True Left

"Between 1930s and 1940s, Nazi Germany researched and built operational ballistic missiles capable of suborbital spaceflight.

There was widespread support for animal welfare in Nazi Germany[1] (German: Tierschutz im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland) among the country's leadership. Adolf Hitler and his top officials took a variety of measures to ensure animals were protected.[2]

Several Nazis were environmentalists, and species protection and animal welfare were significant issues in the Nazi regime.[3] Heinrich Himmler made an effort to ban the hunting of animals.[4] Hermann Göring was a professed animal lover and conservationist,[5] who, on instructions from Hitler, committed Germans who violated Nazi animal welfare laws to concentration camps. In his private diaries, Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels described Hitler as a vegetarian whose hatred of the Jewish and Christian religions in large part stemmed from the ethical distinction these faiths drew between the value of humans and the value of other animals; Goebbels also mentions that Hitler planned to ban slaughterhouses in the German Reich following the conclusion of World War II.[6]

The current animal welfare laws in Germany were initially introduced by the Nazis.[7]
...
the Nazis rejected anthropocentric reasons for animal protection—animals were to be protected for their own sake.[9] In 1927, a Nazi representative to the Reichstag called for actions against cruelty to animals and kosher butchering.[8]

In 1931, the Nazi Party (then a minority in the Reichstag) proposed a ban on vivisection, but the ban failed to attract support from other political parties. By 1933, after Hitler had ascended to the Chancellery and the Nazis had consolidated control of the Reichstag, the Nazis immediately held a meeting to enact the ban on vivisection. On April 21, 1933, almost immediately after the Nazis came to power, the parliament began to pass laws for the regulation of animal slaughter.[8] On April 21, a law was passed concerning the slaughter of animals; no animals were to be slaughtered without anesthetic.

On April 24, Order of the Prussian Ministry of the Interior was enacted regarding the slaughter of poikilotherms.[10] Germany was the first nation to ban vivisection.[11] A law imposing total ban on vivisection was enacted on August 16, 1933, by Hermann Göring as the prime minister of Prussia.[12] He announced an end to the "unbearable torture and suffering in animal experiments" and said that those who "still think they can continue to treat animals as inanimate property" will be sent to concentration camps.[8] On August 28, 1933, Göring announced in a radio broadcast:[13]

An absolute and permanent ban on vivisection is not only a necessary law to protect animals and to show sympathy with their pain, but it is also a law for humanity itself.... I have therefore announced the immediate prohibition of vivisection and have made the practice a punishable offense in Prussia. Until such time as punishment is pronounced the culprit shall be lodged in a concentration camp.[13]

Lab animals giving the Nazi salute to Hermann Göring for his order to ban vivisection. Caricature from Kladderadatsch, a satirical journal, September 1933. Göring prohibited vivisection and said that those who "still think they can continue to treat animals as inanimate property" would be sent to concentration camps.[8]

Göring also banned commercial animal trapping and imposed severe restrictions on hunting. He prohibited boiling of lobsters and crabs. In one incident, he sent a fisherman to a concentration camp[13] for cutting up a bait frog.[11]

On November 24, 1933, Nazi Germany enacted another law called Reichstierschutzgesetz (Reich Animal Protection Act), for protection of animals.[14][15] This law listed many prohibitions against the use of animals, including their use for filmmaking and other public events causing pain or damage to health,[16] feeding fowls forcefully and tearing out the thighs of living frogs.[17] The two principals (Ministerialräte) of the German Ministry of the Interior, Clemens Giese and Waldemar Kahler, who were responsible for drafting the legislative text,[15] wrote in their juridical comment from 1939, that by the law the animal was to be "protected for itself" ("um seiner selbst willen geschützt"), and made "an object of protection going far beyond the hitherto existing law" ("Objekt eines weit über die bisherigen Bestimmungen hinausgehenden Schutzes").[18]

On February 23, 1934, a decree was enacted by the Prussian Ministry of Commerce and Employment which introduced education on animal protection laws at primary, secondary and college levels.[10] On 3 July 1934, a law Das Reichsjagdgesetz (The Reich Hunting Law) was enacted which limited hunting. The act also created the German Hunting Society with a mission to educate the hunting community in ethical hunting. July 1, 1935, another law Reichsnaturschutzgesetz (Reich Nature Conservation Act) was passed to protect nature.[15] According to an article published in Kaltio, one of the main Finnish cultural magazines, Nazi Germany was the first state in the world to place the wolf under protection.[19] Nazi Germany "introduced the first legislation for the protection of wolves."[20]

In 1934, Nazi Germany hosted an international conference on animal welfare in Berlin.[21] On March 27, 1936, an order on the slaughter of living fish and other poikilotherms was enacted. On March 18 the same year, an order was passed on afforestation and on protection of animals in the wild.[10] On September 9, 1937, a decree was published by the Ministry of the Interior which specified guidelines for the transportation of animals.[22] In 1938, the Nazis introduced animal protection as a subject to be taught in public schools and universities in Germany.[21]

In 2010, there were over 445 million chickens on Russian farms. 77 percent of these were on agricultural enterprises (as opposed to households and peasant farms), up from 68 percent in 2005.[2]

A similar trend towards agricultural enterprises in pig farming was observed: from 2005 to 2010, agricultural enterprises increased pig inventories from 7 million to 11 million while rural households decreased from 6 million to 5.6 million.
...
Russian chicken and pig production has increasingly moved towards an intensive farming model.[2] There are no regulations on animal farming other than the general anti-cruelty provision in the Penal Code. De-beaking, de-toeing, tail-docking, tooth pulling, castration, and dehorning of livestock without anaesthetic are legal, as is confinement in gestation crates and battery cages.[1]

In 2014, Russian fishermen caught an estimated 4.215 million metric tons of wild fish.[3]
...
Testing cosmetics on animals is legal in Russia.
...
As of 2013 Russia was the world's largest fur market; 80% of Russians wear fur during the winter. It is also one of the fastest-growing markets for luxury furs.[6]

Russia is a major producer of mink, with roughly 2.7 million pelts in 2011. Russia also produced about 120,000 fox skins in 2011.[6]

Fur animals are raised on fur farms, which are unregulated except for the anti-cruelty provisions in the Penal Code, as well as trapped. The most popular form of trapping in Russia is the leg hold trap, which has been banned in 90 countries for being inhumane.[7]

I still more close towards Islamism

Transcend material existence, huh? People who have scientific and rational thinking will laugh at you if you consider that transcendence theory, or about afterlife theory is real, I don't believe in transcendence or so-called "afterlife" no every single of people prove that there is an another realm other than this world which we are live in, so no need to believe that funny and ridiculous doctrine of many spiritual religion, they are spreading liar speculation propaganda and trash, and I consider that aim to establish an utopian society is positive struggle of people to get freedom and luxury

Quote from: kameradbaren on September 10, 2021, 03:28:11 am

I still more close towards Islamism

You aren't even Muslim!

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/questions-regarding-aryanism/?message=8656

Quote from: kameradbaren on September 09, 2021, 12:45:15 am

Transcend material existence, huh? People who have scientific and rational thinking will laugh at you if you consider that transcendence theory, or about afterlife theory is real, I don't believe in transcendence or so-called "afterlife" no every single of people prove that there is an another realm other than this world which we are live in, so no need to believe that funny and ridiculous doctrine of many spiritual religion, they are spreading liar speculation propaganda and trash, and I consider that aim to establish an utopian society is positive struggle of people to get freedom and luxury

You aren't even Muslim!

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/questions-regarding-aryanism/?message=8656

And he likes wearing Western suits:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/re-dress-decolonization/msg5881/#msg5881

 

You still don't get it. Even if they had zero Jews/Jewish bloodlines, they would still be bad guys based on their behaviour alone! That you fail to understand even this further confirms your unsuitability for explaining our ideology to others.

This is your problem: you think in terms of self-interest.

You are simply not a morally minded person. If you were, you would not consider whether another country endangers your own country, but instead would consider the intrinsic quality of that country. Until you can do the latter, there is no point talking to you.

Just look at how the Native American Indians were ostracized by the "American Nation States" because they were deemed not to be American.

I like Western suits only because of it's quality and comfortable to be seen by other people, it makes me look handsome