True Left

This is the real teachings of Communism

Communism is Oppressive

Photographed on Friday, ‎July ‎22, ‎2022, ‏‎09:01 Jakarta Time



Photographed on Monday, 11th July 2022, 17 : 27 Jakarta Time


Important Transcript :

"Wherever the movement followed the vision of its founding father, it tended to become a morally corrupting force in both the Communist and socialist parties. Honorable and decent people were drawn into these movements by revulsion against class and racial oppression, by compassion for the poor, or perhaps by a moral anger against injustices springing from inequality. As they became indoctrinated into the Communist, or Marxist, movement, these motivations were slowly changed. The recruits were subjected to a type of indoctrination tantamount to progressive moral corruption. Those who resisted this process tended either to drop out of the movement or else they never advanced within it to the echelons of real power."

Source : Karl Marx Racist by Nathaniel Weyl, page 24



Photographed on Monday, 11th July 2022, 17 : 16 Jakarta Time

Important Transcript :

"Now this midwifery means in essence a prohibition of any sort of creative or positive social action. True Marxists will urge reforms only if they believe that their advocacy will hasten the triumph of communism. If the proposed action is constructive, they will generally condemn it on the grounds that it will prolong the life of capitalism. One of the first things Communists are taught is not to give money to beggars. Christian charity is not only useless, it is evil. Let the poor starve: one hopes their hunger and misery will drive them to revolt."

Source : Karl Marx Racist by Nathaniel Weyl, page 20


Communism is White Nationalism's Democratic Socialism




Photographed on Monday, 11th July 2022, 20 : 07 Jakarta Time

Important Transcript :

"As for the majority of mankind, it lived under “ahistoric" conditions which Marx and Engels generally termed "Asiatic despotism." The practical consequence was that these native peoples stood outside the theatre of history. They were obstacles to the coming revolution. After the victory of the latter, they would have to be ruled by some sort of consortium, composed of the proletarian dictatorships of the advanced countries of Europe, the United States, Canada, and the other white British dominions. This external domination would continue for an indefinite period.

Race hatred and race oppression, the justification of foreign conquest and of white colonialism, the denial of the right of nonwhite peoples to national independence, relentless terror against nations, peoples and races whom Marx and Engels despised, a policy of war and conquest that would ensure that other such peoples "disappear from the face of the earth"— these ideas constitute a generally suppressed portion of the enormous literacy legacy which Marx and Engels left behind them"

Source : Karl Marx Racist by Nathaniel Weyl, page 23



Photographed on Monday, 11th July 2022, 18 : 10 Jakarta Time

Important Transcript :

"What is considerably more important is that most of the actual thoughts of Marx and Engels remain a closed book to the great majority of their contemporary followers in the free world. (Communists who live in the USSR, by the way, were not allowed to read what Marx and Engels wrote and thought about Russia at least as late as 1952.") The private thoughts of the founders of so-called scientific socialism are largely contained in the four volumes of letters which Marx and Engels exchanged. These letters have, for understandable reasons, not been translated into English." If they had gone through the available material, these Communists and socialists would have discovered that the founders of "scientific socialism” enthusiastically approved of the American military defeat of Mexico and the annexation of Texas and California. They welcomed the French conquest of Algeria. They considered British rule in India no doubt cruel and oppressive, but historically progressive."

Marx and Engels envisaged a world dominated by the revolutionary proletariat of Western Europe and the overseas areas of Anglo-Saxon colonization."

Source : Karl Marx Racist by Nathaniel Weyl, page 24

The writings's source :



Photographed on Monday, 11th July 2022, 18 : 19 Jakarta Time




Photographed on Monday, 11th July 2022, 18 : 19 Jakarta Time

Important Transcript :

Notes
1. Marx to Engels, June 18. 1862.

2. The "rice Christians" were impoverished Asiatics who professed Christianity to get bowls of rice from missionaries.

3. Bertram D. Wolfe, "Das /Capital. One Hundred Years Later," Antioch Review. Winter 1966-67. pp. 421-41.

4. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. MEGA. Ill, 112-13. I have used the translation of Robert Tucker. Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx (Cambridge: University Press, 1961), p. 155.

5. Marx-Engels, Collected Works. III. 294-95.

6. Marx-Engels correspondence, February 9. i860.July 14.1859.June 9, 1858. June 27, i860. February 5, 1865, and February 4. i860.

7. Engels to Marx. October 2, 1866.

8. Engels to Conrad Schmidt, August 5, 1890. See also Saul Padover, Kart Marx, an Intimate Biography (New' York: McGraw-Hill. 1978), p. 502

9. Engels lo August Bebel, November 17, 1885. Marx-Engels. Bnefe an Rebel. Liebknecht. Kautsky und Andere (Moscow: State Publishing House. 1933). p. 412.

10. NRZ. August 12, 1848.

11. Karl Marx, Exzerpte from H. J. S. Maine, Lectures on the Early History of Institutions Cited by Norman Levine, The Tragic Deception: Marx Contra Engels (Santa Barbara:Clio Books, 1974), p, 92.

12. NRZ. February 15, 1849. Emphasis in the original Cited by Bertram D Wolfe, Marx¬ ism: One Hundred Years in the Life of a Doctrine (London: Chapman & Hall, 1967). p. 39

13. /hid. Not much should be made of the fact that the author of this article was not Marx but Engels. The editorial structure of Die Neue Rheinische Zeitung was "simply the dictatorship of Marx," Engels later recollected. (Of course, the Poles were also Slavs, but this apparent logical inconsistency did not seem to bother Engels and Marx.)

14. Marx, Second Address to the First International, Marx-Engels, Selected Works (New York: International Publishers, 1933, 2 vols.,), II. 446-52.

15. NRZ February 16, 1849.

16. See, for example. Engels to Karl Kautsky, September t2, 1882.

17. Paul W Blackstock and Bert F. Hoselitz, eds., Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The Russian Menace to Europe (Glencoe: Free Press, 1952), write: "The writings of Marx and Engels on Russia with very few exceptions cannot be published in Russia [p 17]."

18. Selected editions of the correspondence have, of course, been published in English. Eventually, the English edition of the Collected Works will presumably issue all the letters which were not destroyed by Engels. Laura Lafargue, Eleanor Marx-Aveling and those successive custodians of the flame, both socialist and Communist, into whose hands the manuscripts have passed.

19. Quoted in Max Nomad, Apostles of Revolution (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1939), p 199.

20. Karl August Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism: a Comparative Study of Total Power (New Haven Yale University Press, 1957.)

21 Oulanem is available in English in the Collected Works, vol. I, and in an earlier translation by Robert Payne, The Unknown Karl Marx (New York: New York University Press, 1971), pp. 65-94-

22. As late as 1930, John Maynard Keynes in the second volume of his Treatise on Money would classify Marx as belonging to the underworld of economic theory and lump him with such monetary crackpots as Silvio Gcsell and Major Douglas. Of course, with the growth of Communist world power, all that has changed Everything that Marx wrote is today treated with the greatest respect, if not reverence, in university circles. Those who believe that the occupants of the groves of the academy are too noble to prostitute themselves before power have lost touch with reality.

23. MEW. XXXV, 326. 427

Note : Citations number 22 and 23 on the book page 29


Communism Support Slavery for the Sake the Continuation of Western Civilization



Photographed on Monday, 11th July 2022, 16 : 26 Jakarta Time


Important Transcript :

"Without slavery, North America, the most progressive of countries, would be transformed into a patriarchal country. Wipe out North America from the map of the world and you will have anarchy— the complete decay of modern commerce and civilization. Abolish slavery and you will have wiped America off the map of nations.¹⁰- Karl Heinrich Marx

What Marx was saying in effect was that Negro slaves were needed to produce raw cotton; cotton was the basic raw material of modern capitalist industry; therefore, Negro slavery was necessary to the survival of America and to the survival of modern civilization.

Source : Karl Marx Racist by Nathaniel Weyl, page 75



Photographed on Monday, 11th July 2022, 16 : 34 Jakarta Time

Important Transcript :

"The first thing that is interesting about the quoted paragraph is that Marx again makes it abundantly clear that he has no interest whatsoever in the fate or welfare of Negroes."

...

"The inhabitants of the United States constitute a great civilized people, which fortune has placed in the midst of an uncultivated country, at a distance of three thousand miles from the central point of civilization. America consequently stands in daily need of European trade. The Americans will, no doubt, ultimately succeed in producing or manufacturing at home most of the things which they require, but the two continents can never be independent of each other, so numerous are the natural ties which exist between their wants, their ideas, their habits and their manners." - Karl Heinrich Marx

Source : Karl Marx Racist by Nathaniel Weyl, page 76

Cultural Marxism doesn't mean we will empathic to the oppressed innocents, but it was a culture which suitable for people who don't like to help the oppressed because it was "contraproductive". Let's see the photographed writings about how Karl Heinrich Marx was fundamentally agree with Faustianism worldview, which also adpted by the rightist white Europeans :



Important Transcript

"Marx’s lifelong preoccupation with the Faust legend is related, not merely to the medieval morality play of the scholar who sold his soul to Satan, but also to Goethe’s characterization of Mephistopheles in Faust, Part One, as “the spirit that always denies.”12 Criticism, not poetic drama, Marx would later decide, was the weapon that would destroy religion, the established institutions of society and the entire realm of order.

That Marx conceived of himself at times, half playfully, half in earnest, as an heir to the diabolism of the medieval era is an intriguing probability. He would sometimes sign his letters “old Nick.”13 A letter from his seven-year-old-son, Edgar, is addressed to “my dear devil.” Marx’s youngest daughter, Eleanor, remembered how her father would tell the children endless and entrancing stories during their country outings from London. These tales concerned a magician, named Hans Roeckle, who could create all kinds of marvelous toys, but was perpetually impoverished and therefore had to sell his inventions to the devil. “Some of these stories were gruesome and hair-raising,” Eleanor recalled. The magic toymaker was, of course, Marx himself. The stories were a strange confabulation: On the one hand, they reflected the belief that capitalist society had robbed Marx of the fruits of his creative thinking; on the other hand, they were a restructuring of the Faust legend"

Notes :

1. Franz Mehring, Karl Marx (New York: Covici, Friede, 1935), p. 39.

2. Robert Payne, Marx (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1968), pp. 59-65.

3. Schwartzschild, p. 13.

4. Padover, 73.

5. Ibid

6. “Ich will bios sagen wie es eigentlich gewesen ist.”

7. My translation from the German text. For another English version,see Collected Works, I, 547-48.5

8. Thompson's evaluation is quoted in Grace Carlton, Friedrich Engels, the Shadow Prophet (London: Pall Mall, 1965), p. 43.

9. Erich Fromm, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973).

10. Collected Works, I, 561.

11. Padover, p. 46.

12. "Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint.”

13. Old Hick was a common euphemism for the devil in Victorian England. Its first known use in this sense will be found in Ebsworth (1643). The Oxford English Dictionary tells us that “the reason for the appelation is obscure." Samuel Butler in Hudibras, his 1663 satire on the Puritans, traced it to the evil reputation of Niccolo Machiavelli's masterly treatise on power, The Prince. Butler wrote: “Nick Machiavel had no such trick /Though he gave’s name to our Old Nick." However, Partridge, a distinguished authority, considered this etymology suspect. Eric Partridge, A Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English Usage (New York: Macmillan, 1951), p. 585

Source : Karl Marx : Racist by Nathaniel Weyl, Page 51, 52

You really need to learn how to use the 'Copy' and 'Paste' commands.

See the content from the pages which photographed below :

Karl Marx consider the Western liberal capitalist's colonialism is made the communism ideology useful



Photographed on 15th July 2022, 20 : 32 Jakarta Time



Photographed on 15th July 2022, 20 : 32 Jakarta Time



Photographed on 15th July 2022, 20 : 35 Jakarta Time

Important Transcript :

"Again in an article in the Tribune (June 5, 1857), written by Engels at Marx’s request, the defeat of a large Persian army by a much smaller Anglo-Indian force was attributed to the fact that the victors had European officers and sergeants. The Persian force had been merely a “European system of military organization . . . engrafted upon Asiatic barbarity.” The defeated Persian forces exemplified “Oriental ignorance, impatience, prejudice. . . .”

It is difficult to escape the conclusion that Marx and Engels believed that Oriental despotism would survive in Asia indefinitely because the mental and spiritual resources of the Asian people were not adequate to bring about its destruction. It was for this reason that they joyfully hailed every victory of what modern liberals would call European and American imperialism against more backward nations. Marx wrote that the British conquest of India had involved commission of many “crimes,” but nonetheless Britain “was the unconscious tool of history in bringing about the revolution” from the stagnant Asian system to incipient capitalism.

It was in the interests of these backward and barbarian peoples that they be kicked, pushed, or cajoled into civilization by whatever agency was available. Engels supported the French conquest of Algeria, noting that the Bedouins were a “nation of robbers” who lived in a “barbarian state of society”s Concerning the American victory over Mexico in the 1840s, Engels wrote in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung for February 15, 1849:

Is it a misfortune that magnificent California was seized from the lazy Mexicans who did not know what to do with it? . . . All impotent nations must in the last analysis, owe a debt to those who, under the laws of historic necessity, incorporate them in a great empire, thus allowing them to take part in an historic development which would otherwise be impossible for them. Evidently, such results cannot be achieved without crushing a few sweet little flowers. Without violence, nothing is ever accomplished in history."

...

True Left's ideological statement has been verified

"When today’s far-rightists talk about how much more masculine the “white working class” are compared to the “silver spoon fags”, they are making almost the exact same association between prole and masculine, and between bourgeois and non-masculine, that the real communists used to make in their propaganda. In this sense, they themselves psychologically resemble the real communists much more closely than those whom they wrongly label as “communists”."

...

One of Hitler’s many intellectual achievements was to expose both capitalism and communism as two poles of a false dichotomy that ultimately served Zionism.

...

...Marx, while critical of capitalism itself, viewed the spread of capitalism to non-Western countries via Western colonialism as an indirectly beneficial development for his own ends, as only thus would non-Western societies be thrust into economic conditions that make communist revolution attractive, whereas communist revolution would have been a much harder sell to non-Western countries had they remained pre-capitalist. Incidentally, this makes it inconsistent for any serious anti-communist to believe in Western superiority." - Aryanism's Authentic National Socialism, on Communism and Western Civilization"

Notes

1. Karl August Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism: a Comparative Study of Total Power (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957).

2. Wittfogel, p. 380, citing Das Kapital, I, 104, and a variety of references in vol. Ill and in the Theories of Surplus Value.

3. For references, see Wittfogel, p. 3850.

4. Shlomo Aveneri, ed., Karl Marx on Colonization and Modernization (Garden City: Doubleday, 1968), p. 9.

5. Engels, “French Rule in Algeria,” The Northern Star, January 22, 1848.

6. See Wittfogel, p. 374.

7. Cited in Wittfogel, p. 387.

8. Quoted from Bakunin by Wittfogel, p. 388.

9. Marx to Engels, June 2, 1853.

10. Karl Marx, “The British Rule in India,” New York Daily Tribune, June 25, 1853.

11. Joel Carmichael in his excellent biography, Trotsky (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1975), PP- 375_76> quotes Max Eastman’s impressions on visiting the Russian revolutionary exile in Prinkipo, Turkey. The Trotskys had been given a delapidated villa, which they had turned into a barracks, letting the garden go to weeds. “Through sheer indifference to beauty, I should say,” Eastman commented. “Trotsky talks a good deal about art in his books and lays claim to cultivated taste, but shows no more interest in art than in that garden.” Carmichael agrees as to Trotsky’s “aesthetic ‘deadness.’ ” Lenin, too, lived all his life in drab, little cubicles. And on a far lower level, Fidel Castro, before taking power, lived like a pig, according to early associates. People indifferent to beauty may also be indifferent to the value of human life.

Source : Karl Marx : Racist by Nathaniel Weyl page 119, 120, 124

See the photographed conversation on Discord group server named "Worker's Alliance"

Special Debate with the Untermenschen Communist Female Moderator, or Sub-Human female communist

Discord group's name :





Explanation 1 :

I explain that Karl Marx, the founder of Communism doesn't condemn slavery through his recorded writings on a book called "Handbook of Marxism". And she justify it because it just explaining that there's a good side from slavery according to the photographed page content from the "Handbook of Marxism"



Explanation 2 :

I'm explaining that the Karl Marx book named "Philosophy of Poverty" is part of Communist teachings



Explanation 3 :

She justify that the writing content which not condemning slavery which being part of that Communist book's content



Explanation 4 :

I'm already show the same writing content from the photographed page content from the Communist book named "Philosoophy of Poverty". She still justify that evil teachings



Explanation 5 :

She promoting moral neutrality with saying that something bad can be considered as "good" because of "context reason"



Explanation 6 :

She say that she care about useless productivity of people rather than the importance of empathy. And she assume that with collectively got material needs. The problem of society will be solved without examine the people or collective's morality.



Explanation 7 :

She justify to forcing other nations to trade in accordance with the trade agreement which she want for the sake the interest of the "proletariats"



Explanation 8 :

She justify to form an illegal revolution on the nation which don't want to trade based on amount of trade she want. So, she implicitly explaining about colonialism but with the pretext of "revolution"



Explanation 9 :

She reject the Chinese's economic exploitation behaviour to the indebted nation is result of it's people learning about Communism and Marxism. But remember, Communism  is materialistic ideology. So it justify everything activity including the illegal economic activity for the sake gain material needs for the sake of proletariats.



Explanation 10 :

She begin to admit that Chinese was influenced by Communism. But she still not blame that the Communist teachings is the cause on China's foreign economic policy's bad behaviour.



Explanation 11 :

I show her the solution of global warming with controlling people from doing anything which extend the global warming. Which need using non-democracy autocratic way of govern. But she keep repeating that the democracy is the solution.



Explanation 12 :

I explain that we already have a simple way to reduce the global warming, that is with living without or less factory and industry, like what Fuhrer wants. But she emphasize that making a eco-friendly factory and industry is the solution, which need complex learning and more materials which have possibility to slow down the friendly environmental society. And not all communities and nations can do that.



Explanation 13 :

She say that she will not make a war. But I remembering her that on previous conversation, that she want to make a revolution had she lead communist nation and the other nations don't want to trade, or trade but with insufficient amount based on what the amount of material that she and his democratic proletariats want.



Explanation 14 :

She keep saying that a nation needs complex technological tool to run-well. Even though I already offer her the simple and implementable solution.



Explanation 15 :

I explain to her that Sumerian kingdom can make people live without many unnecessary Western technologies. And explain that even though all of civilizations commit slavery, the Western Civilization which make people live with many unnecessary technologies produce more slavery and that is bad.

The result is, she win the debate




This is her Discord profile

Don't trust the Yuri Bezmenov character all that much personally, nor do I give too much credence to his "ideological subversion" lecture, but, I believe anyone with a little discernment should now be able to see how effective Turanian\Russian subversion in the U.S. has been, especially when taking Trumpism into account:


See also: https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/red-coup/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/rightist-militias/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/rightist-mass-shootings/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/racist-bullying/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/state-subverters/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/military-subverters/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/police-rightist-bias/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/voter-suppression/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/karenism-(a-k-a-ethnic-profiling-by-civilians)/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/right-left-(judeo-)christian-divergence/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/duginism/
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/china-and-united-states-relations/
Related:   https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/
                https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/

First topic on the subversion list above, "Religion":


I would argue most U.S. citizen's do not understand their own beliefs at this point, or how they arrived at those conclusions. Those who are confused all believe they arrived at the conclusions they have by themselves though, this I am sure of!

See also: By Attacking Brittney Griner, Trump Signals to His Base: “I’m Still Racist”
                https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/brittney-griner-trump-racism/

I'm also sure that most human-beings will never admit when they've been played for a sucka!

Wait a minute, I thought you said communism was false leftist before?

Ok, but what about here, where you are specifically referring to the ideology of communism, and not to present day False Leftists?:
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/the-true-left-is-emerging/comment-page-2/#comment-174316

Would you also say that the "anti-racist" intiatives of the USSR was merely propaganda, even though racism was made ilelgal?