True Left
History => Human Evolution => Topic started by: 90sRetroFan on November 24, 2020, 02:49:18 am
-
OLD CONTENT
We hereby commence the pushback against the popular HBD notion (tacitly grounded in Western standards) that colder habitats evolve superior people on average. It all depends on what standards we use to measure superiority.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345077
Sexual dimorphism in body composition across human populations: associations with climate and proxies for short- and long-term energy supply.
...
CONCLUSIONS:
The inverse correlation between lean mass dimorphism and adiposity dimorphism indicates a sex-trade-off between these two tissue accretion strategies. At colder temperatures, females invest disproportionately more in adiposity, and males disproportionately more in lean mass. Dimorphism also increased in proportion to proxies for short-term but not long-term energy availability. These findings suggest that phenotypic plasticity contributes to variability in body composition dimorphism, and that the occupation of dimorphic niches regarding reproductive energetics may be important.
In other words, warmer habitats evolve lower sexual dimorphism on average. Therefore, by Aryan standards (low sexual dimorphism is superior), warmer habitats evolve superior people on average.
---
bigthink.com/surprising-science/humans-evolved-live-in-cold
Humans emerged from a tropical environment. For the most part, our bodies are not well adapted to the cold. You might be feeling that this winter as you battle the frost winds and dream of sunnier days. The fact that we can live in cold climates is a result of many behavioral adaptations. Though, in recent years we've also found that some populations have genetically evolved to be able to better adapt and live in the cold.
...
Tapper goes on to say:
At the higher latitudes, you're confronting seasonality for the first time. . . They were experiencing winter. No other primate lives where there's no fruit in winter. There may be a dry season, but there's not a cold winter like these individuals in Dmanisi were experiencing.
It's believed that by shifting to a more meat-centric diet that they were able to live in such an environment.
...
According to research from the Biological Sciences and Molecular Medicine at the University of California Irvine, scientists discovered that after early humans had migrated to colder climates, their chance of survival increased when their mtDNA was mutated and generated greater body heat production.
Professor Douglas C. Wallace states that:
In the warm tropical and subtropical environments of Africa it was most optimal for more of the dietary calories to be allocated to ATP to do work and less to heat, thus permitting individuals to run longer, faster and to function better in hot climates… In Eurasia and Siberia, however, such an allocation would have resulted in more people being killed by the cold of winter. The mtDNA mutations made it possible for individuals to survive the winter, reproduce and colonize the higher latitudes.
In other words, cold-adapted humans are thermodynamically more wasteful twice over, once via their diet and once in how they allocate energy after eating.
---
www2.palomar.edu/anthro/adapt/adapt_2.htm
A study of 100 human populations during the early 1950's showed a strong negative correlation between body mass and mean annual temperature of the region. In other words, when the air temperature is consistently high, people usually have low body mass. Similarly, when the temperature is low, they have high mass.
...
A corollary of Bergmann's rule stated that a linear shaped mammal will lose heat to the environment faster than a more compact one of similar size. The boxes below illustrate this fact. Note that the long, narrow box has the same volume but greater surface area. It is comparable to a tall, slender animal.
(https://www2.palomar.edu/anthro/adapt/images/Bergmann's_boxes_2.gif)
In 1877, the American biologist Joel Allen went further than Bergmann in observing that the length of arms, legs, and other appendages also has an effect on the amount of heat lost to the surrounding environment. He noted that among warm-blooded animals, individuals in populations of the same species living in warm climates near the equator tend to have longer limbs than do populations living further away from the equator in colder environments. This is due to the fact that a body with relatively long appendages is less compact and subsequently has more surface area. The greater the surface area, the faster body heat will be lost to the environment.
While we (for good reason!) place a lot of emphasis on the selective pressures exerted by the subsistence farming lifestyle, it is also possible that (and this would explain why farming began in warm regions) is that some initial physiological neotenization occurred as a result of warm climate, which came with mentality changes that made these proto-Aryans think that farming would be a good idea, thus creating the selective pressure that then led to further and more comprehensive neotenization.
---
I remember reading the Communication part of aryanism.net (out of curiosity of course), and I had a mind pop about how warmth usually equals welcoming, friendly, and empathetic while cold equals unfriendly, calculated, detached, frigid (hence the idiom "as cold as ice"). I thought it had some correlation with some of the core messages of this website and that a lot of those on the right who are interested into evolutionary biology always relate to whites being descended from the Arctic and relying on that as to why they claim they've created more complex civilizations (via destroying everything in their path with "cold calculation." This is a random tangent, but I'm just curious....
---
Definitely! One of the most dangerous enemy strategies we are fighting against is the Arctic Alliance, which I guess deserves reposting in this thread:
vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-at-amren-the-arctic-alliance-revisited
I divide the human race into Arctics and non-Arctics on paleoanthropological grounds. So Arctics are those present-day races whose remote ancestors inhabited the forests and tundra of northern Eurasia—the whites and the yellows, to a first approximation. In my book We Are Doomed I used the synonym “Ice People.”
In the world today, the Arctics exhibit two characteristics that separate them quite clearly from non-Arctics, or “Sun People.”.
**** YOU. We are Sun People.
See also:
www.stormfront.org/forum/blogs/u64037-e3293/
In warm climates, people survive easily. They do not need to devote much effort to finding food, as fruit grows plentifully in the forests year-round. Contemporary hunter-gatherers living in tropical areas eat relatively little meat, and anthropologists believe Africans have always been highly herbivorous[1].
...
In cold climates, on the other hand, food is difficult to come by, as fruit does not grow the whole year round. Consequently, people need to hunt to survive. In fact, primitive peoples in Arctic climates rely virtually exclusively on animal foods. Hunting requires creating tools and understanding of the behavior of animals, both of which are spurs to the evolution of intelligence.
-
Example:
https://sports.yahoo.com/nebraska-high-school-football-player-dies-following-heat-exposure-at-practice-221332158.html
Geiger's father Scott Hoffman told the World-Herald that his son was 6-foot-3½ and 389 pounds and didn't have any known medical conditions.
"He was a big kid, but he was a healthy big kid," he said.
He was a cold-adapted big kid.
(https://ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/a703f95/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1920x1080+0+0/resize/1280x720!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fewscripps-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F0b%2F56%2F68892238462e899e412edd0de3b4%2Fkid.png)
Note sibling similarities:
(https://images.gofundme.com/YF_MwxgSqPSNQo1ZIRfi3BSgXkA=/1200x800/https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/59138609_1628664239511675_r.jpeg)
-
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/extreme-heat-killing-europe-elderly-150042521.html
For the elderly, increased vulnerability can be explained by several factors.
“First, as people age, their bodies become less efficient at regulating temperature and adapting to heat stress,” says Dr Raquel Nunes, Assistant Professor in Environmental Change and Public Health, at Warwick Medical School.
This makes it harder for older individuals to move heat from the core to the skin and maintain a stable internal temperature during hot conditions. Once the body can no longer cool itself, death can come in a matter of hours.
It all fits together. People living in warmer habitats would have been under greater selective pressure for ability to adapt to heat stress. Since aging reduces ability to adapt to heat stress, it should follow that people in warmer habitats evolved to be higher in average neoteny. This matches what we see not only physiognomically but also culturally:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg16234/#msg16234
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/msg6238/#msg6238
Cold-habitat-evolved people are inferior!
Also, our enemy Taylor on this topic from a while back:
https://www.amren.com/videos/2022/12/how-the-races-got-that-way/
The most important environmental pressure that produced racial differences wasn’t altitude or living around cattle — it was the challenge of living far from the equator, where it was cold and the winters were long. It was much harder to survive in Europe and East Asia than in Africa, where it was warm and where there were berries and fruit all year round.
Sounds rather nice to me.
the organ that came under the greatest evolutionary pressure in the north was the brain. If you’re not smart enough to make warm clothes and build shelter for the winter, you die. If you don’t store food to eat over the winter, you die. If you don’t make weapons and cooperate with others to bring down mammoths, you die. People living where it was warm didn’t have to do those things, so they were not under intense evolutionary pressure to evolve higher intelligence.
So, which type of humans would the mammoths prefer?
People in the north had to evolve not just the intelligence to build shelter, make warm clothes, and invent weapons for killing big game. They had to think ahead, and this is one of the most important human traits.
This is thinking ahead:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-sustainable-evil/
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/progressive-yahwism/
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/
How much better would the world be with less thinking ahead?
-
Photo of actor Vijay at age 13:
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Childvj.jpg/320px-Childvj.jpg)
Note how long his legs are compared to his torso. I myself assumed his legs were shorter before scrolling down the whole page and seeing his feet!
-
https://twitter.com/Sapratha/status/1696724899287495160
Er. Shailesh Bharadwaj
@Sapratha
Yeah genius, that is why civilization emerged in the harsh winters of Scandinavia & Siberia as opposed to the hot & dry climates of Egypt & Sumer.
Aristotle on why Persia has an empire while Europe doesn't: people inhabiting the cold are brave but lacking intellect
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F4v6P2xWgAAP6rd?format=jpg&name=medium)
https://twitter.com/CovfefeAnon/status/1695797257583448118
Covfefe Anon
@CovfefeAnon
Imagine going through life pretending to not notice that the tropical species that doesn't have to plan for winter views wealth as purely something to show off and that the species that does have to plan for winter views it as a way to provide for the future
-
https://www.courthousenews.com/evolution-of-human-body-size-directly-related-to-climate-study-finds/
-
Eurocentrist detected:
https://twitter.com/frontierindica/status/1699423872116805952?t=VNlA-FqZri6X8vlJN6P75Q&s=19
All the problems of the Indian sub continent would have been solved if the average temperature was 15 degrees lower (historically and continuing into the present).
-
Aryan means being farmer, westerners means being intelligent and progressivist
First, in temperate and cold climates, females became dependent on males for provisioning them with food because they were unable to hunt, whereas in the tropics women were able to gather plant foods for themselves. For this, women would have required higher intelligence to select as mates the men who would provision them. Second, women would have selected as mates men who could provision them and their children, and these would have been men with higher intelligence. This is a case of sexual selection, identified by Darwin as one of the driving forces of evolution. In the tropics, where women could collect plant and insect foods that are available throughout the year, women did not need men to provision them and would have been less prone to select men with high intelligence as mates.
Race Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn page 236
https://archive.org/details/RaceDifferencesInIntelligenceAnEvolutionaryAnalysis/page/n233/mode/2up?q=northern+latitudes
Continuing :
A fourth selection pressure for enhanced intelligence acting on the peoples who migrated into Eurasia has been proposed by Satoshi Kanazawa (2008). He argues that intelligence evolved in hominids to solve novel problems, and that Eurasia presented migrants with these. He shows that mean annual temperature and the novelty of the environments have independent effects on the average intelligence of populations in different parts of the world. This theory has received some support from Valerie Stone (2002, p.420) who writes, “The major selection pressures acting on Homo erectus seem to have been those of foragers moving into new habitats with unfamiliar food resources. Archaic Homo sapiens, in contrast, were big game hunters and faced somewhat different selection pressures”—i.e., those of catching and killing large animals.
-
in temperate and cold climates, females became dependent on males for provisioning them with food because they were unable to hunt, whereas in the tropics women were able to gather plant foods for themselves.
...
women would have selected as mates men who could provision them and their children
Our enemies are literally proud that cold-habitat women evolved to select men on materialistic rather than romantic criteria!
We should be grateful that warm-habitat women, who did not need to rely on male provisioning, could afford to be romantic.
Taking the above further, do cold-habitat or warm-habitat men have more leverage to be patriarchal? Hence:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/colonialism-and-sexism/
-
Continuing :
Villarreala finds that there is “evidence of profound social stratification by skin color.” Individuals with darker skin tone have significantly lower levels of educational attainment and occupational status, and they are more likely to live in poverty and less likely to be affluent, even after controlling for other individual characteristics (2010, pg. 652). The results “indicate a very strong association between respondents’ skin color and their educational attainment. Individuals with darker skin tones have substantially lower education levels (pg. 665).” For instance, the odds of having a college education or more are 29.5 percent lower for respondents who are light brown compared with those who are white. Similarly, the odds of having a college education are 57.6 percent lower for respondents who are dark brown compared with those who are white (pgs. 665 66).
Hitler even wasn't went to college
The validity of the IQs is the question of the extent to which they provide genuine or valid measures of the cognitive abilities of samples. It has often been argued that the peoples who obtain low IQs are really just as intelligent as Europeans, but the tests are biased against them. The issue of test bias has been discussed at length by Jensen (1980) in his book Bias in Mental Tests, in which he demonstrates that the assumption that tests are biased towards Westerners is simply not tenable. Individuals and races that do well on intelligence tests also tend to do well in education, earnings, job performance, and socioeconomic status (Jensen, 1980, 1998; Herrnstein and Murray, 1994). An Australian psychologist, Murray Dyck, (1996, p. 67) has given this verdict on the “bias” thesis: The evidence indicates that cognitive tests are equally reliable across races, are of equivalent item difficulty across races, yield similar subtest correlations…and factor analyses yield similar results. The question of whether standard ability tests are culturally biased has been answered: they are not.
Richard Lynn's research on Negro people
During the last 200,000 years, the ancestors of the contemporary sub-Saharan Africans continued to inhabit the tropical and sub-tropical environments of equatorial sub-Saharan Africa. This environment was not strongly cognitively demanding for them, and primates had adapted to it for some 60 million years. The hominids up to and including Homo erectus were largely plant eaters, but they supplemented their diets with scavenging the carcasses of animals killed by lions, leopards, and cheetahs (Lee, 1968; Tooby and de Vore, 1989). The evolving Africans lived much as hunter-gatherer peoples in tropical and sub-tropical environments do today,subsisting largely on plant foods, of which numerous species are available throughout the year, and on insects and eggs, with only occasional supplementation from animal meats obtained from hunting. The ready availability of plant foods, insects, and eggs throughout the year meant that the evolving sub-Saharan African peoples in tropical and sub tropical Africa did not have to hunt animals to obtain meat.
The humans that evolved in equatorial Africa were largely herbivorous and were not adapted for hunting large mammals, so this would have presented new cognitive problems for them.
...
Another was cliffs towards which a group of men could drive a herd of herbivores, so that some of them would fall over the edge and be killed (or sufficiently injured for other members of the hunting group to kill them). Other natural traps were bogs and the loops of rivers, into which hunting groups could drive herbivores and then kill them. Archaeological excavations have shown that all these traps were used by early humans in Eurasia
...
Like other peoples who have evolved in tropical and subtropical environments, the New Guineans and the Australian Aborigines were able to live on plant foods, insects, and eggs throughout the year. When the Australian Aborigines were studied in the desert of Western Australia in the 20th century, their diet remained largely unchanged: they obtained 70–80 percent of their food from plants and most of the remainder from eggs and insects. They had no well-developed group hunting techniques (Gould, 1969). It has been estimated that the Gadio people, a tribe of New Guineans, obtain 96 percent of their food from plants and only four percent from meat (Dornstreich, 1973).
If the negro were evolutionary like that, then :
A negro with his taboos is far superior to a human who firmly believes in Transubstantiation. - Adolf Hitler, December 13, 1941
Source: Adolf Hitler - Table Talk page 146
The dirt was visible on the blacks only when the missionaries, in order to teach them decorum, obliged them to wear clothes. In its natural state, the negro is very clean. For a missionary, the smell of dirt is agreeable. From this point of view, they themselves are the dirtiest pigs. They have water horrors. Adolf Hitler, February 19, 1942
Source: Adolf Hitler - Table Talk pages 319 - 320
Richard Lynn's research on "whites" and "East-Asians" people :
By about 10,000 years ago, when the ended and the ice sheets and tundra that covered northern Europe receded, the Europeans emerged with higher intelligence shown by an increase in their encephalization quotients (EQ), i.e. brain size in relation to body size. Richard Cutler (1976) estimated that preWürm Europeans had an EQ of 7.3, and by the end of the Würm glaciation they had an EQ of 8.1. With this increased intelligence, Europeans were able to make the Neolithic transition from hunter-gathering to settled agriculture. However, despite their high IQ, they were not able to develop early civilizations, such as those built by the South Asians and North Africans, mainly because the continent was still cold, covered with forest, and featured heavy soils that were difficult to plough. This environment was unlike that in which the early civilizations were built, which had light soils and river flood plains, which provided annual alluvial deposits that allowed for agricultural surpluses, which could sustain an urban civilization and intellectual class (Landes, 1998). From around 2500 BC, the Europeans overcame these problems in the relatively benign climate of southern Europe, where they developed the first European civilizations in Crete and Greece. From around 700 BC, the Italians began to build a civilization that eventually became the Roman Empire; by AD 200, they embraced the whole of Europe west of the Rhine, including the Danube basin, the Near East, and North Africa. These first European civilizations in Greece and Rome surpassed those of the South Asians and North Africans in science, mathematics, technology, literature, philosophy, and the arts. The western Roman Empire had collapsed by the end of the 5th century AD, and European culture suffered a setback in the ensuing period, commonly called the Dark Ages. However, from about the year AD 1,000, it revived, and by the year 1500, Europeans became the foremost people in virtually all areas of civilization (Murray, 2003).
The reason on whites's material evolvement rather than East Asians
A low level of social conformity and an element of psychopathic personality appear to be ingredients in creative achievement because they reduce anxiety about social disapproval and appear to facilitate the generation of the original ideas that are required for the highest levels of scientific discovery, artistic expression, and economic enterprise.There is also evidence for lower levels of creativity in the East Asians (Lynn, 2007). Another factor may be an historical accident, which has been discussed by Erich Weede and Sebastian Kampf (2002): throughout much of its history, China was a single state whose autocratic rulers were able to suppress liberties, including freedom of thought, more effectively than the rulers of the numerous European states, who were forced by competition to concede liberties to their peoples.
Therefore, if "whites" were evolutionary like that, then :
We were ready to throw our forces into the scales for the preservation of the British Empire; and all that, mark you, at a time when, to tell the truth, I feel much more sympathetically inclined to the lowliest Hindu than to any of these arrogant islanders. Later on, the Germans will be pleased that they did not make any contribution to the survival of an out-dated state of affairs for which the world of the future would have found it hard to forgive them. We can with safety make one prophecy: whatever the outcome of this war, the British Empire is at an end. It has been mortally wounded. The future of the British people is to die of hunger and tuberculosis in their cursed island. - Adolf Hitler, 4th February 1945
Source : Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 7
Spain, France and England had all weakened, weakened and exhausted themselves in this futile colonial enterprise. The continent from which Spain and England gave birth, which they created piece by piece, has today acquired a completely independent way of life and completely selfish views. Even so, they were just an artificial world, without a soul, culture, or civilization of their own; and judging from that point of view, they were nothing more than dirt. - Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945
Source :
Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 13
The United States and Australia afford good examples. Success, certainly - but only on the material side. They are artificial edifices, bodies without age, of which it is it is impossible to say whether they are still in a state of infancy or whether they have already been touched by senility. In those continents which were inhabited, failure has been even more marked. In them, the white races have impose their will by force, and the influence they have had on the native inhabitants has been negligible. - Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945
Source :
Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 13
The white races did, of course, give some things to the natives, and they were the worst gifts that they could possibly have made, those plagues of our own modern world-materialism, fanaticism, alcoholism and syphilis. For the rest, since these peoples possessed qualities of their own which were superior to anything we could offer them, they have remained essentially unchanged. Where imposition by force was attempted, the results were even more disastrous, and common sense, realizing the futility of such measures, should preclude any recourse to their introduction. One solitary success must be conceded to the colonizers: everywhere they have succeeded in arousing hatred, a hatred that urges these peoples, awakened from their slumbers by us, to rise and drive us out. - Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945
Source :
Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 13 - 14
Transplant a German to Kiev, and he remains a perfect German. But transplant him to Miami, and you make a degenerate of him - in other words, an American - Adolf Hitler, 7th February, 1945
Source: Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 15
I have never liked France or the French, and I have never stopped saying so. ... - Adolf Hitler, 15th February 1945
Source :
Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 29
I have always abstained from criticizing or passing judgment on Italy. I have on the contrary always been at great pains to treat her as an equal. Unfortunately, the laws of nature have shown that it is a mistake to treat as equals those who are not your equals. - Adolf Hitler, 17th February 1945
Source :
Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 33
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/5e1670c61b0f2f430e3300eb6352dc5a/4f15adcd00022294-a8/s1280x1920/855f5d7658133a87b54d7ae6a4708ef219f5cfc4.jpg)
Source :
Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 13
Source of Richard Lynn's research :
Race Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn page 194, 201, 248, 251, 259, 263, 265
https://archive.org/details/RaceDifferencesInIntelligenceAnEvolutionaryAnalysis
Hitler was did total betrayal to the White Nationalism
-
Blacks are disproportionately in the lower socioeconomic classes, and socioeconomic class is known to be associated with IQ. Therefore, many people suggest, part of what appears to be an ethnic difference in IQ scores is actually a socioeconomic difference.
...
The trouble is that socioeconomic status is also a result of cognitive ability, as people of high and low cognitive ability move to correspondingly high and low places in the socioeconomic continuum
In the American context, Wade Boykin is one of the most prominent academic advocates of a distinctive black culture, arguing that nine interrelated dimensions put blacks at odds with the prevailing Eurocentric model. Among them are spirituality (blacks approach life as “essentially vitalistic rather than mechanistic, with the conviction that non-material forces influence people’s everyday lives”); a belief in the harmony between humankind and nature; an emphasis on the importance of movement, rhythm, music, and dance “which are taken as central to psychological health”; personal styles that he characterizes as “verve” (high levels of stimulation and energy) and “affect” (emphasis on emotions and expressiveness); and “social time perspective,” which he defines as “an orientation in which time is treated as passing through a social space rather than a material one.”109 The notes reference a variety of other authors who have made similar arguments.110.
Source :
The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life by Richard Herrnstein page 318, 339
Therefore, "low-IQ" people tend to easily refrained from materialist way of life because of their simple cognitive ability, which prevent them from doing large damage, the correct way to judge is :
A negro with his taboos is far superior to a human who firmly believes in Transubstantiation. - Adolf Hitler, December 13, 1941
Source: Adolf Hitler - Table Talk page 146
The dirt was visible on the blacks only when the missionaries, in order to teach them decorum, obliged them to wear clothes. In its natural state, the negro is very clean. For a missionary, the smell of dirt is agreeable. From this point of view, they themselves are the dirtiest pigs. They have water horrors. Adolf Hitler, February 19, 1942
Source: Adolf Hitler - Table Talk pages 319 - 320
Then, the "high-IQ" people will do the opposite of what "blacks" will do, the correct way to judge is :
The white races did, of course, give some things to the natives, and they were the worst gifts that they could possibly have made, those plagues of our own modern world-materialism, fanaticism, alcoholism and syphilis. For the rest, since these peoples possessed qualities of their own which were superior to anything we could offer them, they have remained essentially unchanged. Where imposition by force was attempted, the results were even more disastrous, and common sense, realizing the futility of such measures, should preclude any recourse to their introduction. One solitary success must be conceded to the colonizers: everywhere they have succeeded in arousing hatred, a hatred that urges these peoples, awakened from their slumbers by us, to rise and drive us out. - Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945[/i]
Source :
Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 13 - 14
The more our enemies showing their data on human biological differences, the more they expose their ideological weakness
-
People with "high intelligence" tend to exposed into democratic and capitalistic way of life. Whereas the people with "low intelligence" tend to prefer socialist way of life
Japan, already exposed into democratic and capitalistic way of life
The failure of Japan to develop economically until the late nineteenth century is largely attributable to a regulated economy and to isolation from the rest of the world. This isolation was deliberately imposed by the rulers because of their fear of the potentially subversive effects of foreign influences. Portuguese traders established contact with Japan in the sixteenth century. Missionaries followed and began to convert the Japanese to Christianity. The Japanese rulers perceived this as a threat, and in 1637 they prohibited all foreigners from Japan and all Japanese from traveling abroad. The only exceptions to this prohibition were that Dutch merchants were allowed to call once a year to trade on the island of Deshima in the Bay of Nagasaki, and Chinese merchants were allowed to trade in Nagasaki city. The importation of European books was banned and those from China were checked by censors before being allowed in. These prohibitions lasted until 1854, when an American naval officer, Commander Perry, forced the Japanese to open the country up to American and other traders.
In 1867-68, a revolution occurred and the Meiji Restoration re-established the control of the emperor. The new rulers embarked on a program to modernize the country by adopting Western education and technology and by freeing up the economy. Compulsory education for four years was introduced and was increased to six years in 1907. There were no universities in Japan until 1877, when the University of Tokyo was established, shortly followed by six more universities in major cities. These were modeled after the German universities with their strong departments of science, engineering, and technology. The economy was liberalized by the abolition of a number of state monopolies that were transferred to private corporations. As a result of these reforms, industries grew rapidly and by the end of the nineteenth century Japan had become a formidable industrial and military power. In 1895, Japan fought and defeated China and annexed Taiwan. In 1904, Japan fought and won a war with Russia. In World War I, Japan fought on the side of Britain and France and at its conclusion annexed Korea. “Henceforth Japan was a world power, with a first-class economy” (Thomas, 1981, p. 661). In World War II, Japan was an ally with Germany. Japan was initially successful in the war in eastern Asia, where she defeated the British and occupied the British colonies of Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia. She also occupied the Philippines. Despite ultimate defeat as a result of the atom bomb, Japan rapidly rebuilt its industrial and economic strength and by the 1980s had achieved approximately the same per capita GDP as Britain, Germany, France, and the rest of northwest Europe.
People of "Sub-Sahara Africa" countries, always retain their autocratic and socialist political system
In addition to low intelligence as a “missing element,” some of the factors that Collier and Gunning propose as contributing to the low economic growth of sub-Saharan Africa are themselves attributable to a low level of intelligence in the populations. One of the major factors identified by economists as responsible for the low economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa is the poor quality of the political leadership that has generally instituted socialistic, protectionist, regulatory, and monopolistic programs. Collier and Gunning conclude that this has been the single most important factor retarding economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa and write that “the degree of hostility of many African governments to private product markets is surely astonishing” (p. 99). A similar conclusion has been reached by Sachs and Warner (1999, p. 335) who conclude that “We find that poor economic policies have played an especially important part in the slow growth, most importantly in Africa’s lack of openness to international markets.” However, these economists have not asked why the political leaders in sub-Saharan Africa have so consistently mismanaged their countries’ economies. In the last resort, much of this mismanagement must be attributed to the political leaders’ inadequate intelligence and their failure to understand that free markets are the most efficient form of economic organization.
Source :
IQ and the Wealth of Nations -Richard Lynn, Tatu Vanhanen -Human Evolution, Behavior, and Intelligence, 2002 - Greenwood Publishing Group page 176, 177, 179
Another research on the connection between political worldview and race
(https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/styles/pubs_2x/public/images/wealth-work-survey/ekins-wealth-work-survey-16.jpg?itok=G7rzoyds)
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/494a5c27ae32e9abca9ea235591a1521/8e2201bdc0a33044-f5/s1280x1920/38a913e6c65fa72961d936d16ed035b9dbf4d151.jpg)
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/d2273f109ea304d9e07a5b312f4b6c01/103267b2badb3a37-b3/s1280x1920/53a48f9f804fe946f2ecbac329a5be120f2724b1.jpg)
-
"democratic and capitalistic"
There is no reason to talk about democracy and capitalism as though they are associated with each other. It is possible to have capitalism without democracy, and it is possible to have democracy without capitalism. Talking about them together just confuses readers.
The correct dichotomies are capitalism vs socialism, or democracy vs autocracy.
Which one are you actually claiming is caused by temperature differences?
-
Which one are you actually claiming is caused by temperature differences?
I mean, people from colder climates tend to be capitalist and progressive. People who are for thousand years lived in tropical and sub-tropical climates, tend to be socialist. Therefore, if we want to see the people with "Aryan characteristics", or the people of farmers, then we cannot emphasize Europe, we emphasize to the people from tropical and fertile zones first.
-
"I mean, people from colder climates tend to be capitalist and progressive."
OK, though we also have to worry about progressives who think capitalism is not progressive enough:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/progressive-yahwism/msg9778/#msg9778
"People who are for thousand years lived in tropical and sub-tropical climates, tend to be socialist. Therefore, if we want to see the people with "Aryan characteristics", or the people of farmers, then we cannot emphasize Europe, we emphasize to the people from tropical and fertile zones first."
Have you seen this?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352250X1930082X
Recent studies find that rice cultures are more interdependent than herding cultures and wheat-farming cultures. In China, people from rice-farming areas think more holistically and show less implicit individualism than people from wheat-farming areas. These differences are mirrored in micro-level comparisons of neighboring counties differ in rice versus wheat. Research has also found evidence of cultural differences based on rice farming within Japan and around the world.
...
Irrigation
Unlike most major cereal crops, rice grows best in standing water. Rice can grow on dry land too, but properly flooded rice increases yield from 1.2 tons per hectare to 5 tons [4]. To get that standing water, rice villages built irrigation networks.
Irrigation networks meant that farmers often had to fill and drain their fields at the same time [5]. Certain irrigation systems also pushed farmers to coordinate what they plant, particularly when water was scarce [6].
(https://royalsocietypublishing.org/cms/asset/42d2634b-b496-48b4-8e36-2157cd87702e/rsos210382f01.jpg)
Of course, "individualism" as used above is the wrong term. We have always recognized the south to be more authentically individualistic as used below:
(https://trueleft.createaforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Faryanism.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fyue.png&hash=49dd7ae97468e0473c773b91f46f928bcba9572a)
Related:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/yandi-vs-huangdi-myth-confirmed/
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-hydraulic-empire/
-
It is not unreasonable to entertain the possibility that regions with less precipitation would bring about evolution of a higher intelligence. Greater precipitation causes greater growth of vegetation so that gathering is relatively easy.
The importance of vegetation in the evolutionary increase in intelligence is strongly implied by Lynn and Vanhanen (2012, p. 380), who said:
When these peoples settled in the temperate and colder latitudes of North Africa, Asia and Europe, they encountered the problem of survival during the winter and spring. This was a problem because the first humans that evolved in equatorial East Africa subsisted largely on plant foods, of which numerous species were available throughout the year (Lee, 1968; Tooby and DeVore, 1989). In temperate and cold environments plant foods are not available for a number of months in the winter and spring. Thus, “plant foods are often available only during short seasons” (Gamble, 1993, p. 117) and compared to warmer environments there would have been fewer edible plant species, and a concomitant requirement for increased reliance on animals . . . and the obvious problem of keeping warm, including the likely necessity of controlling and even making fire. In effect, these northern temperate environments “pushed the envelope” of Homo’s adaptation (Wynn, 2002, p. 400).
Source :
Templer, D. I., & Stephens, J. S. (2014). The relationship between IQ and climatic variables in African and Eurasian countries. Intelligence, 46, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.06.001
Hitler was closer culturally to Equatorial East Africa rather than North Africa, Asia, and Europe, because he relied on plants rather than meats. Therefore Hitler was not part of Western Civilization which heavily relied on meats