True Left

According to my observation accross the city, people with "Aryan" face shape and body type tend to live in luxury and work on high expertise job and high salary. It's mean being "Aryan" means being capitalist and materialist?

And many people with so-called "non-Aryan" face and body type tend to live in poor and frugal place, and tend to work on simple job and got minimum salary.

@90sRetroFan

In my observance most famous Nusantaran people today whose face shape is "Aryan" face shape are ideologically liberal or something leftist idea. They show their true political and way of life through their Instagram post. Most of them are celebrities, artist, social media influencer, or politicians from a party which it's ideological program are left-leaning. And their face is like youngling even tough they already 35 years old and above. Is this coincidental with Aryanism community's racial theory?

If the people with "Aryan" type were dominate on this world someday. Are they will keep procreating? Because according to you the "Aryans" are perfect human whose their body aesthetically good-looking and they are wished to be physically healthy... And they will make a new civilization after the defeat of modern civilization.

So, they will make the material world good for live but the different is without any wasteful and complex machines, so, are they keep procreating and enjoy living on the Creator's world whom we should hate? I think they will have more s*x and make more babies because they already feel perfect to each other

Perfect humans would be so neotenous as to be physically incapable of reproducing.

Hitler was so neotenous, even his vital organ reported as unable to reproduce. And indeed he doesn't wanted to reproduce. He also behave like an early child who doesn't  eat meat, always gloomy on photo, and like ranting when the conditions being not suitable to his ideals. Different to Western behaviour's norms which order people to speak correctly and alter the emotions even though it's needed to show that there are oppression around us. Because feelings are something that Westerners dislike.

This is how the not Westernized people's speak when the oppression happens : (See from minute 01 : 18 until end)

Adolf Hitler



Saddam Hussein (From 00 : 24)



Habib Mohammad Rizieq Shihab (From 01 : 20)



(He talked about spread Islamic messages, and confront the people who spread a post which against Islam on social media, or jihad on social media)

Compare them to how Westerners speak : (See from the video begin until 00 : 33)

United States's former president George Warren Bush Junior



British Queen Elizabeth



British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (See from 00 : 32 until 00 : 49)

Since sexual dimorphism was mentioned in the Facial Aryanism topic in Human Evolution, it reminded me of this topic. Though it is also a one time attempt for kameradbaren (guest30) to debate with 90sRetroFan, I'm gonna try to coincide with the etymology of the topic's name like I did before. Here's my take.

Using voice as a measure of neoteny, Hitler is less neotenous than an average present-day woman. Whereas our racial ideal would be people whose voices do not deepen at all.

I searched to see if there are males whose voices don't deepen. Apparently there's a term called puberphonia, which is seen as a condition focused on the vocal chords instead of the person's phenotype, such as:



You can tell the patient's jaw, chin and throat is pretty slim, not to mention the minimal facial hair and that you can almost see an overbite (though I don't know how long the nose is). That is low sexual dimorphism. However, the patient wasn't too self-confident to go to an expert to higher their sexual dimorphism and deepen their voice. This it reveals the lack of cuteness in the influence of western culture, due to altering (which shares the same PIE root to 'adult' and 'altruism'). When anything is altered, the quality lowers. Majority of adults are basically altered children. Puberphonic voices in male adults top majority of the other male adults' voices in terms of neoteny and sexual dimorphism



Again, if 90sRetroFan wants to reply, thank you. Though I'd still encourage 90sRF to work on updating the Aryanism blog. I still want feedback though.

I have a relatively Aryan-looking face but a very deep voice. People have often commented how my voice doesn't match my body. When I was in school, I found that my deep voice could command respect, but from all the wrong types of people (i.e. Gentile women), while previously these same subhumans would not respect me. I appreciated the fact that they were respecting me, but I did not appreciate the fact that my voice had to deepen for them to do so, as it felt like I had to change my original personality for validation. In effect, I ended up not appreciating the respect either.

"Nicole Kidman, Megan Fox, Chris Hemsworth for example who are  physically "Aryan""

WTF?!?!







"I doubt that the people with "Aryan oval face shape" constantly matched with "Aryan character of nobility" which promoted by us."

As Zea_mays already explained perfectly:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg460/#msg460

When we're judging aesthetics, the main focus is not actually about the individuals in the images. It's about the perceptions of the individuals who are viewing the images! How a viewer reacts to the images and how attractive they consider the images is a test revealing the quality of the viewer's aesthetics.

We must use photos of actual people to discuss about aesthetics, because artistic depictions and computer-generated images are not always available and not always able to evoke the same emotions and reactions as images of real people.

In other words, when we have these sorts of discussions, we are not discussing the ethical quality of someone like Baboumian and whether or not he personally should be allowed to reproduce, but rather people who view photos of him and find his physical type the most attractive.

If instead of using photos of Baboumian, we used some random person from the street, there would be no way to determine the ethical quality of that individual solely from looking at them. The only thing we could determine is the aesthetic quality of whoever looks at the photos! And, indeed, that is what we are testing.

We judge highly masculine and highly feminine body types to be aesthetically inferior because these body types are correlated with ignoble character traits (i.e. see all the scientific studies that have been posted here. Factors such as high testosterone/estrogen are often what are influencing both the body types and behaviors). Therefore, we hypothesize an individual who prefers highly-sexually-dimorphic body types will have a higher tendency towards those ignoble character traits as well.

Additionally, over time, selection for highly-dimorphic body types will also decrease the average ethical quality of the population (again, because selecting for these body types will increase average testosterone/estrogen levels in the population). This is why racial idealism matters in the long run.

It is not because these body/face types themselves inherently cause ignoble behavior. As you point out, Baboumian is vegan, and therefore ethically superior to an androgynous-looking person who has always preferred a meat-heavy diet. But, we aren't judging him as an individual, but instead the people who find his body type the most attractive.

Which brings us to how Fox views herself:



What does Fox's choice of cosmetic surgery direction tell us about what is inside her?