"Totally. Even within the Aryanist movement were members who had made rightist presumptions about the movement that I never intended (e.g. presuming that being anti-Jewish meant being homophobic, despite Judaism literally being the origin of homophobia). And this is not even to mention the confusion over the meaning of "Aryan". Even after the Aryan Diffusion series was published, some still presumed it was a series about prehistoric "white" migrations worldwide!"
I would have been banging my head against the wall. Its one thing for WN randos to make these presumptions, but when journalists do it its even more lazy. Do you remember this Vice article lumping us in with WNs?
https://www.vice.com/en/article/why-so-many-white-supremacists-are-into-veganism/"Take Aryanism.net, for example. Among all the articles devoted to the history, philosophy, and politics of white nationalism, the site has a full page dedicated to veganism. Littered with quotes from Hitler, Hess, Devi, and Joseph Goebbels, the anonymous author(s) claim that veganism is a hallmark of an authentic National Socialist, and a sign of genuine empathy and a level of nobility beyond presently popular norms. Its not enough to be vegan, however. Like Devi, the webpage is adamant that Aryans should be vegan for ethical reasons, and not simply for health or vanity."
This was infuriating.
"Some even thought that I was merely a WN opposed to violence against "non-whites" currently alive, and that the reason why I talked about state control over reproduction every day was because my plan was to prohibit all "non-whites" from reproducing while allowing "whites" to reproduce, thus still ending up with the world that WNs want. The possibility that I would if anything first prohibit "whites" from reproducing never occurred to them in their wildest dreams..... until I finally started saying it explicitly."
I think they were too dumb to read the "REFUGEES WELCOME" banner right there on the blog. I have no other explanation.
"And when they at last understood this, some reacted by trying to turn my own values against my own strategy, such as arguing that if I wanted a vegan world (which indeed I do), I should want a "white" world since (according to them) only "whites" care about veganism. WTF?!"
Saying "whites" are the only ones who believe in Veganism is just plain ignorant. Even if a "non-white" country is empirically measured to have a low amount of Vegans, the fact is that most non-Western countries don't eat meat every single day the way Westerners do. Because of that, there's a sort of de-facto Vegetarianism.
"More broadly, I suspect that a major reason why many back then liked exposing the disproportionate Jewish influence on Western history was that they saw it as a way to shift blame for the horrors of the colonial era away from "whites" as a whole onto Jews only, when actually the point of the narrative was to include Jews among "whites" (and thus oppressors) contrary to the image of Jewish victimhood ("Holocaust survivors") that Jews have preferred."
I always say Jews have thrived in "white" countries for a reason. "Whites" are willing culprits to their crimes, especially "white" Evangelical Judeochristians:
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/09/christian-zionism-evangelicals-israel-trump-foreign-policy/