Post reply

Warning - while you were reading 50 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: rp
« on: March 23, 2024, 11:27:04 pm »

"You think women don't also do this?"
I agree.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: March 23, 2024, 02:42:25 pm »

Our position is that more neotenous individuals are better nurterers. Our position happens to coincide with the enemy tweeter's position in this case only because the pictured individual man is low in neoteny. You yourself said:

Quote
trying to relate to them by speaking in "baby talk" but in reality end up looking like retards

You think women don't also do this?

We also never said that mothers are superior to fathers. We said that children with incomplete information who have Oedipus complex are superior to other children with similarly incomplete information who do not have Oedipus complex:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg25343/#msg25343

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg25347/#msg25347

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg25349/#msg25349

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg25357/#msg25357
Posted by: rp
« on: March 23, 2024, 09:43:33 am »

The tweet seems to be from the perspective of traditional gender roles: mothers are better "nurturers". Given that we were just discussing about mother being superior to fathers, how does our position differ?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: March 22, 2024, 04:28:25 pm »

While I agree with what you are saying, the tweeter seems to be an enemy also. You should also point out how our position differs from the rightist position. 
Posted by: rp
« on: March 22, 2024, 12:38:30 pm »


Note how the infant clearly appears to be in distress, while the subhuman who conceived it sports the typical sh!t eating grin.

This is why I hate these Western fathers in particular: pretending to care about their offspring all the while lacking empathy and instead overly patronizing their children (e.g. trying to relate to them by speaking in "baby talk" but in reality end up looking like retards).
Posted by: Schwartze Katze
« on: March 02, 2024, 07:39:03 pm »

Facing Psychological Racism | CS Joseph Live
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxu5vLdTiqA&t=1617s

This is all about how the [western] public school system psychologically abuses children from a Jungian analytical psychology perspective. C.S. explains in the above video how the [western] public school system is psychologically racist towards certain personality types.

C.S. blames what he has defined as the "Mind Temple" personality types for the western school system and it's psychological racism towards certain personality types:

What are the god Functions of the Mind Temple? (ESTJ, ISTP, ENFJ, INFP) Season 35 | CS Joseph
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc6XYvmIZm0
Posted by: rp
« on: December 19, 2023, 07:01:08 am »

https://x.com/kukoi24/status/1724333635896275189?s=20
Quote
“They do not think of differences amongst themselves, difference of class or caste or color or status. They are wiser than their fathers or their
mothers”

Quote from Nehru known for his immense love for children

Below video from Doordarshan. Do Watch
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 07, 2023, 04:50:01 pm »

https://twitter.com/GoinCrazyFights/status/1732804204136120767 (video at link)

Quote
What Kind Of Person In The Right State Of Mind Thinks It’s Okay To Do This To a Child? Disgusting..

Is the infant upset? No. Therefore there is no problem.

But Westerners think the above is a problem while countless (Western-endorsed) parenting actions which cause infants to cry are not a problem.

When Westerners interact with children, their aim is not to avoid upsetting the children but to avoid upsetting Western civilization.
Posted by: cruelty
« on: December 06, 2023, 11:45:35 pm »

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/england-freedom-of-information-government-b1125334.html

Child cruelty offences in England double in five years, police figures show

Quote

Recorded cases of adults neglecting, mistreating or assaulting children have doubled in five years, police figures show.

Freedom of information (FOI) requests to 35 forces across England show 29,405 cruelty offences recorded between April 2022 and March 2023 compared to 14,263 between April 2017 and March 2018, the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) said.

Reported cases of children in the country being subjected to cruelty or neglect rose year on year in that period, according to the children’s charity, which says this is because of the coronavirus pandemic and cost-of-living crisis putting struggling families under “increased strain”.

Its chief executive Sir Peter Wanless said:“These latest child cruelty figures are a stark wake-up call that our current system is struggling to prevent the horrifying abuse and neglect happening to some of the youngest and most vulnerable in our society.

“We can not afford for this to be delayed any longer as there is a real danger we will continue to see these offences spiral upwards if significant change doesn’t happen.

This year has seen a number of court cases following the deaths of babies and children, including 15-month-old Jacob Lennon, 10-month-old Jacob Crouch, five-month-old Ava Mae Collard, 10-month-old Finley Boden and nine-year-old Alfie Steele, who all died between 2019 and 2021.

In 2022-23, more than 655,000 child in need assessments were completed by children’s social care to determine whether a child requires support from a service, the NSPCC said.





Posted by: rp
« on: November 24, 2023, 08:07:43 am »

Children seem to like autocrats more than they do Democrats:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/s41KZDV65jk

Of course, adult supremacist Westerners will accuse such children of being brainwashed.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: November 18, 2023, 05:22:33 pm »

But do those children who lie in retaliation to their parents (who first lied to them) later become parents who do not lie to their own offspring? If not, then the problem of traditional lying remains.

What I mostly observe is:

1) X's parents lie to X while teaching X not to lie.
2) X realizes parents' hypocrisy and lies to parents in retaliation.
3) X accepts hypocrisy as part of tradition.
4) X lies to offspring while teaching offspring not to lie.
5) X does not mind when offspring, realizing X's hypocrisy, lies to X in retaliation.

The main problem with Western traditionalism is 3). Western tradition officially tells us what the rules are but in practice expects the rules to be broken because of:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/plebian-hubris/

which is also part of Western tradition. What to everyone else is hypocrisy is to Westerners merely doing what is natural from each position. This is why we call Westerners barbarians.
Posted by: Santa
« on: November 18, 2023, 04:45:47 pm »

I have no problem with deceiving those who have tried to deceive me first...

Perhaps this is why many children have no problem with lying to their parents?
Posted by: lying
« on: November 18, 2023, 12:54:59 am »

Ya your right, lying's wrong
Posted by: SirGalahad
« on: November 17, 2023, 10:44:54 pm »

Christmas is around the corner. It got me thinking about how there’s this whole tradition centered around convincing little kids that Santa is real, and letting them believe that.

In some ways, I feel like when I was finally told that Santa wasn’t real, that was the official end of my childhood. What a lesson to thrust upon children in the most unintentionally callous way possible. Kids who grow up believing in Santa have this sense of magic in the world instilled in them, only to have the rug pulled out from under them when they realize that the world isn’t magical at all, and their parents are capable of lying. I remember crying

It’s funny, because I actually found out the truth about Santa really late, which ties further into it being the end of my childhood. I still believed in Santa all the way into late elementary school, where even other kids (who were starting to grow peach fuzz) knew at that point, and were telling me and my sister that Santa wasn’t real. Even then, I didn’t believe them at first, and thought that they were just saying that to act cool. I didn’t care about being “cool”, so I held onto that belief for a tiny bit longer until I interrogated my mom in the car and she told me the truth

If I were raising children, I wouldn’t lie to them about that kind of thing. I can understand why people get suckered into continuing this tradition, believing that in the end it’ll make the child happy and that they’ll supposedly cherish those memories later in life, but lying is just wrong, no matter what
Posted by: rp
« on: November 08, 2023, 06:16:56 am »

The video is staged, but I agree with your points nevertheless