Since sexual dimorphism was mentioned in the Facial Aryanism topic in Human Evolution, it reminded me of this topic. Though it is also a one time attempt for kameradbaren (guest30) to debate with 90sRetroFan, I'm gonna try to coincide with the etymology of the topic's name like I did before. Here's my take.
Using voice as a measure of neoteny, Hitler is less neotenous than an average present-day woman. Whereas our racial ideal would be people whose voices do not deepen at all.
I searched to see if there are males whose voices don't deepen. Apparently there's a term called puberphonia, which is seen as a condition focused on the vocal chords instead of the person's phenotype, such as:
You can tell the patient's jaw, chin and throat is pretty slim, not to mention the minimal facial hair and that you can almost see an overbite (though I don't know how long the nose is). That is low sexual dimorphism. However, the patient wasn't too self-confident to go to an expert to higher their sexual dimorphism and deepen their voice. This it reveals the lack of cuteness in the influence of western culture, due to altering (which shares the same PIE root to 'adult' and 'altruism'). When anything is altered, the quality lowers. Majority of adults are basically altered children. Puberphonic voices in male adults top majority of the other male adults' voices in terms of neoteny and sexual dimorphism
Again, if 90sRetroFan wants to reply, thank you. Though I'd still encourage 90sRF to work on updating the Aryanism blog. I still want feedback though.