Also, another thing: I see a lot of people claiming that Paul was the one who made Christianity a universal religion, and that had he not taken control of the religion, it probably would’ve remained a minor Jewish sect. And on its face, I can see where they’re coming from, because as far as I’m aware, there really isn’t much of Jesus directly preaching to non-Jews in the Bible. Some people point out how a lot of the passages talking about spreading the word to gentiles are from Paul’s texts, or the texts inspired by Paul (and attributed to him pseudepigraphically). The texts that aren’t attributed to Paul or inspired by him, have an awful lot of the “I was only sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” talk. It’s kind of hard to ignore the fact that at least in the New Testament, Jesus himself never really mentions preaching to non-Jews, but he DOES explicitly mention preaching to Jews multiple times. The farthest his interactions with non-Jews seem to go, is performing a couple miracles for them here and there.
I don’t know. I feel like the more I look into this stuff, the less faith that I have that it’s salvageable for us. The closest thing we have to a smoking gun is the Gospel of Thomas. Because it rivals the other canonical gospels in how early it was composed, so it does have credibility to its authenticity. And it’s the only text of its kind that doesn’t reference Judaism and doesn’t seem to be influenced by it. The Gospel of the Holy Twelve, I WANT to believe that it’s authentic, but the backstory behind its existence is kind of sketchy. And even if I WERE to take it at face value, it references Jewish prophets and Jewish laws and doctrines just as much as Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John do.