From this writings of a book's pages. Karl Marx was ardhent supporter of white nationalismPhotographed on 13th July 2022, 21 : 44 Jakarta Time Photographed on 13th July 2022, 21 : 44 Jakarta TimePhotographed on 13th July 2022, 21 : 46 Jakarta TimeImportant Transcript :Russia Must Be Destroyed"The polemics against Palmerston and the unfinished propagandistic history of Anglo-Russian relations fell on barren soil, but
Marx’s belief in Teutonic superiority, his drive for personal power, his love of war, and his hatred of the lesser breeds of mankind remained. In 1865,
his search for a savant whose writings would provide “scientific” support for his doctrines of Teutonic expansion and Russian subjugation led him to an obscure Polish ethnologist named Francois Duchinski. Born in Kiev in 1817, Duchinski settled in France and during 1858-64 published a succession of ethnological and historical volumes which attempted to prove that the
Russians were not really Slavs at all. They were Asiatics, he argued. Hence, they were intruders and should be driven back to the Asian land-mass."
...
Marx announced his find to Engels.
On August 7, 1866, he wrote his “Lieber Fred”: “A very important work which I shall send you ... is
P. Tremaux, Origins and Transformations of Man and Other Beings, Paris, 1865. It is, despite all the faults which strike me, a very important advance over Darwin.”
...
This “great law” disclosed that the beauty, health, intelligence, energy, and civilization level of peoples corresponded directly to the geological age of the land they occupied. Crude, brutish, stupid and lazy peoples and races lived on geologically old terrain. Refined, civilized, handsome, healthy, bright, and energetic peoples occupied geologically new land.
...
To prove his theory, Tremaux took his readers on a rapid, imaginary tour of the world, correlating soils and peoples as he proceeded: “In India, where the soil permits, one finds fairly handsome people,
but in its peninsula, where there are large expanses of primitive soil . . . one sees people with black skins as hideous as monkeys. . . .”17 Turning to Scandinavia, Tremaux observed that it contained “the greatest area of geologically primitive terrain in Europe.” What followed with respect to its inhabitants? Why that “the Lapps are therefore the most inferior of people.” The Swedes, Norwegians and Finns had not lived there long enough, but, give them time, and they would degenerate to the Lapp level.1
...
Engels was justifying German aggrandizement on the grounds that the Scandinavians were too uncivilized to govern their own territory.
The most
favorable soils, according to Tremaux, were
“all of the west and south of Europe, and more especially France, Italy, Greece, part of Germany, southeast England, and eastern Spain. It is there that civilization and the intellectual faculties rule.”19
...
Another “discovery” of this scientific genius was that Neanderthal skulls were “strongly reminiscent of the crania of monkeys.”22 He also proclaimed that
“the backward Negro is not an evolved ape, but a degenerate man. . . .”23 Marx heartily agreed with this last finding and he considered it further proof of Tremaux’s scientific superiority to Darwin."
Source : Karl Marx : Racist by Nathaniel Weyl Page 131, 132, 133Karl Marx and Hegel, the founding fathers of Communist ideology, was Discriminated the Slavic peoplePhotographed on 13th July 2022, 21 : 46 Jakarta TimePhotographed on 14th July 2022, 06 : 32 Jakarta TimeImportant Transcript :Tremaux also pleased Marx by observing that the
Hungarians, living on splendid, geologically recent soils were therefore superior to their Slavic neighbors. Writing in the
Neue Rheinische Zeitung for February 15, 1849,
Marx and Engels had argued that the Magyars were a superior racial group which had every right to oppress its Slavic neighbors: “If the eight million Slavs have had to be satisfied to let four million Magyars keep them under their yoke, then this alone is enough to show which is the more capable of living and more energetic, the many Slavs or the few Magyars. It turns out that this ‘crime’ of the Germans and Magyars against the dubious Slavs is one of the best and most worthy acts of which our people and the Hungarians can boast.”
Extending Marx’s and Engels’ argument that a minority is justified in ruling a majority if it has the force to do so from the category of nation to that of class, it would follow that both aristocratic and capitalist domination of the laboring masses were morally justifiedThe important paragraph meaning, which it's words are marked all by red :Capitalism and Communist ideology are related to each otherSource : Karl Marx : Racist by Nathaniel Weyl page 135Another the author's conclusion on Karl Marx and Hegel, the founding fathers of CommunismPhotographed on 13th July 2022, 21 : 51 Jakarta TimeImportant Transcript :"...The road was also cleared for the even more convenient
political lie that Marx and Engels were not racists at all, but true internationalists who nobly championed the rights of weak peoples, nations, and races against the great powers which sought to subjugate and oppress them."
Source : Karl Marx : Racist by Nathaniel Weyl page 136Photographed on 13th July 2022, 21 : 51 Jakarta TimePhotographed on 13th July 2022, 21 : 51 Jakarta TimeImportant Transcript :Notes :
1. This latter charge is clearly implied in Karl Vogt, Mein Prozess gegen die Allgemeine Zeitung (Geneva, 1859). It is almost certainly false.
2. Stefan T. Possony, introduction to Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto (Chicago: Gateway, 1954), pp. vii-xli.
3. Ibid.
4. Donald Southgate, “ The Most English Minister...”, (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1966), p. 68.
5. Ibid., p. 70.
6. Jasper Ridley, Lord Palmerston (London, Constable, 1970), p. 236
7. Wolfe, p. 41.
8. Mehring, pp. 540-41. It is also interesting to note that, while Marx ridiculed Urquhart as a buffoon and a madman to Engels, he gave Liebknecht, a comparative outsider, the impression that the Scottish agitator was a man of great ability and foresight. See Liebknecht’s Memoirs.
9. Quoting Payne, The Unknown Karl Marx, pp. 227-28.
10. The Secret Diplomatic History of the Eighteenth Century (New York: International Publisher, 1969), pp. 88, 91.
11. Ibid., pp. 108, 121, 114; quoted in Seigel, p. 227.
12. Marx, The Secret History of the Eighteenth Century, in Payne, Unknown Marx, pp. 314-15-
13. Ibid., p. 311.
14. Vogt, p. 141.
15. Note that Marx, the “internationalist” and “humanist,” explicitly accepts the genocidal myth that Adolf Hitler would later make reality. First, that the Indo-Germans, or Aryans, are a race, not merely a linguistic group. Second, that non-Aryans can be expropriated, expelled, driven into the tundra to perish. Marx conveniently forgot, as usual, that he, himself, was not an Aryan, but a Jew.
16. Pierre Tremaux, Origines et transformations de Thomme et des autres etres, Premiere partie (Paris: Hachette, 1865), p. 17. Capitalization, italics, punctuation, etc., are as in the original. The translations of both Tremaux and the Marx-Engels Briefwechsel are my own.
17- Ibid., p. 28. Tremaux may have had in mind the partly Australoid tribes of Kerala, such as the Uralis and Kadar.
18. Ibid., p. 33.
19. Ibid., p. 34.
20. Francis Galton, Hereditary Genius (Cleveland: World, 1962 ed.), p. 395.
21. Tremaux, Origines, pp. 107-8.
22. Ibid., p. 283. Of course, there is no resemblance between Neanderthal skulls and the crania of monkeys. Possibly, Tremaux had monkeys confused with anthropoid apes. Even so, he was still wrong.
23. Ibid., p. 31.
24. Ibid., pp. 426-28.
25. Engels to Bebel, November 17, 1885. Wolfe, p. 68. While the quoted letter was written after Marx’s death, Marx and Engels held similar opinions about Balkan peoples.
26. Tremaux, Origines, pp. 420-21.
27. “So you see, phrenology is not the base art Hegel imagined.” Marx to Kugelmann, January 11, 1868
Source : Karl Marx : Racist by Nathaniel Weyl page 137, 138