Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - The Tower Crow

Pages: [1]
1
Human Evolution / Re: Aryan teeth
« on: September 07, 2024, 08:28:56 pm »
According to this information, the teeth crowding/jaw-size reduction that followed the Neolithic is more likely a lifestyle effect than a genetic one at this stage. So, it'd probably be a much more reliable indicator of one's genetic adaptation to an agrarian lifestyle if they have a smaller jaw without teeth crowding.

That being said, modern meat-eaters can't be expected to have wider jaws than vegans/vegetarians except possibly as an indication of being more caveman-like, but in the long-run, unless vegans for some reason become the most avid processed-food eaters, jaw width should increase for them (due to the inclusion of more fibrous, lower calorie foods) and decrease for those following a Standard Western Diet and perhaps even carnivore diet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_jaw_shrinkage
Quote
This short length of time, relative to evolutionary timescale, means human genetics are still essentially the same as before these modern changes in lifestyle practices.

Quote
The main contributing factor to the recent increase in malocclusion is widely considered to be due to a sharp reduction in chewing stress, especially during critical periods of craniofacial growth. Experiments done on non-human subjects have shown that induced nasal blockages and/or dietary changes earlier in life lead to maladaptive morphological change in their jaws, intended to simulate what we are observing globally in human children. Significant craniofacial changes due to diet have even been experimentally shown in pigs during development; researchers fed groups either a hard-consistency diet or a soft-consistency diet, for eight months in total. Drastic differences in jaw and facial musculature, facial structure, and tooth-crowding were observed; researchers directly related the findings to what we are observing more in human populations.

2
Questions & Debates / Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
« on: September 07, 2024, 04:07:33 am »
Sexuality is a vulnerable aspect of many people's lives, in respect to addiction or trauma. Sensitive and impressionable children, no less any sensitive and impressionable individuals, need to be protected. This crucial protection is, bizarrely, being confused with oppression, which is the opposite. When a child is convinced their preferences are unimportant because they can't make sound decisions for themselves even regarding consent to being touched and must defer to adults, how can they be expected to resist unwanted sexual advances from adults? How can they be empowered over their own sexuality, when autonomy is outright denied to them and they're gaslighted and made to feel confused over their own desires? Even when anxiety and shame about "hedonism" are put on prepubescent children about their sexuality which is usually very playful, mild, and innocent?

Newsflash: Subjection to adults by children is LEARNED from repeated bullying just like this by adults, especially parental figures. In a just society, children would always feel free to express their non-consent and reject the requests or demands of adults. Addiction is the overvaluation of sexuality as a source of suffering and satisfaction, this is promoted by things like trauma and fear, peer pressure and overemphasis of sex. In what world it's promoted by the practice of making decisions for oneself over one's sexuality, I haven't a clue. If anything this gives us the opportunity to improve executive control (the ability to overcome base instincts and direct oneself toward the attainment of higher goals.)

Adult supremacism is terribly unjust to children and I'm glad there are people in the world speaking up against it, as well as the unfair treatment of those with different sexualities. It's insane we live in a world (at least in the West) where it's socially acceptable to express hatred toward children but not attraction.

Pages: [1]