
https://people.com/texas-dad-to-be-dead-electrocuted-while-trimming-tree-8655820
Quote
A 20-year-old man, who was expecting his first child, died by electrocution while trimming a tree on May 25.

Face:
Posted by: rp
« on: April 26, 2024, 01:27:05 am »

Wait, weren't rightists like Duchesne saying that "Whites" are superior to "non Whites" because "Whites" are more mature? I guess it's ok for "Whites" to be mature.