True Left

Our enemies discuss the phenomenon of reproductive Eurocentrism:

https://www.unz.com/book/wilmot_robertson__the-dispossessed-majority/

Even the most committed racial equalitarian can hardly deny that the physical traits of the idealized Nordic stereotype are deemed desirable by most whites and many nonwhites.[1] The current sociological line, partly derived from Marxism, is that these traits are not favored because of an inborn or universal aesthetic preference, but because they are typical of the dominant population group and ipso facto bestow higher social status upon their possessors.

It is not difficult to find holes in the materialistic theory of aesthetics. The first documented evidence of blondism is an Egyptian wall painting of a daughter of Cheops, Queen Hetep-Heres II.[2] If one of the earliest and greatest Egyptian pharaohs had a blond daughter, both he and his wife must have had some blond genes.[3] Blondness, consequently, must have been attractive or prestigious as far back as 3075 B.C. in a highly civilized land of brunet Mediterraneans and never ruled, as far as anyone knows, by a blond race.
...
Of the medieval Caliphate of Cordova it has been written, “Most of the Caliphs were fair or ginger-haired with blue eyes,”[9] a coloration perhaps due to intermarriage with the earlier Visigothic nobility.

While I believe that the history of Western colonialism has contributed to present-day Eurocentrism, I have also theorized before that there is a heritable factor that causes non-Giant Gentiles to consider Giants to be superior to other Gentiles:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/psychological-decolonization/msg6339/#msg6339

and hence "non-white" individuals with Gentile blood memory would want to reproduce with "whites" in order to acquire the Giant blood for their offspring. This would adequately account for pre-colonial-era Eurocentrism.

Although the Majority is in the descendant, the most up-and-coming minority males seem driven to marry or seek out the company of Majority females. For proof one has only to look at the couples who throng the most expensive nightclubs, restaurants, and resort hotels. Moreover the Nordic physical ideal has not only been the marriage ideal of the minority “New Rich” in America, but of European social climbers for at least a thousand years.

Social climbers are aggressive types, thus likely to have less Aryan blood. What I am still waiting for is a survey of exclusively non-aggressive types to see if blond-worship is indeed weaker among them than among the aggressive types, as I was wondering all the way back here:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/reproductive-decolonization/msg2343/#msg2343

The first question which I would ask is: does the poor brother actually have the same aesthetical tastes as the rich brother? We do not know for sure that he does. Sailer (being a rightist) presumes he does, but might there be a positive correlation between aggressive personality (as described as possessed by the rich brother) and blonde obsession? If there is, and hence if the poor brother (who would tend to have a less aggressive personality) would not prefer a blonde wife even if he could attract one, then we are dealing with a simpler problem.

Back to enemy article:

Orientals of all sizes and shapes are greatly attracted to blondes

Is it really "all sizes and shapes", though? I would be willing to bet that gracile types would be less attracted to blondes than robust types.