Post reply

Warning - while you were reading a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 09, 2022, 04:44:47 pm »

Posted by: guest55
« on: February 16, 2022, 10:08:41 pm »

Quote
Which is why I find it amusing that when our enemies choose stock pictures to represent those whom they dislike, they have a trend of choosing narrow faces:

I also find this more and more amusing as each days passes, as well as more and more noticeable that what you described is exactly what is going on!
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: January 15, 2022, 03:00:01 am »

Quote

Which is why I find it amusing that when our enemies choose stock pictures to represent those whom they dislike, they have a trend of choosing narrow faces:

Posted by: Zea_mays
« on: January 14, 2022, 04:28:07 pm »

I have read this book before--it is a work of phrenology (basically 19th century palm reading pseudo-science for the skull).

Obviously we can't actually tell a real individual's character solely from looking at their physical features, but the book does have some some illustrations of timeless physiognomic intuitions.



Posted by: guest55
« on: January 13, 2022, 09:47:38 pm »

Fascinating stuff dude!!! Definitely grabbing this book! Found this one interesting too:
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: January 11, 2022, 02:33:27 am »

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 27, 2021, 10:01:37 pm »

Dune edition (Chani 2021 vs 1984):



In 2021, it is the traitor Yueh who gets the Aryan face:



I am certain this is all deliberate. The Dune fans themselves have noticed the absurdity of the new casting compared to the description in the book:

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 15, 2021, 03:12:22 am »

I learned something new today:

https://medlineplus.gov/ency/imagepages/17182.htm

Quote
Body frame size is determined by a person's wrist circumference in relation to his height. For example, a man whose height is over 5' 5" and wrist is 6" would fall into the small-boned category.

I also found something that again reflects the absurdity of Western obsession with sexual dimorphism:



Why would you have gender-specific sets of sizes (which, to make things worse, use the same names for different measurements!) when you could simply have a single set of non-gender-specific sizes? (They also need to add a size A (Aryan) for <15cm wrists (e.g. mine).)

https://www.youbeauty.com/fitness/ask-a-scientist-being-big-boned/

Quote
(A quick cheat: If you wrap the thumb and middle finger of one hand around the opposite wrist, do they overlap, just touch or not touch at all?)

I had enough space left over to insert at least nine pens. My thumb and middle finger can touch around my ankle FFS. When are we going to stop letting subhumans set the standards?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: May 14, 2021, 04:36:39 am »

I told you so:

Posted by: rp
« on: March 19, 2021, 11:54:04 pm »

"Did you yourself too view such traits as superior, or did you assume you were alone in not finding such traits superior?"

I was a relativist, so I thought the concept of viewing traits as superior itself was bad because of the negative personality attributes associated with those traits, such as aggression and high sexual promiscuity, and I thought the concept of superiority itself was intertwined with those traits.

I honestly did feel alone and cornered though because I was trying to retain my original nobility by flashing back to my childhood when I definitely did not find such traits superior, so I started questioning why such traits are considered superior by the majority of people, and wanted to challenge their idea of superiority but was intellectually restricted by my relativism. It wasn't until I discovered Aryanism, whereupon I encountered aesthetic anti-traditional absolutism through the "human beauty" page, that I realized such traits are only not superior but are in fact inferior. As a bonus, it was like the page was essentially just verbally articulating what I was feeling but was previously unable to express verbally, so I wouldn't say the website even "persuaded" me.

Does that make sense?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: March 19, 2021, 11:27:39 pm »

"I assumed these were traits that were viewed as "superior" by all people"

Did you yourself too view such traits as superior, or did you assume you were alone in not finding such traits superior?
Posted by: rp
« on: March 19, 2021, 08:39:00 am »

"hunter eyes" have always been an incel favorite, along with high fwhr (face width/height ratios. Until I discovered Aryanism, I assumed these were traits that were viewed as "superior" by all people, when in fact they are only "superior" according to Western standards of beauty that percolate through Western institutions.

Also, lol at "farmoids".
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: March 19, 2021, 01:36:48 am »

Our enemies are now recycling our old content:

https://incels.co/threads/hunter-gatherers.284516/

Quote

but using it to promote their preferred traits:

Quote
we don't even need muscles and skin to see he was chad and had hunter eyes

brutal af, agricultural revolution was a mistake

They have a new slur for us too:

Quote
How can farmoid subhumans cope?

Of course they are wrong about who is subhuman. The word "human" comes from "humus" (ie. soil). Therefore by definition it is non-farmoids/non-Aryans who are subhuman.
Posted by: guest27
« on: January 20, 2021, 03:42:02 pm »

Quote
These are what flapping wings are for, which require similar energy conversion to walking, but in much greater quantity, as energy must be wasted to lift and support body weight. You would have to flap your wings a lot to do the same amount of farm labour in midair (and even more if you are carrying stuff around all day).

True! Thanks for giving this some thought. I suppose we shan't be bees or faeries but a spot of gliding here and there can't hurt. Imagine: Light bones and gracile muscles, you spread your wings to take advantage of a gust of wind, carrying you effortlessly to the middle of your field, where you land gently on the soil to tend a wee plant. I shall call this the Mary Poppins model. It's possible the energy required to maintain extra appendages outweighs the energy saved by occasional gliding, however.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 19, 2020, 01:52:31 pm »

I have no problem with using flying in war against our enemies. But flying was irrelevant to the Neolithic Revolution. Therefore it is incorrect to refer to it as Aryan in an evolutionary sense (what this subforum is about).

Regarding energy, you are referring to gliding, but that is only possible after considerable horizontal speed has been built up, and then there is the issue of changing direction (as would be frequently necessary for farm labour). These are what flapping wings are for, which require similar energy conversion to walking, but in much greater quantity, as energy must be wasted to lift and support body weight. You would have to flap your wings a lot to do the same amount of farm labour in midair (and even more if you are carrying stuff around all day).