True Left

Ideology => True Left vs False Left => Topic started by: 90sRetroFan on July 04, 2020, 02:22:03 am

Title: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 04, 2020, 02:22:03 am


Leftists should not be disagreeing with rightists on the importance of firearm ownership. We should only be disagreeing with them on who deserves to be shot.

It is one thing to theoretically prefer that firearms had never been invented in the first place, but given that they have been invented, it is stupid for leftists to not be at least as well-armed as rightists. The only thing that will stop a rightist with a gun is a leftist with a gun. It is that simple.

Throughout the history of the United States, from the disarmament of blacks under Jim Crow to California’s 1967 prohibition of open carry after armed Black Panthers began conducting “copwatching” patrols in their neighborhoods, gun control has been used to impose state authority on the same vulnerable communities liberals say they want to protect and empower.

Vice News recently published a “Leftist Argument Against Gun Control,” presenting the case that for “a black leftist male” in a nation “founded on, by, and sustained through genocide, slavery, and theft,” giving the government “a total monopoly on violence” by “surrendering effective means of self-defense” is “suicide.” Or, to put it more simply, if cops are racist thugs who can’t be trusted, why should they be the only ones with guns?
So, I say to the American left, if Trump announced tomorrow that he planned to outlaw the Democratic Party and arrest its leadership, how would you respond? Do you, like your predecessors around the world, still believe that some causes might be worth taking up arms against a tyrannical government?

You spent the last administration telling the Cliven Bundys of the world to lay down their arms and trust the government. Now that the tables have turned and the enemy of all you hold dear sits in the Oval Office, history suggests you shouldn’t feel so confident taking your own advice.

If you are not convinced, go on rightist blogs and read their graphically detailed plans for mass-murdering us. Here is just one example:

there are a far greater number of scoped bolt-action hunting rifles in private hands in the United States. Keep this number in mind: based on deer stamps sold, approximately twenty million Americans [they are referring to rightists here] venture into the woods every fall armed with such rifles, fully intending to shoot and kill a two-hundred-pound mammal. Millions of these scoped bolt-action deer rifles are quite capable of hitting a man-sized target at ranges out to and even beyond a thousand yards, or nearly three-fifths of a mile.
Among the mobs [they are referring to leftists here, or at least how they stereotype us] are thugs armed with pistols and perhaps even AK-47s equipped with standard iron sights, and except in rare cases, these rifles have never been “zeroed in” on a target range. In other words, past a medium distance of fifty to a hundred yards, these MUY shooters will have little idea where their fired bullets will strike—nor will they care. Typically, most of the rioters armed with a pistol, shotgun or an iron-sighted rifle could not hit a mailbox at a hundred yards unless by luck. Inside that distance, any non-MUY could be at immediate risk of brutal death at the hands of an enraged mob, but beyond that range, the mob will pose much less danger.

Taking this imbalance in effective ranges of the firearms most likely to be available to both sides, certain tactical responses are sure to arise

When word is received that a flash mob is forming at one of their pre-reconnoitered intersections or highway interchanges, the SAV team will assemble. Sometimes cooperating police will pass tactical intel to their civilian friends on the outside. Some clever individuals will have exploited their technical know-how and military experience to build real-time intel collection tools, such as private UAVs. Police will have access to urban security camera footage showing MUYs moving barricade materials into position—a normal prerequisite to a flash mob riot intended to stop traffic. Tip-offs to the vigilantes will be common, and where the networks are still functioning, citizens may still be able to access some video feeds. Sometimes, police will even join the SAV teams, incognito and off-duty, blurring the teams into so-called “death squads.”

The operation I will describe (and it’s only one of dozens that will be tried) uses two ordinary pickup trucks and eight fighters. Two riflemen are lying prone in the back of each truck, facing rearward, with removable canvas covers concealing their presence. Their semi-automatic, scoped rifles are supported at their front ends on bipods for very accurate shooting. A row of protective sandbags a foot high is between them and the raised tailgate.

In the cab are a driver and a spotter in the passenger seat who also serves as the vehicle’s 360-degree security. The two trucks don’t ever appear on the same stretch of road, but coordinate their movements using one-word brevity codes over small FRS walkie-talkie radios. Each truck has a series of predetermined elevated locations where the intersection in question will lie between 200 and 500 yards away. Each truck is totally nondescript and forgettable, the only detail perhaps being the non-MUY ethnicity of the suburbanite driver and spotter driving relatively near to a riot in progress.

By the time the two SAV pickup trucks arrive at their firing positions on different streets and oriented ninety degrees to one another, the flash mob riot is in full swing. A hundred or more of the rampaging youths are posturing and throwing debris into traffic in order to intimidate some cars into stopping. The riflemen in the backs of the pickups are waiting for this moment and know what to expect, trusting their spotters and drivers to give them a good firing lane. The spotters in each truck issue a code word on their radios when they are in final position. The tailgates are swung down, and the leader among the riflemen initiates the firing. All-around security is provided by the driver and spotter.

Lying prone and using their bipods for support, the shooters have five to ten degrees of pan or traverse across the entire intersection. Individual rioters are clearly visible in the shooters’ magnified optical scopes. Each of the four snipers has a plan to shoot from the outside of the mob toward the middle, driving participants into a panicked mass. The left-side shooters start on the left side and work to the middle, engaging targets with rapid fire, about one aimed shot per two seconds. Since the two trucks are set at ninety degrees to one another, very complete coverage will be obtained, even among and between the stopped vehicles.

The result is a turkey shoot. One magazine of thirty aimed shots per rifle is expended in under a minute, a coded cease-fire is called on the walkie-talkies, and the trucks drive away at the speed limit. The canvas covering the truck beds contains the shooters’ spent brass. If the trucks are attacked from medium or close range, the canvas can be thrown back and the two snipers with their semi-automatic rifles or carbines will add their firepower to that of the driver and spotter.

Back at the intersection, complete panic breaks out among the rioters as a great number of bullets have landed in human flesh. Over a score have been killed outright, and many more scream in pain for medical attention they will not receive in time.

Note that this was a blog post written in 2012. Meanwhile, all the way to 2018 I have yet to see comparable tactical planning on leftist blogs. It should not take me to tell you the likely outcome if this total leftist lack of war-readiness is not decisively remedied before larger-scale conflict breaks out.

And if you are still not convinced, read the Turner Diaries.

Let me spell this out: We are going up against Western civilization, by far the most warlike civilization in world history, a civilization that once colonized most of the planet and which is responsible for inventing almost all modern weaponry and indeed the method of modern warfare as a whole. Do you honestly think we can win without a lot of physical fighting up ahead? Do you honestly think we stand a chance without being at least as well-armed, well-trained and generally prepared for combat as they are?


A new network of 3D-printed gun advocates is growing in America – and this time things are different. Unlike previous attempts to popularise 3D-printed guns, this operation is entirely decentralised. There’s no headquarters, no trademarks, and no real leader. The people behind it reckon that this means they can’t be stopped by governments.

“If they [the government] were to come after me, they’d first have to find my identity,” says Ivan the Troll, a member of the group. “I’m one of many, many like-minded individuals who’re doing this sort of work.”

Known only by his online moniker, Ivan the Troll is the de facto spokesman of an underground wave of 3D-printing gunsmiths. Ivan says he knows of at least 100 people who are actively developing 3D-printed gun technology, and he claims there are thousands taking part in the network. This loose-knit community spans across the whole world.
“Even if there was no government telling me I couldn’t do this, I think that I would still do it,” Ivan says. “Some people get a kick out of video games, I like spending hours and hours drawing stuff on CAD.”

Ivan isn’t just “drawing stuff on CAD” though. He’s providing free files to help anyone with a half-decent FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) 3D printer and some hand tools to make a workable handgun. Once the CAD file is downloaded, it’s opened in a “slicer” program that translates the CAD files into instructions that the 3D printer can understand. Once the 3D-printed gun parts are ready, they can be assembled into a fully workable gun.

The CAD gun designs put out by Deterrence Dispensed are so well-made, according to Ivan, that they’re not just “workable”, but superior. “Our AR15 CAD model is the best in the public domain without a doubt,” says Ivan.
He then went on to cite the many police shootings of unarmed black men in American, specifically mentioning Stephon Clark. Clark, 22, was shot to death by police in his own back garden while holding nothing but a mobile phone. “I believe it is inherently important that … you should be able to own a gun,” Ivan continued. “You should be able to own the same legal force that the cops are using to control you.”
Ivan sounds at times more like a radical leftist than the right wing “gun nut” many in America label him as.

Yes, because more and more leftists are understanding that rightists want us dead.


If this enemy video (MUST WATCH) does not convince you of the importance of leftists owning and being willing to use firearms, nothing will:

Many of the other supposed disadvantages of the left proposed by the narrator can actually be countered, but only if leftists are armed and paramilitarily organized. The narrator talks as though there are zero leftists in Red states, but in fact there are easily >30% of Blue voters in most Red states, who if adequately armed, trained and motivated could turn the 4G tables against the rightists in short order by the same strategic logic that the narrator himself espouses. Furthermore, the narrator's claim that rightists are totally self-sufficient in resources is untrue (I can elaborate in private if required).

Our enemies are trying to demoralize us with videos like this one. Instead of being demoralized, put more effort into getting every leftist you know to own firearms and lots of ammunition!


Someday, I'll have money for my own rifle. You think a Jeff Cooper style Scout Rifle will be good to start?


The main advantage would be their relatively light weight, but at the cost of effective range. You may wish to consider a compromise, for example:

But the most important thing is to find a weapon you as an individual feel comfortable using. This is arguably more important than flat specs, since ultimately you will do better with a weapon that suits your own physique and even your own personality (though my impression is that personality tends to be more of a factor with handguns). The best person to judge this is yourself. I suggest trying out a variety of roughly similar weapons in a single practice session, so that you can compare how they feel directly. Don't just shoot with them either; try running with them, climbing, crawling, and so on. Don't forget to test how they feel with whatever other equipment you expect to be carrying at the same time during actual operations.

It is good to see interest in firearms increasing among leftists. We still have a lot of catching up to do:

Liberals are notoriously loath to take their own side in a fight. But their reticence may well be changing in an age of vigilante, white nationalist terror—openly condoned and supported by an incumbent president who has suggested that his armed devotees won’t stand for his removal from office. Increasingly, the antifa left is arguing—and training—in response. They are worried not only about an armed reckoning following a contested election, but also about rising violence from the paramilitaries loyal to President Donald Trump.
As a result, many leftists and even some liberals are beginning to reconsider their feelings about firearms, joining a loose amalgamation of gun groups, from John Brown Gun Clubs (which take their name from the abolitionist) to the Pink Pistols (an LGBTQ group), Liberal Gun Club, and Socialist Rifle Association. Some of these organizations are moderate and traditionalist, others radical and revolutionary. But all share one implicit goal: to normalize firearms ownership and training among liberals. Some of their members hope such efforts will at least make Republicans think twice before attempting a massacre.
Trump deserves most of the blame for this particular uptick in gun sales. In March, he told Breitbart, “I have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of the Bikers for Trump—I have the tough people … it would be very bad, very bad,” if his followers decided to “play it tough.” In those remarks, some saw not Trumpian “swagger or machismo,” Adrian Bonenberger, an Afghanistan combat veteran, writer, and member of the Socialist Rifle Association told me, but “an incredibly thinly veiled threat.”

Not all threats these days come veiled. Former Trump adviser Roger Stone has used the Proud Boys—a group of neofascist men who describe themselves as “Western chauvinists”—as his own private security force. Border militias have been conducting vigilante operations against suspected undocumented immigrants. (One vigilante told BuzzFeed in April that his group was coordinating with border protection officials on an hourly basis.) And former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who compared American politics in 2019 to the vitriolic climate just before the Civil War, lent his name to an Italian “gladiator school” for training “culture warriors” to defend Christianity in the West. 

Bonenberger believes it would take at least 20 years to create a force to rival the conservative militias that boast tens of thousands of members. By comparison, antifa has a combined membership in the low thousands, and even fewer people belong to armed leftist groups.

20 years is too long.


More people getting it:

“I don’t trust black leadership that wants to de-arm black people,” Killer Mike, whose real name is Michael Render, told Yahoo News at his Atlanta barbershop, the Swag Shop.
Render, a member of the National African American Gun Association and staunch Second Amendment supporter, has advocated for black gun ownership as a civil rights issue. He argued that many of the nation’s problems could have been avoided if guns had been evenly distributed throughout the country at the time of its founding and throughout its history.

“If everyone owned guns from day one, it would have been a lot harder to commit acts like slavery and genocide on Native Americans,” Render said. “If you read the book ‘Guns, Germs and Steel,’ it kind of explains to you, you know, why a lot of the wars indigenous people lost was because people came with superior technology and guns.”

Render’s views on guns are not new.

“Gun laws affect black people first and worst,” Render said while quoting African-American investigative journalist and civil rights leader Ida B. Wells, who documented lynchings of blacks in the late 1890s, and declared “a Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every black home, and it should be used for that protection which the law refuses to give.”

“They don’t want you to have guns in cities for fear of crime and violence, yet the crime and violence [are] there and the police treat you as though you’re criminally violent,” Render said. “So at what point do you become responsible for one’s one life? At what point are you going to buy a gun, are you going to train, are you going to commit yourself?”
“In my household, there are always going to be 10 or more weapons,” Render said. “We’re always going to be trained and proficient with them. And if anyone ever comes down my driveway and decides to exercise what perceived power they have, they will surely go out in the back of an ambulance dead.”

Follow this guy's example.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 04, 2020, 02:39:17 am

A study (read quoted passage from bottom to top):

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — The Latest on several police officers shot in Philadelphia (all times local):

10:45 p.m.

Police say all six officers wounded by gunfire from a man who has barricaded himself inside a north Philadelphia building have been released from the hospital.

Philadelphia Police Commissioner Richard Ross says "it's nothing short of a miracle that we don't have multiple officers killed today."

Ross says the situation that began about 4:30 p.m. Wednesday has "gone from a hostage situation to a barricade."

Sgt. Eric Gripp said the suspect was "still armed and inside" the house. But Ross said police had been able to speak to him and were still trying to get him to surrender. He said the man's attorney was apparently on the line as well.


9:45 p.m.

Police say two officers who were in a building with a gunman barricaded inside a northern Philadelphia home have been "safely evacuated" by a police SWAT team.

Sgt. Eric Gripp said shortly after 9:30 p.m. that the suspect was "still armed and inside" the house. There was no immediate word on how the officers were freed. Earlier, six officers were struck by gunfire but were in stable condition and others were injured responding to the scene.

Commissioner Richard Ross said officers were serving a narcotics warrant at the home and had already entered when gunfire erupted. Ross said the gunman fired multiple rounds and officers returned fire. He said many "had to escape through windows and doors to get (away) from a barrage of bullets."

Ross said officers had been calling the gunman and trying to communicate with him with a bullhorn, but he had not responded.


8:30 p.m.

Police say an hourslong standoff with a gunman barricaded inside a northern Philadelphia home is continuing into the night as the shooter ignores officers.

Commissioner Richard Ross said during a Wednesday night news conference the "very volatile" situation is still unfolding.

Six officers were struck. All are in stable condition. Ross said other officers were injured responding to the scene.

Ross said officers were serving a narcotics warrant at the home and had already entered when gunfire erupted. Ross said the gunman fired multiple rounds and officers returned fire. He said many "had to escape through windows and doors to get (away) from a barrage of bullets."

Two officers remained inside the home, but Ross says he believes they are OK.

Ross said officers have been calling the gunman and he has picked up but did not speak to them.


7:25 p.m.

A Philadelphia Police sergeant said officers are attempting to communicate with a shooter that has fired at police, wounding at least six officers.

Sgt. Eric Gripp tweeted Wednesday evening that police are "imploring him to surrender and avoid further injuries."

The shooting situation remained active at 7 p.m. Wednesday.

Authorities say police were serving a warrant in the Nicetown-Tioga neighborhood before gunfire started around 4:30 p.m. At least six officers have been shot and none of their injuries are considered life-threatening. The officers were taken to hospitals.

A heavy police presence remains in the neighborhood.

Officials said President Donald Trump and Attorney General William Barr have been briefed on the shooting and are monitoring the situation.


6:40 p.m.

A Philadelphia Police sergeant says six police officers have been shot and the suspect is still firing at police.

Sgt. Eric Gripp also tweeted Wednesday that additional officers are receiving treatment for injuries that aren't from gunshots.

Gripp is asking that people continue to stay out of the city's Nicetown neighborhood.

He also said officers were serving a warrant to a home in the northern Philadelphia neighborhood before shots were fired.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reports two officers were trapped inside the house when the shooting first started.

Dozens of police officers on foot are lining streets blocks away, some in cars and some on horses.

President Donald Trump has been briefed on the shooting in Philadelphia and continues to monitor the situation.


6:10 p.m.

A Philadelphia Police sergeant says five police officers have been shot in what's still an active shooting situation in the city.

Sgt. Eric Gripp tweeted Wednesday shortly before 6 p.m. that all of the injuries are considered non-life threatening.

He also said that the suspect is still firing and warned people to stay out of the Nicetown neighborhood.

The officers have been taken to area hospitals. Temple University Hospital referred questions on the conditions of police officers to police.

A massive police presence remains with dozens of police cars and officers, many of them with their guns drawn.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives says numerous agents are responding to the scene to assist Philadelphia police.


5:45 p.m.

Authorities say several Philadelphia police officers have been shot in an "active and ongoing" shooting situation in the city.

Sgt. Eric Gripp tweeted there was at least one suspect firing at police officers Wednesday afternoon.

A police spokesman confirmed the shooting in the Nicetown section of the city.

Temple University tweeted that it has locked down its Health Sciences Center Campus.

Video shows a massive police presence with dozens of police cars and officers, many of them with guns drawn.

One officer appeared injured and was taken away in a police car. Video also showed two other officers carrying a man and putting them in the back of a car.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives says numerous agents are responding to the scene to assist Philadelphia police.


5:30 p.m.

Authorities say several Philadelphia police officers have been injured in an "active and ongoing" shooting situation in the city.

Sgt. Eric Gripp tweeted there was at least one suspect firing at police officers Wednesday afternoon.

A police spokesman confirmed the shooting in the Nicetown section of the city but offered no other information.

Video shows a massive police presence in a neighborhood with dozens of police cars and officers, many of them with their guns drawn.

One officer appeared injured and was taken away in a police car. Video also showed two other officers carrying a man and putting them in the back of a police car.

It's unknown if any police officers have been shot.


5:15 p.m.

Officials say at least one gunman is shooting at police officers in Philadelphia.

A police spokesman confirmed Wednesday afternoon that a gunman was actively shooting at officers in the Nicetown section of the city. The spokesman who was reached on the public affairs phone number offered no other information.

Sgt. Eric Gripp tweeted said there was at least one suspect firing at police officers.

Video shows a massive police presence in a neighborhood with dozens of police cars and officers, many of them with their guns drawn.

One officer appeared injured and was taken away in a police car. Video also showed two other officers carrying a man and putting them in the back of a police car.

It's unknown if any police officers have been shot.

I'm unconcerned with this incident in itself (which was apparently about drugs), but it is a good example of how difficult it is to handle even a single civilian willing to shoot and adequately equipped to do so.

Now imagine if every person whom ICE wants to deport were willing to put up as much resistance as the gunman in the story above. Would ICE really be willing to go through all the above each time it wants to deport just one person?


False Leftists want to ban firearms out of their selfish concern for their children's supposed safety, which will ultimately affect "non whites", but of course they do not care.


They overestimate the practicality of a firearm ban, for one thing. Almost no rightist firearm owners will turn in their firearms voluntarily. And even if government officials go door to door searching for firearms, rightist firearm owners could just hide their firearms elsewhere. Worst of all, a firearm ban would create a false sense of security among leftists, and therefore reduces their incentive to train (while rightists will without doubt continue training, in secret if necessary).

We should indeed be thinking about what can be done to minimize rightist firepower, but a firearm ban is by far the worst suggestion. The best approach is simply to minimize the number of rightists. This could trivially be done via state control over reproduction. Something as obvious (and easily environmentally justified) as a flat one-child policy would halve the number (and hence firepower) of rightists within a generation. State control over reproduction - not banning firearms - should be the focus of leftist policy advocacy.

Other than the above, it will come down to straightforward reduction by attrition, which of course requires leftist firepower.

Our message is spreading, though:

“I refuse to wait for a police officer to get to make the decision of how dangerous my white assailant is,” she said, referring to a past domestic violence incident when she said the police took the word of her white abuser over her own.
There’s an old trope in gun control circles: if you’re being robbed, instead of playing the hero with a gun it’s much safer to simply cooperate. Give them what they want.

“Well what if they want you dead?” asked Fordham University School of Law professor Nicholas Johnson.


"Disgusting, anti-immigrant rhetoric from @tomilahren in the wake of El Paso," tweeted Julián Castro, who is a former Obama cabinet official.

Castro, a Texas native, was referring to comments Lahren made on the topic of gun control on Fox Business Network, implying that armed Americans would have to shoot people coming across the border.

"And all the things the Democrats want to put in place, my goodness, if they want to open our borders, you better be sure that the people in Texas, the people in South Dakota, the people in the middle of this country, we're going to be armed and ready," Lahren said to Fox's Stuart Varney on Friday.

And so should our side be also!



If Tubman had used a protest sign, would she have succeeded?


You have been warned:

President Donald Trump's supporters will "hunt down" Democrats and bring "violence to America" once the president leaves office, according to right-wing Christian pastor and conspiracy theorist Rick Wiles.

On his apocalyptic TruNews programme, captured by Right Wing Watch, Mr Wiles said the president's impeachment or "however he leaves" office will inspire "veterans, cowboys, mountain men" and "guys that know how to fight" to bring "violence to America" by hunting down Mr Trump's political enemies.

Co-host Edward Szall said "once the blood starts flowing, it's near impossible to stop".
Rob Drake wrote his threat on Twitter, then deleted it.

"I will be buying an AR-15 tomorrow, because if you impeach MY PRESIDENT this way, YOU WILL HAVE ANOTHER CIVAL (sic) WAR!!! #MAGA2020," he wrote. "You can't do an impeachment inquiry from the basement of Capital(sic) Hill without even a vote! What is going on in this country?"

Our enemies will use their firearms against us. Will we use ours against them?




the Joint Chiefs of Staff know that the day will come when they will have to re-conquer those territories that have become foreign on our own soil. The plan is already in place. It’s called Operation Ronces [Roncesvalles, where Charlemagne fought the Moors].It has been developed with help of the specialists from the Israeli Army.”

What are your sources?

—Someone very close to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

You are claiming that the French Army is ready to do…


—What? The, the…?


—To do the cleaning?

—Yes. It will be the Algeria Battle all over again!

No-go zones had better have MANPADS:

in addition to military grade firearms, body armour and other equipment. They also need to be able to retreat underground. Even then they will be fighting at a horrific disadvantage (comparable to Palestinians vs IDF). What should really be happening is that if the French military makes a move, the US military retaliates (as it did during Operation Deliberate Force). But to have any chance of that we need Trump out first.



This can be used against our enemies...


If others have rifles, we'll have rifles; why leftists groups are taking up arms:


Speaking of rifles, during my time in the military I have also heard plenty of stories about the NATO 5.56mm high-velocity round. The bullet is so small, .22 caliber, and moving so fast, that more often than not it passes right through the target without the target even realizing they have been hit. I've heard stories too of people being shot by the 5.56mm 5 to 10 times and still being able to run away afterwards, or continue fighting. Not so with the 7.62 rifle round, which has much more stopping power.
AR15 vs AK47, Which is Better??? (AR15 is 5.56 standard, AK47 is 7.62mm)

The German MG-42 uses the 7.92mm, and I got to fire it when I was stationed in Germany.


Now they know:
Gun shop owners in the Washington, D.C., area said they were seeing a surge of first-time Chinese American buyers.

At Engage Armament in Rockville, Maryland, most gun buyers in the first two weeks of March have been Chinese American or Chinese, according to the owner, Andy Raymond.

More than a fifth of Rockville’s residents are of Asian ethnicity, and Raymond said buyers from Korean and Vietnamese backgrounds were not unusual. But Raymond said he was stunned by the flow of Chinese customers — in particular green-card holders from mainland China — that began earlier this month, a group that rarely patronized his shop before.

“It was just nonstop, something I’ve never seen,” he said.
Already a gun owner, Du, 48, said he was in the process of buying an AR-15 style rifle.

“Katrina is not far away,” he said, alluding to the unrest in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina in 2005. “And when all these bad things come, I am a minority. People can see my face is Chinese clearly. My son, when he goes out, they will know his parents are Chinese.”

For American-born Asians, there is a sudden sense of being watched that is as unsettling as it is unfamiliar.

“It’s a look of disdain,” said Chil Kong, a Korean American theater director in Maryland. “It’s just: ‘How dare you exist in my world? You are a reminder of this disease, and you don’t belong in my world.’ ”

He added: “It’s especially hard when you grow up here and expect this world to be yours equally. But we do not live in that world anymore. That world does not exist.”


If only we had access to military grade weaponry...


Until our side is already using civilian-grade weaponry to their maximum capacity against our enemies and it is still proving insufficient, I don't really think we are qualified to demand military-grade weaponry.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 04, 2020, 02:49:17 am

Behold the extent of improvement we have brought in how leftists think about firearms these days (ignore Pakman):


The county had been split in three since the 1880s, after the Lumbees resisted North Carolina’s post–Civil War efforts to segregate its citizens into two racial categories. The county had three sets of buses, three separate water fountains and three school systems.

But in the 1950s, things were starting to change in Robeson County, and the Klan wasn’t happy about it. Brown v. Board of Education had recently outlawed school segregation throughout the United States. More locally, the Lumbee Tribe had been formally recognized by the state of North Carolina, and Solicitor Malcolm B. Seawell, a local law officer who would later become North Carolina’s attorney general, had given a speech addressing 15 arrested Klansmen, warning them that Robeson County “would not tolerate” the Klan.

“Your society is neither invisible nor invincible,” Seawell said in his speech to the Klansmen. “You may discover that the easy way or the hard way. Take your choice.”

The KKK chose the hard way.

The Lumbees stood off to the side, many of them armed. Some began moving closer to the Klan’s makeshift stage.

Lumbee member Neill Lowery shattered the light bulb with a gunshot, extinguishing the field’s only light source. As the field plunged into darkness, the scene turned to chaos. An Associated Press photographer who was on the scene later told the Rocky Mount Telegram that “several thousand rounds” of ammunition were fired.

Catfish Cole ran into the nearby swamps, followed by other Klansmen who hurriedly drove or ran away from the field.

“They was scared, and they were surrounded,” Locklear said. “They just, you know, they just gave up.”


History lesson:

Over the past 50 years, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has opposed most legislative efforts to restrict citizens’ right to bear arms, regardless of the justification. But, as gun control advocates were quick to point out in the wake of the Florida shooting, a notable exception occurred in 1967:

Social media postings noted that in contrast to their current policy of backing laws that allow citizens to openly carry loaded firearms in public, in 1967 the NRA supported a statewide ban on open carry in California after armed members of the Black Panther Party started patrolling city streets to counter police brutality. A Facebook meme hammered the point home with an image of Black Panthers brandishing weapons in the California state capitol:

“Local cops were dumbfounded to discover that there was no law which prohibited the Panthers from carrying loaded weapons so long as they were unconcealed, a legal fact which the Panthers had carefully researched.”

In a statement quoted by Associated Press, a Panther spokesman said, “The cops asked us what we were doing and we told them. ‘We’re exercising our constitutional rights and we’re not going to take any bull.'”

The Mulford Act was designed to impose a limits on those very constitutional rights in the state of California, establishing that “every person who carries a loaded firearm on his person while on a public street, or in a public place within any city or in a vehicle while in any public place or on any public street in an incorporated city or in an inhabited area of unincorporated territory is guilty of a misdemeanor.”



My favourite story today:

A Michigan lawmaker returned to the state Capitol on Wednesday with an armed security detail following a coronavirus lockdown protest at the building last week attended by white supremacists and militia groups.

Rep. Sarah Anthony, a Democrat whose district is in the capital city, Lansing, told Yahoo News in an interview that her security detail, made up of local black and Latino activists, came together because the armed protesters bearing white supremacist symbols represented a “different level of terror.”
Anthony posted a video to Facebook, which she filmed as the protests raged outside. Members of her community responded and, when Anthony returned to the Capitol on Wednesday for the first time since the demonstration, she was escorted by a group of six black and Latino activists who carried their own guns.
The activists who accompanied Anthony on Wednesday included local Lansing firefighter and activist Michael Lynn Jr. along with multiple members of his family. Lynn told Yahoo News that Anthony’s video of the protests inspired him to offer her protection.

“My thing is, you know, we elected her and we elevated her to that level to represent us in that Capitol. I don’t want her going in there with a fear or worry about doing anything. … I don’t think that’s right, that they would try to intimidate her that way,” Lynn said.

He said seeing the armed protesters challenging Anthony “enraged” him and reminded him of the darker days of white supremacist opposition to the civil rights movement.

“It takes a lot to get a black woman elected into the House of Representatives,” Lynn said. “There’s not that many of them, and we did that. We got her elected in there, and we’re going to make sure she’s protected to go do her job.”
Challenging the perceptions of people of color and guns was one of Lynn’s goals in providing security for Anthony.

“Anytime somebody sees a minority with a gun, it’s got a negative connotation to it, and I don’t like that,” said Lynn. “We were able today to provide some sort of protection but also just the feeling of being protected. I think that was great.”

We need more people like these:


to shoot these:




But I hope this doesn't lead leftists to assume that parading with firearms is enough. In fact, parading will eventually just make you easy targets for rightists with firearms, who will not be parading but will be concealed. Read the enemy article excerpt from the first post of this thread.


What I have been saying all along:

Killer Mike has long been a proponent of the second amendment, especially with regard to minority gun ownership. He took things a step further in an op-ed he wrote for Colorlines.

The Run the Jewels rapper encouraged African-Americans and people of color to “to take seriously their Second Amendment rights” after the murder of Georgia jogger Ahmaud Arbery.

“I put this statement out because the police cannot always get to you on time, and the world is not a just place. I also released these remarks because we cannot assume that everyone who wears a police uniform is just and fair,” he wrote.

He continued by saying that minorities could only rely on themselves for protection and not law enforcement.

“My message to Black people across the country is the same today as it was a year ago: the only person you can count on to protect yourself and your family is you,” he said. “God gave you the right to use whatever tools are available to defend your rights. Nothing—including gun ownership—should be discarded. I encourage gun ownership to my wife, my son and daughters, your sons and daughters and all Black people.”

Killer Mike stated that the biggest challenge that they face is to “normalize” gun ownership for them.

“We should be highlighting and showcasing responsible gun owners. We should be looking to Black organizations such as the National African American Gun Association, which offers firearms training, self-defense training and other services. They understand the cultural nuances of gun ownership and speak directly to our needs,” he said.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 05, 2020, 03:57:57 am

Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on July 05, 2020, 07:27:44 pm
[blockquote class="twitter-tweet"][p lang="en" dir="ltr"]Armed blacks are now stopping and questioning white people. Thank god we defeated Hitler and won the war [a href="">[/a][/p]— 𝐼𝓃 𝑀𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓇𝓎 𝑜𝒻 𝒮𝒦𝒴 𝒦𝒾𝓃𝑔 (@whiteguuy1352) [a href=""]July 4, 2020[/a][/blockquote] [script async src="" charset="utf-8"][/script]
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 15, 2020, 11:38:06 pm
More Black Guns Matter:

Maj Toure, the founder of Black Guns Matter, has taken another tack: Advocating for Black Americans to take up arms for self-defense.

While many argue that the way to prevent violence is to have fewer guns, he says the opposite.

"I believe that more Black people would be alive if they were armed," Toure told Business Insider Weekly.

"So when I hear 'unarmed Black man,' I'm sad," he added, "because there should be no such thing."

I agree. And the same applies to all "non-whites" (which does not include Jews).

At his class, he demonstrated for crowds proper firearm technique, ran through attacker scenarios, and occasionally challenged the views of spectators who disagreed with his approach.

One common criticism is that gun ownership alone is not enough to protect Black Americans from a criminal justice system perceived as systemically racist.

"What we do know is that when Black people do have guns, they are still shot and killed by police or by other bystanders," said Amber Goodwin, founder and executive director of the Community Justice Action Fund.

"Breonna Taylor — her boyfriend Pat was lawfully owning a gun, and she was still shot and killed. And so I think the issue was larger than just give people Black people guns."

This is true. Which is why I keep saying that the correct strategic way to use firearms is not as a defensive weapon but as a counteroffensive weapon. The correct reaction to police brutality is a sniper operation targeting the perpetrators and their corrupt superiors who do not punish them. That is what the Second Amendment is really for. To assume that firearm ownership is about on-the-spot reaction to being shot at misses the point.

One thing he repeats: Systemic racism has stacked the rules around gun control against Black people.

"I pick my words very carefully: All gun control is racist," Toure said. "Whether they change it to make it look like, you know, you got to pay a fee, you got to do this, you do that."

Historians say the links between gun control and racial discrimination go back to slavery and, later, Black Code laws that forbade African Americans from owning guns.

"Gun control in America was initially created to stop melanated beings from having arms," Toure said.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 18, 2020, 05:09:09 am

How does this not evoke a Second Amendment response?

Or, more to the point, if even the above does not evoke a Second Amendment response, then what will?
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 21, 2020, 01:44:13 am

If Donald Trump loses the election and refuses to leave, as he has threatened to do, and the United States military does not remove him from office, I, the undersigned, will personally go to Washington and help remove him from the White House with my fellow Americans.

Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on July 23, 2020, 08:29:40 pm
False Leftist naivety/stupidity on full display:

Mike Prysner ( @MikePrysner  Jul 22 (
It doesn’t matter what kind of decked-out assault rifles these goons bring to our cities; if we hone and sharpen our weapons of mass action, anti-racist solidarity & class unity, they’ll be running scared like they were a month ago.

“Weapons of mass action”
Read that one more time. Yes, this is actually a real statement from a self-proclaimed “leftist”. This idiot wants us to believe that militarized police forces can be fought with “weapons of mass solidarity”. These False Leftists are going to get “non-whites” killed, but then again maybe they don’t care since they are “white” themselves and have reproduced.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 24, 2020, 11:05:20 pm
Lasers work:
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 28, 2020, 01:35:21 am

When coronavirus lockdowns spread nationwide in March, millions of Americans flocked to their local grocery stores and wholesale markets to stock up for what would become months stuck at home. Black Americans did the same, but some had one addendum to their shopping list: a firearm.
“The days are over of African Americans sitting around singing Kumbaya and hoping and praying that somebody will come and save them. We're gonna save ourselves,” Smith said. “And any politician that wants our vote moving forward, they better be on the side of our thinking otherwise, you're not gonna get our vote. We're not gonna be sheep anymore.”
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on September 13, 2020, 11:19:44 pm
This is how easy it actually is to apply the Second Amendment:

So, why hasn't this been done against ICE and CBP since 2017?
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on September 14, 2020, 12:03:00 am
Note that it took place in the "ghetto" "non-white" city of Compton, while (mostly) "White" False Leftists are still busy holding carboard signs.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: Killthebank on September 14, 2020, 11:06:46 am
Do we know the history of the two deputies that were shot in Compton? Do we know what they were doing at the location where they were shot? Why can't this stuff happen during unlawful arrests?
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on September 21, 2020, 02:38:56 pm

Before he drove to the grocery store parking lot, Romeal Taylor did the same thing he's done every day this summer — he holstered his 9-millimeter handgun to the waistband of his gym shorts until he could feel it hug his right hip.

When he arrived at the store in north Minneapolis he spotted six other Black men, some in tactical gear, armed with Glock 23s and Smith & Wesson M&Ps.

I am worried about the emphasis on handguns. I hope these guys also own rifles.

They had come together for a meet-and-greet to introduce themselves to the community, marking one of the first public gatherings of the Minnesota Freedom Fighters.
Leslie Redmond, president of the Minneapolis National Assn. for the Advancement of Colored People, said she is happy the men are armed and wants them to grow as community leaders.

"These brothers were there in the beginning, when threats were being made by white supremacists," she said. "There is no doubt they stepped up for the community."

Taylor and other members view the group as a way to provide safety for peaceful protesters. But they also understand that Black men armed with legally registered guns are viewed differently by many in law enforcement and other parts of society than, say, white militia members who stormed state capitols waving their firearms without repercussions in recent months.

Nonetheless, he said, “We are like any other American.... We have the right to bear arms.”
At this point, 36% of white people nationwide own a gun, according to the Pew Research Center, compared with 24% of Black people.

This is not good enough. (Remember that "blacks" are only 10% of the population! 24% of 10% is just 2.4%!)

In a nearby suburb in 2016, Philando Castile, who had a licensed firearm, was killed by police during a traffic stop after he let an officer know that he had a legal weapon.

Think about this for a moment. Owning a firearm but not using it makes us less safe than not owning a firearm. It is USING firearms (e.g. to create no-go zones) that makes us safe, not owning them.
Post by: rp on December 04, 2020, 12:32:22 am
"Please also try to encourage firearm ownership among leftists."
I am trying to find these leftists first, i.e. distinguish the False Leftists from True Leftists
Post by: 90sRetroFan on December 04, 2020, 01:18:24 am
Even False Leftists should be encouraged to own firearms.
Post by: rp on December 04, 2020, 04:13:23 am
Why? Purely for the sake of outnumbering firearm owning rightists?
Post by: 90sRetroFan on December 04, 2020, 04:19:04 am
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on December 06, 2020, 01:02:20 am
Tactical Driving and Firearms Training:
Post by: rp on December 06, 2020, 04:04:21 am
Ok, but are False Leftists willing to use these firearms to shoot rightists? How can we be sure they will fight for our cause?
Post by: 90sRetroFan on December 06, 2020, 04:42:36 pm
We cannot be sure that armed False Leftists will fight on our side. But we can be sure that armed True Leftists alone are far outnumbered by armed rightists.
Post by: rp on December 07, 2020, 01:14:11 am
Ok. So even if they are not used against rightists, at least it will be kept out of rightists' hands because they could potentially use them against us. That being said, I assume this refers strictly to firearm ownership, and not firearms training, the latter of which we should recruit True Leftists for?
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on December 07, 2020, 01:17:34 am
Two-man fire team tactics:

These firearms appear heavy (I have never carried one before), probably because they were designed for rightist body types, so we can say rightists are at an advantage there. However, leftists will greatly be advantaged if they have a well-disciplined military structure and if they receive training similar to what is shown in the above video. Rightists lack military discipline; they are merely barbarians who attack those at a severe disadvantage.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on December 07, 2020, 02:37:09 am
"These firearms appear heavy (I have never carried one before), probably because they were designed for rightist body types, so we can say rightists are at an advantage there."

Actually, lighter people should in theory benefit more from heavy firearms in terms of absorbing recoil, whereas heavier people already have the inertia of their own body to absorb recoil with.
Post by: 90sRetroFan on December 07, 2020, 02:40:53 am
"I assume this refers strictly to firearm ownership, and not firearms training, the latter of which we should recruit True Leftists for?"

No, as many leftists as possible should receive firearms training.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on January 15, 2021, 11:29:00 pm
Another finally starts to see the light:

To Protect Herself Against White Supremacy, Roxane Gay Reveals She's Purchased Firearms: 'I Got Me a Berretta'

She still has a long way to go, however:

“There’s a difference between us and them,” Gay replied. “We believe in the sanctity of all life, and they don’t. They will kill us and they will be happy. There’s nothing we can do to help the situation, but to stay home and to stay safe.

Or you could (*gasp*) actually use the firearm you bought?

And first of all, there is original sanctity of all life, but there is no sanctity in the lives of those who do not believe in the original sanctity of all life. Until you understand this, your firearm will remain ornamental.

“I got me a Beretta. And a Sig Sauer,” Gay said. “Guns are not my thing. I think that if people want to own one handgun, or two, that’s fine. I don’t think people should own AR-15s or automatic weapons.

Wrong. Racists own AR-15s. Good luck fighting an AR-15 shooter with a Beretta.

I wish AR-15s had never been invented. But given that they have, and our enemies are using AR-15s, we need to use AR-15s against them! It is always justified to use any existing machine to kill the same civilization which invented that machine. We are already handicapped by our ethical unwillingness to invent new machines (which is initiated violence); we cannot afford to further handicap ourselves with stupid refusal to use machines already invented by our enemies.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on January 20, 2021, 03:23:49 am
I have said for a long time that arming leftists is only half the issue. The other half is disarming rightists. Finally we have a precedent on this front:


If we can do this to Loomer, we should be able to do it to at least everyone to the right of her. So we need to beginn pressuring the government to do so.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on February 14, 2021, 09:54:14 pm
Tribute to Christopher Dorner:

an American hero who truly understood how the Second Amendment was supposed to be applied:

His manifesto:

Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest5 on February 15, 2021, 01:33:44 pm
Had never heard of him until now. Certainly is a hero and an American.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest5 on February 15, 2021, 01:54:25 pm
Child kills suspect after 73-year-old Goldsboro woman shot during robbery

Shouldn't be too surprising, children are often the most heroic among us.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest5 on March 11, 2021, 09:16:11 pm
Why Gun Reform is No Longer the 'Third Rail' of U.S. Politics
Moms Demand Action Co-Founder Shannon Watts joins Mehdi Hasan to discuss two new popular bill expanding background checks for gun sales that just passed the House, and the future of the legislation in the Senate.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on March 16, 2021, 11:44:55 pm
RIP Nika Nicole Holbert:

field training officer Josh Baker from the East Precinct, was patrolling in the area of Brick Church Pike near the intersection of Ewing Drive when he spotted a black 2015 Chevrolet Camaro. Officer Baker was aware that the registered owner of the Camaro, convicted felon Demond Buchanan, had six outstanding drug warrants, charging five felonies and one misdemeanor, that were issued last month for possession of heroin, ****, methamphetamine, ecstasy, Xanax and crack ****. Officer Baker radioed to check on the airborne status of a police helicopter, believing that the driver of the Camaro might try to flee. The camaro stopped in the parking lot of the Dollar General store. Officer Baker found that it was being driven not by the wanted drug felon, but by Nika Nicole Holbert.

Finally another American who understands what the Second Amendment is for! Unfortunately, she panicked in the heat of the moment, which sharply lowered her combat effectiveness. Her first mistake was to let Baker see her draw her firearm (3:50), leading to him shooting her at the same time as she shot him. If you are going to keep a firearm in your car, keep it in a bag (so that it cannot be seen, but you can still shoot through the bag). But even then she could have salvaged the situation. Rather than flee in her car (4:14), she should instead have used the car to run him over, and then empty her remaining ammo into his head! She was dying anyway by that point; what did she have to lose?! This is what I keep saying about militarism as opposed to survivalism: the moment combat begins, you stop caring about your own life and focus on ending the life of your oppressor at any cost, so that even if you die too, at least you have accounted for yourself demographically. But she tried to save her own life, and the result was that she still died:

She died later Friday morning at a local hospital.

while her oppressor survived:

Officer Baker is in stable condition after undergoing surgery.

With that said, Holbert is still far more respectable than any of the countless victims who let the racist police slaughter them in total passivity. At least she can say she tried to fight, even if she lacked the skill to fight well.

This is the piece of **** who should have died but did not:


Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest5 on March 17, 2021, 11:00:15 pm
With this device you could technically have the firearm in the firing position and pointing at the door (if you attached it to the door), this way all one need do is squeeze the trigger and fire through the door. A Desert Eagle would do the trick for sure.

Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on March 23, 2021, 12:38:56 pm
Boulder martyr on christian mohammedan solidarity:
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on March 23, 2021, 10:42:02 pm

Yes, he is. So why didn't you shoot 10 Trump family members (excluding Mary) instead of 10 random people? (If it is later revealed that the 10 people you shot were all Trump supporters, then fair enough, but still, why not go for the Trumps (excluding Mary) themselves given that you will only have one chance?)
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on April 18, 2021, 04:36:22 am
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on April 20, 2021, 12:50:00 am
Zaid Hamid (ex-Mujahideen) on firearms:

More on Hamid:
Hamid claims that the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, were part of a plan hatched by "Hindu Zionists", and that it was an attempt by the Indians to stage a false flag attack, which he accuses the September 11th Attacks of being.[5][8]

Hamid believes that Muhammad had declared war on India, and claims that India will be "trounced and enslaved according to sharia if Hindus don’t repent and embrace Islam."[9]

The moment I saw Hamid was an ex-Mujahid on his Twitter bio, I knew he would have invaluable firearms expertise. One thing I like about Mujahids is their militaristic attitude toward combat, which distinguishes them from Westerners. It is something you can just "feel" just by watching the video; his determination to defeat the enemy at all costs, even his own life. I believe all non-Westerners should learn this style of combat, as it demonstrates the frame of mind they should have if they want to defeat Westerners: you should fight not because you want to, but because you have to. The only thing I worry about is that Hamid's anti-Indian views may be off-putting to them.

Also his dietary prescriptions:

While I have heard some say that it is necessary for warriors to adopt a non-vegan diet in order to foster the frame of mind needed for combat, I do not agree with this. How can vegan non-Westerners feel confident in being a vegan warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your take on this?

This is why I feel it is important to distinguish between False Leftist (pacifist) vegans and True Leftist (militarist) vegans.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on April 22, 2021, 01:53:41 am
The guy I was talking about recruiting:
It’s truly embarrassing that it is 2021 and no one has heroically put a bullet into this racist subhuman’s skull yet
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on April 24, 2021, 01:26:52 am
"How can non-Westerners feel confident in being a non-vegan warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your take on this?"

Is there a typo here?

Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on April 24, 2021, 01:44:49 am
I changed it. Here is the new sentence:
"While I have heard some say that it is necessary for warriors to adopt a non-vegan diet in order to foster the frame of mind needed for combat, I do not agree with this. How can vegan non-Westerners feel confident in being a vegan warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your take on this?"
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on April 24, 2021, 03:27:45 am
"How can vegan non-Westerners feel confident in being a vegan warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your take on this?"

Those who feel they must eat animal products in order to be ready to fight are reflecting only who they are racially. Even if it is true that those people are incapable of combat unless they eat animal products, it does not imply that we would also be incapable of combat unless we eat animal products. We and they are different, hence with different dietary requirements for optimizing performance, whether in combat or any other field. If we should lack confidence in our diets because people like them exist, then by the same logic they should also lack confidence in their diets because people like us exist! But they don't. So why should we?

(Of course, the ethical duty is on them to find a way to be adequately combat-ready without animal products.)

Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on April 24, 2021, 03:40:26 am
"If we should lack confidence in our diets because people like them exist, then by the same logic they should also lack confidence in their diets because people like us exist!"

I guess the point I am trying to get it at is that people lack confidence in fighting because of our diets. For example, those who consume animal products clearly have an advantage due to their higher aggression. And history reflects this, as non-Aryans almost always end up defeating Aryans. This is why I believe in creating combat methods separate for Aryans.*

*Perhaps this could account for why in NS Germany the Aryan SS was kept separate from the Wehrmacht, the latter of which mostly had non-Aryans in its ranks?

Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on April 24, 2021, 04:15:49 am
"those who consume animal products clearly have an advantage due to their higher aggression."

Are you saying the animal products chemically causes aggression in anyone who consumes them, or are you saying that those who are inclined to consume animal products are more aggressive anyway?

In any case, aggressiveness can be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on circumstances.

"And history reflects this, as non-Aryans almost always end up defeating Aryans."

I am not sure which examples you are thinking of. Aryan diffusion involved us defeating Gentiles many times. The main historical Turanian advantage over us is ergonomic: their food being able to walk with them while we had to carry our food! This allowed them to retreat back to the steppe whenever they needed to, and if we tried to pursue them, we would always run out of food first.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on April 24, 2021, 04:26:32 am
"Are you saying the animal products chemically causes aggression in anyone who consumes them, or are you saying that those who are inclined to consume animal products are more aggressive anyway?"

The former. But regarding the latter, I believe that Aryans who would be so appalled at animal slaughter might think that non-Aryans can defeat them because they possess more lightning than Aryans, i.e. the non-Aryans can bring themselves to kill humans because they have no compunction in killing innocent animals, but Aryans cannot bring themselves to kill humans since they do have such compunction.

"I am not sure which examples you are thinking of. Aryan diffusion involved us defeating Gentiles many times. The main historical Turanian advantage over us is ergonomic: their food being able to walk with them while we had to carry our food! This allowed them to retreat back to the steppe whenever they needed to, and if we tried to pursue them, we would always run out of food first."

Ok. I thought it was because of aggression, but now I see that this is not the case.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on April 24, 2021, 06:05:22 am
"I believe that Aryans who would be so appalled at animal slaughter might think that non-Aryans can defeat them because they possess more lightning than Aryans, i.e. the non-Aryans can bring themselves to kill humans because they have no compunction in killing innocent animals, but Aryans cannot bring themselves to kill humans since they do have such compunction."

Precisely because I am so appalled at animal slaughter, I have no problem bringing myself to kill humans who have no compunction in killing innocent animals. Did Cain think Abel could defeat him because Abel had no compunction sacrificing lambs to Yahweh? Cain is our rolemodel.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on May 29, 2021, 10:12:39 pm

Black gun owners plan to march in Oklahoma Saturday to advocate for gun ownership and in honor of the Tulsa Race Massacre.

As VICE News reported, hundreds of members from Huey P. Newton Gun Club, Anubis Arms Gun Club, and the Panther Special Operations Command as well other organizations from across the country are expected to participate in the protest.

"Our hope is to try to galvanize a community, educate around the position of Second Amendment rights, and hopefully be a vehicle to more or less unify the African American community," co-founder of the Newton Gun Club in Dallas, Texas, Yafeuh Balogun, said to VICE News.
The groups in attendance also aim to draw attention to the Tulsa Race Massacre, a race riot that occurred 100 years ago this year. Commemoration events are underway, and the US Department of Homeland Security warned that white supremacist groups might target the events. In addition, the groups also hope to inform the Black community about how to act during a police interaction, the report said.

Balogun told Vice that the groups credit themselves in part for the spike in gun sales from Black people. As firearm sales boomed in 2020, purchases from Black people also spiked amid the COVID-19 pandemic and racial reckoning in the US.

I would like to see a breakdown by type of firearm. We need long guns above all, but I fear people are concentrating on handguns.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest5 on May 29, 2021, 11:55:42 pm
Sniper rifles preferably.

The Quietest Sniper Rifle Ever... and Why The Government Doesn’t Regulate It...
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: rp on May 29, 2021, 11:59:18 pm
I've always seen sniper warfare as cowardly. But this merely reveals the ignobility of those who invented it in the first place. So it goes without saying that I will use any means necessary to destroy them, including sniper warfare.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest5 on May 30, 2021, 01:14:10 am
Interestingly to myself at least, I've been contemplating this very topic for a game I'm pondering making. I arrived at the conclusion not too long ago that the ignoble races in the game's story would use rifles and bullets and that the noble races used thrown weapons and a shield of some kind as a counter, refusing to resort to the enemies weaponry. Then you posted this the other day:  That really blew my mind, lol! I had also thought the noble races would be able to leap long distances because they would be much lighter physically since they sustain themselves with mushrooms only, and that the planet the story takes place on has a weaker gravity than earth, allowing them to close the gap between them and bullet-users faster. The ignoble races on the other hand would use the weak gravity of the planet to build ever bigger machines of war....

Back to reality:
The Whitworth rifle was arguably the first long-range sniper rifle in the world.[1] Designed by Sir Joseph Whitworth, a prominent British engineer, it used barrels with hexagonal polygonal rifling, which meant that the projectile did not have to bite into the rifling grooves as was done with conventional rifling. His rifle was far more accurate than the Pattern 1853 Enfield, which had shown some weaknesses during the recent Crimean War. At trials in 1857, which tested the accuracy and range of both weapons, Whitworth's design outperformed the Enfield at a rate of about three to one. Also, the Whitworth rifle was able to hit the target at a range of 2,000 yards, whereas the Enfield could only manage it at a distance of 1,400 yards.[2] During the American Civil War, the Confederate sharpshooters equipped with Whitworth rifles were tasked to kill Union field artillery crews, and were responsible for killing Major General John Sedgwick – one of the highest-ranking officers killed during the Civil War – at the Battle of Spotsylvania Court House.

Like 90sRF always says, nothing ignoble about using the weaponry an enemy invented against that enemy.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on May 30, 2021, 10:37:40 pm
CJNG demonstrates the correct way to use firearms:

The cartel kidnapped several members of an elite police force in the state of Guanajuato, tortured them to obtain names and addresses of fellow officers and is now hunting down and killing police at their homes, on their days off, in front of their families.
the cartel has already declared war on the government, aiming to eradicate an elite state force known as the Tactical Group which the gang accuses of treating its members unfairly.

“If you want war, you'll get a war. We have already shown that we know where you are. We are coming for all of you,” reads a professionally printed banner signed by the cartel and hung on a building in Guanajuato in May.

“For each member of our firm (CJNG) that you arrest, we are going to kill two of your Tacticals, wherever they are, at their homes, in their patrol vehicles,” the banner read, referring to the cartel by its Spanish initials.

Officials in Guanajuato — Mexico's most violent state, where Jalisco is fighting local gangs backed by the rival Sinaloa cartel — refused to comment on how many members of the elite group have been murdered so far.

But state police publicly acknowledged the latest case, an officer who was kidnapped from his home on Thursday, killed and his body dumped on a highway.

Guanajuato-based security analyst David Saucedo said there have been many cases.

“A lot of them (officers) have decided to desert. They took their families, abandoned their homes and they are fleeing and in hiding,” Saucedo said. “The CJNG is hunting the elite police force of Guanajuato.”

What I don't understand is how this has still not yet started in the US (against ICE/CBP also).


The Trump administration in the U.S. pressed for building a wall on Mexico's northern border, and it also implemented measures attempting to stem the flow of migrants from Central America and other regions of the world. Although López Obrador expressed sympathy with migrants during his campaign, since taking office his stance has changed. When the number of migrants surged, the U.S. pressured his government with trade sanctions, and he hardened the southern border. Government forces broke up migrant caravans heading through Mexico to the U.S.[314] At the northern border, Mexico is now the stopping point for migrants sent back to Mexico by U.S. immigration authorities awaiting adjudication of their claims for asylum.[315] López Obrador dismantled the Federal Police, saying they were corrupt, but incorporated them into the new National Guard, now being used to stop Central American immigrants at the southern border, delighting U.S. President Trump.[5]

In contrast:

Food from the cartels with love
From the Sinaloa Cartel to their rivals, CJNG or Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generacion, in Mexico, where the government is lacking the cartels and their families have stepped in to win the hearts of those in need. In this video posted in social medias in Mexico these donations are said to be from the Viagras in Michoacan. Perhaps the most surprising video coming out of Mexico is of these two ladies, one of them is Alejandrina one of El Chapos' daughters.

While their father sits in a U.S. Super Max Federal Prison in Colorado, his daughter hands out food in Guadalajara, courtesy of their company "El Chapo 701"

Their faces protected by a mask with a silhoutte of El Chapo on it. In the boxes... rice, oil, sugar and other necessities.

Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on June 06, 2021, 09:47:40 pm
At last firearms are entering the picture!

BALTIMORE (AP) — Two juveniles and an 18-year-old have been charged with first-degree murder in the shooting of a 31-year-old Israeli man who was visiting relatives in Baltimore last month.

Baltimore police said William Clinton III, 18, and a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old are being held without bail in the May 3 fatal shooting of Efraim Gordon.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on June 17, 2021, 10:35:49 pm
As I keep saying, arming leftists is only half of what this topic is about. The other half is disarming rightists:

Mark and Patricia McCloskey, a St. Louis couple who gained notoriety after brandishing guns at Black Lives Matter protesters last summer, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges and agreed to give up their weapons in court on Thursday afternoon.
Neither will face jail-time, but will have to pay a collective fine of $2,750 and forfeit their guns to be destroyed.

The McCloskeys became a household name last summer after an image went viral of the couple wielding guns at Black Lives Matter protesters passing through their neighborhood on the way to the mayor’s house. Mark McCloskey held an AR-15, while his wife held a semiautomatic handgun, with the couple later defending their actions by saying they felt threatened by the protesters.

I am willing to bet they own more firearms than just these two.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on June 20, 2021, 10:02:23 pm

McCloskeys get new guns after firearms confiscation

Just confiscating particular weapons does not work. So long as they are still allowed to own firearms, they will own firearms.

Firearm possession should be for Americans only, not for Western occupiers. For a start, anyone who has ever displayed a Confederate flag or a flag of any Western colonial power (including Israel) should be permanently banned from owning firearms. Similarly for anyone who has ever expressed views supporting Western colonialism (e.g. opposing removal of colonialist statues), and so on.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 01, 2021, 11:25:28 pm

A group of undocumented migrants broke into a Texas ranch house near the border with Mexico on Tuesday and stole firearms, ammunition and other items, authorities said.

So at least you understand that they need to have firearms. So far so good. But then you screw up:

Border agents in the Big Bend Sector responded to the ranch house in Sierra Blanca, Hudspeth County, that had reportedly been burglarized and encountered three armed undocumented migrants, U.S. Customs and Border Protection said in a news release.
Agents searched the three migrants and discovered two loaded handguns, ammunition, food and clothing that had been stolen from the ranch house, CBP said.

WHY DIDN'T YOU SHOOT THE CBP AGENTS WITH THE FIREARMS THAT YOU HAD JUST PROCURED?!?! What good is having firearms when you won't use them? And now not only do you not have the firearms any more, you will be put into a concentration camp.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on August 12, 2021, 11:27:53 pm
CJNG understands how to use firearms:

In a video that circulated widely throughout the country, a masked man surrounded by other masked and heavily armed men reads off a death threat from the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (known as CJNG for its Spanish-language acronym). The man singles out Milenio Television’s national anchorwoman Azucena Uresti, and vows to “come for you wherever you are, and make you eat your words.”
“If CJNG can get to one of the most protected police officials in the country, they can easily assassinate a reporter like Ms. Uresti,” Mike Vigil, the DEA’s former Chief of International Operations, told The Daily Beast. “When they make threats, they are not idle ones, and they carry them out with impunity.”
Vigil describes CJNG as “one of the most powerful and violent cartels in the world” that “operates like a paramilitary force” and controls whole swaths of the country.

“The government is powerless against them,” Vigil said.

So what is it about CJNG that makes it so formidable? And how are they able to get away with such brazen and violent behavior?
According to Dr. Robert J. Bunker, Director of Research and Analysis for strategic consultancy Futures, LLC, CJNG is “extremely violent and warlike,” capable of “fielding company-sized mounted infantry forces fighting from armored vehicles with turreted .50 caliber guns.”

Bunker added that CJNG’s ground forces are “increasingly supported by ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) and weaponized drones armed with explosives.”
Bunker agreed with Teun’s analysis, and harkened back to an even older analogy than that of the franchise, calling CJNG’s path to power a “neo-feudal system of vassalage.”

“Once a local criminal group petitions to become a (CJNG) affiliate Mencho must then approve it in a warlord-to-vassal type of relationship. The new group then accepts the narratives, symbols, and strategic guidance of CJNG, while retaining some local autonomy in its decision making,” Bunker said.
“Mencho has the power projection capabilities throughout Mexico to put CJNG kill-teams and contract sicarios [assassins] anywhere on the ground in a day or so, in some cases within a matter of hours, to make good on his public threats,” Bunker said.


This is the kind of structure needed to defeat our enemies.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on August 22, 2021, 04:26:23 pm
Armed Man In South Africa Unknowingly Proves The Importance of the 2nd Amendment

We are all we have!
Title: Re: True Left Breakthrough: Ahimsa
Post by: guest55 on August 24, 2021, 12:48:57 pm
This is worth remembering:

Men Against Fire: How the Majority of Soldiers in Every War Steadfastly Refuse to Harm the Enemy
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on August 25, 2021, 10:03:09 pm

The serious question: who is more likely to win if pitted against each other?

That is why leftists need to stop being liberals and get armed ASAP.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on September 30, 2021, 07:35:04 pm
Why Did 135 Republicans Just Vote To Advance ‘Red Flag’ Gun Confiscation Laws?
On September 23, 2021, the US House of Representatives passed Bill H.R. 4350.

This bill is called the National Defense Authorization Act.

Inside this BIll there is a section titled, "Authority of Military Judges and Military Magistrates To Issue Military Court Protective Orders.

If you haven't caught on yet, that ladies and gentlemen are Red Flag Law Provision.

This provision will give military courts the authority to confiscate or prevent a soldier from exercising their 2A rights without due process.

The Bill passed 316-113 and of the 316 votes in favor of the bill, 135 were Republicans.

This obviously ticked 2A Community because we can't understand why under any circumstance would Republican politicians who pride themselves on protecting our constitutional rights ever be ok with Red Flag laws that literally violate not only the 2nd but also the fourth Amendment completely ignoring due process?

US Congressman Gregory F. Murphy, claims the Democrats concealed the Red Flag Law in the Bill. 

He stated, “I am outraged that House Democrats are once again trying to conceal unconstitutional red flag laws in the NDAA that could be used to unjustly deprive American servicemembers of their Second Amendment rights,” said Rep. Murphy. “Our national defense bill is a key component of ensuring that our Armed Forces and their families have the resources they need, and it is reprehensible that Democrats are trying to use the NDAA to subvert our veterans’ right to possess a firearm.”

Heated Gun Debate Between Colion Noir & Co-Founder of Gun Control Organization
Pro 2A Advocate, Colion Noir, Gets in a Heated debate with John E Rosenthal, the Co-Founder of a Gun Control organization, Stop Handgun Violence.

John E Rosenthal: Is chairman of Stop Handgun Violence that supports Banning the most popular and commonly owned rifle in the country the AR-15, Magazine Capacity limitations, Background checks on Private Gun Sells, Taking Peoples Guns Without Due Process known as Red Flag Laws, and Other Gun Controls. (SHV) was the lead advocacy organization for the Massachusetts Gun Control Acts of 1998 and 2014.

Colion Noir: Is a Lawyer & 2A advocate that creates content that conveys complex arguments perpetuating the ideals of our constitutional rights in America regarding the 2nd amendment in a way that makes them simple and entertaining.

Who thinks rightists would be anti-gun altogether if leftists started fully embracing gun culture?
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on October 27, 2021, 09:23:55 pm
Our enemies are ready to use their firearms against us:

Are we ready to use ours against them?
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on November 16, 2021, 08:37:00 pm
Morale-lifting story of the day:

Critical race theory defender tells parents he's got 1,000 soldiers 'locked and loaded,' some see it as threat
"For those who got an issue with this critical race theory equity, this is something I fight for, for my children," Austin, who is African American, began. "How dare you come out here and talk about the things that my daddy and my grandparents went through, the lynching, the oppression, Jim Crow, and my kids are still being afflicted by this."

"We are not our ancestors," Austin added. "I got over 1,000 soldiers ready to go."
After Austin's one minute to speak had run out, officers came and escorted him out of the room. During this time, he shouted, "I'll bring my soldiers with me next time… locked and loaded." (video here)

Assuming he is not bluffing, Austin is what America needs. If he really does have 1000 soldiers ready to be martyred for America, and he were to send them all to assassinate Trump and other rightist leaders in the US, he could change the course of world history.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on December 28, 2021, 07:26:55 pm
There are a few in American hip-hop who care enough to do the right thing. Apparently being sniped at doesn't concern most hip-hop artists either considering their security detail can obviously stop sniper rounds going down range mid-flight with their magical powers of security. Reminder:'s-walk-of-fame-after-'sniper-t/

The sniper rifles are already coming out to play. Wakey wakey!!! I see the lights are on....

Have any of these hip-hop "stars" even taken the time to consider that they are in fact a bigger non-"white" target for "white"-supremacists than the average non-"white"?

Professor Griff deserves some applause for being one of the few in hip-hop who cares enough to do the right thing:
professorgriff: Developing An Urban Tactical Mindset w/ Professor Griff

Considering the title of this post I'm guessing Griff is realizing too that all the tough-talk we've been hearing from rappers for the last two decades amounts to absolute squat unless they're shooting into crowds of innocent bystanders or driving-by and shooting at opponents from moving vehicles hoping that if they let off enough rounds they may actually get lucky and strike their intended target?

Only other rappers I can think of that are on this level off the top of my head: Paris, Dead Prez, and Immortal Technique....
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on March 24, 2022, 09:55:20 pm
Apparently, rightists are talking about masculinity in conjunction with having a "strong military" again. I thought I'd make this point:

Are women rated as better shooters than men?
There’s a lot of data on who makes a better shooter. Numerous studies have been done, most by the military (including ours (USA)). It was found that in most situations women outperform men in accuracy and thoroughness. What that means, as stated in some of those same reports (including ours), is that women can hit the target more often than a man, and if given the task of completing a set goal a woman is more likely to follow through and get the job done. In layman terms (also stated) - women make better killers.

A lot of guys [WESTERNERS] dispute this because they think it means their balls will fall off, or something. But real personnel are waiting for the rest of the report as they’ve probably seen it, read it, and know the same thing I am going to drop with the other shoe…

Women make better Pool\Billiard players as well, this I know from personnel experience. I'm so sick and tired of Westerners and the way they think. What a plague they've been to this world! Straight fucken plague!

Let's talk about hypersonic tech and masculine militaries....

And, as narrator points out in the above video, this guys "masculine" military is currently being defeated by a military that has an LGBT unit in it that wears a "unicorn patch":


According to Putin's Orthodox Church Putin's army is currently having it's teeth kicked in by a "gay parade".
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on April 08, 2022, 09:46:23 pm
Watch a modified DJI drone drop a grenade on a car in Ukraine with startling accuracy
Watch a modified DJI drone drop a grenade on a car in Ukraine
In Ukraine, a local UAS company used a modified DJI drone, reportedly a DJI Phantom 4, to drop a grenade on a vehicle.

On Twitter, the following short video was shared by Calibre Obscura that shows a grenade being dropped on a car from about 400 feet in altitude.

“A local UA company developing a way to drop payloads onto Russian vehicles simply from COTS drones; here an F-1 grenade is dropped from a DJI Phantom 4 onto a car from 100m,” Calibre Obscura tweeted. “Note that this is civilians developing this for defense, not the Ukrainian Army.”

The video was recorded by the drone so while we can see the modified DJI drone gaining altitude, positioning itself over the vehicle, and dropping the explosive, we cannot see the drone itself.

The video seems to show a test of the modified DJI drone being able to drop a grenade as we do not see an explosion at the end of the clip.

It is remarkable to see how seemingly easy it is to accurately drop an explosive from about 400 feet high.

The video is very short and no additional information was provided. We do not know the exact location of the event, nor do we have a date and time of the recording.

Using an off-the-shelf, DJI drone, and modifying the aircraft so that it can be used to drop grenades is nothing new. In recent years, we have seen numerous examples of DJI drones being used this way in the Middle East.

#ukraine #grenade #djidrone #djiphantom #stoprussia

This knowledge could certainly come in handy at some point in the near future considering the path humanity is currently on....
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on April 10, 2022, 07:36:50 pm
Leftist Explains Why She's Pro-Gun
Jessica Burbank discusses why she's a pro-gun leftist.

Leftists getting it:
To be pro gun is the real leftist position! If you're anti 2nd amendment you're a reactionary.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on April 11, 2022, 02:36:46 pm
Biden announces new rule on "ghost guns" aimed at combating gun crimes | full video
President Biden announced on Monday new steps to regulate the manufacturing and sales of “ghost guns” — homemade firearms lacking serial numbers, making them difficult for law enforcement to trace. Mr. Biden also announced the nomination of former U.S. attorney Steve Dettelbach to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

#News #LiveNews #GhostGuns
Title: Let's talk about the end to the age of the tank....
Post by: guest55 on April 12, 2022, 08:38:24 pm
Let's talk about the end to the age of the tank....

I was just thinking about this to myself earlier today in conjunction with top U.S. military brass saying similar things recently. As I have said before, and numerous other veterans have now as well, I would not want to be in a tank on a modern battlefield. I'd rather take my chances out in the open as well.

If I had to be in a vehicle on a modern battlefield I'd rather be in something lightly armored, exceptional at driving on off-road terrain, and fast as hell while doing so! Loaded down with all the latest anti-tank missiles and grenade launchers of course. 50 cal. machine-gun too just for good measure. A couple of sniper rifles, etc....
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on April 19, 2022, 05:10:22 pm
Just found a rebuttal to the previous post so I thought I'd post so we can hear both sides of the argument:

No, The Tank Is Not Dead.
Taking a slightly different tack on this debate. There has been much focus in recent years on the ability of various systems like drones and sensor-fuzed artillery to destroy tanks. Some have observed that the tank has been declared 'dead' several times, going back as far as 1919. In this video, I attempt to explain why the tank still has a place on the modern battlefield, even if it takes more work and money to keep them alive.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on May 16, 2022, 12:43:13 pm
The U.S., where the wrong people have been getting shot for well over 250 years now...

America has had 201 mass shootings this year. And counting. Hear where they were
So far this year, there have been 201 mass shootings in the United States, and it's only May. CNN and the Gun Violence Archive define a mass shooting as one that injures or kills four or more people. As a reminder that gun violence spares no state, city or town, these are the places where they've happened in 2022. #CNN #News

(Unless of course you are a non-human completely incapable of shooting back or defending yourself against human attack because you are weaker than humans and technology. Only assholes beat-up and bully those weaker than them. Punch-up!).

In defense of Mattis and his above quote, Mattis at the least may not be a humanist:


I'd be interested to hear what Mattis' plan for killing Trump was?:


Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on May 26, 2022, 02:02:11 pm
The U.S. does not have a firearm problem as much as it does a mental health and spiritual crisis problem.

The following is not an endorsement of Switzerland either, but the point of the article reinforces the point I made above:

Switzerland doesn't have mass shootings despite having a high rate of gun ownership
Switzerland hasn’t had a mass shooting in 21 years, despite having about 2 million privately owned guns in a nation of 8.3 million people. In the U.S., gun death rates are now at their highest in more than 20 years.

Seems many False-Leftist types do not want to admit that Westerners in general have serious mental health issues, many of which stem from what they do to their own minds and spirits with their "entertainment" and "media". Westerners literally make themselves mental, physically, and spiritually sick. This is nothing new and has been occurring in the West since the start of the industrial revolution. This has most likely had a more dire impact in non-Western America (identity crisis) than it has in Western-styled Switzerland.

See also:

'It’s not about guns, it’s about mental health.’

That’s a common refrain conservative politicians typically trot out in the wake of any mass shooting in America.

It’s one that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott certainly did, speculating to reporters this week that the gunman had a ‘mental health challenge’—even though Abbott admitted at the same appearance that the gunman had no clear history of mental health problems or criminality. What’s ironic is that if the gunman indeed had a mental health concern, he probably wouldn’t have been able to get proper care in the Lone Star State.

Just one month before the Uvalde shooting, Abbott cut more than $200M from the department that oversees mental health programs. His home state ranks dead last out of all 50 states for overall access to mental health care, according to the 2021 State of Mental Health in America report.

The murderer seems to have been bullied. What was Western colonialism at it's most primitive form if not bullying?

Western civilization is one big mental health problem!
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: guest55 on May 29, 2022, 03:26:53 pm
U.S. Gun Culture Wasn’t Always Like This | The Mehdi Hasan Show
In today’s America, everyone carrying guns everywhere is seen as a hallmark of our exceptional liberty. But it wasn’t always like this, even for conservatives. Author and law professor Adam Winkler joins Mehdi to discuss how we fight this hardline, far-right gun culture that’s left generations of schoolchildren in America traumatized and unsafe.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on May 30, 2022, 01:15:30 am

Rep. Mo Brooks Says We Need Our Guns So We Can 'Take Back' The Nation

We need guns to stop Brooks and his followers!
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on June 05, 2022, 09:17:08 pm
Now we are talking:

The answer to bring mass shootings in our schools to an end is right there in front of us, but no one wants to say it. So, I will.

It’s time to arm the kids themselves.
Kids could report to their classroom in the morning, recite their Pledge of Allegiance, and then be issued their gun for the day. Just before the final bell, they would turn their weapon back in to their teacher to be safely locked away until the following morning.
imagine some would-be mass shooter bursting into a classroom only to be faced almost instantly by the barrels of at least 15 to 20 handguns.

I agree.

Naturally. the children would have to be trained in the use of their weapon. Target practice on the school shooting range could be incorporated into their regular Physical Education classes.


Now, we have to be reasonable about this. We obviously don’t want kindergartners running around shooting each other accidentally with their tiny fingers, so we would have to establish a rational age requirement. Say, maybe 10 years old.

Disagree. Mass shooters would then just attack kindergartens.

On the other hand, I propose that any child who has ever hunted or who has parents who hunt should not be allowed to have a firearm in school.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: Polinc_Socjus on June 05, 2022, 11:43:51 pm
It's time to arm the kids themselves.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on June 09, 2022, 08:07:56 pm
False Left article:

She explained that “the blast effect, or the cavitation effect” that a handgun shot causes is not as wide and devastating to internal organs as the one inflicted by high-velocity weapons such as the AR-15 and similar rifles. “When you see handguns, you often just see a little hole on the outside on both sides; shotguns, which are a little bit higher velocity, a little bit bigger. But assault weapons, it's much bigger,” she said, adding that as a bullet from this type of weapon penetrates the body, it typically creates a large cavity that can cause significant bleeding from vessels and completely destroy soft tissue, as well as organs.

“The organs, for example, like the liver or the spleen, that aren't very elastic, they can't handle that. They would basically rupture,” Naik-Mathuria said.

The True Left response is simple. Do you want rightists to experience what is described above? If so, then buy an AR-15!
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on June 16, 2022, 12:13:51 am
The direction we want:

Hate crimes, need to feel safe lead to more Black people buying guns

Georgia resident Destiny Hawkins bought her first gun, a Glock 43, two weeks after the Jan. 6 insurrection in Washington, D.C.

But again, handguns are not enough. Rightists have assault rifles. We will need to at least match them in firepower per person just to stand a chance.

Since May 14, the day 18-year-old Payton Gendron entered a Buffalo, New York, grocery store and allegedly murdered 10 people specifically because they were Black, it looks like gun sales among African Americans have continued to rise, the report contends.

One person interviewed noted that he was “stunned” at how many other Black people were in line at a Maryland gun shop just days after the Buffalo murder spree.

“A lot of us have the same idea,” federal employee Michael Moody told NBC News. “It’s getting bad when someone specifically targets Black people to shoot. We have to be prepared to fight back. And you can’t survive bringing a knife to a gunfight.”

It is not much better to bring a handgun to an assault rifle fight. And don't forget to buy body armour and helmets also.

According to The National Shooting Sports Foundation, 90 percent of gun stores have reported selling more firearms to Black people, and gun ownership among Black women is up by a whopping 87 percent.

“And you wonder why?” asked Moody. “You look at Buffalo and the feeling of ‘This could have been me’ is there. We could be the next target. And when it’s you, what are you going to do? Are you going to run and hide? Or are you going to be able to protect yourself? Protect your family? I didn’t want a gun; I’m not a gun person. But this world has made me get one. Getting one for my wife next.”

Those who didn't want a gun should be the only ones allowed to have guns. Those who are not gun people should be the only ones allowed to have guns.

But in order to take guns away from the gun people, we need to have more firepower than they have.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on June 21, 2022, 08:16:35 pm
More encouraging signs:

Body armor manufacturers are seeing a spike in sales amid recent incidents of gun violence in the US, NPR reported. Increasingly, they're seeing purchases from leftists and progressives of color who "want to have that protection," a gun rights advocate said.

"It's becoming popular among leftist progressive people of color," P.B Gomez the founder of the Latino Rifle Association told NPR, adding that they "want to protect themselves at protests when they're in situations where they might be confronted by far-right agitators."

Good! (Next, stop associating leftism with progressivism.)

In the wake of racially motivated attacks like the Buffalo, New York, supermarket shooting, which targeted a predominantly Black community, groups like the Latino Rifle Association have argued that body armor is "valid protection from hate crimes."

"If you are POC or LGBTQ+, highlight the fact that body armor is valid protection from hate crimes, you don't appreciate New York's attempt to make you vulnerable," the Latino Rifle Association tweeted last month.

In reality, however, body armour is not intended to protect peaceful people going about daily activities. It is intended to protect active combatants who expect return fire. Therefore while I absolutely support purchasing body armour, I advice using it the way it was intended: put it on prior to launching attacks on rightist gatherings.

"We often heard the good guy with the gun can stop the bad guy with the gun, but in this case, the bad guy with the gun had body armor on and the retired police officer, Officer (Aaron) Salter, could not stop him," New York State Senator Sean Ryan, who is in favor of the bill, told Spectrum News 1.

We must become the good guy with the gun and the body armour so that the bad guy with the gun cannot stop us!

Justin, the owner of a co-op that designs and sells firearm accessories with left-leaning views, told Insider a rise in right-wing violence "is forcing people to make the choice to have to protect themselves."

You will not be truly protected until all rightist bloodlines have been eliminated.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 11, 2022, 01:55:14 pm
This is what we need! Selective confiscation of firearms from rightist ownership only! Our enemies complain:

he left-wing interior minister of the German state of Thuringia, Georg Maier, wants to withdraw gun licenses from Alternative for Germany members, which would effectively result in a mass weapon confiscation.
While the interior minister says that they will target “right-wing extremists,” this list also apparently includes law-abiding members of the AfD who have never been convicted of any crime or shown any sign of participating in terror activity. The rule would, for example, target AfD members who legally own weapons as hunters or marksmen, according to German news outlet T-Online. The letter says that “appropriate revocation procedures should be initiated against these in principle.”
AfD Thuringia is suing against this classification in the report as being for the protection of the constitution. AfD state spokesman Stefan Möller criticized the actions of the interior minister. He accused him of using an adapted weapons law in Germany “as a substitute criminal law against law-abiding hunters and marksmen in the AfD.”

Certainly (and as I have always argued), anyone who has ever used a firearm to hunt have proven that they do not deserve to own firearms. (It is of course no coincidence that hunters are disproportionately rightists.)
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on July 23, 2022, 02:25:37 pm
Every US leftist should own one of these:

New assault rifle being sold to civilians is twice as powerful as the AR-15 and capable of shooting through bulletproof vests, report says
SIG Sauer's MCX-SPEAR is the civilian equivalent of the US Army's NGSW-R (Next Generation Squad Weapon-Rifle), specifically created to tear through body armor, The Daily Beast reported.

"It'll shoot through almost all of the bulletproof vests worn by law enforcement in the county right now," Ryan Busse, a former firearms company executive now a senior policy analyst with the Giffords Law Center, told the outlet.

The gun fires bullets with twice the kinetic energy of those from an AR-15 has a longer range, and has a noise suppressor that could make a gunman harder to locate, the outlet reported.

because every US rightist will soon own one of these, and if they have more firepower than we do, they will win.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on August 27, 2022, 11:52:02 pm
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on September 16, 2022, 03:36:50 pm
Why leftists should not be anti-firearm:

“Did she literally just tweet out the video of her kicking me?” Pecora wrote on Twitter along with Greene’s video. Pecora shared a different angle on her own feed.

“I’m so sorry but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect members of Congress to not kick an 18 year old citizen,” Pecora added.

Voters of Tomorrow wrote in a statement to reporters that Greene “physically and verbally attacked members of our team,” and that “in addition to yelling at our Executive Director, a Mexican immigrant, to ‘go to another country,’ she physically assaulted another young staffer.”

Santiago Mayer, executive director of the group, wrote on Twitter that Voters of Tomorrow is consulting with their legal team and “keeping our options open.”

Greene attacked Meyer on Twitter, calling him a “paid political activist” and telling him to “go back” to Mexico if he didn’t like the gun laws in the United States.

The following woke comment explains:

The teenager was in that place first, maybe she should have exercised her stand your ground right that the GOP is so fond of, and we wouldn't have to worry about Madge anymore.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on September 28, 2022, 01:37:07 am

They need to train with rifles, not handguns.
Title: Re: Firearms
Post by: 90sRetroFan on November 17, 2022, 12:32:03 am
It is encouraging to know that the good guys at least 1) have firearms and; 2) are willing to use them to protect refugees:

Their shooting skills need a lot of work, though.....