Author Topic: "Royal" Family hate thread  (Read 2618 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #30 on: June 27, 2021, 10:23:14 pm »
The Windsors (ie. Westerners) use "American" as a slur:

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/prince-william-reportedly-royal-leading-154351872.html

Quote
Prince William Reportedly the Royal Leading the Charge Against Meghan Markle for Being 'So American'

Coming from them, it is a compliment. But will enough leftists understand this and hence embrace being American as something to be proud of in that being American means being anti-Western?

« Last Edit: June 27, 2021, 10:26:51 pm by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1108
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #31 on: June 27, 2021, 11:09:03 pm »
Yes, old-world Westerners look at America with contempt, probably because of it gaining independence from the U.K. False Leftist Westerners also share this reverential attitude for old-world Western countries, which is what I was talking about in the "Linguistic Decolonization" thread.

I agree we must embrace being American, but the ZC rightists, who claim to be "Americans", will (like us) praise the revolutionary war for gaining independence from Britain, but only because it allowed them to retain their Western identity (e.g. the stereotypical Judeo-Masonic "Murican", replete with burgers, beer, masculinity, etc.). So in a way, they view old-worlders as being insufficiently Western compared to themselves.

I would like to embrace American identity, but first, it must be disassociated from Anglo-Protestant Judeo-Masonic Western identity. On the other hand, conflating the two and outrighting discarding American identity would be playing right into the Duginists' hands, so I don't want that either.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2021, 11:26:22 pm by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Canada residential schools
« Reply #32 on: July 03, 2021, 10:47:10 pm »
https://www.yahoo.com/news/calls-queen-apologise-unmarked-graves-statue-pulled-down-162017304.html

Quote
"I would like to see Pope Francis apologise on behalf of the Church, but also Queen Elizabeth II for the role of the monarchy, given the British monarchy’s actions led to the establishment of residential Indian schools."

Dr Ducey said: "That the Queen has not apologised for such historical injustices is symptomatic of an absence of regret and of antipathy to historic wrongs."

So if she does not, what should we do to her?

(Serving suggestion:

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-slTvD6HWFrI/YMjonc8PghI/AAAAAAAAEgg/7TlXPebpZIURtVDjqUDqvA2BbZr7PPAjQCLcBGAsYHQ/w640-h360/image%2B4.jpeg )

Quote
Support for the monarchy appears to be dwindling in Canada. A poll by the Angus Reid Institute in February found that 21% of Canadians thought the monarchy was still relevant.

55% thought it was no longer relevant, a jump from 41% who felt that way in January 2020.

Support for the Queen as the head of state was down to 50%. It had been 61% in January 2020.

A month later Research Co polling found 45% would prefer an elected head of state up 13 points from a similar poll it carried out in February 2020.

This is where the False Left gets it wrong again. Why not replace Elizabeth with a local monarch? This would clarify our message that we are not anti-monarchist, just anti-Windsor.

On the other hand, the choice between a Windsor and a democratic head of state is a choice between Western civilization and Western civilization. This is unacceptable to True Leftists.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #33 on: July 14, 2021, 10:59:14 pm »
https://www.yahoo.com/news/prince-william-defend-uk-football-180755596.html

Quote
Prince William can defend UK’s football team against racism, but not his own sister-in-law
...
Prince William is learning that you can’t be anti-racist when it’s convenient or politically expedient. People can sniff out performative allyship. What exactly does that look like? Allowing racist trolling to go unchecked under the Kensington Palace social media account for over a year, as a barrage of monkey emojis, racial slurs, and threats are leveled at Meghan, before instituting new social media guidelines — which are not even enforced.

As if we haven't known for a long time who William is:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/'royal'-family-hate-thread/msg5101/#msg5101

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #34 on: August 18, 2021, 12:41:43 am »
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/see-swedish-royals-best-photos-162900816.html

Why do they all have the same subhuman face shapes? (And why do they reproduce so much?)







« Last Edit: August 18, 2021, 09:42:39 pm by 90sRetroFan »

Zhang Caizhi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Location: Bangkok, Thailand
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #35 on: August 18, 2021, 02:30:31 am »
May I ask you why a socialist prime minister of Sweden, Olof Palme, decided to just limit the monarch's political power instead of abolishing the monarchy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olof_Palme

Quote
During the tenure of Palme, several major reforms in the Swedish constitution were carried out, such as orchestrating a switch from bicameralism to unicameralism in 1971 and in 1975 replacing the 1809 Instrument of Government (at the time the oldest political constitution in the world after that of the United States) with a new one officially establishing parliamentary democracy rather than de jure monarchic autocracy, abolishing the Cabinet meetings chaired by the King and stripping the monarchy of all formal political powers.

Polinc_Socjus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Canada residential schools
« Reply #36 on: August 18, 2021, 08:36:55 pm »
This is where the False Left gets it wrong again. Why not replace Elizabeth with a local monarch? This would clarify our message that we are not anti-monarchist, just anti-Windsor.

On the other hand, the choice between a Windsor and a democratic head of state is a choice between Western civilization and Western civilization. This is unacceptable to True Leftists.

Queen Meghan of Canada when? She's not a Windsor anymore right?
« Last Edit: August 18, 2021, 08:38:51 pm by Polinc_Socjus »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #37 on: September 11, 2021, 12:20:35 am »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #38 on: September 25, 2021, 10:55:41 pm »
Might this be a good movie?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5RvcrJTFIQ

At least it associates Western architecture with imprisonment. Perhaps this could help break the positive presumptions about it and make it easier for people to eventually see it as we do:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/

christianbethel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Miami, FL, USA
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #39 on: September 25, 2021, 11:29:42 pm »
'Anyone want to bet on whether it will happen?'

No need. We all known she's never gonna do it.
When in doubt, use the 16 Words: 'We must Engineer the Destruction of Western Civilization and Tribalism, and Unite All Races Through Nobility.'

Aryan ≠ 'White'.

History is Written by the Victors.

He Who Controls the Past Controls the Future; He Who Controls the Present Controls the Past.

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #40 on: September 30, 2021, 09:39:02 pm »
https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-host-first-royal-wedding-102707431.html

Quote
MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia's former Imperial capital is set to play host to the wedding of a descendant of the Russian royal family in the first such event in more than a century.

Grand Duke George Mikhailovich Romanov will tie the knot with Italian fiancée Victoria Romanovna Bettarini at St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg on Friday in an elaborate religious ceremony with hundreds of foreign guests in attendance.
...
George Mikhailovich was born in Spain to Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna of Russia - the self-proclaimed heir to Russia's imperial throne - and her husband Grand Duke Mikhail Pavlovich of Russia. He lived in France and Spain for most of his life.

His great-grandfather, Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich, managed to escape Bolshevik violence during the 1917 revolution to Finland. He and his family later relocated to Western Europe.

George Mikhailovich visited Russia for the first time in 1992, and now lives in Moscow where he works on a number of charity projects.

Bettarini, 39, converted to the Russian Orthodox faith last year and took the name Victoria Romanovna.

The Romanov dynasty ruled Russia for 300 years before Nicholas II abdicated in 1917, setting Russia on course for the Bolshevik Revolution, civil war and 70 years of Communist rule.

Russia's Orthodox Church canonised Nicholas II in 2000, after being portrayed as a weak leader by Soviet authorities.

In other words, the Orthodox Church is trying to put a positive spin on the dynasty that presided over almost all of Russia's colonial exploits:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Romanov

Quote
The House of Romanov (also transcribed Romanoff; Russian: Рома́новы, tr. Románovy, IPA: [rɐˈmanəvɨ]) was the reigning imperial house of Russia from 1613 to 1917. They achieved prominence after the Tsarina, Anastasia Romanova, was married to the First Tsar of Russia, Ivan the Terrible.

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/russia-the-last-colonial-empire/msg5125/#msg5125

Oh well, at least gives us an opportunity to laugh at the subhuman Romanov phenotype:


90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #41 on: October 05, 2021, 09:33:16 pm »
How do we know something is bad? Answer: Trump likes it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-awestruck-queen-england-viewed-192813538.html

Quote
Trump was 'awestruck' by the Queen of England and viewed meeting her as 'the ultimate sign' that he 'had made it in life': book

Former President Donald Trump was "obsessed" with the idea of making a state visit to the UK and wanted it to be one of his first major foreign trips, former White House Russia advisor Fiona Hill wrote in her new book.

Trump was also fixated on meeting Queen Elizabeth II, Hill wrote in "There Is Nothing For You Here: Finding Opportunity in the 21st Century."

"Going to Buckingham Palace was supposed to be a highlight of his presidency," the book said. "Meeting Queen Elizabeth II was particularly important to President Trump. He often referred in conversation to his mother, Mary Anne Mac-Leod, who was originally from Scotland, and her admiration for Queen Elizabeth."

Hill went on to say that Trump was also "clearly" an admirer of the queen and that he was "always slightly awestruck when he talked about her-his voice and his face would soften. A meeting with the Queen of England was the ultimate sign that he, Trump, had made it in life."
...
Trump then started dropping hints in "every encounter" he had with May or other British officials after January 2017.
...
Trump's fascination with the royal family and his desire to be seen as their equal has been long documented.

"This is more important than any piece of legislation he could get through Congress, greater than resolving problems at the border with Mexico," Michael D'Antonio, the author of "The Truth About Trump," told The New York Times in 2019. "I would think one of his dying thoughts will be of this. When he is about to leave this earth, he will think, 'I was that person, standing with the queen.'"

D'Antonio added that even though Trump doesn't view most people as being worthy of respect, "the queen may be one of the only people on Earth who could expect he was going to be respectful." He is "as sincere as he can be about anything with this respect."



See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/msg4197/?topicseen#msg4197
« Last Edit: October 09, 2021, 12:01:21 am by 90sRetroFan »

Zea_mays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
    • View Profile
Re: Museum decolonization
« Reply #42 on: October 06, 2021, 02:20:55 pm »
Quote
Police have been barred from searching the Queen’s private estates for stolen or looted artefacts after ministers granted her a personal exemption from a law that protects the world’s cultural property, the Guardian can reveal.

Buckingham Palace and the government are refusing to say why it was deemed necessary in 2017 to give the Queen an exemption that prevents police from searching Balmoral and Sandringham.

A spokesperson for the Queen dismissed any suggestion that stolen or looted artefacts were being held on the monarch’s private estates.
[...]
Although the law predominantly relates to the preservation and protection of cultural property in war zones, parts of it relate to stolen or looted artefacts that have been trafficked out of those countries.

It made the buying or selling of these stolen or looted artefacts a criminal offence punishable by up to seven years in jail. Police have the power to search premises if it is suspected that they are being used to store illegally obtained artefacts.

Whittingdale’s private secretary, who was not named, stated that the draft bill had been carefully phrased when it referred to the Queen’s special exemption.
“Separately, we wish to ensure that the powers of part 4 of the bill are not exercisable in relation to Her Majesty’s private estates,” the official wrote.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/25/revealed-police-barred-from-searching-queens-estates-for-looted-artefacts

Queen Victoria had a dog named "Looty" because the British Empire looted so much stuff. Half of the stuff in the UK's royal estates are probably looted.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-11/pekingese-dog-looty-from-beijing-palace-to-queen-victorias-pet/12876904

guest55

  • Guest
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #43 on: October 18, 2021, 02:03:04 pm »
Are The British Royal Family Illegitimate? | Britain's Real Monarch | Real Royalty
Quote
New evidence is unearthed that strongly suggests that Richard's brother, King Edward IV, was illegitimate. If that were the case, the entire royal bloodline that traces its lineage to Edward has no legal right to the throne. In fact, according to our own constitutional rules, Britain's real monarch today is not Elizabeth II, but King Michael, a resident of Jerilderie, Australia.

From Elizabeth II to Cleopatra, Real Royalty peels back the curtain to give a glimpse into the lives of some of the most influential families in the world, with new full length documentaries posted every week covering the monarchies of today and all throughout history
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Euc1JskB7Uo

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7385
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: "Royal" Family hate thread
« Reply #44 on: October 24, 2021, 03:12:58 am »
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/queen-elizabeth-place-throne-soon-213026410.html

Quote
“Neither her physical nor her mental health are waning,” the insider told the magazine. A second source noted that the Queen remains “well” and “in good fettle,” so much so that she was still enjoying horseback rides in her older years.

The Turanian blood memory never disappears.