True Left

I mean, doesn't social justice call for equality and fair treatment and the rejection of discrimination?

So what you're saying is Aryanists believe in equity, not equality.

We have no problem with atheism. The problem is the association between atheism and materialism promoted by the progressive (and hence False Left) New Atheist movement, which leads back to:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/progressive-yahwism/

They may reject the notion of a personified creator, but they in effect have the same attitude on material existence.

Instead, we recommend atheists consider Buddhism, which properly understood is a form of Gnosticism which requires no theistic assumptions. However, Western progressives have been attempting to infiltrate and subvert Buddhism (with the aim of de-Gnosticizing it) for some time now. I am looking to recruit anyone willing to defend Buddhism against this.

Agnosticism is a position of conscious uncertainty. I encourage agnostics to hypothesize each of the possibilities they are uncertain about. It should not matter which possibility is the real one; our behaviour should still be the same.

We have no problem with currently theocratic states remaining theocratic and currently secular states remaining secular. We only demand that people be allowed to migrate between them as they see fit, thereby ensuring that everyone ends up paying taxes to the type of state they themselves prefer.

I can also easily make a contribution to that task over on my website. While I consider myself deeply religious, I'm technically an agnostic since I never make any definitive claims myself, and I used to be an atheist in my teenage years like many people, so I understand the rationale behind it. Buddhism is my favorite of the contemporary, mainstream religions (part of why I now consider myself neo-Manichaean), so I feel much more comfortable discussing it than Islam (of course, Islam will have its place on the website as well)

Rambling side note: What's the deal with the word agnostic? I feel like following the definition, almost everybody would fundamentally be agnostic, even people who claim to believe in a god and deny being agnostic. So it feels kind of redundant. And it starts to get confusing when we factor in agnostic gnostics 

Does Aryanism support totalitarianism?

Westerners are always going to think government hindering their rights to harm, abuse, and kill others (on mass) is totalitarian. Westerners don't hate communism because it's selfish, barbaric and western, they hate it because it doesn't allow them to be selfish, barbaric or western enough.

Why do we put 'whites' in quotes but not Jews?