men’s preferences for female facial sex-typicality show a much more systematic 94
pattern. Although there is some research showing environment-related variation in facial femininity 95
preferences (38), more feminine female faces are perceived as more attractive unanimously across 96
cultures (12, 39–41). This may be because it could reveal reproductive potential (i.e. fecundity), as 97
women with more feminine faces may have higher levels of estrogen (42).
...
weaker preference for feminine-looking women has been found to be 401
positively correlated with level of national health (38).
...
An interesting finding is that all European countries revealed 420
larger differences between male and female average faces than in all the other populations.
TOKYO
Well, there's no denying it any more: the size of Japanese mammaries have become larger. We know this thanks to a survey by lingerie manufacturer Triumph International Japan, which recently made public the results of its research.
According to Nikkan Gendai (Aug 7), the subjects of the survey were Japanese females between the ages of 20 through 60 years. And when the data was confirmed, Triumph found that while only 4.5% of its customers had required a D-cup size bra or larger back in 1980, that percentage had expanded to 17.6% by 1990. By 2018, the percentage had swelled impressively to 53.1%. Or in other words, a remarkable twelve-fold increase over 40 years.
Interestingly, the 17.5-centimetre average measurement from the underside of the breast to the top had not shown any appreciable change during those four decades. Which means the size of the breasts themselves had definitely become larger.
Naturally, Nikkan Gendai's reporter wants to know why.
"There are two reasons for this," explained Shuko Sakata, manager of brand marketing at Triumph. "The first is changes in the diet, such as increased meat consumption and westernization in general. The other is because we manufacturers have become better at teaching customers the correct way to select a brassiere. When putting on their bras, women tend to lean forward and by so doing gravity collects fleshy parts on the sides of their torso to fill up the cup. That alone can increase cup size by as much as two sizes."
Mutsuko Taniguchi, a veteran stylist with some 40 years in the trade, is in agreement.
"These days when women put on their bra, they press in their flesh from four directions -- from the sides below their arms, up from their stomach area and then downwards from their collarbones. Doing this produces more cleavage and posture benefits from an overall improvement," she said.
Japan has a culture of exposure, says Taniguchi, so women here want to emphasize their cleavage, whereas these days western females tend to dress in a way that enables their left and right breasts independent movement.
Arata Samon, a doctor and author, estimates that 70 to 80% of women's breast sizes are determined by heredity.
"But for the remaining 20% or so, nutrition has a certain effect," he says. "About 90% of a breast is composed of fat cells. The levels of body fat are determined at three life stages: while still an embryo, while nursing up to around age 3, and then at puberty. If one's mother ingests a lot of beef or pork during pregnancy, the number of fat cells in the fetus will increase. Then what they consume as children and adolescents, such as meat, dairy products, fried chicken, convenience store sandwiches and so on, will enhance the size of the breasts. If you look back at dietary changes over the past 40 years, the greater ingestion of fats has definitely had an impact on women's breast size."
And no doubt we can look forward to continued growth in the future, the writer says.
© Japan Today
Batres and her colleagues found that women with higher levels of attraction to other women were more likely to view less masculine-looking male faces as more attractive.
Here we show, based upon female assessment of digitally projected life-size, computer-generated images, that **** size interacts with body shape and height to determine male sexual attractiveness. Positive linear selection was detected for **** size, but the marginal increase in attractiveness eventually declined with greater **** size (i.e., quadratic selection). **** size had a stronger effect on attractiveness in taller men than in shorter men. There was a similar increase in the positive effect of **** size on attractiveness with a more masculine body shape (i.e., greater shoulder-to-hip ratio). Surprisingly, larger **** size and greater height had almost equivalent positive effects on male attractiveness. Our results support the hypothesis that female mate choice could have driven the evolution of larger penises in humans.
The Yamato nadeshiko is renowned for her bihada (美肌, beautiful skin), bihatsu (美髪, beautiful hair) and yanagigoshi (柳腰, willowy hips), not to mention a patented okuyukashisa (奥ゆかしさ, a deep and abiding modesty) that both defines her personality and adorns her being. She’s also about practicality. According to my own observations, 75 percent of the typical Yamato nadeshiko is made up of an unshakeable devotion to kaji (家事, household chores) — whether she’s married or not.
Past research has highlighted links between meat consumption and masculine gender role norms such that meat consumers are generally attributed more masculine traits than their vegetable-consuming counterparts. However, the direct link between gender roles and men’s food choices has been somewhat neglected in the literature. Three studies conducted in Italy investigated this link between meat and masculinity. Studies 1 and 2 analyzed female mating preference for vegetarian and omnivorous partners, confirming that women preferred omnivorous men (Study 1 and 2), rated them as more attractive (Study 1 and 2), and felt more positive about them (Study 1) than vegetarians. Moreover Study 2 showed that the attribution of masculinity mediated this relationship, such that vegetarian men were considered less attractive because they were perceived as less masculine. Study 3 tested the relationship between the endorsement of food-related gender norms and food choices in a sample of Italian men. The results showed that men who perceived vegetarianism as feminine preferred meat-based dishes for themselves and expected their female partners to choose vegetarian dishes. Together, these findings show that gender role norms prescribing that men eat meat are actively maintained by both women and men and do in fact guide men’s food choices.
fertile women were more biased against men of different races and men of different social groups than men of their own group.
...
McDonald and Navarrete said their team's findings are consistent with the idea that women's prejudice may reflect the workings of an evolved psychological system that once functioned to protect them from sexual coercion, particularly when the costs are highest – that is, when women are fertile.
a growing body of evidence that suggests that men are able to not only detect when women are ovulating, but find them more attractive
Recent evidence suggests that in sexual selection on human males, intrasexual competition plays a larger role than female choice. In a sample of men (N = 164), we sought to provide further evidence on the effects of men's physical dominance and sexual attractiveness on mating success and hence in sexual selection. Objective measures and subjective ratings of male sexually dimorphic traits purportedly under sexual selection (height, vocal and facial masculinity, upper body size from 3D scans, physical strength, and baseline testosterone) and observer perceptions of physical dominance and sexual attractiveness based on self-presentation video recordings were assessed and associated with mating success (sociosexual behaviour and number of potential conceptions) in a partly longitudinal design. Results from structural equation models and selection analyses revealed that physical dominance, but not sexual attractiveness, predicted mating success. Physical dominance mediated associations of upper body size, physical strength, as well as vocal and facial physical dominance and attractiveness with mating success. These findings thus suggest a greater importance of intrasexual competition than female choice in human male sexual selection.
One in three women in Europe inherited the receptor for progesterone from Neandertals -- a gene variant associated with increased fertility, fewer bleedings during early pregnancy and fewer miscarriages. This is according to a study published in Molecular Biology and Evolution by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany and Karolinska Institutet in Sweden.
...
Progesterone is a hormone, which plays an important role in the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy. Analyses of biobank data from more than 450,000 participants -- among them 244,000 women -- show that almost one in three women in Europe have inherited the progesterone receptor from Neandertals. Twenty-nine percent carry one copy of the Neandertal receptor and three percent have two copies.
...
The study shows that women who carry the Neandertal variant of the receptor tend to have fewer bleedings during early pregnancy, fewer miscarriages, and give birth to more children.
Do you know Stargate?
Whenever in doubt, I recommend going back to neoteny. While we agree that Oblong is less robust than Square, do you not think that Oblong is actually the LEAST neotenous of all the shapes, even less so than Square? I have seen children with Square, Pentagon, Round and Oval faces, but have you ever seen a child with an Oblong face? I haven't. Therefore Oblong could be viewed as a terminal group for selective pressure that minimizes neoteny.
From a face shape standpoint I agree Oblongs are the least neotenous (I've also never seen a child with such a shape), but if we also take into account somatotype, many Oblongs seem to be rather tall/skinny. This leads me to think that they must have at least some interplay with Ovals (who are the 'core' ectomorphic type). Perhaps Oblongs are a terminal group rather than a 'transition' group, but if shapes like the Square and Pentagon--which are associated with core racial groups--can transform, surely Oblongs could too?
Again let's look at how children's face shapes change as they become adults.
Square adults were Square or Round children.
Pentagon adults were Pentagon, Oval or Round children.
Oval adults were Oval, Round or Pentagon children. (Note that this is the same set as the Pentagon.)
Round adults were Round, Oval or Pentagon children. (Same set again.)
Oblong adults were Oval or Square children.
Not only is the Oblong the odd one out in terms of not being able to map onto itself, but also the Pentagon, Oval and Round taken together map onto themselves. This suggests to me that the Oblong is a dead end.
That is a very good argument. I suppose if I look at the transitions in a more "fluid" manner, then having shapes take a "detour" through a group like the Elongated Pentagon before transforming into Oval makes more sense than going directly through the Oblong.
It is interesting that you mention a connection between Rounds and Ovals. It is technically possible for an Oval to be reduced to a Round, although I'm not sure how common this is in real life.
Jimmy Kimmel noticed Monday how President Donald Trump gestured when he said he might nominate a woman to replace Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died last week. (See the monologue below.)
It seems the president moved his hands in the shape of an hourglass ― an outdated gesture for denoting a woman’s curves.
“Who does that?” the talk show host said. “His mouth is always lying but his little hands tell the truth.”
The comedian then showed an example from earlier in the coronavirus pandemic. The president spoke of research “models.” And once again his hands went to work.
The corset first became popular in sixteenth-century Europe, reaching the zenith of its popularity in the Victorian era. While the corset has typically been worn as an undergarment, it has occasionally been used as an outer-garment; corsets as outer-garments can be seen in the national dress of many European countries.[2]:22
Based on Deuteronomy 22:5 in the Bible ("The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man"), some groups, including the Amish, Hutterites, some Mennonites, some Baptists, a few Church of Christ groups, and most Orthodox Jews, believe that women should not wear trousers. These groups permit women to wear underpants as long as they are hidden. By contrast, many Muslim sects approve of pants as they are considered more modest than any skirt that is shorter than ankle length.
New Delhi: A set of newly declassified tapes from the White House reveal the stark hostility former US President Richard Nixon had towards India and Indians. Nixon referred to Indians as the “most sexless” and “pathetic”, and called Indian women the “most unattractive women in the world” during a meeting with senior officials at the Oval Office on June 17, 1971, reports say.
...
Nixon's antipathy towards Indians was also fanned by Henry Kissinger, the National Security Adviser during that time, who also determined US policy towards New Delhi in the early 1970s, Indian Express reported. Richard Nixon, a Republican, was the 37th President of the United States, serving from 1969 until 1974.
A Brazilian bikini model has joked that she is “going to heaven” after a photograph of her in a skimpy schoolgirl outfit was ‘liked’ by the official Instagram account of Pope Francis.
Looking good = being dimorphic. How can you not understand this?
Foids want a man whose arms are as thick as her torso, who can kill other men with his bare hands, not some chinky fag who produces as much testosterone as a **** chihuahua.
...
This is a top-tier white Chad. His SMV is basically infinite. He can point at a foid and she’ll be sucking his dick within seconds.
(https://incels.co/attachments/be5fd588-e203-4bae-8c3e-9fae83fd76f9-jpeg.375531/)
...
show me their K-pop equivalents and tell me that dimorphism doesn’t matter
The researchers found that while men and women gave similar ratings to the models, neither gender was accurate at guessing how the other would evaluate the models. Both men and women felt that the other sex would be less likely to rate the models as too thin and more likely to find the models attractive than they actually were. The researchers call this a “parallel misconception”, explaining that men overestimated the extent that women would idealize the models’ bodies, and women similarly overestimated the extent that men would admire the models’ bodies.
Roberts was born in 1955 in the Bronx, New York City, the second child of a father of Irish descent and a Jewish mother.[2]
Roberts was married to Barry Roberts from 1974 until his death in 2006. They had no children.[11]
Men obsessed with building muscles are significantly more likely to objectify women, be hostile toward women, and have sexist attitudes, new research finds.
"We have previously found that men who hold stronger oppressive beliefs are more likely to think that thinner women are attractive," study researcher Viren Swarmi, of the University of Westminster in the United Kingdom, told LiveScience in an email.
"but we're also arguing that those oppressive beliefs directed at women also have an impact on men's own body images, specifically their drive for muscularity," Swarmi said.
Those men who showed more interest in being muscular were also more likely than others to score higher on sexist beliefs, hostility toward and objectification of women.
"We think men who hold oppressive beliefs about women and gender equality are also more likely to endorse traditional stereotypes of masculinity, which includes the muscular physique," Swarmi said.
"In addition, in societies where patriarchal structures are being challenged, some men may seek to reassert their masculinity by enhancing their physiques." For example, they might react to having a female boss by beefing up at the gym.
This is how i imagine myself in my dreams.
https://incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimg-comment-fun.9cache.com%2Fmedia%2Fa6N2rnN%2Fa5jPb5LB_700w_0.jpg&hash=a1ffe7d8a8e32f326e8f22ac5f596640
There are 100/10 giga stacies that I don't even get a crush on because they're light years out of my league like top models and top actresses. Barbara Palvin for example:
https://incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hawtcelebs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2Fbarbara-palvin-for-aimer-spring-summer-2019-14.jpg&hash=8c74584fc4ebcea668d4a41ad2015ba2
female faces were shown to have greater luminance contrast between the eyes, lips, and the surrounding skin than did male faces. This sex difference in facial contrast was found to influence the perception of facial gender. An androgynous face can be made to appear female by increasing the facial contrast, or to appear male by decreasing the facial contrast. Application of cosmetics was found to consistently increase facial contrast. Female faces wearing cosmetics had greater facial contrast than the same faces not wearing cosmetics. Female facial beauty is known to be closely linked to sex differences, with femininity considered attractive. These results suggest that cosmetics may function in part by exaggerating a sexually dimorphic attribute—facial contrast—to make the face appear more feminine and hence attractive.
White trad wives are the most desired creatures on the planet, but many white women still manage to blow it because they have never been told the rules that were invented by our female ancestors to protect their daughters. Even when men have fewer choices, they will still be men, even those who have the vision to create a family and build their own white clan.
...
The white woman should be reactive, which is the opposite of the sexually aggressive, dominant, promiscuous, vulgar, emotionally empty woman that modern media have taught us to be: “Just be yourself, throw yourself over him, and it will magically work out”. It won’t. Men appreciate women with standards and values they want transmitted to their children even if they themselves are not 100 percent up to these standards.
I wish our men could help us become better versions of ourselves by explaining what makes us attractive. Unfortunately, reality is different. We must discover who we are, and whom we want to attract. Men must do the same. Fish do not tell fishermen how or when to cast their lines. Fishermen must figure this out for themselves.
One of the things I like about President Trump is that he has made more like himself/ourselves. Failed marriages? So what. That's not important. The important thing to do is reproduce and reproduce White.
He said that went to college partly just to meet girls lmao, he chose Queen's University because of its high female-male ratio. Meanwhile an incel wouldn't even dream of meeting girls. What a **** jock tbh, he's had three divorces, is 6'2'', is a multi billionaire, very high IQ and has a big robust skull.
What a **** jock tbh, he's had three divorces
big robust skull.
Scientists believe that populations living in Europe became lighter-skinned over time because pale skin absorbs more sunlight, which is required to produce enough vitamin D. The latest findings suggest pale skin may have emerged later, possibly when the advent of farming meant people were obtaining less vitamin D though dietary sources like oily fish.
Christian Identity proponents point out that the Hebrew etymology of the word 'Adam' translates as 'be ruddy, red, to show blood (in the face)'
An interesting finding is that all European countries revealed 420
larger differences between male and female average faces than in all the other populations.
Men report stronger attraction to femininity in women's faces when their testosterone levels are high
Why women – including feminists – are still attracted to 'benevolently sexist' men
...
If a man offers to help a woman with her heavy suitcase or to parallel park her car, what should she make of the offer?
Is it an innocuous act of courtesy? Or is it a sexist insult to her strength and competence?
Social psychologists who describe this behavior as “benevolent sexism” firmly favor the latter view.
But researchers have also revealed a paradox: Women prefer men who behave in ways that could be described as benevolently sexist over those who don’t.
How could this be?
Some say that women simply fail to see the ways benevolent sexism undermines them because they’re misled by the flattering tone of this brand of kindness. Psychologists have even suggested that benevolent sexism is more harmful than overtly hostile sexism because it is insidious, acting like “a wolf in sheep’s clothing.”
Since then, social psychologists have been busy documenting the pernicious effects that benevolent sexism has on women.
According to studies, women who acquiesce to this behavior tend to become increasingly dependent on men for help. They’re more willing to allow men to tell them what they can and can’t do, are more ambivalent about thinking for themselves, are less ambitious and don’t perform as well at work and on cognitive tests.
Evolution, therefore, shaped female psychology to attend to – and prefer – mates whose characteristics and behaviors reveal the willingness to invest. A prospective mate’s muscular physique (and, today, his big wallet) certainly indicate that he possesses this ability. But opening a car door or offering his coat are signs that he may have the desired disposition.
We found that strong feminists rated men as more patronizing and undermining than traditional women did. But like the other women, they still found these men more attractive; the drawbacks were outweighed by the men’s willingness to invest. It seems that even staunch feminists may prefer a chivalrous mate who picks up the check on a first date or walks closer to the curb on a sidewalk.
But several interesting questions remain. Does benevolent sexism always undermine women? It might depend on context. A male being overly helpful to a female co-worker in a patronizing way might hurt her ability to project professional competence. On the other hand, it’s tough to see the harm in helping a woman move heavy furniture in the home.
"I watched two guys get into a fist fight at an office Christmas party over who was going to 'help' an intoxicated 27-year-old married woman get home.
Women Are Sharing The Completely Normal Things They Did That Somehow Pissed Off Men
...
1. "I got a haircut. He was upset that I hadn’t discussed it with him first. We were not in a relationship. We were not friends. He was an acquaintance that I occasionally ran into, and he was livid that I had cut off my long, blonde hair without his input/permission."
–u/Nightmare_Gerbil
"I chopped my hair off into a pixie at 24. The number of random male acquaintances who felt the need to tell me that it was a bad idea and that women should have long hair was ASTONISHING. Didn't matter if I pointed out how much time and money long hair costs; obviously, women should suck that up for the viewing pleasure of the men they see occasionally. I can't even imagine having the audacity. I prefer facial hair on guys, but I don't walk around telling random dudes to grow a beard for me."
–u/Effective-Walrus1157
2."My ex asked if I wanted help carrying my bag at the airport. It was an old one with no wheels. I declined and carried it down a flight of stairs. When we arrived at the bottom, he got mad at me because he thought two men who happened to be standing there were judging him for not carrying my bag."
–u/Millie517
...
4."My ex was mad at me for getting a better GPA than him in college. Then, he told me that if he stayed with me, I would prevent him from getting into medical school. We broke up, and it turned out that a year later, he couldn’t get into medical school because he wasn’t qualified. I had nothing to do with it."
–u/TheRestIs_Confetti
"Broke up with my ex over something like this. We studied the same degree, and I was generally always a bit better than him, which he was already miffed about. I assumed he was just being competitive. But then, we studied together for one of our math exams, and I got 100%, and he barely passed. He exploded at me and said I did it on purpose to humiliate him. Like, what?"
–u/aliciachiquata
"hogging" is basically when groups of men compete to have sex with the "fattest" woman at a bar or party.
...
According to Slate, people reported the Zeta Beta Tau fraternity for having what they called a "pig roast," where members of the house "competed to sleep with women they consider overweight."
...
"Hogging is a practice of achieving masculinity," Megan told BuzzFeed. "One of the ways men can do that, in their eyes, is by sleeping with the greatest number of people possible. They see fat women as easy targets."
An interesting finding is that all European countries revealed 420
larger differences between male and female average faces than in all the other populations.
While medicine as a whole, and even other elite specialties like dermatology, thoracic surgery, and otolaryngology, has begun to increase the number of people of color in its ranks, orthopedics’ numbers have barely budged. Less than 2% of those practicing in the field are Black, just 2.2% are Hispanic, and 0.4% are Native American. Even Asian American physicians, a group considered overrepresented in medicine, are much scarcer in orthopedics, making up just 6.7% of these specialists.
...
Orthopedics is also the most male of specialties:
Specialties with the fewest female physicians are:
Plastic and general surgery: 20%
Cardiology: 14%
Urology: 11%
Orthopedics/orthopedics surgery: 9%
high in systematizing but low in empathy—the extreme “male brain.”
Gerhard Meisenburg is among those who have found a male advantage among whites of over 35 percent of a standard deviation (written 0.35d, and equivalent to 5 IQ points), compared to only 0.10d (1.5 points) among blacks. This is consistent with J. P. Rushton’s finding that brain mass differences by sex are smaller, both absolutely and relatively, among blacks than whites.
men throw more accurately than women, whether at stationary or moving targets. The difference shows up by age four, and is independent of male superiority in spatial abilities. The evolutionary advantage for hunting should be obvious.
3-D mental imagination is notably less correlated with the overall g factor. So you get a fair number of inarticulate guys who can visualize objects in space really well.
This may help explain why men tend to have, even relative to their body size, bigger brains than women: just as gaming PCs have, between their CPU and GPU, more volume devoted to processing, so do male brains.
Verbal vs. visual ability seems to be like buying a PC: the power of the CPU, like the g factor, determines how well it processes verbal and quantitative data. But if you want a gaming computer for 3-D imagery, it helps to add a GPU, a graphics processing unit.
Just as most people with PCs with high end GPU chips are male, most people with high end shape rotation skills are male, probably for similar reasons: 3d brainpower is useful in fighting, hunting, making objects, and moving large, bulky objects like my new treadmill.
White people’s average testicle size is significantly larger than that of blacks. Now why would this be?
It makes sense if we understand that the pre-history of Sub-Saharan Africans is better comparable to the situation with gorillas, who have small testicles, while the pre-history of Whites is better comparable to that of chimpanzees, who have large testicles.
...
it would make sense to produce more semen as an insurance policy against your female having had sex with another male.
...
Testicles are semen factories, so testicles would necessarily get bigger. This is the situation of chimpanzees. They live together in highly social groups, meaning that there is every opportunity for a female to have sex with multiple males. So, they have larger testicles than gorillas; with gorillas not needing larger testicles because they are unlikely to ever be cuckolded.
This applies to White-Black differences. Evolved to a relatively easy yet unstable ecology, blacks, compared to Whites, don’t need to cooperate as much. They, thus, create smaller and weaker social groups with less of an opportunity for cuckoldry. Moreover, they invest less in their offspring anyway, so it matters less if they are cuckolded.
Whites create large and highly bonded social groups, investing a great deal of energy in their offspring that they have with a smaller number of females, with whom they have less sex, so that they have energy to invest in the offspring. It thus matters a great deal if they are cuckolded and there are more opportunities for this to occur. As such, they need to produce more semen, resulting in larger testicles.
We also found some evidence that Northeast Asians have the smallest testicles of all. This would make sense insomuch as the groups are very highly cooperative and very low in testosterone, to the extent that the women are unlikely to cuckold the men despite ample opportunity to do so. Thus, the biological expense of growing large testicles is a waste of energy for such a group.
we explored associations between perceived dominance, perceived sex-typicality, measured sexual shape dimorphism, and skin colour in a European and an African population. Unlike previous studies, we investigated the effect of facial variation due to shape separately from variation due to visual cues not related to shape in natural nonmanipulated stimuli. In men, perceived masculinity was associated with perceived dominance in both populations. In European women higher perceived femininity was, surprisingly, likewise positively associated with perceived dominance.
Czech women with higher perceived femininity were actually perceived as more dominant, while in Cameroonian women the association between perceived femininity and dominance was weakly negative.
People who held traditional stereotypes about masculinity tended to have more positive evaluations of Brett Kavanaugh during his contentious Supreme Court hearings and more negative evaluations of the women who accused him of sexual misconduct, according to new research published in Social Psychological and Personality Science.
The authors of the new research have previously found the endorsement of “hegemonic masculinity” — an idealized form of masculinity — was associated with support for Donald Trump.
“There has been a lot of coverage in the news and in daily conversations about masculinity – particularly “toxic masculinity.” So, it is important to understand how we – on the individual and societal level – internalize and endorse certain qualities of masculinity through our social, economic, and political institutions that lead to these toxic outcomes (e.g., sexual harassment, homophobic violence, gendered racism, etc.),” said study author Nathaniel Schermerhorn, a PhD student at The Pennsylvania State University.
“Research has shown a link between masculinity and conservatism (e.g., McDermott, 2016; McDermott et al., 2021) and, in the present paper, we focus on a conservative political figure – Brett Kavanaugh,” Schermerhorn said. “Therefore, questions still remain as to how the endorsement of hegemonic masculinity relates to the support (or lack of support) for Democratic political figures and, equally as important, how Democratic politicians own endorsement of hegemonic masculinity influences their policies and actions.”Entire article: https://www.psypost.org/2022/05/new-study-links-support-for-brett-kavanaugh-to-the-endorsement-of-hegemonic-masculinity-63141
The study – Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats – was published on November 14th, 2021 by Professor Paul Zak, the Director of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies at Claremont Graduate University.
“His research has made a substantial impact in explaining the variation in human social behaviors and has been cited by other scholars over 18,000 times placing in the top 0.3% of all scholars,” explains his professional biography.
Zak’s latest findings reveal a link between testosterone levels and political preference through analyzing 136 voting-age males throughout the 2012 election season.
“Our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red shift” among weakly-affiliated Democrats,” summarized the paper.
Researchers administered synthetic testosterone or placebo to participants who previously disclosed their political affiliations, allowing researchers to track how the hormone affected participants’ politics.
“When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone, the strength of their party fell by 12 percent and they reported 45 percent warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president,” explained the study.
“Before the testosterone treatment, we found that weakly affiliated Democrats had 19 percent higher basal testosterone than those who identified strongly with the party,” the study continues, reiterating the correlation between individuals with lower testoreone having left-wing political beliefs.
Francis was fascinated by the question of why human females have permanent breasts. This is true of no other species, which only have breasts while they are lactating, it being a waste of metabolic energy to maintain breasts when you are not.
In fact, Francis argues, breasts are something of a paradox. They are a “secondary sexual characteristic,” which males find very attractive, yet they signal infertility, insomuch as when a woman is lactating she is very unlikely to get pregnant.
...
Francis makes the radical suggestion that permanent breasts may have been selected for precisely because they signal infertility:
A male primate who is not put off by, or even attracted to, breasts will stay with a female protecting her when she is in her most vulnerable state—during pregnancy and just after childbirth. For a female to select for such males improves her chances of successful reproduction. Moreover, in an environment where it is an advantage for males to stay with and support a female, a taste for breasts can keep the male investing in his own interest at the most critical time for support.
...
Breasts are also indicator of how quickly a woman is aging, due to the way in which they droop.
(I have no idea why Georgians have such an extreme preference for boobs over ass!)
“male type careers” that are completely normal for male biology, but incompatible with motherhood. They are also abnormal as they usually require “alpha” type leadership skills and bossiness that are abhorrent, abnormal traits in a female. Like a sweet strawberry flavor is fine in a desert, but not in a savory meat stew; leadership command is necessary for the Alpha Male leading the tribe out of danger, but abhorrent in a female partner. There is nothing more unnatural than young men in the workplace having to take orders from some ****. It grates on you, I even felt it unnatural in elementary school taking orders from female teachers.
Kari Lake, Election Denier And Arizona GOP Candidate, Says Trump, DeSantis Have 'BDE'
...
Kari Lake ― the Republican nominee for governor in Arizona who has embraced the far right’s lies about the 2020 presidential election ― went below the belt during a rally in Phoenix on Sunday, musing on stage that former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) both have the quality known as “BDE.”
...
“I’ll tell you what he’s got ― I don’t know if you’ve heard of this, but he’s got BDE,” she said of DeSantis. “Anybody know what that means? Ask your kids about it later.”
“I call it ‘Big DeSantis Energy,’” Lake added, although the term has traditionally been understood to mean “big dick energy.”
Lake went on to compare DeSantis to Trump, saying: “He’s got the same kind of BDE that President Trump has. And frankly, he has the same kind of BDE that we want all of our elected leaders to have.”
Lake has been a leading proponent of the false claim that the 2020 presidential election was "stolen" from Trump.[52] During her campaign, she aligned herself with Trump,[34] and made promotion of election lies central to her candidacy.[52][53][54]
Lake falsely claimed President Joe Biden did not receive 81 million votes and that Arizona (which was won by Biden in the 2020 presidential election) was actually won by Trump.[52][55] After the 2021 Maricopa County presidential ballot audit found no evidence of election fraud, she demanded the election be "decertified"—a legal impossibility,[52] as such a process does not exist.[56] She endorsed a false assertion by Trump spokeswoman Liz Harrington that Democrats use mail-in ballots to rig elections. Lake tweeted quotes made by Sidney Powell on Lou Dobbs Tonight falsely asserting there was a sweeping election fraud conspiracy. She has advocated imprisoning Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (who is running for governor in 2022 as a Democrat) on baseless and unspecified allegations of criminality related to the 2020 election.[52] Lake also called for imprisoning journalists.[52] Lake repeatedly and falsely claimed that defendants arrested in connection with the January 6 attack were being "being held in prison without being charged."[57][58]
Hormonal contraceptives (HCs) are believed to suppress biological processes associated with women’s preferences for cues of partner genetic fitness, cues that may be summarized by men’s facial attractiveness.
...
there is some evidence that HC use weakens the hormonal processes that partially account for these preferences (8) (for exceptions, see refs. 9 and 10). Specifically, a few studies demonstrate that women using HCs show weaker cyclical shifts in preferences for cues of genetic fitness than do nonusers (11–14). Further, a few additional studies demonstrate that women using HCs demonstrate weaker overall preferences for cues of genetic fitness than do nonusers (15, 16). In one study, for example, women showed a weaker preference for facial masculinity when using HCs versus not (16).
And I want readers to understand that the Iranian people, like the people of any country, are not the same as the government and system ruling over them. And in Iran's case, the difference is stark. You will find that Iranian women are be among the most passionate, feminine, fashionable, beautiful smelling women around the world. We care about all these things! And I can't wait for the day when we can freely express those parts of our identity in our own homeland.
What is bigorexia?
As the name "bigorexia" indicates, muscular body dysmorphic disorder causes those impacted to fixate on muscularity — and to consistently view their bodies as not strong enough. "Those with the condition become obsessed with becoming more muscular and are preoccupied with the fact that their body is too small, or is insufficiently muscular," explains Allison Chase, Ph.D., CEDS-S, a regional clinical director at the Eating Recovery Center.
The hallmark issue of bigorexia is an unbalanced drive to work out excessively, pushing the body way beyond its natural limits. This obsession can be traced back to a desire to increase muscle mass as quickly as possible, as well as trying to maintain unrealistic gains with increasingly difficult routines.
...
There isn't one issue alone that causes bigorexia, experts say — but there are known mental health issues that may put an individual at greater risk for developing the condition.
"Bigorexia is likely caused by a combination of several factors including a genetic predisposition and psychological factors," says Chase. "These include perfectionism, depression or anxiety, low self-esteem and negative early life experiences."
Many bigorexia sufferers would already be considered quite muscular and athletic by their peers, explains Mary Pardee, N.D., IFMCP, a naturopathic doctor and founder of a Los Angeles-based private functional medicine clinic.
clinical research has shown the disorder is increasingly common among younger men, particularly teenagers
At the start of 1997, Kenny and Bobbi McCaughey were trying to add to their family with help from the ovulation-stimulating drug Metrodin (used for infertility). Bobbi soon found out she was pregnant with not one, or two, or three fetuses — or even four or five or six — but seven!
On November 19, 1997, the septuplets — four boys and three girls — were born prematurely ranging from two pounds, five ounces to three pounds, four ounces. Incredibly, all seven McCaughey septuplets survived...and turn 25 this month!
Adams immigrated to the United States in 2012.[7] He said that he immigrated to America because "I love guns, hot dogs, chicken fried steak, barbecue, cheerleaders, American football, small town parades, beauty pageants, pick-up trucks, muscle cars and 16-lane freeways lined with supersized American flags." He has said that since he held conservative views that he had to wait nearly five years to acquire citizenship because of discrimination by the Obama administration. Adams works as a motivational speaker and conservative activist. He has said that his fascination of the American political system lead him to promoting American ideals.[6] Then-Texas Governor Rick Perry crowned Adams an "honorary Texan" prior to a speech in 2013.[10]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Adams_(commentator)
In 2017, the “Soy Boy” meme went viral. The Soy Boy was a feminine and physically weak man, with the idea taken from the belief that products containing soy increased estrogen levels and, so, made men more effeminate. In that left-wing males were clearly more likely to virtue-signal with their food via being vegetarian and even vegan, “Soy Boy” soon became a term that was deployed against left-wing men [‘Soy boys’ is the far-right’s newest favorite insult, By Jay Hathaway, Daily Dot, October 27, 2017].
Soybeans were a crucial crop in East Asia long before written records began.[71] The origin of soy bean cultivation remains scientifically debated. The closest living relative of the soybean is Glycine soja (previously called G. ussuriensis), a legume native to central China.[72] There is evidence for soybean domestication between 7000 and 6600 BC in China, between 5000 and 3000 BC in Japan and 1000 BC in Korea.[73]
...
Prior to fermented products such as fermented black soybeans (douchi), jiang (Chinese miso), soy sauce, tempeh, nattō, and miso, soy was considered sacred for its beneficial effects in crop rotation, and it was eaten by itself, and as bean curd and soy milk.
...
The earliest documented evidence for the use of Glycine of any kind comes from charred plant remains of wild soybean recovered from Jiahu in Henan province China, a Neolithic site occupied between 9000 and 7800 calendar years ago (cal bp).[73] An abundance of archeological charred soybean specimens have been found centered around this region.[76]
According to the ancient Chinese myth, in 2853 BC, the legendary Emperor Shennong of China proclaimed that five plants were sacred: soybeans, rice, wheat, barley, and millet.[77] Early Chinese records mention that soybeans were a gift from the region of Yangtze River delta and Southeast China.[78]
Leftist men are shorter, less muscular, and weaker in the upper body than conservatives:
Height, Income and Voting, By R. Arunachalam and S. Watson, British Journal of Political Science, 2018
The Ancestral Logic of Politics: Upper Body Strength Regulates Men’s Assertion of Self-Interest Over Economic Redistribution, By M.B. Petersen, D. Sznycer, A. Sell et al., Psychological Science, 2013
this article finds that taller individuals are more likely to support the Conservative Party, support conservative policies and vote Conservative; a one-inch increase in height increases support for Conservatives by 0.6 per cent.
men with greater upper-body strength more strongly endorsed the self-beneficial position
What man sits cross legged ? No man.
Only **** do that. I see increasingly more guys using this position for sitting.
I always despised this way of sitting and my balls are luckily too big to be able to sit cross legged.
true.
but this should be common knowledge. never cross your legs as a man.
Always sit with your legs as widely spread as possible.
It makes women **** and feminists seethe.
my **** is too big so i physically can not sit in such a way
I have no idea how some guys can cross their legs while sitting. It **** hurts my balls to do that.
They have no or very small balls
I don't know any guy that does this. Wouldn't your balls and dick get crushed?
There is no single man on earth that actually crosses his legs like a foid. You would crush your balls
I thought it actually is a way that gay men communicate to eachother that they are in fact gay.
I hate the fags who sit like that, only manginas are able to sit like that cause they have no testicles
It's definitely gay
If you can sit cross legged it means you're a dickcel
(https://incels.is/attachments/1694547402586-png.872222/)
Big-hipped women have higher IQs, a longer life expectancy and smarter kids, according to a growing body of research. On top of that, men find curvy women more attractive, say a lot of other studies.
...
During the study, researchers at the universities of Pittsburgh and California found even the offspring of curvy women were smarter.
The reason for the higher IQ? They suggest it is connected to the omega-3 fatty acids stored in the extra fat cells on the hips and thighs of curvy women.
These omega-3 fatty acids come into play again to help create brainier babies. In the last trimester, when the baby's brain is growing at a rate of knots, it is calling on this hip fat to fuel the energy needs. After the birth, the mother's body uses the hip fat again to create the energy required for breastfeeding.
...
being curvy is also more attractive to the opposite sex, it seems. One of the most recent studies, out of the University of Texas last year, claims men prefer curvy women for "casual relationships".
While researching the links between hip fat and intelligence, Dr Lassek also found men were more attracted to women with low hip-to-waist ratios. His theory is men are biologically programmed to seek out women who can give them the most intelligent offspring.
Crusaders were moggers. If you read the accounts of Anna Komnene, daughter of Byzantine emperor Alexios I., and her physical descriptions of the crusaders, you can clearly see that the crusaders mogged the Byzantines from Adrianople to Antioch. She was definitely attracted to them even though she considered them barbarians. If anything that just added to the halo effect because they were dark triad Nordic Germanic Chads.
This is how she described the tall GIGA-Chad Nordic crusader leader Bohemund of Taranto. She literally says that such mogger was never before seen in the land of the Romans (Byzantines), admitting that he mogged the entire empire. Bohumend was a Norman and descendant of Viking moggers. He was one of the tallest men of his age, in fact I think he was originally named Mark but people started to call him Bohemund after a legendary giant named Bohumend.
Now the man was such as, to put it briefly, had never before been seen in the land of the Romans, be he either of the barbarians or of the Greeks (for he was a marvel for the eyes to behold, and his reputation was terrifying). Let me describe the barbarian’s appearance more particularly—he was so tall in stature that he overtopped the tallest by nearly one cubit, narrow in the waist and loins, with broad shoulders and a deep chest and powerful arms. And in the whole build of the body he was neither too slender nor over-weighted with flesh, but perfectly proportioned and, one might say, built in conformity with the canon of Polycleitus. He had powerful hands and stood firmly on his feet, and his neck and back were well compacted. An accurate observer would notice that he stooped slightly, but this was not from any weakness of the vertebræ of his spine but he had probably had this posture slightly from birth. His skin all over his body was very white, and in his face the white was tempered with red. His hair was yellowish, but did not hang down to his waist like that of the other barbarians; for the man was not inordinately vain of his hair, but had it cut short to the ears. Whether his beard was reddish, or any other colour I cannot say, for the razor had passed over it very closely and left a surface smoother than chalk, most likely it too was reddish. His blue eyes indicated both a high spirit and dignity; and his nose and nostrils breathed in the air freely; his chest corresponded to his nostrils and by his nostrils … the breadth of his chest. For by his nostrils nature had given free passage for the high spirit which bubbled up from his heart. A certain charm hung about this man but was partly marred by a general air of the horrible. For in the whole of his body the entire man shewed implacable and savage both in his size and glance, methinks, and even his laughter sounded to others like snorting. He was so made in mind and body that both courage and passion reared their crests within him and both inclined to war.
Looking through the looks lens so much of history makes sense. Its all about tall white buff guys literally bullying everyone else
(https://incels.is/attachments/32bb92f235cc9bb5-jpg.919598/)
Brutally JBW- and tittymogged. Even this pic proves that there is JBW and then actual JBW. Like whites among whites
An extensive evolutionary history has led humans to develop some fairly accurate first impressions of other people from their appearance. Although these inferences could be uncomfortable to some perceivers, an acuity to such kernels of truth could have a benefit to the perceiver.
...
One physical characteristic of a person that reliably connotes information about one’s physical abilities is sexual dimorphism. Dimorphism refers to the extent to which men appear masculine and women appear feminine through facial and bodily features connoting specific hormonal activities. Testosterone masculinizes facial structures, with men’s faces being particularly wider than women’s, in addition to fostering a “stronger” jawline.
...
implicit connections between masculinization and conservatism could implicate masculinized men as presenting a heuristic threat to non-conservatives in their attainment of group goals. One such group that has received considerable interest over the past decade relevant to this potential threat judgment is left-wing authoritarianism (LWA), a personality trait indicating the extent to which an individual is interested in disrupting present social hierarchies in favor of one that could better satisfy the goals of left-wing political ideas. In the case of left-wing authoritarians, such goals could include the implementation of redistributive policies as replacements for social policies that emphasize competitive resource acquisition and favor formidable men.
...
The data indicated a general pattern of misandry as a function of heightened LWA, but the magnitude of effects was much larger masculinized male faces. In other words, left-wing authoritarians disliked masculine men.
There's Science That Explains Why Women Fantasize About Rough Sex
...
Most people—regardless of gender and sexual orientation—appear to have been turned on by the idea at some point.
So why is rough sex arousing to so many people, and especially to women?
The authors of this study interpret these results through the same evolutionary lens: When men perceive a risk that their female partner has had sex with someone else, this triggers sperm competition. In other words, it leads men to engage in sexual behaviors—like deep and vigorous thrusting—aimed at displacing any semen that may have been deposited by rival men so that their own sperm have a better shot at fertilization.
My theory is that white men’s testicles are the largest, which explains why they also produce the most sperm.
...
the size was twofold lower in two Chinese samples compared with a Danish sample. Differences in body size make only a slight contribution to these values.” (Diamond, JM (1986)
...
Race differences in testicle size have also been measured (Asians = 9 grams, Europeans = 21 g). This is not just because Europeans have a slightly larger body size. The difference is too large. A 1989 article in Nature, the leading British science magazine, said that the difference in testicle size could mean that Whites make two times as many sperm per day as do Orientals.
...
Researches found “marked differences among samples, adult male Danes have testes that are more than twice the size of their Chinese equivalents, for example.” This range is far beyond what average racial differences in body size would predict Various estimates conclude that Cauacsians produce about twice the number of spermatozoa per day than Chinese (185-235 X 10 to the 6 power compared with 84 X 10 to the 6 power)
Men’s testes are substantially larger, relative to body size, than those of gorillas, a species in which males are polygynous but females mate monogamously so that “sperm competition” within the female reproductive tract is absent.
“We think it likely that testes size differences among human races have been adaptive in their own right — different responses to different mating behavior,” the two scientists write. They make reference to a study of the testes sizes of some Chinese and some Danes. The Danes’ testes, even when body size differences are taken into consideration, are twice the size of the Chinese subjects’.
...
“It could be that for generations the Chinese lived in a society that was sexually secure, while over the same time the Danes lived in a ****-and-pillage and violence kind of society,” Prof. May suggested in an interview.
...
Furthermore, diet and environmental factors would have to be factored in before arriving at any solid conclusion regarding the relationship between sexual monogamy and genital anatomy. For example, many Asian diets include large quantities of soy products, while many Western people consume large quantities of beef
Gwyneth has made a candle called This Smells Like My **** for her website, Goop. And, of course, it has sold out
(https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/835bd125d03a8c4abcd6a5f53d7c1da551100766/0_0_5000_3000/master/5000.jpg?width=620&dpr=2&s=none)
Choking, smothering, slapping: More teens are having rough sex. Here’s why.
...
For sexual activities that occur between women and men, the woman is nearly always the person on the receiving end of rough sex, and the man is nearly always the person doing the choking or slapping or smothering.
...
In my research, I’ve found that many young people think that sex is supposed to be rough.
...
Some young men worry they won’t be viewed as masculine if they don’t choke or slap their partner.
The Hellenist ☀️
@The_Hellenist
That large penises are seen as desirable is just another symptom of western degeneration. Large penises are a sign of low intelligence and savage genetics. Small penises indicate high intelligence and aristocratic blood.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FjJlSCuUcAAzCUt?format=jpg&name=medium)
Women are more selfless than men in love ❤️
A woman can love a man for years without having sex with him⭐️
Tell a man to love a women for 5 years
and be committed to her
(without having sex or any physical intimacy)
⭐️He will either cheat or breakup with her in 95 % cases⭐️
You can have the fat women, transgenders and circus freaks you want in all the ads and magazines you want.
But Sydney Sweeney just proved that for 200,000 years in a row men still prefer blondes with racks.
Carmine Sabia
@CarmineSabia
🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Christian, conservative, Journalist / Editor, Radio, TV, Pundit, Yankees fan, NRA member, Israel supporter.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GH2NS16XsAAWqPu?format=jpg&name=large)
In an ancient myth recorded by Hesiod's Theogony, Cronus envied the power of his father, Uranus, the ruler of the universe. Uranus drew the enmity of Cronus's mother, Gaia, when he hid the gigantic youngest children of Gaia, the hundred-handed Hecatoncheires and one-eyed Cyclopes, in Tartarus, so that they would not see the light. Gaia created a great stone sickle and gathered together Cronus and his brothers to persuade them to castrate Uranus.[4]
Only Cronus was willing to do the deed, so Gaia gave him the sickle and placed him in ambush.[5] When Uranus met with Gaia, Cronus attacked him with the sickle, castrating him and casting his testicles into the sea.
...
The period in which Cronus ruled was called the Golden Age, as the people of the time had no need for laws or rules; everyone did the right thing, and immorality was absent.
Hitler was brought up in a bitterly unhappy home. He loved his mother and hated his father, and any modern psychologist will tell you what that means. The mother was a saint, the father a brute, as Hitler saw them, and he identified himself with the former in opposition to the latter. He developed what is known today as the Oedipus Complex; jealousy of his father which led him to train his own character on as different lines as he possibly could—even going to extremes in the opposite direction.
Witness Hitler today. He is a passionate ascetic. He neither drinks nor smokes. So vigorously does he condemn tobacco that he refuses, even in the open air, to allow anyone to smoke near him. He eats very little meat. He weeps easily. He has, so far as one can judge, no love life at all. At 45 he is a bachelor, and is likely to remain so, probably because he cannot forget his mother-image, because his mother was the one woman of importance in his life.
...
His father was radically different in character. Old Alois Hitler was heavy, besotted, given to indulgence; he was born illegitimate; his character was overbearing and truculent; he married three times and he died over a bottle of wine in a public house.
...
On the tombstone, as is common in Austria, is a small photograph of the dead man. So this is Hitler’s father! A skull big and round and hairless like a melon; small, sharp, wicked little eyes; a pair of bicycle-handle mustaches, and a heavy, dominant, tyrant’s chin, jutting out like the bow of a cruiser. The mother’s picture we saw later in a relative’s house: a tall woman, with a narrow, sensitive face and sunken cheek-bones; the yellow braids of hair now a grey fluff over the back of the neck; large, luminous, beautiful eyes.
...
Adolf was a dreamy, moonstruck boy. He never had a nickname, like the other boys, nor a sweetheart, nor any comrade but Max. He was pale and nervous, greatly given to reading books of history.
...
Alois was terribly strict with Adolf. He was worried about the boy’s dreaminess. When Adolf was about 6 the mother began to develop cancer; it took her almost 10 years to die. Adolf watched her day by day, torn by her pain, bitter at a universe which could inflict such suffering, and resentful at the behavior of his insensitive father.
...
He tried at first to retreat into dreams, to compensate for the unhappiness of his actual life by creating an imaginary world of happiness and success. His will to be utterly different from his father made him wish to be an artist. He was overcome by his yearnings to fulfill the great historical mission that life, in the person of his mother, promised him.
Fred Trump "perverted his son's perception of the world and damaged his ability to live in it," she writes, adding that she believes the president is still seeking his deceased father's approval to this day.
"Every one of Donald's transgressions became an audition for his father's favor, as if he were saying, 'See, dad, I'm the tough one. I'm the killer,'"
In my case, I believe I had somewhat both Aryan parents. My dad is a strict vegetarian (no eggs either) and a teetoaler. He would always stress the importance of things like not killing insects. My mother is also a vegetarian. My mother also avoids wearing silk due to my father's insistence.
So I would say I have my sympathies for both parents.