Posted by: christianbethel
« on: May 22, 2022, 11:37:22 am »I have been talking to several antinatalists on Twitter. I haven't told them about Aryanism yet, as I'm trying to establish a relationship. Stand by.
The region’s indigenous Canaanite, pre-Jewish cereal farming culture had a 100% vegan army first. The Jews refer to that army in their records as “Amalek”
Autocrats do not have to have a material interest in becoming autocrats. They can be idealistically motivated without assuming any material possession
It is impossible to eliminate the hierarchy of the nuclear family without a state. Leadership of any revolutionary state “creates new hierarchy”
It literally did. Children have always been violently forced to obey their biological parents and elders. That is the essence of the nuclear family
It’s not by random coincidence either. The culture-founders of both (Puntian agricultural complex for the Igbo, Yangtze agricultural complex for Japan) maintained contact with each other during the Neolithic revolution. It is reasonable to assume individuals migrated between them
Non-western imperialism will always be preferred over western colonialismhttps://twitter.com/taiyogakure/status/1374873467321917443?s=20
Western civilization has done more damage to the world than every non-western civilization combined—including non-western civilizations that had empires—so it actually is the worst part
It has everything to do with the fact that it was western. Non-western civilizations were in possession of similar resources anyway, yet they did not industrialize. The drive to industrialize and then steal resources from non-industrial people is a symptom of western hubris
The observation that white supremacy is a uniquely western creation is evidence enough that western civilization possesses a unique form of hubris. What other evidence are you even asking for at this point
White supremacy existed before industrialization. Violent industrialization is a symptom rather than a cause. In some other universe, maybe industrialization could have occurred peacefully if it instead had nonviolent motivations
No other culture has ever industrialized “independently of the west.” They all industrialized in order to compete with the west, out of economic necessityhttps://twitter.com/taiyogakure/status/1375135701528813574?s=20
As long as we aren’t viewing natural selection as a positive force, we have reason to favor the nonviolent/antiviolent strategies that aren’t favored by ithttps://twitter.com/taiyogakure/status/1375142070415810563?s=20
Absolutely. Western civilization must die, and, out of respect for the victims, the oppressors must be punished
Chimapzees are individuals who are capable of opting out of that. Just because natural selection favors the ones who do the violence doesn’t mean we can just label every individual as ubiquitously violent