Post reply

Warning - while you were reading 65 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: March 11, 2024, 07:33:04 am »

Quote
Christian Identity, also sometimes called Israel Identity, is the only true conservative Christianity. It is true because it seeks to maintain the understanding – in accordance with Scripture - that the New Covenant was made only with those same people with whom the Old Covenant was made: the House (family) of Israel and the House (family) of Judah. These Israelite people are traceable through time to the Keltic and Germanic tribes of today. None of these people are Jews. The Jews are descended from a mere remnant of the old Kingdom of Judah along with assorted Edomite and other Arabs who were mixed into the Roman province of Judaea during the Hellenic period. There are – at last count – at least sixteen detailed essays on this website which demonstrate this, and which are replete with Biblical, archaeological and historical citations.

Christian Identity is the belief that the Covenants of God are real and consistent. It professes that the people of the Old Testament were every bit as much Christian as the people of the New Testament. They were simply looking forward to the first advent of the Christ, while we today await His Second Advent. As the famous Christian bishop Ignatius said nineteen hundred years ago, Christianity did not come from Judaism: rather, Judaism is a perversion of Christianity. Christian Identity is therefore the original Christian Orthodoxy, and Christian Identity is the original catholic faith, in the true and original use of the word "catholic" by Christian writers of the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD.

Christian Identity is the belief that there is no disparity between the Word of God, His Creation, His prophecy, and world history. It is also the understanding that while Scripture was inspired by God when it was transmitted, men have certainly mistreated it since that time, and so every passage and every doctrine must be fully investigated from all of the most ancient sources possible. As it reads in the King James Version: Study to show thyself approved.

The audio file attached to this page is perhaps one of the best we have to offer for introducing Christian Identity to the uninitiated. [It can be downloaded on the page which you are directed to by clicking here.] Please listen to it objectively, rather than regarding the slanders of the ADL and similar Jewish organizations – forever the enemies of Christ.

This paper is under development, and so is this website – always. We pray that you consider the things written here, and also in all of our other papers. And if you are one of His called, May God favor your journey.

William Finck, Christogenea.org

Source :

https://plus.google.com/+WilliamFinck. (2010, December 3). What is Christian Identity? | Christogenea.org. Christogenea.org. https://christogenea.org/articles/what-christian-identity
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: March 07, 2024, 10:22:35 pm »

Origin of Capitalism Rightist Economic Worldview

Quote
Abraham writes that Weber came to these views in conscious opposition to Werner Sombart’s contemporaneous book, The Jews and Modern Capitalism (1913), where he had argued that Jews were the major promoters of a modern nation-less capitalism. Kalberg appears to be in agreement with Abraham in writing that Weber “saw the capitalism of the Jews as a form of the speculative capitalism that had existed universally” (2002: xxiii). Nevertheless, it seems to me that Weber did detect in Judaism a rationalistic disposition as well as a “this-worldly” attitude to the world that had strong affinities with Protestantism. As Love reminds us, Weber wrote in the Protestant Ethic that Puritanism inherited the “perfectly unemotional wisdom of the Hebrews” which had seen “the rational suppression of the mystical…side of religion.” Weber also observed that Old Testament morality, despite its traditional basis in ethics, “was able to give a powerful impetus to that spirit of self-righteous and sober legality which was so characteristic of the worldly asceticism of….Protestantism” (in Love 2000b: 200).13 He included Judaism – together with the theoretical rationality of Catholic theology and the Protestant rediscovery of the original Judaic ethic – in his grand theory of Western rationalization. It was ultimately Protestantism that promoted the modern spirit of capitalism, but this should not lead us to conclude that Weber did not also attribute a very important (early) role to Judaism.

Source :

The Uniqueness of Western Civilization Ricardo Duchesne page 259 - 260
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: February 21, 2024, 03:38:04 pm »

Hope:

https://rmx.news/article/germanys-catholic-church-facing-major-crises-and-conflict-with-vatican-says-afd-party-members-arent-welcome/

Quote
The chairman of the German Bishops’ Conference (DBK), Georg Bätzing, who also serves as bishop of Limburg, said that membership in the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party is not compatible with volunteer work or holding office in the Catholic Church.

This is correct!

Quote
"Unfortunately, the danger of ethnic-nationalist and right-wing extremist thinking also exists among Catholics,” he said.

Germany’s Catholic Church is increasingly getting political, with bishops from Berlin, Erfurt, Hamburg, Magdeburg, Dresden, and Görlitz penning a letter warning against the AfD coming to power
...
The Catholic Church in Germany is not the only Christian branch that has gone “woke.” Nearly all Christian organizations now feature a variety of pro-migration and anti-conservative stances, and nearly all are hemorrhaging members.
...
It is also important to note that there is an entire area of the country where Christianity holds little sway already. The east of Germany, which was once ruled by communists, is remarkably less Christian than the former West Germany. This may in part account for the east’s willingness to back the AfD party
...
As this map from 2011 shows, the east has by and large abandoned religion, with the vast majority listing their religion as “none” or “other,” which includes the non-religious.



As Pew notes in a study comparing both East and West Germans, there are extreme differences between the two parts of the country: “Six-in-ten adults in former West Germany say religion is very or somewhat important in their lives, whereas an identical share of those in former East Germany say religion is not too or not at all important. This includes 45 percent of those in the former East who say religion is not at all important in their lives.”

East Germans also have stronger anti-immigration stances, and with Christian organizers pushing for radical open borders and an easier path to citizenship, many easterners see this messaging as failing to resonate or openly against their interests.

For once things are at least the correct way round!

See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/afd/
Posted by: races
« on: January 19, 2024, 01:09:15 am »

Maybe it was the case in the old universe that all races must live separate in their own places, but in the new universe that is being created all will be one in the light of God.
Posted by: races
« on: January 19, 2024, 12:58:32 am »

It's not possible to create a racial homogenous country in countries were multiple different races live. Therefore it's a duty for the leaders of said countries to unite the people under a nationalist ideal that is able to transcend racial divisions. It takes strength to carry this out though, one must be immune to the criticisms of the masses to do this. That's why democracy doesn't work in countries where many different races live, politicians in democracy's only focus on pleasing the masses.   
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: January 18, 2024, 12:39:16 am »

Quote
Contrary to what one has heard from the pulpit or on Christian radio, the Bible supports racial preservation and even separation. The Bible teaches that mankind is composed not of an amorphous mass of individuals but of nations. It also teaches that the basis of all genuine nations is a common ethnic stock, which is more important even than a common language, culture, political allegiance, or locale. The Bible praises homogeneity as a blessing, and posits it as the basis of love, friendship, social peace, and national harmony. The Bible also sanctions love of nation and fatherland, a virtue antagonistic to indiscriminate and large-scale immigration.

According to the famous “Table of Nations” in Genesis 10, God organized mankind into discrete nations in the aftermath of the Great Flood. He created three sets of nations, each set descending from one of the three sons of Noah: Fourteen nations from Japheth; 30 from Ham; and 26 from Shem. After listing the progenitors of each of the nations that sprang from Shem, Genesis uses a formula closely repeated for Ham and Japheth, “These are the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their languages, by their lands, according to their nations” (Gen. 10:31). The Genesis account of the dispersal of the nations concludes, “These are the families of the sons of Noah, according to their genealogies, by their nations; and out of these the nations were separated on the earth after the flood” (Gen. 10:32). These passages make clear that the essential constituent element of each nation is common ancestry, together with a “land” and a distinctive language. This is God’s creation, with no indication that it is anything other than entirely in accord with His will.

Genesis describes the areas in which these different nations settled in terms of migration patterns that conform to a broad division of races. For centuries there was universal agreement in Christendom that the Europeans were descended from Japheth, the Semites (Jews, Persians, Syrians, Arabs, and Asians) from Shem, and the Africans (including Egyptians and Canaanites) from Ham. However literally or figuratively one chooses to interpret this account, Genesis clearly divides the peoples of the earth into groups of related but racially distinct peoples.

Modern Biblical commentators and Christian leaders have tried to deny the obvious by insisting that the division of nations is not providential but accidental. They believe God intended the nations to be all as one (i.e. to cease being distinct nations). Therefore, they urge Christians to do all they can to restore mankind’s lost unity by tearing down national boundaries, promoting mass immigration, teaching English as a universal language, and intermarrying freely with members of other racial families.

This interpretation suffers from several flaws. First, if God intended mankind to be as one, why did He create many nations in the first place? Second, it is contradicted by the order of the Genesis narrative. The Table of Nations comes before the story of the Tower of Babel, indicating that God’s ordering and separating of the nations was part of His plan from the beginning. The sons of Noah refused to follow God’s clear mandate to separate and fill the earth. Instead, they gathered together, founded a city, and built a huge tower as a symbol of their power and independence. However, God’s sovereign purpose cannot be frustrated by the designs of men: “The Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth” (Gen. 11:9).

The scattering was neither arbitrary nor chaotic. According to the Biblical account, people moved with their nations in an orderly exodus that fulfilled God’s purpose. As we learn in Deuteronomy, God gave each nation or people its own lands and separated these lands by territorial boundaries: “When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of man, He set the boundaries of the people” (Deuteronomy 32:8).

The third flaw of the modernist interpretation of Genesis 10 and 11 — and from a Christian perspective the most dangerous — is that it repeats the sin of the people who built the Tower of Babel. The modern desire for global unity, amalgamation of peoples, destruction of territorial boundaries, English as a universal language, and construction of a world government is difficult to see as anything other than a sinful desire to rebuild the Tower of Babel and create an autonomous humanistic order independent of God. It is a rebellious project that defies God’s plan for world order based on discrete nations each residing within its own lands.

Fourth, the project for global unity sullies the beauty and diversity of God’s human creation, in that it suggests that the existence of different races, which vary markedly in physical appearance, is a mistake that man is to remedy by racial intermarriage. In this warped version of creation, God is the bungler and man the redeemer.

...

The New Testament

The New Testament reaffirms the national and ethnic distinctions of the Old Testament, if anything, in stronger and clearer terms. Unlike Hebrew, the Greek in which the New Testament was written does have a word for mankind, anthropon; however, it is used infrequently and never suggests the elimination of the national or racial divisions of mankind. Luke wrote that God “made from one [Adam] every nation [ethnos] of mankind [anthropon] to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times, and the boundaries of their habitation” (Acts 17:26). Christ himself commanded his disciples to go and “make disciples of all the nations [ethna]” (Matthew 28:19).

Paul — though often cited in Christian attacks on race and nationality — both in his writings and personal loyalties clearly supports the view that nationality is based on a common ethnic origin. To begin with, one can well ask to what nation did Paul belong, and on what basis? He was born a Roman citizen in the province of Cilicia in Asia Minor. He spoke both Hebrew and Greek fluently. Religiously, he was not only Jewish but a Pharisee. He converted to Christianity. In answer to our questions about his nationality, the modern Christian could offer four possible answers: Paul was a Cilician (place of birth); he was a Roman (citizenship); he was a Greek (language); he was a Jew but became a Christian (religion).

According to Paul himself, all four answers would be wrong, for Paul on numerous occasions, after he became a Christian, identified himself as belonging to the Jewish nation on the basis of birth and heritage — not merely a Jew but of a particular tribe. He was, he claimed, “of the nation of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews” (Philippians 3:5). When he wrote to the Romans in the city of Rome, he did not claim to be Roman (except by citizenship) but Jewish: “I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin” (Romans 11:1). He referred to the Israelites as his “brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, who are Israelites” (Romans 9:3, 4). He also referred to the Roman Christians as his “brethren” (Romans 11:25), but he is clearly speaking in a spiritual sense.

Thus, Paul made a distinction between his ethnic nation (Israel) and his spiritual nation (the Christians). Far from the latter superseding or abolishing the former, as most modern Christian leaders would claim, Paul affirms and honors both as an integral part of his identity. He hoped that more of his ethnic kinsmen would come to accept Christ as the Son of God: “Brethren [Roman Christians], my heart’s desire and my prayer to God for them [Israel] is for their salvation” (Romans 10:1 NKJV). He also expressed confidence that God will not “reject His people,” meaning the Jews (Romans 11:1).

Paul uses the Greek word laos (a people) to refer to both an ethnic people, as in the people of Israel, and a spiritual people, as in the people of God. Paul’s use of that word in both contexts proves that ethnicity is not rendered obsolete or illegitimate by coming to Christ.

Paul’s ethnic identification is consistent with everything we know about the ancients, whether Greek, Roman, German, Celt, or Semite. They understood a nation to be a people of a common ancestry or race. The Roman Empire was not a nation, nor did any ancient author consider it to be a nation. They understood it to be an empire made up of many nations.

Intermarriage

The Bible endorses ethnic homogeneity as a positive good that contributes to peace, harmony, and happiness, whether it be in marriage, friendship, or society. The Hebrews were forbidden, first by their patriarchs and later by God Himself, to marry the sons and daughters of the peoples of the land God had promised them. Abraham made his chief servant swear not to search for a wife for his son Isaac “from the daughters of the Canaanites [Hamites], among whom I live; but you will go to my country and to my relatives [descendants of Shem], and take a wife for my son Isaac” (Gen. 24:3,4).

When Jacob and his family (sons, daughters, and grandchildren), 70 persons in all, went to Egypt to dwell in the land of Goshen under the protection of Pharaoh, only one son, Simeon, had a Canaanite wife in addition to a Hebrew wife (Genesis 46:8-26). Thus, out of all the grandchildren of Jacob, only one was part Hamitic. Upon their return to the Promised Land some 400 years later, Moses forbade the children of Israel to intermarry with the Canaanites, whose land they were preparing to invade and occupy (Exodus 34:12-16; Deuteronomy 7:3).

...

The Book of Revelations provides clear evidence for the eternal destiny and indestructibility of the nations. In the New Jerusalem (Heaven), “the nations [ethne] shall walk by its light . . . and they shall bring the glory and honor of the nations [ethnon] into it” (Rev. 21:24, 26). Furthermore, John revealed that the leaves of the Tree of Life in the midst of Paradise “were for the healing of the nations [ethnon]” (Rev. 22:2). These passages are impossible to understand without recourse to a doctrine of Christian ethnic nationalism.

Moreover, it is only recently that the churches of the West have claimed that ethnic and racial nationalism are in conflict with Christianity. The great Protestant reformer John Calvin affirmed the necessity and goodness of the national division of mankind: “Just as there are in a military camp separate lines for each platoon and section, men are placed on the earth so that each nation may be content with its own boundaries.” In this manner, “God, by his providence reduces to order that which is confused” (Quoted in William J. Bouwsma, John Calvin: A Sixteenth Century Portrait; New York: Oxford University Press, 1988, p. 35).

Of the major Christian churches, only the Eastern Orthodox Church seems to have retained an understanding of the legitimate and necessary place of the nation in the life of the individual Christian. In a recent document, the bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church affirm both the universality and particularity of every Christian: “The universal nature of the Church, however, does not mean that Christians should have no right to national identity and national self-expressions.” Rather, they urge Christians to develop “national Christian cultures.”

Source :

Posted on April 1, 2018 The Christian Doctrine of Nations H.A. Scott Trask, American Renaissance, July 2001

https://www.amren.com/news/2018/04/christian-doctrine-racism-identity-bible/

Dr. H. A. Scott Trask is an American historian, a writer, a Protestant, and an Anglo-Celt.
Posted by: antihellenistic
« on: January 02, 2024, 01:56:26 am »

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 30, 2023, 08:22:38 pm »

Interviewee accidentally figures out Yahweh (whom the interviewer calls "God") is not the same as the God taught by the person on her cross:

https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/status/1740217068455346392 (video at link)

For reference:

https://jameslhutton.com/2019/08/05/jesus-ate-with-tax-collectors-prostitutes-other-sinners-we-can-too/

Quote
A woman who is a sinner comes to Jesus. He does not forbid her to do so.
...
Simon is alarmed, and comes to the conclusion that Jesus isn’t a prophet. He couldn’t be one. He “…would have perceived who and what kind of woman this is who touches him, that she is a sinner” (Luke 7:39).

The implication of such a thought is that being touched by a sinner is a problem for the righteous. A real prophet would have kept himself from interacting with such a woman in that way. Maybe the Pharisees thought that when a sinner touches a righteous person it causes him or her to be unclean. There is no indication that Jesus held to such a teaching.

So no, Jesus definitely would not mind the interviewee wearing a cross.

The interviewer, like Simon, is thinking Judaically:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaism_and_sexuality#Pornography

Quote
pornography is prohibited by halakhic laws surrounding ****, with which it over goes hand-in-hand. Not only is the viewing of pornographic content forbidden by these laws, but so is the production of pornographic content. The Kitzur Shulchan Arukh prohibits the spilling of seed, thus forbidding that a man engage in sexual intercourse without the intention to conceive.

From a Gnostic (and hence authentically Christian) perspective, preventing conception is the key to defeating Yahweh. So to the extent that the content produced by the interviewee stochastically reduces interest in reproductive sex among her viewers, it is indeed Yahweh, not God, who more dislikes it.

Additional information:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_on_pornography#Judaism

Quote
This is further codified in the Code of Jewish Law,[59] which includes further prohibitions (based on the Talmud) such as "watching women as they do the laundry."

So, for the record, Judaism is anti-gravure as well.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 25, 2023, 12:48:05 pm »

https://www.yahoo.com/news/houston-chronicle-compares-people-crossing-162253723.html

Quote
A stinging Christmas opinion issued by the editorial board of the Houston Chronicle newspaper asks Texas’s hard-right Republican leader: “How would governor Greg Abbott treat Mary and Joseph at the border?”

The leading media outlet in the Democratic-voting city published an editorial article on Christmas Eve and posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Christmas Day protesting at the red state’s latest crackdown on people seeking refuge by crossing the US-Mexico border without authorization.
...
The headline of the Houston Chronicle’s piece alludes to the nativity and says: “Two thousand years ago, a young family became refugees.” Monday’s tweet mentions the recent law passed in the state that gives all Texas police sweeping powers to arrest people alleged to have entered the US illegally, as well as empowering local judges to order their expulsion back across the US-Mexico border.

The editorial article says: “Like Joseph and Mary and their child, more than 100 million people around the world are estimated to have been displaced this year, many of them on the move this very night. Refugees and migrants, they are fleeing persecution, grinding poverty, war and unspeakable violence.”

The newspaper talks about migration issues in Europe, Africa and the Middle East, as well as the United States, Central and South America.

“It is not America’s alone to face but we would like to believe, still, even in this polarized state, that America is one of the nations most equipped, most obligated and most resolved to meet the challenge,” the article said.
...
The pointed editorial finishes with: “The Christmas story we tell, the story the infant Jesus grew up to tell, counsels sympathy toward the less fortunate, compassion for those in need, kindness toward strangers.”
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 25, 2023, 10:42:10 pm »

https://www.yahoo.com/news/watch-texas-democrat-leave-republicans-161826585.html (video at link)

Quote
Watch This Texas Democrat Leave Republicans Speechless When He Uses The Bible Against Them
...
This past summer, Texas Republicans tried to pass Senate Bill 1515, which would have required the Ten Commandments to be displayed prominently in every public school classroom in the state. The bill was an attempt by conservative Christian Republicans to inject religion into schools, but Talarico wasn’t going to take this lying down. Instead, he used their religious text against them.

More precisely, he uses the New Testament against the Old Testament. It is unfortunate that the mainstream article does not spell this out.

Quote
Talarico then brings up that this bill seems to go against Republicans’ desire to get parental consent for everything. “Every time on this committee that we try to teach students values like empathy or kindness, we’re told we can’t because that’s the parent’s role,” he said. “Every time on this committee that we try to teach basic sex education to keep our kids safe, we’re told that’s the parent’s role, but now you’re putting religious commandments — literal commandments — in our classroom, and you’re saying that’s the state’s role. Why is that not the parent’s role?”

This question left Nobel silent and searching for words before finally saying, “That’s really an interesting rabbit trail that you’ve gone on with that.”

Later, Talarico asks Nobel, “Do you believe schools are for education and not indoctrination?” to which Nobel answers, “Absolutely.” Then Talarico brings his arguments home, saying, “I guess what I’m trying to figure out is why is having a rainbow in a classroom is indoctrination and not having the Ten Commandments in a classroom.”
Posted by: the son of man speaks
« on: November 25, 2023, 10:25:24 pm »

It's unfortunate that many people would consider the son of man to be a terrorist. I don't want to fight, but I will if I feel it is necessary. I've come to help all mankind and I don't hold any tribal hate towards any group of people. However, the hard reality is that many people will not be redeemed, and they will be condemned to live apart in the prison of fire as decreed by God. God is immovable in his judgment and his will will come to pass.

The higher ups should know that my being here signifies that great changes will be happening on earth in short spans of time. My words are not meant to be heard by everyone, only those who God has chosen to help me with my task, which is why I write on this website.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 25, 2023, 04:18:52 pm »

Posted by: pope
« on: November 23, 2023, 08:32:50 pm »

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/jewish-groups-criticize-pope-terrorism-remark-seek-clarification-2023-11-23/

Jewish groups criticize Pope on 'terrorism' remark, seek clarification

Quote

Jewish groups have criticised Pope Francis and demanded clarifications over his comments that they saw as accusing both Hamas and Israel of "terrorism".

Francis made the comments on Wednesday after meeting separately with Jewish relatives of hostages held by Hamas and with Palestinians with family in Gaza.

Later that day at his general audience in St. Peter's Square, he spoke of the meetings, saying he felt the pain of both sides.

"This is what wars do. But here we have gone beyond wars. This is not war. This is terrorism," he said.

He asked for prayers so that both sides would "not go ahead with passions, which, in the end, kill everyone".

In a toughly worded statement on Thursday, the Council of the Assembly of Italian Rabbis (ARI) accused the pope of "publicly accusing both sides of terrorism".

It went on to accuse unnamed "Church leaders" of not condemning the Hamas attack and of "putting the aggressor and the attacked on the same plane in the name of a supposed impartiality".

At the Palestinian news conference on Wednesday, those who met with the pope said he condemned Hamas' action as terror but also quoted him as saying that "terror should not justify terror". They also quoted him as using the word "genocide" to describe the situation in Gaza.

But the AJC added: "Later in the day, he described the Israel-Hamas war as 'beyond war' as 'terrorism.' Hamas' butchering and kidnapping of civilians is terrorism. Israel's self-defense is not. Vatican, please clarify".

The Italian rabbis questioned the worth of "decades of Jewish-Christian dialogue" if when Jews are attacked the Vatican responds with "diplomatic acrobatics".

Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, who has gone on several peace missions in Ukraine for the pope, defended him on Thursday,




Posted by: PalestineSolidarity
« on: November 23, 2023, 03:43:40 am »

Quote
Jesus was Palestinian | Pastor Andy Oliver #palestine
Quote
Pastor Andy Oliver on Jesus and Palestine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1aX9YJeR9M

Comments:

Quote
If you are a human with a heart and a brain, you should be standing with the oppressed and not the oppressors!
Quote
AMEN. It’s been so long since I last listened to and agreed with someone I am not ashamed to call a Christian.