Author Topic: Psychological decolonization  (Read 7211 times)

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2298
    • View Profile
Re: Psychological decolonization
« Reply #30 on: May 12, 2021, 08:46:10 am »
"I increasingly suspect that Eurocentrism is at least partially genetic."

So it seems to a product of Paleolithic Gentile blood (Vanavasi?) as opposed to Turanian blood. I was thinking Turanian because the girls' father is an Islamophobe and also sexist, and from the Turanized Indian state of Gujurat. But then I found out that his family were not natives of the state, but had immigrated from the (less Turanized) state of Maharashtra. His dietary habits are also remarkably similar to the cousin I mentioned in the "Inbreeding" thread, i.e. he was initially born into a vegetarian family but now consumes meat.:

"Given that present day Aryan individuals frequently are the only one in their entire known family"

However, even here the inferior descendants would be able to mask their ignobility as it is possible they are merely adopting vegetarianism out of social pressure. In this case, it is better for such individuals to not reproduce. One of my cousins, for example, despite belonging to the same vegetarian clan as myself, regularly consumes meat and has even taken up hunting! However, it is only because he is unmarried that he pursues these activities openly, whereas if he were married, his ignoble blood would stealthily be passed on as he could pretend to be noble merely for social purposes.

Hence, with the removal of the social pressure to reproduce in order to "save the clan", my ignoble cousin has effectively been weeded out from the gene pool.

The cousin in question has a very Gentile looking appearance and is also very dark in complexion, the latter of which I would say minimizes the possibility of Turanian ancestry. So it seems to me that children born out of endogamous marriages within vegetarian clans but who nevertheless choose to consume meat are most likely doing so because of their Paleolithic Gentile blood. This could be because certain non-Aryan recessive genes that were not expressed in previous generations are being expressed now, which substantiates your claim that endogamy does not ensure Aryan offspring. What bears further investigation is how this Gentile blood even came to exist in the endogamous clan in the first place.

Also, for the record, the girl I mentioned as denigrating "Arabs" in front of her "White" friends was actually posting on Twitter what she previously heard from her "White" friends IRL, but then also added a laughing emoji to illustrate agreement. Moreover, the fact she posted it on Twitter means she actively knew, and perhaps even wanted, her "White" friends to see it. So we cannot say she was merely a passive bystander who just "went along" with what her "White" friends were doing.

So my original description of the incident still applies, hence why I did not think to add this detail in the original post.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2021, 11:24:21 am by rp »