Post reply

Warning - while you were reading 39 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: christianbethel
« on: June 13, 2023, 11:43:49 am »

I don't know his first name, but people can be identified by their last names.
Posted by: guest98
« on: June 12, 2023, 03:15:15 pm »

Why do you put brackets around the word last?
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: June 10, 2023, 04:04:23 pm »

That's his (last) name.
Posted by: guest98
« on: June 10, 2023, 03:51:35 pm »

Why do you call him Reuters?
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: June 10, 2023, 10:20:38 am »

Quote
Why do you also use ASCII code to skirt the automatic forum censor, just like "Ascesis" did?

Really, Reuters? Really?

I don't approve of censorship. AS chose to create a new forum on a platform which censors profanity, so I have to circumvent the filter.

Quote
Furthermore, just because you're the only person who posts a profile picture of yourself supposedly on this forum and lead in by sharing with all of us that you have "autism", doesn't mean you're not some "white" moronic Trump supporter sitting in a basement in Florida somewhere, does it?

You're an idiot, Reuters. That is my real face. That is my real name. This is the autistic registry card I had when I was a kid (apparently the person who issued it to me was Jewish. Fancy that.): https://photos.app.goo.gl/CioFB79A9jytwsaY9
Quote
Regardless of whether or not you are actually autistic, pretending to be an ally to a movement while simultaneously being deceptive to it's members ultimately just makes you an enemy of said movement.

Point out the moments where I have 'pretended' to be an ally of/deceived the movement (or have tried to).
Posted by: 2ThaSun
« on: June 09, 2023, 10:42:57 pm »

Quote
I'm asking these questions because I just finished watching some videos about 'sexualization of minors' and 'excessive fanservice in anime' and I wanted an Aryan perspective, as I've never dealt with this subject before. And then there's ecchi, which involves 'softcore' pörn... Many of the video essayists report this is because of the 'hikikomori' crowd which is infamous for it's attraction to child pörn. They also say there are a lot of aggressively sexual characters in anime for marketing reasons. What do you think?

@christianbethel:

Why do you also use ASCII code to skirt the automatic forum censor, just like "Ascesis" did? One example of many:

Quote
How about you start by reading our website you stupid fúck?
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/t1853/?message=19758

You did this in an email to myself also.

Furthermore, just because you're the only person who posts a profile picture of yourself supposedly on this forum and lead in by sharing with all of us that you have "autism", doesn't mean you're not some "white" moronic Trump supporter sitting in a basement in Florida somewhere, does it? Regardless of whether or not you are actually autistic, pretending to be an ally to a movement while simultaneously being deceptive to it's members ultimately just makes you an enemy of said movement.
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: June 09, 2023, 08:38:42 pm »

Again, that's fair. Thanks for your clarity.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 09, 2023, 08:37:45 pm »

The state should not prohibit it. I would judge on a case-by-case basis what I think of it.
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: June 09, 2023, 08:33:39 pm »

OK, replace 'minor' with 'child' or 'youth'.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 09, 2023, 08:32:06 pm »

Rephrase your earlier question such that the term "minors" is replaced with a more meaningful term.
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: June 09, 2023, 08:20:25 pm »

This sounds like the 'it's just a drawing' argument otakus use to justify their pedophilia. Can you elaborate?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 09, 2023, 08:17:52 pm »

It doesn't make much sense to apply real-life legal concepts (such as "minor") to fictional characters who:

1) generally have no legal personhood standing in this world;
2) may live in a fictional society with a different (often unspecified) legal system;
3) may not age linearly in-story with their out-of-story chronological franchise existence in this world.
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: June 09, 2023, 07:47:38 pm »

That's fair. I assume that also includes such material involving minors?
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 09, 2023, 07:46:24 pm »

"I would imagine things like hentai, lolicon, shotacon, ecchi, etc. are off-limits, right?"

If by off-limits you mean the state should prohibit them, no. If by off-limits you mean I personally dislike them, I would have to judge on a case-by-case basis.
Posted by: christianbethel
« on: June 09, 2023, 07:43:26 pm »

OK, where do we draw the line with drawn/animated content? I would imagine things like hentai, lolicon, shotacon, ecchi, etc. are off-limits, right?