Author Topic: Demographic Blueshift  (Read 4883 times)

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1318
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #60 on: April 18, 2021, 02:13:28 am »
They will just replace them with "non-white" Westerners.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #61 on: April 22, 2021, 10:17:01 pm »
Can it happen?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UtiFy7UI74

Jones is on the case:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/republicans-blew-democratic-congressman-accused-164723018.html

Quote
Republican lawmakers blew up on Thursday after Democratic Rep. Mondaire Jones accused the GOP of spreading "racist trash" during a heated debate over a bill to grant statehood to Washington, DC.

"I've had enough of my colleagues' racist insinuations that somehow the people of Washington, DC, are incapable or even unworthy of our democracy," Jones said on the House floor.

He then called out Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas for saying DC wouldn't be a "well-rounded working-class state."

"I had no idea there were so many syllables in the word 'white,'" Jones said.

He also pointed out Republican Rep. Jody Hice's claim that Washington, DC, does not deserve statehood because it doesn't have a landfill.

"My goodness, with all the racist trash my colleagues have brought to this debate, I can see why they're worried about having a place to put it," Jones continued, as Republicans could be heard objecting to his comments. "The truth is there is no good-faith argument for disenfranchising over 700,000 people, Mr. Speaker, most of whom are people of color."
...
the history of opposition to federal representation for Washington, DC, is rooted in anti-Black racism. Confederate lawmakers explicitly rejected DC's various attempts to self-govern and elect its own representation because of its large Black population.

"In the face of this influx of negro population from the surrounding States, [Congress] … found it necessary to disenfranchise every man in the District of Columbia … in order thereby to get rid of this load of negro suffrage that was flooded in upon them," Sen. John Tyler Morgan of Alabama, who owned slaves, said in 1890.

Morgan explained that Congress got rid of local leadership in the city "to burn down the barn to get rid of the rats … the rats being the negro population and the barn being the government of the District of Columbia."

It wasn't until the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 70s that the city was given the right to elect its own mayor and non-voting House member.

Like Like x 1 View List

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #62 on: April 23, 2021, 10:11:23 pm »
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9497675/Rashida-Tliab-tells-Muslims-welcome-House-passes-bill-prevent-travel-bans.html

Quote
Rep. Rashida Tlaib said Wednesday that Congress had sent a message to Muslims that 'you are welcome here' after the House voted for legislation that would prevent actions like President Trump's Muslim ban.

The House on Wednesday passed the 'No Ban Act,' which would limit the president's ability to  to suspend or restrict the entry into the U.S. of a 'class of aliens.'

'I want to really be very loud and very clear and sending a message to every Muslim and African person here and around the world that you are welcome here. And the United States of America,' said Tlaib, who famously called to 'impeach the mother******' in reference to Trump at the start of her term in 2019.

She unloaded on Trump's administrative actions Wednesday, as the House once again passed legislation it also passed under Trump – when the president certainly would have vetoed it if it ever reached his desk. 

'The Congress United States of House of Representatives took action to ensure racist and dangerous bans like The Muslim and African ban will be no more,' she said. 'Today the passage of the no ban app or ban as is showing our immigrant neighbors and refugees everywhere. The House Democrats will not tolerate racist immigration policies,' she said.

The bill passed on a 218-208 vote.

Republicans bashed the move.

WE WILL REPLACE YOU!

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #63 on: April 24, 2021, 12:49:09 pm »
Dem lawmaker: Here's why opposition to DC statehood is racist
Quote
Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-NY) explains why he condemned GOP objections to statehood for the District of Columbia as racist.
#CNN​ #News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzKuMy2hNcg

This might be a bit of a stretch, but something tells me Tom Cotton's ancestors may have had something to do with cotton?

Or cottages apparently (after looking it up) :D
Quote
The name Cotton is of Anglo-Saxon origin and came from when a family lived in one of a number of similarly named settlements throughout England. Coton is found in Cambridgeshire, while Cotton was in Cheshire. ... All of these names stem from the Old English phrase ćt cotum, which means at the cottages.
https://www.houseofnames.com/cotton-family-crest

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #64 on: April 26, 2021, 11:34:56 pm »
Post-census Congressional seat changes:





The stakes for turning Texas Blue, or failing to, are higher than ever!

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #65 on: May 08, 2021, 11:56:34 pm »
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/beyond-trafficking-and-slavery/case-five-new-states/

Quote
The case for five new states

Granting statehood to the US’s territories would transform the lives of 4+ million citizens, and probably US politics as well

One of the most transformative things Democrats could do with their narrow majority in Congress would be to grant statehood to all the remaining inhabited US territories. That would make five new states: Washington DC, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Mariana Islands (a reunion of the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam, which is the southern Mariana Island).

There are no constitutional barriers to admitting all five of these states. The US Constitution gives Congress the power to admit new states as long as it assures they are republics and that the majority of people of the territory want to be admitted. The Senate will have to eliminate or reduce the power of the filibuster to do so without Republican support, but the filibuster is a Senate rule that the majority has the power to change.

All five of these territories have larger populations than Nevada did when it was admitted with around 40,000 people in 1864. Washington, DC is larger than two existing states and Puerto Rico is larger than 21 states. The populations of all five are:

    American Samoa: 55,000
    The U.S. Virgin Islands: 105,000
    Gaum and the Northern Mariana Islands: 230,000
    Washington, DC: 705,000
    Puerto Rico: 3,193,000

Territorial status was not meant to be permanent for any significant population. It was used for lightly settled areas in the expectation that statehood would be granted once population density increased. Not allowing this change to occur is an exercise in oppression. The people of these territories are subject to US law, yet are denied equal say (in most cases any say at all) in making US law. They are literally second-class citizens. The federal government for the most part treats them as such – the Trump administration’s reaction to the damage Hurricane Maria inflicted on Puerto Rico is only one in a long line of blatant examples.

Ending the Whiteness of Congress

These territories have so far been prevented from becoming states as part of a larger, long-standing project to keep the Senate and Electoral College White. A long history of White identity politics, underhanded political maneuvers, and outright violence intentionally created the situation in which non-Hispanic, White Americans – who make up 61.5% of the US population – are the majority in every state but Hawaii (which has an Asian American plurality of 37.3%). Americans of Native, Black, or Latin heritage together make up 31.1% of the US population, but they do not make up a majority in any state – neither alone nor in combination.

That didn’t just happen.

Several Native American groups with sizable populations applied for statehood at various times and were turned down by Congress simply because they were Native Americans. Arizona and New Mexico, which were majority Mexican American when they applied for statehood, weren’t accepted until enough eastern settlers had arrived to give them White majorities – more than half a century later.

At the end of the Civil War, two states (South Carolina and Mississippi) were majority Black, but White gangs violently took over the state governments and refused to let them vote. Four other states were more than 40% Black at the time, but similar tactics were used to completely shut this population out of power. Nearly 100 years later these states were forced to let Black people vote, but by then enough had fled north to create comfortable White majorities in all of these states.

These decisions were made long ago, but they continue to have the intended effect of giving Whites outside influence over Congress and the electoral college. Had the White majority been fair and evenhanded, the US would have several Black, Native, Latin-heritage majority states today.


Let’s see how these potential states would change the equation. Despite being different in many respects, one trait they share is that none has a White majority. Look at the largest ethnic group in each of them:

    American Samoa: 89% Samoan
    The U.S. Virgin Islands: 76% Afro-Caribbean
    The Northern Mariana Islands: 35% Filipino (24% Chamorro)
    Gaum: 37% Chamorro (26% Filipino)
    Washington, DC: 49% Black (43.6% White)
    Puerto Rico: 98% Latin heritage

Given American history, it’s reasonable to believe that their ethnic makeup is a primary reason why they are not states already. And by refusing to grant them statehood, the White majority is effectively choosing to guard and maintain its outsized influence in the federal government. It’s not something that happened a lot time ago. It’s something being actively preserved every day.

Admitting these states would create one near-majority Black state (Washington, DC), one majority Afro-Caribbean state (the U.S. Virgin Islands) and one majority Latin-heritage state (Puerto Rico). Samoans and Chamorros are indigenous peoples in territories that have been colonized by the United States. The people in these new states can’t hope to ‘represent’ people with similar ethnic backgrounds on the mainland, but perhaps the people they would send to Washington would have greater understanding of marginalized groups than most members of Congress do now. All would certainly bring new perspectives into the mix and roil the status quo.

These new states would have a minor impact on the House of Representatives, but they’d have a major impact on the Electoral College and the Senate. The number of Senators would increase from 100 to 110, and they would not necessarily be closely connected to either party. Maybe they would help de-polarize American and help end the politicization of the big-state/small-state divide.

Equal rights for equal citizens

Three of these territories are very small; would statehood give them too much influence over US politics? Whites would be still be in the majority in 89% of the states (49 of 55), and therefore would still have disproportionate power in the Senate, the House, and the Electoral College – just not as disproportionate as it is now. All of these territories (except the Northern part of the Mariana Islands) have been subject to US law for over 100 years and have had little or no influence over the shaping of US law in all that time. It would be rather disingenuous of mainlanders to say that 2% of power in the Senate is ‘too much’ for people from these territories to wield, while 100% of power is somehow an appropriate amount for them.

Should we combine these territories into larger units or incorporate them into existing states? For Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, that makes sense. They share history, ethnicity, and language, and are separate now because of US federal government decisions. But otherwise, these five potential states share little or nothing.

Forcing them to combine is not how America works. There are both large and small states because the union recognizes that people have distinct regional interests, and the system was designed to help small states hold their own against large ones. Wyoming wasn’t forced to combine with Vermont, the next smallest state, although they are geographically closer together and more culturally similar than American Samoa and the Mariana Islands are. Nor were the people of Wyoming forcibly incorporated into Colorado, where they would constitute only 10% of the population and would have little impact on the state’s decisions. If the United States won’t do this to the people of Wyoming, it should not do it to the people of the US Virgin Islands or American Samoa.

There is no need to wait for a wider political consensus. The constitution doesn’t require any more consensus than a majority vote of both houses. Republicans don’t wait for consensus to disenfranchise voters, Gerrymander districts, or give tax cuts to the wealthy. Why should Democrats wait to enfranchise US citizens living on US territory? The cure for disenfranchisement is enfranchisement, and right now there is an opportunity to do that in a big way.

The Democrats have the power to admit all five of these territories as states in time for the 2022 midterm elections. It would bring equal citizenship to every citizen living on US territory. It would transform American politics forever and for the better.
Like Like x 1 View List

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #66 on: May 12, 2021, 01:02:54 am »
Poll: Opposition to Newsom recall grows and Jenner fails to break through
Quote
A growing number of Californians oppose the forthcoming recall of Gavin Newsom, according to a survey released Tuesday morning, a boost for the sitting governor who has suffered a series of political blows over the past year.

Roughly 49 percent said they were against removing Newsom, a tick higher than the 45 percent who responded similarly in January.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/11/gavin-newsom-recall-opposition-grows-486973

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #67 on: May 15, 2021, 12:12:56 am »
We are not safe yet:

https://vdare.com/letters/a-patriot-lawyer-has-a-small-white-pill-about-the-white-birth-rate

Quote
The biggest news out of it is that births are way down, declining by 4% from 2019. The decline has been happening for about a decade, but seems to have accelerated as a result of the pandemic. I would expect that 2021 will show a further decline.

One thing I noted, however, was that white births as a percentage of the total remain pretty much unchanged. It was 51.1% in 2019, and it is now just a click over 51.0% for 2020. That is statistically insignificant. So, despite one million legal immigrants per year—and an untold number of illegals—whites are holding steady. This is because some of the sharpest drops occurred amongst minority women as compared to white women.

It is no surprise that those least likely to practice social distancing were those who conceived the most.....

Quote
If an immigration moratorium were imposed, or even if immigration were reduced, I would suspect that the white share of births—and the overall population—would start to increase.

This is why we need state control over reproduction.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2021, 12:15:03 am by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1318
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #68 on: May 15, 2021, 12:15:40 am »
This is what I have been saying as well, i.e. only a steady decrease in population will suffice, as opposed to them merely becoming the minority.

Also, a reminder that any "leftist" who identifies as "White" but still nevertheless chooses to reproduce in this day and age is directly contributing to this problem and is therefore an enemy. See:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/cair-and-abby-martin/
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/israel/?message=2481
« Last Edit: May 15, 2021, 12:29:46 am by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #69 on: May 16, 2021, 09:59:59 pm »
We are rising by 2%/year, which is too slow:




90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #70 on: May 21, 2021, 10:11:46 pm »


1) Our Blue takeover is practically a done deal. Which is not to say that we do not need to continue pushing it along, as we need it to happen fast enough that the US is still militarily capable of taking on Israel, which will cease to be the case if we leave it too long.

2) The age trend is on our side. High life expectancy could slow things down, though.

3) Why does a degree have opposite effects depending on gender?

4) If only "black" Americans were >10% of the US population.....

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #71 on: May 22, 2021, 11:04:55 pm »
A Sea Change on Israel for the Democratic Party
Quote
Mehdi explains why so many more Democratic lawmakers are criticizing the violence unfolding in Gaza, Israel, and the West Bank. Rep. Mark Pocan of the Progressive Caucus joins Mehdi to discuss why Biden must demand an immediate ceasefire. He talks Mehdi through why the change in opinions among elected officials is representative of a change among their constituents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnV1x7JM_Vo

Leftists have always had more empathy for others than rightists.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #72 on: May 24, 2021, 02:47:02 am »
Our enemies acknowledge our success:

https://vdare.com/articles/the-left-is-changing-on-israel-because-of-black-lives-matter-and-immigration

Quote
The latest clash between Israel and its Palestinian subjects has exposed a new fissure within the U.S. Left. New anti-white, hard-Left voices in the Democrat Party are demanding the U.S. stop supporting “colonizer” Israel.
...
There’s also rising anti-white sentiment due to the unchallengeable moral hegemony of the Black Lives Matter movement; and the tipping of the Democrat Party and its Leftist auxiliaries because of Third World immigration.
...
Popular HBO host John Oliver said likewise and claimed Israel practiced a “form of apartheid”
...
Of course, this sounds a lot like the things Leftists have long said about the United States: White Europeans “replaced” so-called Native Americans etc. etc. But now the Left is saying the same about Israel, and its top spokesmen don’t want the U.S. supporting it.

Influential Democrat Reps. Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for instance, decry America for supporting the “colonizers” and back legislation to stop arm sales to Israel
...
And who are these three? They are, in a nutshell, Third Worlders who aren’t in any sense Americans or even vaguely connected to the West.

Actually, not being even vaguely connected to the West is what makes them superlatively American. Being connected to the West would imply being connected to the Western colonial powers which colonized America!



Quote
Recall that the late Charles Krauthammer wondered why anti-Semitism was rising in Europe. Many of his fellow neocons undoubtedly wonder why it is rising in the United States today. Because the likes of Omar are elected to Congress. To rework James Carville’s famous utterance, it’s the immigration, stupid!

Yes, Operation Gaddafi is working also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/operation-gaddafi/

Quote
Then there’s the rising power of Leftist blacks who see everything through the prism of race. Missouri Rep. Cori Bush, right, a BLM organizer, for instance, connects racial causes in America with those of Palestine:

    “We’re saying that our own government is funding a brutal and militarized disposition towards our very existence—from Ferguson to Palestine.”

Palestinians are fellow “POC” and must be defended. This view is also shared by New York Rep. Jamaal Bowman, right, who says he understands what it means to live in a society designed to perpetuate violence against “people who look like me.”[How Black Lives Matter changed the U.S. debate on the Mideast, by Sean Sullivan and Cleve R. Wootson Jr., The Washington Post, May 22, 2021].

BLM even issued a statement of “solidarity” with Palestinians this week:

    We are a movement committed to ending settler colonialism in all forms and will continue to advocate for Palestinian liberation. (always have. And always will be). #freepalestine.

Additionally, nearly 150 prominent Leftist advocacy groups—spanning the range from feminists to non-white interest lobbies—signed a joint letter denouncing Israel’s plan to secure a Jewish majority state. The letter essentially called Israel ”white supremacist”
...
Meanwhile, tens of thousands of people demonstrated against Israel’s actions across America. Many were Muslim immigrants bolstered by their ever-increasing numbers [People across the US join pro-Palestinian protests, by Alisha Ebrahimji, CNN, May 18, 2021]. In a manner similar to BLM and Antifa goons who staged the Floyd Hoax riots, and attacked police and innocent bystanders, Muslims in Los Angeles and New York hunted down and beat up Jews.
...
As America becomes less white, fewer of its people will support Israel.
...
We would not have random Jews being attacked in the streets if it weren’t for mass immigration and the BLM-ification of the Left.

...
now American Zionists face an imported competing ethnic lobby. Will the U.S. turn against Israel like it did against South Africa?

There was no US military invasion of Apartheid South Africa. There will hopefully be be a US military invasion of Israel.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2021, 04:03:02 am by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8202
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #73 on: June 01, 2021, 10:08:10 pm »
Another poll:

https://twitter.com/USA_Polling/status/1399143075688161295

Quote
'Who is more responsible for the violence in the Mideast - Israel or Hamas?'

All:
Hamas: 60%
Israel: 40%

18-34:
Israel: 60%
Hamas: 40%

35-49:
Israel: 51%
Hamas: 49%

50-64:
Hamas: 72%
Israel: 28%

65+:
Hamas: 76%
Israel: 24%

We will win!

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Demographic Blueshift
« Reply #74 on: June 02, 2021, 12:23:22 am »
New Poll Shows Nina Turner DOMINATING
Quote
A new poll shows former Ohio state senator Nina Turner dominating the Democratic Primary race for Ohio's 11th district.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO-lm-pnnSQ&list=TLPQMDIwNjIwMjE1Ud1XEfNT9g&index=7

Quote
VoiceOfTheEmperor
12 hours ago (edited)
Let's write History. After we win. Also, don't let up, even for a day. But most importantly, don't underestimate your opponents. It breeds complacency and that always leads to disaster.