True Left

Islamic dress codes try to reduce women's visible sexual dimorphism as opposed to Western dress codes which try to increase women's visible sexual dimorphism. It is incredible that I even need to explain this

I actually think that this needs to be explained further, especially when we consider that many False Leftists who receive our propaganda share similar positions (often in agreement) with Rightists on the topic of Mohammedanism. Generally, False Leftists who hold some form of anti-colonial/anti-western/anti-“white” beliefs already agree that Islamic dress codes are at least superior to Western dress codes. However, explicit discussions of sexual dimorphism being the reason for this superiority may result in the more idealistically-motivated False Leftists (especially ones who claim to be anti-traditionalist) seeing contemporary Islamic dress codes as visually sexually dimorphic in their own right on account of such codes employing different articles of clothing for men than for women and on account of the perception that those dress codes reduce the visual sexual dimorphism of women without simultaneously reducing the visual sexual dimorphism of men to the same degree.

This may produce positive results, such as the motivation to improve existing Islamic dress codes. It also could produce negative results, such as False Leftists drawing an incorrect conclusion that Mohammedanism views women as more sexually dimorphic than men. I believe this potential confusion could be proactively prevented if we are able to communicate an idealized version of the Islamic dress code according to Mohammedan standards to the audience receiving our message. What might such a dress code look like relative to the existing ones?

Brandeis University

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandeis_University

Founded in 1948 as a non-sectarian, coeducational institution sponsored by the Jewish community, Brandeis was established on the site of the former Middlesex University. The university is named after Louis Brandeis, the first Jewish Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

If this university’s anti-racism efforts were in any way sincere, its administration would have started by abolishing every one of its institutional references to Judaism and by renaming the institution itself.

More on the racist who the university is named after:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Brandeis

Brandeis also became a prominent figure in the Zionist movement. He became active in the Federation of American Zionists in 1912, as a result of a conversation with Jacob de Haas, according to some. His involvement provided the nascent American Zionist movement one of the most distinguished men in American life and a friend of the next president. Over the next several years he devoted a great deal of his time, energy, and money to championing the cause.

Leftists should treat this university no differently than the many other institutions and monuments on American soil dedicated to racists.

Given the amount of rubbish published along with the kernels of truth, it seems that the university is deliberately trying to confuse anti-racists, which is of course consistent with the interests of every racist. Considering this intrinsic racist self-interest that must motivate the university’s decisions and its remorseless display of its rotten origins, I find it reasonable to assume that it only ever feigns adherence to any semblance social justice as some sort of preemptive measure in order to dissuade future Cancel Culture targeting.

their unwillingness to adjust their stance when confronted with our arguments

To be fair, I would like to point out that this was the behavior of one member. I do not believe she held any leadership roles in the group (but I could be wrong about that). In general, I was not familiar with Black Hammer other than its main propaganda account and “Reparations Corps” account on Twitter, so I am not sure how their organization operates with respect to uniformity in the attitudes/behaviors of their members. Because of this, if another Black Hammer member were to reach out to me in the future, I would certainly view them with more suspicion than I initially viewed the member who attempted to recruit me, but I also probably would not treat them as an enemy until they demonstrate similar behavior.

If they come to us asking for our help, it would be appropriate to simply point them to our information and waiting to answer questions.

But in this case we are pitching to them

I should have made it clearer in my previous posts that this interaction occurred in the context of the Black Hammer member reaching out to me in an attempt to recruit me to join that group. Even though I had no actual desire to join, I wanted to at least share our projects (and positions) with her instead of just telling her I was uninterested. I would have liked to continue our discussion where it was going and direct it towards ideological positions, but at this point, she has read my initial invitations to take a look at our own accomplishments with respect to activism but has ceased responding. To me, this seems to indicate a disinterest with our own work, let alone our positions. Let me know what you think.

Regardless, I sought an evaluation of Black Hammer as a potential ally when I posted the organization’s information in this section, so I appreciate everyone’s feedback!

Since the group is relatively new to the US leftist scene, I intended to expose them to our ideologically consistent anti-colonialist positions. I am wagering that if their leadership was already willing to make the jump towards seeing Jews as “white” without any True Left influence, other anti-colonial positions such as abandoning Western ideals like democracy should be possible (and even organically desired by members of their organization). Most of their justifications for those positions appear to be based on weak/inconsistent ideological concepts such as “Maoism” that I suspect are merely borrowed out of convenience from previous versions of anti-“white” anti-colonial organizations. This leads me to believe that simple exposure to True Leftist ideological consistency with respect to anti-Western sentiment could be sufficient to influence changes in those positions.

I hadn’t originally considered formally joining their group, but they do seem to be actively recruiting new members.