Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Aucontraire

Pages: [1] 2
1
Questions & Debates / Re: Abortion = Kindness?
« on: January 14, 2026, 02:34:46 pm »
Quote from: christianbethel on January 14, 2026, 12:23:38 pm
We hate life. We only live to complete our mission.

Resentful attachment is still attachment.

Quote
Everything you just said is the opposite of what we believe in.

Yet you promote it anyway, even though criminalizing abortion doesn't serve as a "means to an end" (unlike selective conception).

2
Questions & Debates / Re: Abortion = Kindness?
« on: January 14, 2026, 02:55:52 am »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan on January 13, 2026, 05:17:41 pm
If they have no preference, intervention is neither kindness nor unkindness towards them. It is initiated violence, though, since you have not been given permission by them to choose on their behalf.

Do you understand the difference between a signed contract with a declaration that the signer has no preference in a given matter (therefore passing the choice to others) and a similar contract without a signature? You are arguing in effect that the latter entitles you to choose on behalf of everyone who didn't sign.

I was referring to intervention in their suffering. The end (non-suffering) is their clear preference, they just can't answer which means they'd prefer. Just like if you were to choose "on their behalf" between non-lethal treatments, like different kinds of analgesic, or a warm bath or some milk and a cuddle.

But, besides (apparently) attacking an argument I didn't make, your reasoning has a major flaw: Babies have no "choice" they can "pass to others" in the first place. Nature is already choosing on their behalf, without their consent. Any intervention would be in violence which is already being committed — not in an individual's agency over whether they live or die.

3
Questions & Debates / Re: Abortion = Kindness?
« on: January 13, 2026, 03:55:56 am »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan on January 13, 2026, 01:19:05 am
Pick one.

You're deflecting. Answer the questions.
Or don't. I don't care. It's clear babies don't want to suffer. If they don't prefer life or death, there's no need to let that question delay intervention.

4
Questions & Debates / Re: Abortion = Kindness?
« on: January 13, 2026, 12:44:20 am »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan on January 11, 2026, 07:04:45 pm
It would be kinder to the conceived to keep them safe until they have expressed a preference one way or another, and only thereafter help them on whichever path they prefer.

Exposing them to life's cruelty is hardly "keeping them safe", is it? Do you listen when a newborn cries, or do think that's not a clear enough expression of preference?

5
Questions & Debates / Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
« on: January 11, 2026, 05:55:15 pm »
What happened to "children are innocent" and "adults are corrupt"? Why would you want to allow mature, adulterated individuals to go into intimate relationships with the young and vulnerable?

6
Questions & Debates / Re: Abortion = Kindness?
« on: January 11, 2026, 05:20:45 pm »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan on January 10, 2026, 04:19:13 pm
If you are referring to our advocacy for state control over reproduction, I have stated previously that no one will be coerced to conceive.

The topic was abortion. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you accidentally glanced over that.

7
Questions & Debates / Abortion = Kindness?
« on: January 10, 2026, 01:52:59 pm »
You don't want to be killed because you've grown attached to life and afraid of death. Innocence means babies have not. They don't consent to life or death. They have no discernable preference. They grow and survive because they are programmed to. Not because they will it — because nature wills it.

Aryanists understand life means they will have a body. That they will suffer and decay. They believe this outweighs any supposed "advantages". That life isn't a gift but a curse. Yet Aryanists advocate letting nature impose this curse on unborn babies, on top of having state authorities coerce people to carry through unwanted pregnancies. They also advocate exploiting children by selectively conceiving them to further their political aims.

What say you in your defense?

8
Questions & Debates / Re: Venezuela
« on: January 05, 2026, 05:33:53 pm »
The very existence of authoritarian power undermines the possibility of free association or "folkish sorting". Governments can and will impede migration when it suits them, and it does. Your dream regime will never be strong enough to tell others what to do. Power always trumps morality and states need to exploit their citizens, factory farm animals, and murder people to get ahead. Stop fantasizing about being some utopian dictator and do something useful.

(Edit: This reply was relocated by admin/mod, I didn't reply here but in the Venezuela thread)

9
Questions & Debates / Re: Hinduism
« on: August 17, 2025, 07:58:26 pm »
Keep playing dumb and reaching. People can see this debate for themselves and see what a dishonest and insane person you are. I've said enough.

10
Questions & Debates / Re: Hinduism
« on: August 17, 2025, 02:53:33 am »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan
I am not bothered by you choosing to not play 90s retro games for your own reasons.

That wasn't the question and you know it.

Quote
You, in contrast, felt so bothered by me choosing not to have sex with a woman for my own reasons that you reacted in the following way:

You're really clinging to that strawman for dear life. You know I never made even the slightest allusion to caring about you "choosing not to have sex with a woman for your own reasons." You can choose not to have sex with her for whatever reason you like. It's your body your choice. You can choose not to have sex with her because you think she's a serial killer. Does that mean I'm not allowed to dispute your accusation that she's a serial killer? Utterly insane.

Quote
Whatever the mechanism

What we were discussing was the mechanism for genetic microchimerism. At this point I'd recommend you get tested for dementia/Alzheimers, but I really think you're just dishonest.

11
Questions & Debates / Re: Hinduism
« on: August 16, 2025, 02:12:31 pm »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan
I am not complaining. Are you?

You don't disagree with the idea that wanting to play 90s retro games means you don't care about justice?

Quote
Quote
Whatever the mechanism, she has been changed as a consequence of sex. That is not what we should prefer if we view women as proposed earlier.

As a consequence of fertilization, not sex, which may or may not result in fertilization

This was so obviously in reference to the specific type of change we were discussing.

12
Questions & Debates / Re: Hinduism
« on: August 15, 2025, 07:39:33 pm »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan
If you view a woman as a goddess, you would not consent to sex with her.
If I view a woman as a goddess, I would not consent to sex with her.
I don't consent to sex with her (this woman whom I am viewing as a goddess).


I can play this game too:

If you care about justice, you would not consent to playing 90s retro games.
If I care about justice, I would not consent to playing 90s retro games.
I don't consent to playing 90s retro games (I care about justice.)

If you disagree with my premise (that caring about justice means you wouldn't consent to playing 90s retro games,) then you're saying I should play 90s retro games against my will! Otherwise what are you complaining about? 🤪

Quote from: 90sRetroFan
your assertion that only sex that leads to fertilization changes women.

Excuse me? When did I say this?
Will you ever stop using dishonest debate tactics?

13
Questions & Debates / Re: Hinduism
« on: August 15, 2025, 02:28:30 pm »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan
You are illiterate.

Because I don't think saying "I don't consent to sex with her" is the same as saying "if you view a woman as a goddess, you would not consent to sex with her"?

This goes far beyond literacy. You are insane.

Similarly insane is thinking some women possibly having their hymen broken by vaginal sex specifically, proves that all sex always changes women.

It's not even an interesting point. You would've looked less ridiculous if you just let the hymen comment bury itself.

Quote
A woman can demand sex from me. I can refuse. Does my refusal remove her autonomy?

Obviously not. That is some kind of rapey incel thinking. Autonomy literally means self-choice. It doesn't mean you get to decide what others do.

14
Questions & Debates / Re: Hinduism
« on: August 14, 2025, 07:37:58 pm »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan
So if you view a woman as a goddess, you would not consent to sex with her, because you would prefer to keep her unchanged.

Which is an entirely different argument to your cute little red herring.

We have established that a woman is not necessarily changed by having sex. We have also established that autonomy is important to women, not material permanence per se (which would be especially true for a goddess, who is by definition above the material world.) Next.

15
Questions & Debates / Re: Hinduism
« on: August 14, 2025, 06:14:39 pm »
Quote from: 90sRetroFan
Certainly not for minimizing change. If it were, healthy children would never grow, let alone mature.

Is your concern about minimizing harmful, non-consensual change, or change in general?? Not everyone wants to stay as babies.

Quote
The burden is on you to explain how.

The debate is there for you and everyone else to see your argument wasn't "I don't consent to sex." Nice red herring though.

Pages: [1] 2