True Left

Example of using wrong terminology to combat dress colonization:
https://twitter.com/confucian_the/status/1632745169455042564?s=20

Comrade Confucius
@confucian_the
Men's clothing from the Majapahit Empire was cool AF. Far cooler (both figuratively and literally) than the stupid asexual Capitalist monkey suit.
I've even got an antique bronze men's ring from around that time period.

Assuming you are referring to the Western business suit, it is far from "asexual", since its very purpose is to emphasize sexual dimorphism! (As we have documented extensively in this thread).

"Furthermore, does this idiot seriously think that ordinary people in pre-colonial times dressed like in that photo as everyday attire?"
Exactly. Here is what people acutally dressed like in the Majapahit Empire:


Note the simplicity of the dress. Contrary to what these "Chadpillers" would have you believe, non-Western civilizations were not sexually dimorphic or complex as Western civilization.

"Then again, do you expect any better from someone literally called Comrade Confucius?"
Forgot to mention this, but his anthropocentric view about "monkeys"  is also a reflection of his username.

https://www.dazeddigital.com/beauty/article/55876/1/exploring-the-popularity-of-the-asian-balayage

While we may be free to make decisions about our hair, what does it mean if we ‘choose’ to pursue an ideal which Western society prizes?
...
The New York Times recently reported that around 50 per cent of Asian customers at Sondar Hair Studio in New York City were looking to dye their hair lighter, while April Taylor, owner of London salon Somewhere in Queen’s Park, estimates that “at least 70 per cent” of her Asian clientele are going blonder.

But Bhagwandas also points to other forces at play that could be subconsciously influencing our decisions. She stresses that “we do have to recognise when beauty trends are cloaked Eurocentric ideals” and explains that Asian culture has a tendency to regard Western features as especially desirable. “It’s so embedded in the culture, in practices like skin lightening or westernising cosmetic surgery, that it’s become the norm,” she says. “These beliefs then become expected customs and beauty standards and end up being passed down from generation to generation, often without being examined and disrupted. But in each country and in each culture, these customs are extremely nuanced and hard to break away from.”

It’s undoubtedly difficult to relinquish the idea that blonde is the ideal hair colour given its representation in popular culture – just think of Barbie or Marilyn Monroe – despite the fact that only two per cent of the world's population has naturally blonde hair. It’s equally difficult to acknowledge that wanting blonde hair may suggest an underlying desire to conform to Western beauty standards. Because while we may be free to make decisions about our hair, what does it mean if we ‘choose’ to pursue an ideal which Western society prizes?

It means you are colonized.

This idea that whiteness was beautiful was exported to Africa and Asia with the advent of colonialism in the 15th and 16th centuries, as colonisers justified their cruelty and racism with white supremacist ideology.
...
Bhagwandas points out that this prizing of ‘white’ features includes hair, not just skin. “European colonialism and slavery – which lasted centuries – created a power dynamic that meant that those that held the power had lighter skin, lighter eyes and lighter hair. So automatically we have the case where those in power look a certain way which sets up an image of what wealth and success look like, and it’s a European or Western face and image of beauty,” Bhagwandas explains. “There was a colonial precedent where those with a proximity to whiteness were given preferential treatment because of it,” she continues. “We’re still living in the legacy of this when we think about how recently colonisation ended – the legacy of white supremacy is absolutely still at play in beauty.”
...
So what’s to be done? Everyone stick to their natural hair colour? That’s the implication in the aforementioned TikTok video: Laura calls Asian women reverting back to their natural dark hair after a brief dalliance with lighter locks “peak character development.”

I would consider it merely the first step. Why not look into reviving pre-colonial hairstyles also? I'm not saying everyone has to wear those hairstyles, but at least no one should be afraid to wear them. If you are afraid to go out in public with a pre-colonial hairstyle (or in pre-colonial clothes etc.), you are still colonized.