"The wife is depicted as the tweeter hopes she looked like. ::"
Yes, I suppose he thought he was "owning" Identitarians by posting a picture of a "Brown" man "scoring" a "White" girl.
Also, replying to an earlier post:
"but this is rarely done. Why?"
Vegetarianism is popular in India, but in the traditional Hindu view, it is restricted to the priestly/philosopher/ascetic caste (Brahmin). One would think that since Brahmins are at the top, vegetarianism (and by extension the genes that allow it) would be held as a model ideal.
This is true, but a Kshatriya who becomes vegetarian is seen as abandoning their duty. This is because the modern-day "universal vegetarian" movement in India and other parts of the world are pacifist in nature, to the point of vegetarianism becoming associated with pacifism (thanks to Eurocentrists like Gandhi). This has led to an inferiority complex among Indians who see themselves as having been emasculated by British who were bigger and stronger than them, which in turn breeds reactionary "chadpilling" on Twitter, where people think they need to eat more meat in order to avoid being trampled over and emasculated/humiliated. There is also an aesthetic angle to this as most Indians, having a non-Aryan metabolism, are left with an unfit physique due to the lack of diversity of grains in their diet (e.g. millet).
Coming back to a Kshatriya abandoning their duty, I agree that one must be a militarist first and foremost, so dietary considerations would be secondary. But vegan food is more economical, thus more advantageous from a military perspective! If a Kshatriya does eat meat from an economical point of view, this would more closely resemble scavenging. But scavenging is what Buddhism advocates (which is ironically called "pacifist")!
In this way we see that the traditional Hindu view has more in common with Buddhism than Westernized right-wingers on the internet.