Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Message icon:


shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Topic Summary

Posted by: christianbethel
« on: May 22, 2022, 11:37:22 am »

I have been talking to several antinatalists on Twitter. I haven't told them about Aryanism yet, as I'm trying to establish a relationship. Stand by.
Posted by: rp
« on: April 23, 2021, 12:06:16 pm »

I have DMd the recruit on twitter. He says he signed up for an account on this forum just yesterday, so this is probably him:;u=46

He also says he hasn't heard of us before, so now I am inquiring him as to how he arrived at the positions he holds today.

UPDATE: He says he has held these positions since childhood, but arrived at the ideology he holds today after he grew discontented with False Left ideology. But get this: he also says he is tangentially familiar with, and that he has read the Aryan diffusion series! But he also says has not commented on the website and only became familiar with it after researching neolithic cultures for a high school project, so that removes the possibility that he is merely faking it. Also, he was the one who said he familiar with the website after seeing it mentioned on here; I never even brought this up to him in our discussion.

Now that I think of it, his political trajectory is similar to mine. If Aryanism could succeed in recruiting the two of us, imagine the potential it has in drawing those who have yet to discover it, but cannot because rightists are sabotaging our effort to do so! I believe this is primarily because racists are wasting our time by getting us to focus on Jew-awareness. While I was Jew-aware myself prior to encountering, it was not the Jew-awareness itself that drew me to the website (I was not even aware Aryanism's focus was Zionism), but the vigorous anti-racism and slamming of rightist aesthetical "standards" which proclaim their "White" features as Aryan. Moreover, I was growing increasingly antagonistic toward the "Jew-aware" alt-right, as I wanted to hate Jews but also wanted to hate the rightist subhumans for selfishly prioritizing their own self interest by bashing Jews for all the wrong reasons.

Perhaps, there is an age factor this. Both the recruit and I are in our late teens/early twenties, whereas most in the "anti-Zionist" movement who tried to subvert us by promoting rightism were older...

Of course there are exceptions, but even if we consider the younger rightists in the anti-Zionist movement such as Brandon Martinez who was 19, Aryanism still takes the cake for attracting a younger audience as the recruit and I were only in high school.
Posted by: guest5
« on: April 22, 2021, 11:47:56 pm »

You'll find some good people in the anti-circumcision crowd as well. Anti-Zionists often frequent those threads too....
Posted by: guest5
« on: April 22, 2021, 07:52:44 pm »

Back when I was on Twitter I found a cluster of people who spoke out quite frequently against antropocentricism also, perhaps you will have luck in those circles now as well in regards to potential recruits?
Posted by: rp
« on: April 22, 2021, 09:41:20 am »

If he truly reached these conclusions spotaneously before/without reading Arianism.nrt, then I think we truly have a recruit of the highest spiritual quality so far.

It also nullifies the possibility that he is merely feigning Aryan traits to appease you and infiltrate the movement, unlike some people on here and on
Posted by: rp
« on: April 22, 2021, 03:04:42 am »

"does he understand Jews?"
The region’s indigenous Canaanite, pre-Jewish cereal farming culture had a 100% vegan army first. The Jews refer to that army in their records as “Amalek”
Posted by: rp
« on: April 22, 2021, 01:33:19 am »

He is anti-Zionist and also vegan. I have invited him:

I am wondering if he is a former Aryanist...

After scanning through several other tweets:
Autocrats do not have to have a material interest in becoming autocrats. They can be idealistically motivated without assuming any material possession
It is impossible to eliminate the hierarchy of the nuclear family without a state. Leadership of any revolutionary state “creates new hierarchy”
It literally did. Children have always been violently forced to obey their biological parents and elders. That is the essence of the nuclear family

I find it hard to believe he has not commented on at least once before.

He even believes in Aryan diffusion:
It’s not by random coincidence either. The culture-founders of both (Puntian agricultural complex for the Igbo, Yangtze agricultural complex for Japan) maintained contact with each other during the Neolithic revolution. It is reasonable to assume individuals migrated between them
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: April 22, 2021, 01:30:08 am »

Talk to the guy yourself, and if you think he will be a good addition to our community (does he understand Jews?), invite him here.
Posted by: rp
« on: April 22, 2021, 01:26:12 am »

I've been following this guy on Twitter, I just found these tweets from him:
Non-western imperialism will always be preferred over western colonialism
Western civilization has done more damage to the world than every non-western civilization combined—including non-western civilizations that had empires—so it actually is the worst part
It has everything to do with the fact that it was western. Non-western civilizations were in possession of similar resources anyway, yet they did not industrialize. The drive to industrialize and then steal resources from non-industrial people is a symptom of western hubris
The observation that white supremacy is a uniquely western creation is evidence enough that western civilization possesses a unique form of hubris. What other evidence are you even asking for at this point
White supremacy existed before industrialization. Violent industrialization is a symptom rather than a cause. In some other universe, maybe industrialization could have occurred peacefully if it instead had nonviolent motivations
No other culture has ever industrialized “independently of the west.” They all industrialized in order to compete with the west, out of economic necessity
As long as we aren’t viewing natural selection as a positive force, we have reason to favor the nonviolent/antiviolent strategies that aren’t favored by it
Absolutely. Western civilization must die, and, out of respect for the victims, the oppressors must be punished

****. The. West. Notice that the idiot False Leftist communist says humans are "inherently" violent according to the synopsis of natural selection, citing chimps as an example. I especially like how the True Leftist attacks this point:
Chimapzees are individuals who are capable of opting out of that. Just because natural selection favors the ones who do the violence doesn’t mean we can just label every individual as ubiquitously violent