True Left

Supporters of democracy claim that the majority of the demos will vote for policies which benefit the majority of the demos, and therefore a democracy will implement policies which benefit the majority of the demos. We agree with this.

Colonialism benefits the colonizers.

Therefore a democracy will colonize any country too weak to pose a threat to the colonizing demos.

(As a corollary, democracy will promote invention of machines by the demos, so that other countries without such machines become weaker in comparison and thus able to be colonized without risk.)

"authoritarianism"

Democracy promotes authoritarianism among the demos. This was covered on the main site:

The essence of this tendency is best described as Western plebian hubris: a refusal to recognize the existence of a few enlightened individuals incomparably superior to everyone else in the same society and who therefore deserve absolute authority as rulers, judges and other arbitrators. ... This plebian hubris was by no means egalitarianism; on the contrary, it merely replaced the qualitative belief in the superiority of high-grade individuals worldwide over low-grade masses worldwide with an ethnocentric belief in the superiority of “white” over “non-white” regardless of grade, implying, for example, precedence of ”white” commoners over even “non-white” royalty, which provided the psychological priming for the uniquely Western phenomenon of colonialism.

""the real democracy""

They want people to compete over who can add more unnecessary products into the economy. What we are doing can be interpreted as the opposite competition: we want people to compete over who can remove more unnecessary products from the economy.

They want a competition in complexification. We want a competition in simplification.

There is no indication that Aristotle was Jewish as far as I know. However, he is from Thrace:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle#Life

Aristotle was born in 384 BC in Stagira, Chalcidice, about 55 km (34 miles) east of modern-day Thessaloniki.[10][11]

(by no coincidence the same region as Achilles, as our enemies like to emphasize:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/western-civilization-late-20th-century-pop-culture/comment-page-2/#comment-170659

Achilles, the “city destroyer” who is the ultimate symbol of an Indo-European warrior elite that was “ferociously male in its focus, with male gods and a cultivation of violence, with no great attention paid to dwellings or public buildings, but a fascination with weaponry, speed and violence.”[xxv] Even in the world of the Iliad, Achilles’ homeland in Thessaly is further north than that of any other character.

), therefore geographically speaking Aristotle is likely to have more Turanian blood than the Greek average.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thracian_horseman

Certainly, Aristotle is immensely admired in Judaism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle#On_medieval_Judaism

Moses Maimonides (considered to be the foremost intellectual figure of medieval Judaism)[178] adopted Aristotelianism from the Islamic scholars and based his Guide for the Perplexed on it and that became the basis of Jewish scholastic philosophy. Maimonides also considered Aristotle to be the greatest philosopher that ever lived, and styled him as the "chief of the philosophers".[179][180][181] Also, in his letter to Samuel ibn Tibbon, Maimonides observes that there is no need for Samuel to study the writings of philosophers who preceded Aristotle because the works of the latter are "sufficient by themselves and [superior] to all that were written before them. His intellect, Aristotle's is the extreme limit of human intellect, apart from him upon whom the divine emanation has flowed forth to such an extent that they reach the level of prophecy, there being no level higher".[182]

"That's why the refugees and the people who dislike their place of origin tend to move to the democratic West which free and advanced rather than the others. What about that?"

Of course we support people being allowed to move to wherever they want to move to! That's the whole point! We are against any country prohibiting people from emigrating, just as we are against any country prohibiting people from immigrating. No one chose where they were born, therefore everyone should get to choose where they wish to live (and pay taxes to). Anything else is initiated violence.

Our duty is to remove colonial-era influences from formerly colonized countries (to not do so is to knowingly perpetuate the violence initiated by the Western colonial powers). On the other hand, we recognize that many people in these countries will not like this. They therefore should not be forced to contribute their labour to this project. Instead, they should be allowed to emigrate to wherever they feel suits them better. (This also has the side-effect of bringing the population in the formerly colonized countries back down closer to the pre-colonization population, which is what we want anyway.)

"The liberals say that education can reduce discriminative and bad behaviour."

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/superiority-cannot-be-taught/

And even if education really can improve behaviour (as might be the case for some individuals), that would then only make it harder for us to subsequently distinguish between heritable superiority and learned superiority.

"more humane rather than how our ancestors were lived during pre-colonial era"

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/dietary-decolonization/msg5060/#msg5060

"Even the "woke" movements are easily emerged today"

Yes, today we have woke movements. In the old days we had Gnostic movements. Which are superior? This is the meaningful comparison to make if you want to compare present-day leftists with ancient leftists.

What are the differences  between Middle Platonism and neoplatonism?