True Left

ok. I will remove it then since it seems redundant to repost it.

Which is why I find it amusing that when our enemies choose stock pictures to represent those whom they dislike, they have a trend of choosing narrow faces:

I also find this more and more amusing as each days passes, as well as more and more noticeable that what you described is exactly what is going on!

I have read this book before--it is a work of phrenology (basically 19th century palm reading pseudo-science for the skull).

Obviously we can't actually tell a real individual's character solely from looking at their physical features, but the book does have some some illustrations of timeless physiognomic intuitions.

I learned something new today:

https://medlineplus.gov/ency/imagepages/17182.htm

Body frame size is determined by a person's wrist circumference in relation to his height. For example, a man whose height is over 5' 5" and wrist is 6" would fall into the small-boned category.

I also found something that again reflects the absurdity of Western obsession with sexual dimorphism:



Why would you have gender-specific sets of sizes (which, to make things worse, use the same names for different measurements!) when you could simply have a single set of non-gender-specific sizes? (They also need to add a size A (Aryan) for <15cm wrists (e.g. mine).)

https://www.youbeauty.com/fitness/ask-a-scientist-being-big-boned/

(A quick cheat: If you wrap the thumb and middle finger of one hand around the opposite wrist, do they overlap, just touch or not touch at all?)

I had enough space left over to insert at least nine pens. My thumb and middle finger can touch around my ankle FFS. When are we going to stop letting subhumans set the standards?

"Did you yourself too view such traits as superior, or did you assume you were alone in not finding such traits superior?"

I was a relativist, so I thought the concept of viewing traits as superior itself was bad because of the negative personality attributes associated with those traits, such as aggression and high sexual promiscuity, and I thought the concept of superiority itself was intertwined with those traits.

I honestly did feel alone and cornered though because I was trying to retain my original nobility by flashing back to my childhood when I definitely did not find such traits superior, so I started questioning why such traits are considered superior by the majority of people, and wanted to challenge their idea of superiority but was intellectually restricted by my relativism. It wasn't until I discovered Aryanism, whereupon I encountered aesthetic anti-traditional absolutism through the "human beauty" page, that I realized such traits are only not superior but are in fact inferior. As a bonus, it was like the page was essentially just verbally articulating what I was feeling but was previously unable to express verbally, so I wouldn't say the website even "persuaded" me.

Does that make sense?

"hunter eyes" have always been an incel favorite, along with high fwhr (face width/height ratios. Until I discovered Aryanism, I assumed these were traits that were viewed as "superior" by all people, when in fact they are only "superior" according to Western standards of beauty that percolate through Western institutions.

Also, lol at "farmoids".