Author Topic: Psychological decolonization  (Read 154 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Psychological decolonization
« on: July 09, 2020, 03:52:21 am »
OLD CONTENT

Really, all other aspects of decolonization would follow spontaneously if we thoroughly decolonized (ie. eliminate Eurocentrism from) how people perceive the world. But this is the hardest one. I have even encountered people who on the conscious level sincerely want to stop being Eurocentric, but are unable to do so on the subconscious level.

In any society, there will be more self-confident people and less self-confident people as a matter of statistical distribution. This on its own would be, and has been throughout history, tolerable. The problem from the colonial era onwards is that, due to Eurocentrism, the lack of self-confidence goes all one-way, whether the parameter be pigmentation, sexual dimorphism, height or any other. For example, where are the insecure light-skinned people who try to darken their skin? They virtually don't exist. (Guess why not.)

And parents (as always) make things even worse:

Quote
colourism often starts from birth, where parents favour the children with lighter skin.

Old but important (and depressing to watch), the famous Doll Tests:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkpUyB2xgTM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRZPw-9sJtQ

---

That is freaking heartbreaking.

---

At least people are pointing it out:

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7086059/Miss-India-pageant-comes-fire-lack-diversity.html

Quote
'This is so white!' Miss India pageant comes under fire for having 'no dark skin' beauty queens among the 'identically' pale finalists
...
The organisation came under fire after a newspaper published headshots of all 30 women competing to take home the crown.

Twitter user LeBrown James shared a photo of the collage, asking: 'What's wrong with this picture?'

The question sparked dozens of responses from social media users who pointed out that all the women have 'fair skin', with one saying simply: 'This is so white!'

---

For sure. I think it is primarily because I have somewhat internalized the Eurocentric notion that self confidence is "arrogance" when exuded from a "non-white" person.

Some non-Westerners I have encountered also struggle with this, as they find it difficult to rebut the argument (from rightists) that colonialism is just a "part of history", and should therefore be accepted.

---

www.buzzfeednews.com/article/susiearmitage/how-mexican-magazines-reflect-racial-discrminiation

Quote
Mexican Magazines Are Way Whiter Than The Actual Mexican Population
...
Dark-skinned individuals make up — at maximum — 20 percent of the people shown in these 15 magazines.
...
Quién, a society magazine, was the whitest in our analysis: only 2 percent of the people in its pages were brown or black.
...
None of the people on the covers of the magazines we looked at have dark skin.
...
When dark-skinned Mexicans do appear on magazine pages, they tend to be in stories about philanthropy, charity events or travel.

In Esquire, the only two dark-skinned Mexicans in the issue appeared in content about an entrepreneurship program.

In Vanity Fair México, we found only one indigenous child in content about an educational charity, and three other dark-skinned Mexican people at an event with the president and first lady of Mexico.

In Quién, Indigenous activist Eufrosina Cruz is one of the few dark-skinned people in the magazine and appears dressed in traditional Zapotec clothing.

In Vanidades, the only dark-skinned people in the issue are three Indigenous people in a story on the celebration of Day of the Dead in Spain.

In Marie Claire México, the majority of the dark-skinned people appear in a photo feature about Havana, Cuba.

The rest of the brown and black people appearing in the magazines are non-Mexican celebrities or political figures, like Beyoncé and Barack Obama.



The article tries to blame the magazine editors, but I would say that editors are just pragmatically doing whatever helps to sell their magazines. Supply follows demand. The real problem lies with the consumers, who are still traumatically mindfucked from the colonial era. Change how the consumers view the world, and the magazine photos will change by themselves as a consequence of market forces.

---

Same results as the Doll Tests:

www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/05/24/726129132/how-disney-princesses-influence-girls-around-the-world

Quote
Uppal has been studying the effects of Disney princesses on girls internationally since 2009. In a world where Disney's TV channels are broadcast in 133 countries, and its films and merchandise pervade even more, she wanted to see how girls of different nationalities perceived the idea of a princess.

Between 2009 and 2018, she asked nearly 140 girls to draw a princess. They were ages 8 to 15 and lived in five countries — the U.S., China, Fiji, India and Sweden. She then conducted private, 10-to-15-minute interviews with each girl, with questions like, "Who is a princess?" and "What age did you start watching Disney princess films?" and "Do you think you could be a princess?" Most girls said they had been watching Disney films since before they could remember.

Her latest study, published in March in the journal Social Sciences, analyzed 63 princess drawings from girls in Fiji, India and Sweden. In this sample, nearly every drawing — 61 out of 63 — depicted a light-skinned princess, many of those resembling Disney characters. Fijian girls drew multiple Ariels; Indian girls drew Belles and Sleeping Beauties. Not one girl drew a princess in her country's traditional garb.

"We didn't say, 'Draw a Disney princess.' We said, 'Draw a princess,' " Uppal says. "In India, they didn't draw a single girl in a sari, or in Fiji a sulu chamba [traditional Fijian garb]."

Additionally, some girls from non-Western nations — India, Fiji and China — said in their interviews with Uppal that they could not be a princess because their skin was too dark and they were not beautiful enough.
...
Since the introduction of Jasmine in 1992, four young women of color have been added to the company's official princess lineup: Pocahontas, Moana, Tiana and Mulan.

"The newer princesses of color have definitely expanded the vision of what constitutes a princess," Hains says.

But Uppal says her report would indicate that this new wave of diverse princesses "has not replaced images of popular white princesses in Disney that have a much older and global presence." Most girls surveyed preferred the "classic," white princesses to Mulan and Jasmine.
...
Of course, Disney is not solely responsible for white and Western notions of beauty: Both Fiji and India were colonized for many decades, ingraining the concept of whiteness-as-beauty before Disney products ever reached their shores. But Uppal's findings show that Disney may bolster these notions, Hains says.

"It's another data point that reinforces these stereotypes and harmful beliefs about who's good enough and who can be considered beautiful."

One reason why the girls prefer the "classic" princesses is because Disney itself added the "diverse" princesses purely for the sake of "diversity", not because it genuinely felt inspired by them. And the girls can sense this:

Quote
Asked by Uppal about the origins of princesses like Jasmine and Mulan, a number of girls in India and Fiji maintained these princesses were "American," not from the Middle East or China as the movies portray.

They can tell the difference between authentic characters and PC quota characters, and will understandably feel uncomfortable with the latter. The very need for Disney to quota-insert precisely one princess of each "non-white" ethnicity, amidst a conspicuous supermajority of "white" princesses, sends an obvious signal that the "non-white" princesses have nothing to offer beyond ethnic tokenism, whereas the "white" princesses are the ones that - PC aside - Disney actually wants to feature. The girls interviewed are merely picking up on this patronization.

What Disney - an American company - should have is 0% of its princesses from Old World fairytales, and 100% of its princesses from New World fairytales. We do not care about "diversity". We care about rejecting Eurocentrism.

---

Found this account on Instagram, that exposes modern-day psychological and social colonisation that are still committed these days by Westerners, particularly in my motherland Indonesia :

instagram.com/bulerasis?igshid=ph9yflvprbla

---

Here is an example of the kind of behaviour that "whites" can get away with in a psychologically colonized country:

nypost.com/video/shocking-video-shows-daycare-worker-smacking-kids/

Quote
A teacher at an English-language daycare in Kitakyushu, Japan, was filmed allegedly hitting, grabbing, throwing and abusing small children. A co-worker secretly filmed the Canadian teacher appearing to mistreat the students on several occasions. The teacher was suspended for misconduct, but no charges have been filed yet.

Also, WTF does "filmed allegedly hitting..." mean? It's already on film FFS!

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEeGLzGgRm4

The irony at the end when they talk about how they have now learned to be proud of how they look, even though most of them have dyed hair.....

And let's be honest: by absolute standards, they are ugly. What makes them psychologically colonized is that they think it's their "non-whiteness" making them ugly, when in reality it is their bad genes. The solution is not to tell them they are beautiful (as many False Left commenters attempt to) because that is just untrue. The True Left solution is to teach them to start noticing the obvious: that most "whites" are just as ugly (if not more so).

The following is what goes on inside Eurocentric minds. When you tell them to imagine a generic "white" person, they automatically imagine an aesthetically idealized "white" person. Whereas when you tell them to imagine a generic [insert "non-white" ethnicity here] person, they automatically imagine an aesthetically mediocre [insert "non-white" ethnicity here] person. In other words, they let an idealized stereotype represent their image of "whites" in general, and mediocre stereotypes represent their image of "non-whites" in general. Once this double-standard is in place, then when they see average/below-average "white" people in real-life, they perceive merely flawed versions of the idealized "white" stereotype (therefore still fundamentally beautiful in their minds). Whereas when they see above-average "non-white" people in real-life, they perceive either merely upgrades of the mediocre [insert "non-white" ethnicity here] stereotype (therefore still fundamentally ugly in their minds), or - worse - partial resemblance to the idealized "white" stereotype (therefore beautiful in their minds, but only because they "look white"(!!!), instead of realizing that the beauty comes from resemblance to the ideal, not resemblance to the "whiteness", and it is Eurocentrism which spuriously superposed the "whiteness" over the ideal inside their own minds).

They often are not consciously aware of this. What we are here to do is help people first become conscious of this, and then get rid of this conditioned perception.

---

This is how bad the Eurocentrism is:

www.rt.com/news/467369-unidentified-leader-reporter-tweet-uproar/

Quote
The AP’s six-year veteran White House reporter Darlene Superville has triggered a backlash in Africa and drawn the ire of many on Twitter after referring to South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa as an “unidentified leader.”
...
“Compounding the blooper, she's a black woman who recognizes white men from their backs, not black men's faces…”
...
Superville then tweeted the same pictures again some 18 hours after the tweetstorm began, without apology, leaving countless irate South Africans fuming.

Does the reverse ever happen? Why not? (We all know why not.....)

---

www.reddit.com/r/JustBeWhite/comments/d4jzey/the_privilege_of_being_blonde_in_mexico/

Quote
In Mexico there are many begger children, kids who beg on the streets for money. Everyone is aware of them, and no one does anything, they just pass by them on their car. One day a blonde haired girl was photographed on the streets begging for change, a guy took a photo of her, and the Mexican media went into a frenzy trying to "rescue" her. After everything was settled she was given donations.

I'm not saying this particular girl should not have received charity, of course. But should not all the other beggar children also receive charity from those willing to help this girl? What the **** is going on inside people's heads? (Answer: Eurocentrism.)

This reminds me of an older story:

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2476772/DNA-test-confirms-Bulgarian-woman-IS-natural-mother-blonde-haired-Maria.html

Again, a "white"-looking child in poverty was caught on camera and the media instantly freaked out. As if "non-white" children in poverty is no big deal, but a "white" child in poverty is an emergency that requires instant investigation (including DNA testing!).

---

www.yahoo.com/news/why-black-puerto-ricans-choose-130945476.html

Quote
More than three-quarters of Puerto Ricans identified as white on the last census, even though much of the population on the island has roots in Africa. That number is down from 80% 20 years ago, but activists and demographers say it is still inaccurate and they are working to get more Puerto Ricans of African descent to identify as black on the next census in an effort to draw attention to the island’s racial disparities.

All residents of Puerto Rico can select “Yes, Puerto Rican” on the census to indicate their Hispanic origin. But when it comes to race, residents must choose among “white,” “black,” “American Indian,” multiple options for Asian heritage, or they can write something in. Most Puerto Ricans choose “white.”
...
Bárbara I. Abadía-Rexach, a sociology professor at the University of Puerto Rico and a member of Colectivo Ilé, was shocked when she learned how many Puerto Ricans identified as white on the last census.
...
“There are people that don’t want to use the word black because they think it’s an insult, and there is still that idea that we need to ‘better the race,’” Abadía-Rexach said, referring to mejorar la raza, a popular saying in Latin American countries that suggests light skin is more desirable than dark skin.

And the punchline:

Quote
Centuries ago, a policy known as gracias al sacar allowed black Puerto Ricans with mixed racial heritage to petition Spain to be reclassified as white for a fee.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKvleI4Uj10

Does this work the other way round? No. Why not? Eurocentrism.

"Whites" in formerly colonized countries get all kinds of special favours for being fluent in the local language (on top of the favours they already get just for being "white"), whereas "non-whites" in former colonial powers are expected to be fluent in the local language just to be barely tolerated.

The underlying message is that the colonized feels flattered that the colonizer deigned to learn the local language, which is a self-declaration of subservience, which is why it only happens one way round. This subservient mentality is what we are here to end.

---

incels.co/threads/chinese-ai-rates-a-white-woman-93-100-placing-her-above-all-asian-women.171652/

The woman:

incels.co/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F170817010758-elle-reeve-vice-news-thumb.jpg&hash=2befe9a18b1865822c40236b71f9ee05

Anyone still disbelieve how bad the Eurocentrism is?
« Last Edit: July 09, 2020, 04:05:10 am by 90sRetroFan »

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2020, 04:14:12 am »
OLD CONTENT contd.

Beardneck foreigner (likely sexpat) shoves "asian" youtuber in Korea in a failed attempt to impress girls:
www.reddit.com/r/hapas/comments/6gn77c/beardneck_foreigner_in_korea_shoves_hapa_terrytv/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT21ISjZ9QA

Why do the local police tolerate such behavior?

I recall another video (although I can't seem to find it now) where there was a similar foreigner in Japan who was playing his music loudly in a bar, and when the police arrived and told him to stop he proceeded to tell off the police. The police just stood idly by and did nothing.

---

"Why do the local police tolerate such behavior?"

They are psychologically colonized, therefore still behave as if all "whites" are colonialists who are above the law.

---

Here is an old enemy article that elucidates what is going on inside the colonized mind of the author (David Yeagley, "non-white" Eurocentrist):

vdare.com/articles/what-s-up-with-white-women-and-white-men

Quote
This article came about as the result of a simple exchange between myself and a white female student, back when I was teaching at Oklahoma State University (Oklahoma City campus).
...
"Look at your culture," she said to me. "Look at American Indian tradition. Now I think that's really great. You have something to be proud of. My culture is nothing."
...
Her words disturbed and offended me in a way that I could not quite enunciate.

I could hardly concentrate the rest of the day. I lay awake that night thinking about what she had said.
...
On the one hand, I was proud to say that it took the greatest culture in the world to defeat the Indians. But, on the other hand, if this young heiress of America considered her own culture to be “nothing”, then what did that say of mine

In other words, all possibility that his own culture is superior to the colonizers' culture has already been eliminated inside Yeagley's mind. Therefore the only way he can cope is to imagine his colonizers' culture to be so great that even inferiority to it is not shameful. Thus, when someone looks down on the colonizers, even though that same person admires his culture, his mind is incapable of processing this information to reach the correct conclusion (that the colonizers are the inferior ones). Instead, he is compelled to defend the narrative of the colonizers' superiority in order to preserve his own slavish "pride".

Quote
I believe in my Comanche people. I know that someday we'll stand as equals before the white man, strong, prosperous and self-sufficient. But we won't get there by listening to empty praise from guilty white women. We'll get there by studying the white man's ways and learning to be strong as he is."

The absolute best he is capable of envisioning is being equal to "whites". Have you ever seen a more pathetic creature than Yeagley? (And worse, you can tell that he thinks what he wrote sounds cool.)

---

Sad! You have proven to me things are much, much worse, than I had ever imagined. Holy cow! Yeagley has clearly never taken the time to imagine what a world without western colonialism may have looked like, or a better world for that matter. That is also sad, especially for a teacher. To fall in love with a barbarian, talk about Stockholm syndrome! What do you think the things Yeagley would list as to why western culture is superior to American Indian culture if he were asked?

---

At least more people want to turn things around now!

https://www.instagram.com/p/CA0jSaRhQ1O/?utm_source=ig_embed

---

"I have seen a lot of these “I used to be Eurocentric” type tweets. What do you make of them? Is it a case of the subject actually gaining self esteem, or are they merely attempting to convince themselves of this?"

In this particular case there is no clear indication from her words that she is no longer Eurocentric. She could have merely personally given up trying to look "whiter", but this does not imply that her tastes have changed (in the same way that many incels who have personally given up lifting weights still believe that a heavily muscular physique is superior). The way I interpret her words, it appears she claims to have been bullied for her skin colour and hence at one stage tried to lighten her skin colour, though that has ended. This is a sign of low self-esteem to begin with. (Whereas if she had said something like: "Being bullied for my skin color made me give up trying to lighten it as I was doing before the bullying started", I would be more optimistic.) Furthermore, if she truly regrets trying to lighten her skin previously (as she would if she were ashamed of her former Eurocentrism), why isn't she now tanning with the other girls in order to cancel out her previous efforts?

---

1010wins.radio.com/articles/johnson-johnson-to-stop-selling-skin-whitening-creams

Quote
According to a spokeswoman, it will stop selling Clean & Clear Fairness line of products sold in India, and earlier in the month, it was reported it would also pull its Neutrogena Fine Fairness line, available in Asia and the Middle East.

"Conversations over the past few weeks highlighted that some product names or claims on our dark spot reducer products represent fairness or white as better than your own unique skin tone," Johnson & Johnson said. "This was never our intention – healthy skin is beautiful skin."

As I always say, withdrawing supply only leads to the vaccuum being filled by someone else willing to provide supply. Removing demand is the only true solution.

---

https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/fashion-beauty/article/3090015/asia-reacts-skin-whitening-creams-withdrawal-pure-racism

Quote
Johnson & Johnson has decided to stop selling skin-whitening creams popular in Asia and the Middle East, after such products have come under renewed social pressure in recent weeks amid a global debate about racial inequality. The company will stop selling its Clean & Clear fairness line of products, sold in India, a spokeswoman told Reuters. It was reported earlier this month that it would drop its Neutrogena Fine Fairness line, available in Asia and the Middle East. Reactions to Johnson & Johnson’s decision on social media ranged from the incredulous to the supportive. “Pure racism and sexism towards Asian women. Our rights as [an] ethnic minority are being infringed [upon],” wrote a commenter based in Hong Kong. “Her body her choice,” wrote a social media user on Twitter, while another said: “A disgrace. If people want to buy them, they have a right to do it.”

---

So businesses cannot decide what products to sell?! This is how Eurocentrism fucks up people's thinking.

---

"This really isn't specific to the thread's main idea, but whenever I'm near those who appear to be "Asian" (East Asian, from my guesses), I can feel how terrified they are of me. It could just be my paranoia, but especially in supermarkets. In the area I live in, they aren't common civilians, but I just remember strictly an incident where I was at a supermarket in the aisle, and this Asian woman looked very wary and kept her child super close to her when she was near me. I also remember visiting a considerably wealthy area near the coast that had a beach. We went on to beach and I could literally sense that we were being stared at or watched, like we weren't supposed to be there. Surprisingly, I never really endure much ethnic profiling from whites because the part of the state I live in has a high density of minorities, which warrants more tension between these groups. Actually, I experience more racism from other minorities (online) than white people. It's super strange."

Firstly, please use "" around "Asian". "Asia" only exists in Western minds.

Secondly, her behaviour is almost certainly an example of Eurocentrism at work, which is what we are here to end. You should ask her whether it was your co-ethnics who colonized her co-ethnics in the past. And yet the actual colonizing ethnicities are probably the ones she ironically has no wariness towards at all. That is what is so **** up about this whole situation.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2020, 04:46:22 am by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2020, 04:25:15 am »
Earlier we had already seen signs of Uncle Tom behaviour from Christian Cooper:

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/christian-cooper-amy-cooper-cnn-200302542.html

Quote
Christian Cooper told CNN’s Don Lemon on Tuesday that he didn’t want to make a situation worse and said as offensive as the woman’s actions, people should remain civil.

“I am told there has been death threats and that is wholly inappropriate and abhorrent and should stop immediately,” he said. “I find it strange that people who were upset that ... that she tried to bring death by cop down on my head, would then turn around and try to put death threats on her head. Where is the logic in that?

(The logic is simple: retribution. You "find it strange" only because you are psychologically colonized. It is because of people like you that racists get away with as much as they do. By defending your own tormentor, you not only betray yourself, but become culpable for all her subsequent victims. Thus you are part of the problem. If you do not shape up soon, any true anti-racist will be only too happy to shoot through you to hit the one you are protecting.)

Well, he's still doing it! And this time he's against not just vigilante justice, but also state justice!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/case-against-amy-cooper-lacks-120946692.html

Quote
The Manhattan district attorney’s decision to charge a white woman with filing a false police report against a Black man in Central Park does not have the support of one key person: the victim himself.

The man, Christian Cooper, has not cooperated with the prosecution’s investigation. The woman, Amy Cooper, lost her job and was publicly shamed after a video Christian Cooper made on May 25 was posted online; it showed her calling 911 to claim an “African American man” was threatening her. Those consequences alone, Christian Cooper said at the time, were in his view perhaps too much punishment.

“On the one hand, she’s already paid a steep price,” Christian Cooper said in a statement on Tuesday. “That’s not enough of a deterrent to others? Bringing her more misery just seems like piling on.” But he added that he understood there was a greater principle at stake and that this should be defended. “So if the DA feels the need to pursue charges, he should pursue charges. But he can do that without me.”

This is how you recognize total psychological colonization. This is identical to the above-noted behaviour of "non-white" police officers in formerly colonized countries letting "white" (and only "white") tourists/foreign workers/etc. break the law with impunity.

And Cooper isn't the only Uncle Tom around either:

Quote
City Councilman Donovan J. Richards, D-Queens, who chairs the public safety committee, said that he was not overjoyed to hear that charges had been brought against Amy Cooper. For him, the matter was complicated.

“I don’t think any of us are celebrating the fact that she was arrested,” said Richards, who is Black. “I’m hoping at the end of the day she learned her lesson and that this is a teachable moment for folks — that they can’t just call 911 and put people’s lives in danger just because their privilege is being checked.”

For Eurocentrists like Cooper and Richards, their motivation for anti-racism is itself Eurocentric: they want these "whites" to one day learn to stop seeing "non-whites" as inferior, whereupon they themselves can then at last enjoy the validation as equals coming from these same "whites", which they have longed for. This validation, and nothing else, is what really matters to them. This is why they are so obsessed with teaching "white" racists to not be racist (which is impossible, by the way), instead of simply wanting to exterminate racists as we do. Being told by other "non-whites" that "non-whites" are not inferior is not satisfying to them. It has to be "whites" unanimously telling them that "non-whites" are not inferior in order for them to feel non-inferior, so low is their self-esteem.

Which in itself proves their inferiority (not necessarily compared to "whites", but compared to non-Eurocentrists).
« Last Edit: July 09, 2020, 06:35:15 am by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2020, 11:25:59 am »
More Eurocentric denial from an account I mentioned previously on Pro-Boards
https://twitter.com/yuktaxkulkarni/status/1285767897676222465?s=20
Quote
yukta @yuktaxkulkarni 13h
my children will not grow up hating themselves or who they are like i did.

Yeah, sure fam. Your children will magically be immune from the Eurocentrism they inherit from you. **** you.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2020, 11:27:32 am by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2020, 12:17:39 am »
Another aspect of Eurocentrism is that multiethnic Eurocentrists always try to emphasize their "white" side and downplay their "non-white" side:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/hispanic-activist-upset-monuments-removal-143802170.html

Quote
RIO RANCHO, N.M. — A New Mexico Hispanic leader upset about the removal of Spanish conquistador monuments is pushing for New Mexico to end its support for Chicano and Native American Studies.

In a letter to University of New Mexico President Garnett Stokes, New Mexico League of United Latin American Citizens executive director Ralph Arellanes wrote that the state’s largest university should dismantle both programs because they teach Latino students “self-hate” about their Spanish heritage.

Should children conceived from **** not hate their rapist parent's bloodline?

Quote
The demand comes as Albuquerque and the small community of Alcalde removed statues of Spanish conquistadors following racial injustice protests. Some Native Americans in New Mexico have long objected to the public glorification of Spanish conquistadors like Don Juan de Oñate, who they blamed for violence and enslavement of some Indigenous populations during the region’s Spanish colonial period.

But some Hispanic activists, like Arellanes, who trace their family linage to early Spanish settlers, regularly celebrate Oñate and other similar figures.

We should treat Arellanes the same way we would treat the conquistadors themselves.



rp

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2020, 12:34:40 am »
“Emphasize their ‘white’ side”
Yes. And when non-Eurocentric POC (I.e. “blacks”) justifiably accuse them of being Eurocentric, these POC in turn accuse them of “dividing the movement”. It is no coincidence that these types are also reproductive Eurocentrists.

This is why I am sympathetic to, for example, “blacks” who criticize “mixed” race POC for being Eurocentric, as well as other POC (such as “Asians” and “Latinos) who try to “act white”, which is what their criticism is primarily directed at, rather than those ethnicities themselves. Remember the Ice Cube song “Black Korea” you were talking about earlier? The same dynamic applies here. It will also help weed out the reproductive Eurocentrists who will inevitably show their true colors.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2020, 12:41:50 am by rp »

rp

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2020, 12:50:21 am »
“Should children conceived from **** not hate their rapist parent's bloodline?”

Those that do not should not reproduce. It is worth noting that Jewish owned “black” online magazines like “The Root” have published slave/master “fantasy fiction” that actively encourages female “blacks” to sexually eroticize slave masters. Yet these same publications shame “black” men as being “misogynistic” for wanting relationships with other “black” women. I intend to elaborate on this in the “reproductive decolonization thread” once you have posted the old content.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2020, 05:43:35 am »
"these POC in turn accuse them of “dividing the movement”."

In the case of "Latin" Eurocentrists, some think of "the movement" in the US as merely being about replacing the "white" Anglo elite (including Anglo Jews) with a similarly "white" Hispanic elite (including Hispanic Jews).....

"It is no coincidence that these types are also reproductive Eurocentrists."

Exactly. Except here they don't even care about Anglo vs Hispanic anymore..... If anything they might even prefer Anglo, because Hispanic (regardless of how blond) is assumed to carry a fraction of New World blood (which is what they want to get rid of whether or not they admit it).....

"“mixed” race POC"

Do you mean multiethnic, or are you really talking about mixed Aryan/non-Aryan POC?

(I actually have a racial theory of Eurocentrism (in addition to colonialism causing Eurocentrism). I currently suspect that, among prehistoric Gentiles, Giants would have been considered superior (e.g. on account of physical size, sexual dimorphism, etc.). On the other hand, among prehistoric Aryans, there would have been no particular reason to consider Aesir etc. superior, since their Golden Age was not better than the Golden Age elsewhere. So when present-day "non-whites" worship "whites", it would be a function of their Gentile blood memory. Based on my anecdotal observations of individuals, Eurocentrism does seem less frequent (or weaker in manifestation) among "non-whites" with noticeable Aryan traits, though as always there are exceptions.)

rp

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2020, 09:52:27 am »
"Do you mean multiethnic, or are you really talking about mixed Aryan/non-Aryan POC?"
I meant multiethnic, hence why I put "mixed" in quotes. Specifically those with one "white" and "non-white" parent who try to downplay their "non-white" ancestry.

"So when present-day "non-whites" worship "whites", it would be a function of their Gentile blood memory."
Yes. This is why some women were sexually attracted to the conquistadors, because they saw them as "worthy conquerors" (LOL). In Gentile culture, "worthy conquest" seems to be synonymous with ****, pillage, and plunder.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2020, 12:02:48 pm by rp »

rp

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #9 on: July 25, 2020, 11:03:38 am »
Also, regarding the term POC, I have no issue with the term itself, but I can understand why some "black" nationalists might have an issue with it. This is because Jews have introduced many categories within "POC" such as latino, asian, etc. that effectively creates a hierarchy within this category in which "white" adjacent groups, such as "white" latinos, "model minority" asians, and "mixed" ethnicity "blacks" are given precedence over "blacks", who are placed at the bottom of the hierarchy. They do this because they recognize the former group is more easily manipulable toward Zionist interests than the latter group, as they will do anything to gain brownie points from "whites".

What do you think? Should the POC term be discarded in favor of something like "non-whites", or should we simply take aim at the extra categories and attempt to get rid of them? I recommend both approaches.

Penny For Your Thoughts

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #10 on: July 25, 2020, 11:20:39 am »
It is best to eliminate all the extra groups under the label of PoC to stop them from jockeying for status vis-a-vis each other, especially for status dispensed by the ruling system. People should be made to see that the enemy is the ruling system and shitting on others to curry the favor of Jewish masters only makes them a collaborator at the end of the day.

As for changing the name, the label "non-white" is the implict assumption already of the label "people of color", if I am not mistaken, so changing the name is not of so much importance as removing the internal subdivisions.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #11 on: July 26, 2020, 12:25:52 am »
"Should the POC term be discarded in favor of something like "non-whites""

Yes, which is why I use "non-white" all the time, but "POC" only reluctantly when someone else has used it first, and even then try to convert it to "non-white" when an opportunity arises.

POC is a stupid name as it implies "whites" somehow lack "colour" which is obviously untrue. At worst it reinforces the gaslighting that "whites" actually have white skin, something which far too many people still believe despite seeing otherwise with their own eyes every day.



"White" Carlson's skin colour is obviously more distant from optical white than "non-white" Omar's and Duckworth's skin colours.



"Non-white" Navarro vs "white" Thiessen - same phenomenon as above.



"Non-white" AOC vs "white" Yoho - same phenomenon again.

That something like this even needs to be explicitly pointed out is a sign of how psychologically powerful Eurocentrism is. But pointing it out is the start of pushing back.

Bonus video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1fl9U5gq2U
« Last Edit: July 26, 2020, 12:49:12 am by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #12 on: July 26, 2020, 01:27:21 am »
OLD CONTENT

“Argues that some people shouldn’t be in the debate because they’re the wrong skin color”, says Carlson, referring to Congressman Cedric Richmond’s statement about how “white” people cannot relate to “black” experiences.

LMFAO. Carlson does not even realize the irony of that statement considering this is Carlson’s skin color:



---

What colour skin is this?



Is Trump's skin closer to the colour of his shirt collar or the colour of the wall behind his left shoulder? (If you are having difficulties, please make use of the NBC logo behind his right shoulder for reference.)

And no, it's not just Trump either:



Do you see any non-Trump skin here which is closer in colour to Trump's/Pence's shirt collars (or even Pence's hair/Bolton's moustache) than to Trump's skin?

Let's try a non-politician:



Hogan's moustache is roughly the same colour as the dog, the ceramics and his cap, all of which are within the casual range of white (though only the drink can is strictly white). His skin, on the other hand.....

Let's go outside the US too:



What skin colour is this? (Hint: compare with background poster colours.)





Why is Kurz better camouflaged in the second picture than the first?

Putin, on the other hand, is a camouflage expert:



Is the wall behind Putin white? (Hint: compare with his shirt.) So what does that make Putin's skin?

---

Skin Colour Analysis, "White Lives Matter" edition:





I only see a white sky.



I only see white T-shirts.



I only see a white phone.

---



Quote
You know, as a quote-unquote rich, white, Christian male, people look at me a certain way.

I am looking at you in a way that includes thinking: "If the colour of your skin is white, what colour is the wall behind you?" (And of course you are not a Christian, you **** racist.)

---

Quote
To be "white" in the first place requires a suspension of objective reality; you have to willingly deceive yourself to accept the membership card for the "White Club." You have to look in the mirror and see a complexion that is nowhere near "white" and say, "I'm white," and it is at that point that you're ready to believe anything else no matter how absurd. No human being is colored white, nor even comes close to the color white. - JAM
« Last Edit: July 26, 2020, 01:36:05 am by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #13 on: July 26, 2020, 01:42:41 am »
By the way, Regis Philbin just died:



Yep, skin same colour as Trump (and their neckties). Definitely not the same colour as their shirts.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2020, 11:48:26 pm by 90sRetroFan »